a person charged with theft will face the rules and consequences under

Answer:

B

Explanation:

will need to apply for a new license after meeting the proper requirements.

Pilots flying over a national wildlife refuge are requested to fly no lower than 3,000 feet above ground level.

Always fly at least 2000 feet above ground level (AGL) over all national marine sanctuaries, wildlife refuges, parks, and other noise-sensitive areas, according to the FAA's suggested best operating practice (see AC 91-36D). This safeguards local wildlife as well as the pilot.

Flying the coast at 2000 feet AGL gives pilots plenty of response time should a problem arise so they can prepare a safe landing. Flying high can lower the risk of bird strikes because investigations of the FAA's Wildlife Strike Database have revealed that the majority of bird hits happen at altitudes beneath 1000 feet AGL.

Direct flyovers or frequent runs through regions with sensitive species might endanger the animals and put pilots in danger. All motorized aircraft must abide by these NOAA overflight requirements.

To know more about Wildlife refer:

https://brainly.com/question/27180478

#SPJ4

The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.

The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.

The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.

Learn more about  exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906

#SPJ11

Construction laws or Laws existing in the area of construction consist of safety laws, standard laws, liability, environment and quality laws.

Laws exist in the area of construction to ensure that construction projects are safe, environmentally friendly, and of a certain quality. They also serve to hold parties responsible for any accidents or damages that occur during construction projects.

To know more about Construction laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32145069#

#SPJ11

When it comes to determining the employment status of an individual, such as George Tacy, it's crucial to consider the level of control and autonomy that Clean, the corporation, holds over Tacy's work.

If Clean plans to control Tacy's work by providing him with a set schedule, training, supervision, and dictating the methods used to perform the work, it's recommended to classify Tacy as an employee. This classification would give Clean the ability to ensure that Tacy is performing his work in accordance with company policies and procedures, and Clean would also be responsible for withholding taxes and providing benefits.

On the other hand, if Clean plans to provide Tacy with a significant amount of autonomy, such as setting his own schedule and determining his own methods for recruitment and hiring computer/IT employees, it would be more appropriate to classify Tacy as an independent contractor. This classification would give Clean less control over Tacy's work, but would also shift the responsibility for taxes and benefits to Tacy.

In summary, Clean should carefully evaluate the level of control they want to have over Tacy's work and based on that, classify Tacy as an employee or an independent contractor. This will ensure a clearly defined agency agreement, which will be beneficial for both parties.

Learn more about agency agreement from

https://brainly.com/question/15182173

#SPJ1

In the debate over the Bank of the United States, President Andrew Jackson agreed with hard-money advocates. Hence, option (b) is correct.

President Andrew Jackson agreed with the "hard-money" advocates in the debate over the Bank of the United States. Jackson was a staunch opponent of the Bank and believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, which meant he favored limited federal power and a decentralized banking system. The "hard-money" advocates shared his view and opposed the Bank's monopoly and influence over the nation's economy. Jackson vetoed the rechartering of the Bank and worked towards its eventual demise, instead advocating for a system of state-chartered banks.

To know more about system of state-chartered banks click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29733700

#SPJ11

The most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the campaign to change the law is that she is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law. Option d is correct.

Roxanne Jones is a representative of all the victims of industrial pollution who can't stand up to fight for themselves. She has struggled to recover after falling seriously ill as a result of the carelessness and inaction of companies like Trevose Inc. Roxanne Jones is not an exception to most mainstream thinking about the law.

It is her circumstances that make the situation complicated, and she's not the primary reason people want to change the law.

The correct answer is D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.

Learn more about campaign https://brainly.com/question/32161257

#SPJ11

Answer:

because of chlorophylls

Explanation:

chlorophyll absorbs light in the red and the blue regions of the visible light spectrum. Green light is not absorbed but reflected, making the plant appear green.

Answer:

chlorolphil makes the tree green

Explanation:

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant

Administrative agencies use a system of administrative law judges to decide cases involving alleged violations of the agency’s rules. This judicial function is known as administrative adjudication.

Administrative adjudication refers to the process in which administrative agencies resolve disputes and make decisions in specific cases based on the agency's rules and regulations. It is a quasi-judicial function performed by administrative law judges (ALJs) who have the authority to conduct hearings, gather evidence, listen to arguments from both parties, and make decisions or rulings. ALJs are appointed by the agency and have specialized knowledge in the area of law that the agency governs.

They act as impartial decision-makers and apply the relevant laws and regulations to the facts of each case to reach a fair and just resolution. Administrative adjudication provides a streamlined and efficient process for resolving disputes within administrative agencies, ensuring compliance with agency regulations and promoting fairness in administrative proceedings.

