) c evaluate arithmetic expressions in a precise sequence determined by the rules of operator precedence and associativity.

Answer:

the good leader is who always speaks the trues

Explanation:

There is a unique link between leadership qualities and organizational success. Leadership is the problem of many organizations but little attention is given to leadership-related research. This paper aimed to examine the qualities of a good leader using principal component analysis (PCA). The study adopted a quantitative research approach by eliciting perceptions of respondents on the qualities of a good leader through structured questionnaire. One hundred and fifty (150) questionnaires were administered to top management of companies within the construction industry, banking industry, food industry, and information technology industry. One hundred and twenty-seven (127) were retrieved and considered for further analysis. The data obtained were analyzed using PCA. The findings revealed the principal qualities of a good leader to be: 1) accessibility and dedication, 2) neutrality and modesty, 3) aspiration and attentiveness, 4) believe and aptitude, 5) dignity and amiability, 6) insight and confidence, 7) vitality and concentration, 8) originality and honesty, 9) responsibility and team spirit, 10) decency and self-assurance, 11) charitable, 12) comical and maintenance culture, and 13) reliability. It is recommended that leaders should demonstrate these leadership qualities to enhance organizational effectiveness and efficiency.

The total costs would be:1500+3000+6000+15000+30000= $55 500 now it depends on how much the insurance is. There is no average settlement on the above case.

Insurance is a means of protection from financial loss in which, in exchange for a fee, a party agrees to compensate another party in the event of a certain loss, damage, or injury. It is a form of risk management, primarily used to hedge against the risk of a contingent or uncertain loss.

An entity which provides insurance is known as an insurer, insurance company, insurance carrier, or underwriter. A person or entity who buys insurance is known as a policyholder, while a person or entity covered under the policy is called an insured.

The insurance transaction involves the policyholder assuming a guaranteed, known, and relatively small loss in the form of a payment to the insurer in exchange for the insurer's promise to compensate the insured in the event of a covered loss.

Learn more about insurance, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27822778

#SPJ2

A public area represents works whose intellectual property rights have been extended or works that have been released by means of the author's false.

The definition of an intellectual is a person greater inquisitive about logic as opposed to emotions. An example of an intellectual is a scientist.

When matters are perceived intellectually, then they are looked at from the aware mind and ordinary awareness, because of this a quantifiable, logical, outside angle concerning a number of mental "doing" = questioning, comparing, concluding, reasoning and planning.

Intellectual skills seek advice from the ways of questioning and problem-fixing utilized by experts in a discipline. A fashionable highbrow skill is vital to all fields of taking a look at is essential wondering. highbrow capacity consists of memory, verbal comprehension, reasoning, analysis, hassle-fixing, and reasoning abilities.

Learn more about Intellectual here:

https://brainly.com/question/1078532

#SPJ4

Answer:

Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.

“Operation Vala” serves as a measure that was put in place at the country's 243 correctional centres, to prevent assault and this also protect the inmates.

The main aim of Operation Vala, is for security purposes, it was an annual DCS campaign.

It was put in place to tighten security measures within the country's 243 correctional centres and to prevent festive-season related escapes and assaults.

Learn more about operation Vala at,:

https://brainly.com/question/2475734

Answer:

The term “organs of state” is used to refer to a range of institutions, including national and provincial government departments, municipalities and their business agencies. “That would be a time-consuming and an almost impossible task, even for an office as well-resourced as mine”, he said.

Answer:

a, proposes an amendment and have congress vote on it.

When a public school district holds a hearing for the same offense for which public courts have already prosecuted a student it is double jeopardy.

Double jeopardy can  be defined as the process of holding a second hearing for the same offence a person committed after the first hearing has been hold.

Based on the given scenario the act committed by the school is known as  Double jeopardy because the courts has already prosecuted the person and the school went ahead to still prosecute the person for the same offence.

Therefore the correct option is B.

Learn more about Double jeopardy here:https://brainly.com/question/14406693

#SPJ1

The form of cannabis mainly found in Northern Europe and parts of Asia is Cannabis Sativa.

