Option (c), It is not often used as a basis to send this type of offender to community corrections rather than prison or jail since it would be more affordable to have him do his time there rather than in prison.
What is the primary aim of community corrections?All community correctional initiatives strive to give rehabilitative services, maintain oversight of offenders, and maximize financial efficiency.
The three goals of community corrections that are most likely to be achieved are (1) assisting the offender in defining his or her situation, (2) assisting the offender in seeking assistance in accordance with the problems identified, and (3) connecting the offender with community services or organizations pertinent to the problems identified.
Why is community-based correction the best option instead of incarceration?Community-based alternatives to prison assert that they are less expensive than prisons, more successful than traditional prisons at reducing recidivism, and less crowded than jails and prisons.
Learn more about community corrections: https://brainly.com/question/24565030
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
A heroin addict has been convicted of two counts of felony theft for stealing packages off of porches to support his habit. Which of the following is NOT a common justification for sentencing this type of offender to community corrections rather than prison or jail?
The offender is more likely to recidivate if he serves his sentence in the community rather than in prison or jail.
The offender does not pose a serious enough threat to society to be incarcerated.
It would be more cost-effective to have the offender serve his sentence in the community rather than behind bars.
The offender’s chances of being rehabilitated arebetter if he is able to maintain his ties to family and friends while serving his sentence in the community rather than having those ties broken through incarceration
PLEASE HELPP!!!What appellate judges look for when they review a case is
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
An appellate court which is also referred to as an appeals court is a court of law that is given the power to change the lower court decision.
The things that an appellate judges look for when they review a case include whether there was a legal mistake during the trial court that was made and also whether the judgement given by the judge was based on the fact that there was a mistake made.
to find that there is an implied contract or an implied-in-fact contract, the court must deem that: (1) the plaintiff provided some property or service to the defendant; (2) the plaintiff expected to be paid for such property or service; and (3) the defendant had an opportunity to blank , but did not.
To find an implied contract or an implied-in-fact contract, a court must determine that three elements exist:
Firstly, the plaintiff provided some property or service to the defendant. Secondly, the plaintiff had an expectation of receiving payment for the property or service provided. And finally, the defendant had an opportunity to object to the agreement, but failed to do so.
An implied contract is one that is not explicitly stated or written down but is still legally binding. It is inferred from the behavior of the parties involved, rather than from any formal agreement.
An implied-in-fact contract is a type of implied contract that arises from the actions of the parties involved, rather than from any express agreement. In both cases, the key element is the understanding that a contract exists between the parties, even if it was not explicitly stated.
For more questions like Implied contract click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/19908088
#SPJ11
which of the following bases for relief from judgment under rule 60 does not necessarily have to be brought within one year?
relief from judgment under rule 60 does not necessarily have to be brought within one year The verdict is invalid.
What does judgement mean?Judgment is another word for adjudication, which denotes the analysis of the evidence to reach a result (or US spelling judgment).
Another part of judgement is making deliberate decisions.
The phrase has at least five different meanings. Aristotle suggested taking into account the phrase's opposing use to determine whether the uses are, in fact, distinct.
Here are some comparisons to help illustrate how they accomplish quite different goals:
Informal: Facts are expressed opinions.
Informal and psychological term used to define a person's level of cognition and judgmental skills; commonly referred to as wisdom or discernment.
Therefore, the decision is invalid.
Refer to: for further information about judgement.
visit
https://brainly.com/question/936272
#SPJ4
Once the sensation of alcohol is at maximum, the user/abuser will look for another source true or false?
This statement is unclear and may have different interpretations. If by "another source" it means more alcohol, then it could be true,
As some people may continue to consume more alcohol to maintain the sensation. However, if it means looking for a different substance other than alcohol, then it may not be true, as people have different preferences and may not necessarily seek out other substances once they have consumed alcohol. Additionally, it is important to note that alcohol abuse and addiction are serious issues that can lead to negative consequences and health problems.
For such more question on alcoho
https://brainly.com/question/30773456
#SPJ4
which of the following does NOT accurately describe the United States’ system of government?
a. it is a presidential system
b. it is a unitary system
c. it is a republic
d. it is a representative democracy
Answer:
Explanation:
B. Because it not always runner under the best circumstances
Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a(n) _____. civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court
Answer:
civil court
Explanation:
Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court.
What do you mean by Court?Court, sometimes known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide matters involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.