Learn more about quasi-judicial here : brainly.com/question/31721245
#SPJ11

Answer:

If I were the prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and Lincoln with accessory after the fact to first degree murder. However, I would cut a deal with both Tommy and Lincoln to testify against the teacher, Darla. Although Tommy did commit and was found guilt of a murder, Tommy is only fifteen years old. He was also seduced, manipulated, and touched by his teacher. In all 50 states of the United States of America, the age of consent is 16, 17, or 18. This means that in all 50 states, Darla is also guilty of statutory r a p e, along with multiple states having even harsher punishments for adults who use their role as an educator, coesunelor, or parental guardian to se xually take advantage of a minor. As a prosecuting attorney, I would charge Darla with first degree murder, and go after her as the prime target. Tommy can have his sentenced reduced. As Darla's defense attorney, the entire case against her is circumstantial and lies solely on the testimony of especially Tommy and also Lincoln. I can argue that Darla, never told Tommy to kill her husband, but that she just informed Tommy the only way they could be together forever is if her husband was out of the picture. Tommy easily could have located the firearm in her house, take the gun, and then killed her husband so that he could be with his teacher forever. The entire case lies on a jury believing a convicted murderer, or a teacher who at this point, has no criminal record that we know of.

Explanation:

If the defendant is unable to successfully argue that the court has no power to hear the case brought by the plaintiff, then the case will proceed to trial.

The parties will present evidence and arguments to the court, and the judge or jury will make a decision on the merits of the case. The outcome of the trial may be a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, a judgment in favor of the defendant, or a settlement between the parties. Regardless of the outcome, the case will be concluded and the parties will be bound by the court's decision.

After discovery, the parties may attempt to reach a settlement through negotiation or mediation. If a settlement is not reached, the case will proceed to trial. During the trial, both parties will present evidence and arguments to the judge or jury, who will then make a decision on the case. If the defendant is found liable, the court may order them to pay damages to the plaintiff. If the defendant is found not liable, the case will be dismissed.

Therefore, It is important to note that the civil litigation process can be complex and time-consuming, and it is often in the best interest of both parties to try to settle the case before trial. An experienced attorney can help guide a defendant through the process and advise on the best course of action.

To know more about defendant refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/30708748

#SPJ11

The duties requiring partners to act in the best interest of the partnership are known as fiduciary duties.

Fiduciary duties are legal and ethical responsibilities imposed on partners or employees of an organization with authority to act on behalf of another person or entity in a relationship of trust and confidence. Fiduciary duty is an obligation to act with loyalty, honesty, and good faith to another person or party. This duty of loyalty ensures that the partners or employees act in the best interest of the partnership and protect its assets, confidential information, and goodwill.

In other words, partners are expected to act with loyalty and utmost good faith toward each other and the partnership. This includes avoiding conflicts of interest, making full disclosures of information that could impact the partnership, and making decisions that benefit the partnership as a whole, rather than just one individual partner.

Learn more about Fiduciary duties here: https://brainly.com/question/31214444

#SPJ11

Answer:

At “T” intersections without “STOP” or “YIELD” signs, yield to traffic and pedestrians on the through road. They have the right-of-way. When you turn left, give the right-of-way to all vehicles approaching that are close enough to be dangerous.

Explanation:

An agency is part of the ______legislative branch_________ branch of government and has the power to ___create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate  laws_________. The correct answer is: option (C) legislative branch;  create laws, implement laws, and adjudicate laws.

adjudicate laws" is not a common phrase or term. However, it is possible to understand it in a general sense as the process of interpreting and applying laws in order to resolve legal disputes or determine their validity. Adjudication typically involves the following steps:

Legal Disputes: Adjudication comes into play when there is a legal dispute between parties. This could involve civil matters, criminal offenses, or administrative issues.

Court Proceedings: The dispute is brought before a court or a judicial body where the parties present their arguments, evidence, and legal reasoning. This can include witness testimonies, expert opinions, and relevant documents.

Interpretation of Laws: The judge or adjudicator analyzes the applicable laws, statutes, regulations, and precedents relevant to the case. They interpret and apply these legal provisions to the facts and arguments presented.

Legal Reasoning: The judge engages in legal reasoning to analyze the facts, arguments, and legal principles in order to arrive at a fair and just decisions.

learn more about adjudicate laws here :

https://brainly.com/question/30501031

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

the correct answer is ,B

The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.

The maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year depends on her net self-employment income and the applicable contribution limits.

For self-employed individuals, the maximum deductible contribution to a Keogh plan is generally calculated as a percentage of their net self-employment income. As of 2021, the contribution limit is 20% of the net self-employment income, up to a maximum of $58,000.

In Jennifer's case, if her net self-employment income is $50,000, she can calculate her maximum deductible contribution by multiplying her net self-employment income by the contribution percentage.

$50,000 x 20% = $10,000

Therefore, the maximum amount Jennifer may deduct for contributions to her Keogh plan for the year is $10,000.

Learn more about contribution limits.

https://brainly.com/question/32559785

#SPJ11

Answer:

Lower courts

Explanation:

I'm assuming you are taking government. I suffered through government last year. So, ik

The Minimum Necessary standard applies to all disclosures of protected health information, regardless of whether it is required by state law or not, but the law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed. Thus Statement is false.