The form of cannabis mainly found in Northern Europe and parts of Asia is Cannabis Sativa.

Cannabis Sativa is a species of the Cannabis plant that is known for its tall stature, narrow leaves, and typically higher levels of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) compared to other cannabis species. In these regions, Cannabis Sativa has a long history of cultivation and use, often for industrial purposes such as fiber production.

It has been traditionally grown for its strong and durable fibers, which are used in textiles, ropes, and other industrial applications. In terms of psychoactive properties, Cannabis Sativa is known for its uplifting and energizing effects.

This variety of cannabis is adapted to colder climates and has thrived in regions such as Northern Europe and parts of Asia where the climate and environmental conditions are suitable for its growth.

For more such question on cannabis

https://brainly.com/question/15725358

#SPJ11

The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.

In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.

Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181

#SPJ1

The  history of Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action, the university admissions policy that would be MOST likely to survive a constitutional challenge is a policy that considers race as one factor among many in an attempt to achieve a diverse student body.

The Supreme Court has given universities permission to use race as one of several factors in a holistic admissions process, based on the history of Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action. As a result, the policy that considers race as one factor among many in an attempt to achieve a diverse student body would be the most likely university admissions policy to survive a constitutional challenge. A policy that automatically awards 40 points (out of 100) to African American, Latino, and Native American applicants, a policy that reserves 25 of 100 positions at the university for African American, Latino, and Native American applicants, and a policy that doubles the GPA and SAT scores for African American, Latino constitutional challenge.

Learn more about  history of Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/4977488

#SPJ11

Answer:

Here is the short story:

The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.

Explanation:

The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off.  The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.

Answer:

answer of this question is Fifth

Explanation:

May this answer is helpful for you

Answer:

The main purpose of the Criminal Justice System is to provide justice to every citizen of its nation and protecting the innocent by finding and punishing those proved to be guilty and also helping them to stop repeating crimes. It keep people aware of the crimes and protects the right the citizens. Criminal justice system ensures that justice will be provide to all irrespective of anything.

Explanation:

Answer:

court of original jurisdiction has the power to hear cases as they re first initiated by a prosecutor. court of appellate jurisdiction many only hear the action after the court of original jurisdiction has heard the case

Explanation:

The  law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.

The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:

https://brainly.com/question/5481344

#SPJ1

(a) The amount of work required to increase the elongation of the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm is greater than 31.9 J according to Hooke's Law.

(b) To verify this, we can use Hooke's Law:

F = -kx
where F is the force exerted by the spring, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.
We can find the spring constant by using the given information:
W = (1/2)kx^2
where W is the work done on the spring and x is the displacement.

Plugging in the given values, we get:
31.9 J = (1/2)k(0.01 m)^2
Solving for k, we get:
k = 25560 N/m

Now we can calculate the force required to stretch the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm:
F = -kx
F = -(25560 N/m)(0.01 m)
F = -255.6 N

The work required is:
W = (1/2)kx^2
W = (1/2)(25560 N/m)(0.01 m)^2
W = 1.278 J

Therefore, the amount of work required to increase the elongation of the spring from 5.36 cm to 6.36 cm is greater than 31.9 J.

For more such questions on Hooke's Law, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/17068281

#SPJ11

Many states have laws that prohibit smoking immediately outside an entrance, usually within 10 to 25 feet.

The exact distance may vary depending on the state and the specific type of building, such as hospitals, schools, or government buildings. The purpose of these laws is to protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke and to create a smoke-free environment in public areas.

In order to protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke, many states in the US have enacted laws that prohibit smoking immediately outside building entrances. These laws typically require smokers to stay at least 10 to 25 feet away from entrances, depending on the state and the specific type of building. The purpose of these laws is to create a smoke-free environment in public areas, and to reduce the risk of exposure to secondhand smoke for those entering and exiting the building. Secondhand smoke is a known carcinogen and can cause a range of health problems, including respiratory issues, heart disease, and cancer. By prohibiting smoking near entrances, these laws aim to reduce the negative health effects of tobacco use and promote a healthier, safer environment for all.

To know more about prohibit click here:

brainly.com/question/28343104

#SPJ4

Attempt robbery or dacoity while armed with a lethal we-apon.— If the criminal is armed with a dangerous we-apon while attempting to commit robbery... dacoity, the im­prisonment with which such offender must be sentenced shall  Law.

Central Government Law committing grave harm voluntarily utilizing dangerous we-apon or ways —Whoever, except as provided in section 335, voluntarily causes grievous harm by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing, or cutting, or any instrument which, when used as a we=apon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or corrosive substance.

To learn more about Law, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ1

In order to finance independent expenditures and other independent political action, super PACs (independent expenditure only political committees) are groups.

that may accept an unlimited amount of contributions from people, businesses, labor organizations, and other PACs. In order to finance independent expenditures, other advertisements that mention a federal candidate, and generic voter drives in federal elections, hybrid PACs (political committees with non-contribution accounts) must maintain a separate bank account and can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labor groups, and other political committees. However, they are subject to all statutory amount limitations and source prohibitions.

learn more about PACs  here:

https://brainly.com/question/13037219

#SPJ4

Answer:

Matheson

Explanation:

desemanaeagentevaiter

Answer:

I would assume

"The Executive Branch". Can you give the drop down options so I can answer the next one?

Explanation:

Answer:

First Box: Executive

Second Box: Congressional, or The Advisors.

Explanation:

The reason I say congressional because it is made into 2 Section the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Presidential Level, doesn't really have two, but he can have 2 Advisers

The most accurate statement is that any type of harassment or discrimination is illegal. (option c)This answer is consistent with U.S. federal and state laws, as well as international conventions, which generally prohibit discrimination and harassment based on race, sex, age, disability, religion, national origin, and other protected categories.

In addition, harassment and discrimination can take many forms, such as unwelcome conduct that creates a hostile or offensive work environment, unfair treatment in employment decisions, and retaliation against employees who complain about discrimination or harassment. Therefore, it is important for employers to have policies and training programs that promote diversity, inclusion, and respect in the workplace.

Company policies can be more restrictive than the law requires, as long as they do not discriminate or retaliate against employees who engage in protected activities. However, it is recommended to ensure that company policies align with the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies are responsible for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and employees who believe they have been harassed or discriminated against can file a complaint with these agencies or pursue legal action.

To know more about harassment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32417535

#SPJ11

The ruling in Kumho Tire v. Carmichael affected how expert witness testimony would be accepted by making it clear that the same standards applied to all expert witnesses, regardless of their area of expertise.

Kumho Tire v. Carmichael was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1999. It was a significant case because it clarified the admissibility criteria for expert witness testimony. The case was about a fatal accident that was caused by a blown-out tire, and the victims' families filed a lawsuit against Kumho Tire Co.

The plaintiffs retained an expert witness to testify that the tire was defective, and it was the reason for the accident. The trial court excluded the expert witness testimony, stating that the expert was unqualified to render an opinion on the tire's design and the defect that caused the blowout. The plaintiffs appealed the decision, and it was overruled by the appellate court, stating that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the expert. The case was appealed again, and it reached the US Supreme Court.

The US Supreme Court upheld the appellate court's decision to overrule the trial court's decision to exclude the expert testimony. However, they set new rules for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. According to the ruling, the trial judge was the gatekeeper of expert testimony, and it was their responsibility to evaluate the relevance and reliability of expert testimony. The court further stated that the Daubert standard, which had previously applied to scientific testimony, would also apply to all expert testimony.

Learn more about Witness

https://brainly.com/question/32240223

#SPJ11

Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members

Other biased sources include the following:

The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20646239

Answer:

Explanation:

I would make sure everything was locked up and own somthing to protect me like a dog or a fire arm or both, you could also get an alarm system set up and camera and such around your property.

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

The three elements or viewpoints of the unauthorized practice of law are as follows:

To know more about unauthorised practice of law refer to-brainly.com/question/30160621#

#SPJ11