A number of small civil concerns are handled by civil courts, such as: consumer disputes; landlord and tenant conflicts (such as eviction, rent arrears, and repairs); (eg as faulty goods)
Tort claims, breach of contract proceedings, and landlord/tenant disputes are the three most frequent civil cases. A civil case often goes through the following stages: filing a complaint, gathering evidence, conducting a trial, and appealing the decision.
Most frequently, a judge will hear them alone and reach a decision by gathering evidence and using the pertinent legal standards. Arguments may be made regarding the veracity of the facts and the precise nature of the law. The judge will render a reasoned decision following the conclusion of the argument.
Therefore, The answer is civil court.
Learn more about Court, here;
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ2
Adia filed a case against Chang in the court at Ohio. However, Chang had never visited Ohio and had no personal ties with anyone in Ohio. Chang could successfully argue that the court:________
a. was in proximity to the place where Chang resides.
b. lacked personal jurisdiction.
c. was limited by subject matter jurisdiction.
d. did not have judges that would understand the languagespoken by him.
Answer:
b. lacked personal jurisdiction
Explanation:
A court is said to lack personal jurisdiction when the offense or activity doesn’t take place in the location of the court or when the court isn’t situated in the state of origin of the defendant.
Ada filing the case against Chang at a court in Ohio which isn’t Chang’s state of origin and in which he has not visited before means that the court at Ohio lacks personal jurisdiction to progress with the case.
Explain FIVE (5) investigative functions relevant to Dato ARahman case.
Answer:
The case of Dato ARahman involves allegations of corruption and abuse of power. Here are five investigative functions that would be relevant to this case:
Explanation:
Gathering evidence: This involves collecting and analyzing evidence related to the allegations against Dato ARahman. This could include financial records, witness statements, emails, phone records, and any other documents or information that could support or refute the allegations.Conducting interviews: Investigators would need to interview people who have information relevant to the case, including witnesses, whistleblowers, and anyone else who may have information about Dato ARahman's actions. These interviews could help investigators gather additional evidence and build a stronger case.Tracing financial transactions: This involves tracing the flow of money related to the allegations against Dato ARahman. Investigators would need to follow the money trail to determine if any illegal transactions occurred and who was involved in them.Analyzing data: Investigators may need to analyze large amounts of data, such as financial records or communications, to identify patterns or anomalies that could be relevant to the case. This could involve using data analysis tools or working with forensic accountants or other experts.Coordinating with other agencies: Given the seriousness of the allegations against Dato ARahman, it may be necessary for investigators to coordinate with other agencies or departments, such as the police, financial regulators, or anti-corruption agencies. This would ensure that all relevant information and resources are being utilized to investigate the case thoroughly.
The liberties described in the Bill of Rights originally:
A. limited the power of both federal and state governments.
B. curbed only the power of the federal government with respect to
individuals.
O c. prohibited state governments from restricting freedom of speech.
D. limited the power of state governments, but not the federal
government
O E. prohibited the government from infringing on the privacy of
citizens.
Answer:
The answer is B, curbed only the power of the federal government with respect to
Explanation:
you are welcome
Gold SCAR make them ladies wet
which tcjs rule states that an intake screening form must be completed on all inmates immediately upon admission to the facility? (5.3.4)
The TCJS rule (TCJS 273.5) mandates that all detainees have an intake screening form filled out as soon as they are admitted to the facility.
People with paranoid personalities perceive others' acts as maliciously threatening or degrading. Because they believe others to be unfaithful, disloyal, or dishonest, people with paranoid personality disorder are untrusting, unforgiving, and frequently resort to irrational anger or aggressive outbursts.
Intentionally or inadvertently failing to serve a writ, warrant, or other process can result in a fine for law enforcement personnel. Displacement is the act of turning one's anger or displeasure towards a different target. The new objective is typically a safer or more respectable target.
Learn more about intake Visit: brainly.com/question/24476422
#SPJ4
Freire’s notion of praxis
do gangs add any value to a neighborhood or community why or why not
Gangs boost crime rates in neighborhoods and provide a poor model for local children. Despite the fact that they fail to complete their education, face employment challenges, engage in drug and alcohol abuse, or wind up in jail, they project an image of strength and respect.
Briefing:-Because of the devastation they can cause to others, communities are afraid of them.
What function do gangs in communities serve?Along with giving weapons and a sense of safety in numbers, or the knowledge that they have individuals who will fight alongside them if necessary, gangs can give its members a sense of protection (Decker & Van Winkle, 1996). Youth safety requirements may be met with the use of such provisions.
What are the top 4 causes for gang membership?Unstable or damaged home.
financial instability
low expectations and levels of education.
members of a family gang.
either one or both parents' neglect.
violence committed against children at home or in the neighborhood.
drug and/or alcohol addiction by one or both parents.
To Know more about neighborhoods
https://brainly.com/question/9679078
#SPJ1
How does the judicial branch examine the actions of administrative agencies?
Answer:
Federal courts routinely uphold very broad delegations of authority. When reviewing administrative agency actions, courts ask whether the agency afforded those under its jurisdiction due process of law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Does this help?
Z is an agent who violated the Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act. Z was then issued and served a statement of charges and notice of hearing by the Commissioner of Insurance. Z's hearing date must be at least ____ days after service of charges.
Z is an agent who violated the Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act. Z's hearing date must be at least 30 days after service of charges.
According to the Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act, when an agent violates any of the provisions of the Act, the commissioner of insurance shall issue and serve on the agent a notice of hearing. The hearing must be held within 30 days of the service of the statement of charges and notice of hearing.
However, the Insurance Information and Privacy Protection Act does not specify a minimum number of days after the service of charges that an agent's hearing date must be. The hearing must only be held within 30 days of the service of the statement of charges and notice of hearing.
According to this Act, a statement of charges and notice of hearing shall be served either personally or by mail, postage prepaid, to the last address provided by the agent to the Commissioner. The Act also defines the penalties for violation of its provisions, including fines and license revocation.
For more such questions on Insurance visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30291521
#SPJ8
what destroys respect
Part A: A man proposes to a woman. She says “Yes”, and the man gives her a $5,000 diamond engagement ring. Later on, the woman breaks up with the man. Is the woman required to give back the diamond engagement ring to the man? Why or Why not?
Part B: A man proposes to a woman. She says “Yes”, and the man gives her a diamond engagement ring. Later on, the man breaks up with the woman. Is the woman required to give back the diamond engagement ring to the man? Why or Why Not?
Whether or not the woman is required to give back the diamond engagement ring to the man would depend on the laws of the jurisdiction in which the couple resides.
The same legal principle applies as in part A.
What is engagement?Part A: In common law jurisdictions, an engagement ring is considered a conditional gift and the woman would be required to return the ring if the condition of marriage is not fulfilled.
However, in some jurisdictions, the ring is considered a gift and the woman would be entitled to keep it regardless of whether the marriage takes place.
Part B: If the man breaks up with the woman, in common law jurisdiction, the woman would be entitled to keep the ring as the condition of marriage is not fulfilled and it would be considered a gift but again, laws of the jurisdiction where the couple resides would be applicable.
Read more about engagement
https://brainly.com/question/8081362
#SPJ1
Should people living with HIV be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status to prospective partners; why or why not? Should a participant be legally required to disclose, if they have taken precautions to limit the transfer of HIV?
No, people living with HIV should not be subject to imprisonment or other criminal penalties for engaging in voluntary, protected sexual encounters without disclosing their status.
HIV is a virus, rather than a crime, and its transmission between consenting adults should not be criminalized. While disclosure of HIV status is important for reducing the risk of transmission, forcing those with HIV to disclose is not always in the interests of public health, and can be a violation of autonomy and privacy.
The legality of disclosing one's HIV status should be left to the individual to decide, and if other precautions have been taken, it should not be legally required.
To know more about HIV , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31765366
#SPJ4
Which statement describes the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
A. Southern states could no longer maintain racially segregated public schools
B. States could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
C. Individuals accused of serious crimes unable to pay for an attorney were entitled to a state-sponsored one
D. Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The answer is b states could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
The current trend for now is to assume that the current administration will correct critical infrastructure issues that are part of the concerns by opponents. If you had to pick one critical infrastructure issue, what would it be and why?
When it comes to critical infrastructure, one of the most pressing issues facing many countries is cybersecurity.
The threat of cybersecurity -With the increasing number of cyber attacks against governments, businesses, and individuals, it is important to ensure that critical infrastructure systems are secure and protected from such attacks. A successful cyber attack on critical infrastructure, such as power grids, water treatment plants or transportation networks, can have catastrophic consequences, and it’s crucial that these systems are fortified with security measures to thwart any possible attack.
Cybersecurity in critical infrastructure systems involves protecting the computer systems, networks, and other critical components of these systems from cyber threats, such as cyber-attacks, hacking, and espionage. As cyber threats continue to evolve, it is essential that critical infrastructure systems remain secure and resilient.
One way to achieve this is through implementing cybersecurity measures like firewalls, network segmentation, encryption, and intrusion detection systems, among others. These measures can help to prevent unauthorized access to critical infrastructure systems and protect against data loss or damage.
To know more about cybersecurity -
https://brainly.com/question/14286078
#SPJ1
Turner was constantly late for work and under performing in his sales quotasHis manager Larry is afraid to fire him because of Title As an employee, Turner does not perform up to standards Larry should
Turner does not perform up to standards Larry should B: terminate Turner as he would terminate any other employee.
What is the lateness about?Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination against employees based on certain protected characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. In this case, Larry may be hesitant to fire Turner because he fears that Turner could claim that he was fired due to one of these protected characteristics, and not because of his poor job performance. This could result in a discrimination lawsuit against the company.
However, it's important to note that Title VII does not protect employees who are performing poorly or failing to meet job expectations. If Turner's underperformance is well-documented and the company has given him opportunities to improve, it may still be within their rights to terminate his employment, as long as they can show that the decision was based on his job performance and not any discriminatory reason.
Read more about lateness here:
https://brainly.com/question/16040164
#SPJ1
See full question below
Turner was constantly late for work and under performing in his sales quotas. His manager Larry is afraid to fire him because of Title VII. As an employee, Turner does not perform up to standards Larry should Multiple Choice
still not terminate Turner because Turner is protected under Title VII.
terminate Turner as he would terminate any other employee.
offer Turner an opportunity to mediate claims under Title VII for improper work performance.
sue Turner under Title VII for lost time and wages since Turner was always late and under performed.
2
Based on the above statement regarding the development of nationalism, how thus, it contributes to our present situation?
Nationalism is an idea and movement that holds that the nation should be congruent with the state. As a movement, nationalism tends to promote the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.
Nationalism is the belief that your own country is better than all others. Sometimes nationalism makes people not want to work with other countries to solve shared problems. Patriotism is a healthy pride in your country that brings about feelings of loyalty and a desire to help other citizens.
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Explain the importance of studying and understanding our criminal justice system
Answer:
Criminal justice is important because it's a system that includes law enforcement, courts, prisons, counseling services, and a number of other organizations and agencies that people come into contact with on a daily basis
Stress is a natural component of police work. However, some stressors in police work are particularly destructive. List and define three areas of stress that affect police officers and identify methods that may be used to reduce stress among police officers.
The areas of stress that may have to affect the work of policemen would be:
Issues with the administrationLong hours and strenuous dutyMedical issues.What is stress?This is the term that is used to refer to the emotional feeling that is caused by the tension that a person would feel. The stress that they feel would make them to react in ways that may show their displeasure and frustration at given events.
The ways that the stress that the police officers feel can be reduced is when they are let to have fewer hours of work on the field. We know that the work that they do is stressful enough.
When they are adequately compensated and let to have vacation and off days. This would help them to regain their strength.
Also giving them the ability to have enough medical attention that they need is also a way to help the police officers.
Read more on stress here: https://brainly.com/question/11819849
#SPJ1
4. What is the leading critique of the electoral college?
A drug dealer was convicted in federal court of possession of 10 kilos of cocaine with intent to distribute. She was sentenced to a prison term. Subsequently, a federal grand jury indicted the dealer under a separate statute for conspiracy to distribute the same 10 kilos of cocaine. She moved to dismiss the indictment. How should the court rule on her motion
The court should deny the drug dealer's motion to dismiss the indictment. Even though the dealer has already been convicted and sentenced for possession of the 10 kilos of cocaine with intent to distribute,
The subsequent indictment for conspiracy to distribute the same drugs is a separate charge. The double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment does not apply here because the charges are based on different statutes and involve different elements. As long as the elements of the conspiracy charge are distinct from the possession charge, the dealer can be prosecuted for both offenses. Additionally, conspiracy is a separate offense that focuses on the agreement to commit the crime, rather than the actual act of possession.
Therefore, the court should rule against the dealer's motion to dismiss the indictment.
To Know more about Drug dealer Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31144904
#SPJ11
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
If a proposed amendment violates the Constitution, should the Supreme Court be able to block its ratification? Provide 2 main points
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The Supreme Court would be violating their constitutional separation of powers if they tried to block a new amendment to the Constitution.
If a case is of a type that can be brought in federal court, that means it can never be brought in state court.