The statement that "Where disclosures are required by Arizona state statutes, the Privacy Rule's minimum necessary standard does not apply, because the law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed" is not accurate.

The Minimum Necessary standard is a requirement under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, which applies to all disclosures of protected health information (PHI) regardless of whether it is required by state law or not. The law requiring the disclosure will establish the limits on what should be disclosed but it does not negate the Minimum Necessary standard.

The Minimum Necessary standard requires that covered entities make a reasonable effort to limit PHI disclosures to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. This means that even if a state law requires a disclosure, the covered entity must still make sure that only the minimum necessary information is disclosed.

Learn more about Arizona state:

https://brainly.com/question/28329794

#SPJ4

In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.

An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.

If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.

To know more about proceedings:

https://brainly.com/question/29791715

#SPJ11

Answer:

Advertising plays a major role in how

**NOT OPINION POLLS BUT BRAINLY WONT LET ME SAY IT**

presents or characterizes a political

**candidate**

during election periods. Each ad has a specific

**message**

created to

**persuade**

a viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Explanation:

I'm 86% sure that correct but its more helpful than the other awenser for now atleast :P

Advertising plays a major role in how

-(B) Media

Presents or characterizes a political

-(B) Candidate

During election periods. Each ad has a specific

-(B) Message

Created to

-(A) Persuade

A viewer to behave in a certain way, such as buying a specific product or voting for a specific candidate.

Media is a sword arm of democracy. In general it means various means of communication.

Media is intended to reach and address a large target group or audience. Media can be categorised into print and digital media.

Media acts as a watchdog to protect public interest against malpractice and create public awareness.

It acts as the fourth pillar of democracy and has an embracing role to act against injustice, oppression, misdeed of our society.

Persuasion is an art of influencing the individual. Persuasion can attempt to influence a person's beliefs, attitude, intention, motivation and behavior.

Psychology looks persuasion through the lens of individual behavior and neuroscience studies the brain activity associated with this behavior.

Persuasion is also often used tool in the pursuit of personal gain such as election campaigning.

It can also be interpreted as using one's personal or positional resources to change people.

To learn more about Media and Persuasion here

https://brainly.com/question/14047162

#SPJ3

Pretrial publicity refers to the media coverage that a criminal case receives before the trial begins. The media has a significant influence on public opinion and perception of the accused, and the way the case is reported can significantly affect the defendant's chances of receiving a fair trial.

Unfortunately, pretrial publicity tends to produce a bias against defendants because the media often presents the prosecution's side of the case more favorably, sensationalizes the crime, and portrays the defendant as guilty before the trial begins.

Studies have shown that pretrial publicity can create a "trial by media" atmosphere that undermines the defendant's presumption of innocence, undermines the fairness of the trial, and ultimately results in a biased jury pool. The media's focus on crime and the sensational aspects of a case can heighten the public's emotions and lead them to demand a conviction. This, in turn, puts pressure on the prosecutor to obtain a guilty verdict, even if the evidence is insufficient.

Furthermore, pretrial publicity can impact the defendant's ability to receive a fair and impartial trial by influencing potential jurors' views on the case. The media coverage can create a preconceived notion about the defendant's guilt or innocence, which can affect the juror's ability to be unbiased. Therefore, in high-profile cases, it is essential to take precautions to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial despite the pretrial publicity's bias against them.

To know more about fair trial

https://brainly.com/question/15196489

#SPJ11

GM should not use the company’s bankruptcy restructuring agreement as a "legal shield" when deciding whether to make payments to the families of those killed because of the faulty switches, as well as those who were injured.

The company had known of the defect before filing for bankruptcy. It is therefore not ethical to use the bankruptcy agreement to shield them from legal responsibilities. General Motors should not use the company’s bankruptcy restructuring agreement as a "legal shield" when deciding whether to make payments to the families of those killed because of the faulty switches, as well as those who were injured. The company had known of the defect before filing for bankruptcy. It is therefore not ethical to use the bankruptcy agreement to shield them from legal responsibilities. It is because GM was aware of the issue before filing for bankruptcy, and the company had already declared the issue before filing for bankruptcy protection; therefore, GM is not allowed to use the protection as a shield, according to the US Bankruptcy Code.

The Bankruptcy Code also mandates that companies in bankruptcy must include all of their claims and potential liabilities in their petitions for protection and other filings. In reality, GM did not include the ignition switch problem as a potential liability in its petition or other filings. Furthermore, it has been revealed that GM had the ignition switch issue on their radar since 2004 and had reported the potential hazard to their dealers in 2005. Even if GM acted legally, it is not ethical to not disclose all possible legal problems to the court when applying for bankruptcy protection.

To know more about bankruptcy visit:

brainly.com/question/30628707

#SPJ11

Answer:69

Explanation:6969696969

Answer:

United state of Representative.

Explanation:

I believe this because they allow Discipline and Punishment.

If wrong do not give me points (: