Answers
Option (d): The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission keeps an eye on whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is being followed.
What are the things that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act guards against?(Title VII), as amended, beginning at section 2000e of volume 42 of the United States Code Employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, s-ex, or national origin is prohibited under Title VII.
Do they carry out the Civil Rights Act?The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) upholds the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA), Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), The Rehabilitation Act of 1973's Sections 501 and 505, as well as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Title VII).
What did Title VII and the EEOC serve to accomplish?A person cannot be discriminated against on the grounds of their race, color, religion, sex (particularly pregnancy, sexual preference, or gender identity), or national origin, according to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII).
Learn more about The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: https://brainly.com/question/17198465
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What are the benefits and drawbacks of ID requirements for voting?
Answers
Voter identity cards have the following benefits:
a trustworthy method of identification.a declaration that a voter is legitimately registered.To increase confidence that the voter is who he or she claims to be, the ballot may include many identifying elements, such as a portrait, signature, fingerprints, etc.drawbacks
Either the government, the electorate, or both must foot the enormous costs. The proportion of eligible voters who receive an identification card will inevitably drop if the cost is passed on to the voter. may be created to address low literacy ratesWhat are the more drawbacks of id?
When many voters lack a fixed address, an effective means of identification may be used.enables voting in places where the voter might not be directly recognizedcan be distributed alongside campaign materials for voter educationThe card may disappear.To learn more about voter id refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13895279
#SPJ2
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answers
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
Which set of events is listed in chronological order?A.The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.B.The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.C.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.D.California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.
Answers
Answer: C.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.
Explanation:
The Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) was founded in San Francisco in 1955, as a lesbian organization aimed to help lesbians that suffered discrimination.
On November 22, 2008, Proposition 8 banned same-sex marriage in California.
In 2020, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission defined discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in violation of Title VII and transgender people as a protected class.
C.
1. The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.
2. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.
3. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.
________ force—the highest degree of force—is considered reasonable only when used to counter an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm
Answers
Answer:
deadly force
Explanation:
Deadly force—the highest degree of force—is considered reasonable only when used to counter an immediate threat of death or great bodily harm.
What is Deadly force?Any force that could potentially cause death or serious physical harm is referred to as deadly force. Its use may only be justified under the most extreme conditions, when all other choices have failed or are impractical.
A person is justified in using lethal force if they have a good reason to believe that doing so is necessary to stop an imminent threat to their own or another person's life, a serious physical injury to another person, or the forced commission of a crime.
Thus, it is Deadly force.
For more details about Deadly force, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24193741
#SPJ1
Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Question 10 (1 point)
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be
destroyed. In a consent search, officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or
following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
True
O False
Answers
Answer:
False. Hope this helped!
Explanation:
Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement influenced the trends shown in
the line graph?
A. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of state governments.
B. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of the federal govemment.
C. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy
D. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in traditionally male-dominated fields
Answers
Answer:
maybe i think option c Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy.
what is c.a.m.p.u.s.
Answers
Answer:
A campus is traditionally the land on which a college or university and related institutional buildings are situated. Usually a college campus includes libraries, lecture halls, residence halls, student centers or dining halls, and park-like settings.
Explanation:
1. Losers in civil cases may be required to pay monetary damages
for their actions.
A. true
B. false
2. Most cases are settled before trial.
A. true
B. false
Answers
The statement that 'Losers in civil cases may be required to pay monetary damages for their actions' is True. Also, most cases are settled before trial. Thus, that is also true.
What are civil cases? Civil cases are non-criminal lawsuits that may include private property disputes, breach of contract, or harassment cases. A civil case is a legal disagreement between two or more parties that arises from an accident, injury, contract, or business disagreement. In a civil suit, one party accuses the other of causing harm or inflicting loss, and the party bringing the claim is known as the plaintiff. Similarly, the accused party is known as the defendant.
The monetary damages in civil cases: The plaintiff, in a civil lawsuit, seeks monetary damages as compensation for the harm or loss incurred. Monetary damages awarded to the prevailing party in a civil lawsuit are intended to restore them to the position they were in before the incident occurred. The goal of monetary damages is to help the injured party regain their financial footing and cover any medical or hospital expenses that may have resulted from the incident.
Actions of the parties: The loser of a civil lawsuit is typically required to pay monetary damages for their actions, as it is the primary goal of civil litigation. Civil litigation is designed to provide financial compensation to the plaintiff who has been harmed or suffered losses as a result of the defendant's actions. In contrast, the defendant is required to pay the plaintiff monetary damages if they are found guilty of causing harm or loss to the plaintiff.
Learn more about Civil cases at: https://brainly.com/question/1065754
#SPJ11
Michael Devereux v. United Parcel Service, Inc. - 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 19 (Tenn. Sup. Ct.)
decision and reasoning
Answers
The legal decisions in Michael Devereux v. United Parcel Service, Inc. - 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 19 (Tenn. Sup. Ct.) are given as follows.
Why is this so?The Tennessee Supreme Court's verdict in Michael Devereux v. United Parcel Service, Inc., determined that a lower court had made an error in providing UPS with summary judgement against an age and disability discrimination lawsuit filed by one of their employees.
The court declared that the employee presented ample evidence to establish a tangible dispute over substantive matters regarding whether UPS carried out discriminatory practices against him.
The decision was grounded on provisions stated under the Tennessee Human Rights Act, which bars employment-based discriminations associated with age and disability.
Learn more about legal decisions at:
https://brainly.com/question/10660758
#SPJ1
stranger originated life insurance has been found to be in violation of
Answers
Stranger-originated life insurance (STOLI) has been found to be in violation of insurance regulations and ethics.
STOLI involves a scheme where a person without an insurable interest in a stranger's life purchases a life insurance policy on that individual with the intent to sell the policy to investors. This practice has faced legal challenges due to its fraudulent nature and potential harm to the insurance industry.
Stranger-originated life insurance (STOLI) is a controversial practice where individuals purchase life insurance policies on the lives of strangers, typically elderly individuals, with the intention of selling the policies to investors. The primary purpose of STOLI is to exploit the insurable interest requirement, which is a fundamental principle in insurance that states that one must have a legitimate financial interest in the life or well-being of the insured.
STOLI transactions often involve misleading practices, such as offering cash incentives to individuals to take out policies or providing them with loans against the future death benefit. This artificially inflates the number of policies in force and can lead to fraudulent claims. Moreover, STOLI undermines the concept of insurance as a means of managing risk, as it turns life insurance into an investment tool rather than a protection mechanism.
Due to these concerns, STOLI has been widely criticized and deemed unethical and illegal in many jurisdictions. Insurance regulators and industry organizations have taken measures to prevent and penalize STOLI transactions, including implementing stricter regulations, imposing fines, and voiding policies involved in such schemes. The goal is to protect the integrity of the insurance industry, ensure fair pricing, and maintain the principle of insurable interest.
learn more about insurable interest here:
brainly.com/question/28164383
#SPJ11
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people
Answers
Select the examples that best demonstrate likely tasks for Professional Support Services workers. Check all that apply. Leon gives psychological tests to students and assesses their results. Helen sets goals, and creates rules and policies for a school. Alexander helps high-school students decide which classes to take. Ebony helps children find books and magazines in a school library. Kyle teaches a kindergarten class that prepares students for first grade. Francisca is a parent who donates money to a school program.
Answers
Answer: 1, 3, 4
Explanation:
i took the test
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Most illegal immigrants come from which country?
Answers
Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.
Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.
Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.
Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.
Learn more about immigrants here:
https://brainly.com/question/28791683
#SPJ6
1. The economic cost nationwide of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes annually is between __________ billion dollars.
A. 15 and 20
B. 25 and 30
C. 35 and 40
D. 50 and 55
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It's actually 44 billion but the answer you put says 40, so go with 35 and 40.
Which jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law?
Answers
Answer:
Harvard law school
Explanation:
As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.
It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.
Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ6
marbury and his attorney, former attorney general charles lee, maintained that the commission's signing and sealing sealed the deal
Answers
Marbury and his attorney argued that the signing and sealing of the commission by the President constituted a binding agreement, but the Supreme Court disagreed in Marbury v. Madison.
Marbury and his attorney, former Attorney General Charles Lee, argued that the signing and sealing of the commission by the President constituted a valid and binding agreement, thereby entitling Marbury to his judicial appointment. They claimed that the act of signing and sealing the commission completed the deal and created a legally enforceable right.
Their argument was based on the following points:
1. Offer and Acceptance: Marbury argued that the President's nomination and subsequent signing and sealing of the commission constituted an offer, and Marbury's acceptance was demonstrated by his acceptance of the appointment.
2. Consideration: Marbury contended that he provided consideration for the appointment by accepting the responsibilities and duties associated with the judicial office.
3. Legal Validity: Marbury and Lee asserted that the act of signing and sealing the commission indicated the President's intention to create a legally binding appointment.
However, the Supreme Court, in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), held that Marbury's claim was not valid. The Court ruled that although the commission was validly signed and sealed, Marbury's remedy was not through the courts but rather through a writ of mandamus, which the Court found to be unconstitutional in this particular case.
Learn more about Attorney
https://brainly.com/question/32365817
#SPJ11
Question 2
Ballistics The science that deals with the motion, behavior and effects of projectiles such as bullets.
a.Yes
b.Νο
Answers
discuss the centrility of law to a stable society or social order
Answers
Explanation:
Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals.
Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.
No country can maintain a rule of law society if its people do not respect the laws.
Everyone must make a commitment to respect laws, legal authorities, legal signage and signals, and courts.
The rule of law functions because most of us agree that it is important to follow laws every day.
Which of thee i NOT one of the four pillar of a preentation?
Quetion 3 option:
reearch
organization
delivery
peruaion
Answers
Among these four, organization is not the pillar of the presentation.
The four options which are given in the ques are research, organization, delivery and persuasion.
Each of these four pillars is essential to ‘true power,’ but the real potential lies in achieving balance in all four.
1) Research: Research is "creative and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge". It involves the collection, organization and analysis of evidence to increase understanding of a topic, characterized by a particular attentiveness to controlling sources of bias and error. The primary purposes of basic research (as opposed to applied research) are documentation, discovery, interpretation, and the research and development (R&D) of methods and systems for the advancement of human knowledge.
Research is a very important aspect of the presentation. Before presenting any topic, there is a need of doing the research on that topic so that the presenter knows each and every aspect of that topic and can give good presentation.
2) Delivery: Next aspect is delivery which means how the presenter delivers his presentation. It is important that he delivers his thoughts and opinions what he actually wants to share. You need to drive the attention of your audience. You need to understand how to make them retain your message. Well in fact, when communicating with other people, we use both verbal and nonverbal messages. Verbal messages are the words that you say; in other words, they are the contents of your presentation. Nonverbal messages are “messages without words” that you communicate through facial expressions, eye contact, tone of voice, gestures, appearance, posture, body language, and other nonverbal cues.
3) Persuasion: It is very important that the presenter is able to convince and influence the audience through his thoughts, ideas, etc.
There are many ways to organize your information in a presentation, to be more persuasive. Three techniques include:
A. Motivated sequence
B. Reflective
C. Proposition to proof
Thus, these 3 aspects are very important in the presentation and the left option i.e. organization is not the pillar of presentation.
Learn more about Pillars:
https://brainly.ph/question/1880388
#SPJ4
Greg invites his supervisor (Leslie) and two other colleagues (Wanda and Eileen) to go fishing on his boat. While fishing, they have some beers. Eileen gets so drunk that she falls overboard. Greg, Leslie and Wanda rescue Eileen with the help of the harbor police. Leslie reports the incident to the management of the company, which opens an investigation. Greg refuses to cooperate and is disciplined.
a. Greg has a privacy right to keep silent because the incident happened at a social occasion and away from the work place.
b. Greg has a 5thAmendment right not to cooperate because the information that he provides might be used against him by the company in a disciplinary proceeding.
c. Greg's rights have not been violated because the company has legitimate business reasons for seeking information about the fishing incident.
d. Although Greg's right to privacy has been violated, the company can discipline him based on the information that it gets from Leslie, Wanda and Eileen.
Answers
Letra c .
Thank
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
mention the bill of rights amendments
Answers
The first ten amendment of the American National Constitution are a part of the Amendments made under the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights can be taken into the sense of general understanding as the bill that contains the rights and powers available in the hands of the American citizens in different scenarios. Moreover, the Bill of Rights contain the ten amendments of the constitution, wherein different protections are granted. These ten amendments are an exclusive inclusion of the Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Amendments here:
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ4
How do you proceed if an item is out of stock
Answers
Explain why the item is out of stock. ...
Include an estimated availability date. ...
Show inventory quantities by size and color. ...
Display channel availability. ...
Offer related or replacement items. ...
Provide email or text notifications.
Breach of contract due to force
majeure is stipulated in Singapore
contract law？
Answers
It is a false statement that breach of contract due to force majeure is stipulated in Singapore contract law.
What is the law on force majeure in Singapore?Singapore has no laws governing force majeure. Force majeure clauses are simply a convenient way of referring to contractual terms agreed upon by the parties to deal with situations affecting the contract over which the parties have little or no control.
Parties who wish to invoke force majeure must define what constitutes a force majeure event in the contract. There is no general rule defining what constitutes a situation of force majeure, and it would be determined by what the parties have agreed to in their contracts.
Read more about force majeure
brainly.com/question/30154382
#SPJ1
officer peabody, a university police officer, received information from an anonymous caller to his cell phone, that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. officer peabody knew the suspect and had suspicions that he was selling drugs before receiving the information. to obtain a valid search warrant, officer peabody will need to obtain the warrant from:
Answers
Officer Peabody will need to obtain a valid search warrant from a judge or magistrate.
In order to conduct a search of the suspect's dormitory room, Officer Peabody will need a valid search warrant. A search warrant is a legal document that authorizes law enforcement officials to conduct a search of a specific location or person.
In order to obtain a search warrant, Officer Peabody will need to present evidence to a judge or magistrate that shows probable cause that the suspect is engaged in criminal activity. The evidence may include information from the anonymous caller, as well as any other evidence that Officer Peabody has gathered in his investigation.
Once the judge or magistrate is satisfied that probable cause exists, they may issue a search warrant that authorizes Officer Peabody to conduct a search of the suspect's dormitory room.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
Find a news about uncertainty law in Indonesia and add
a conclusion into it (Dont Plagarism pls)
Answers
The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.
The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.
As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.
To learn more about Indonesia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31792781
#SPJ4
Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.
In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.
Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.
To know more about law:
brainly.com/question/30133385
#SPJ4
When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not
Answers
If the corporate plan contains exaggerated financial data and is intentionally confusing, an investor should analyze it before investing.
What do financial numbers actually meanA full set of stock or flow data known as financial statistics contains all of the liabilities and assets of an economy's several sectors. You are not the only one, if that is the case. Only 33% of Americans had a written financial plan, according to the Schwab 2021 Modern Prosperity Survey. An investor should examine the corporate plan before investing if it contains inflated financial facts or is purposefully unclear. The term "financial intelligence" refers to the capacity to gauge financial accomplishment and comprehend how the numbers portray or influence an organization's performance. Four essential skill sets can be drawn from it: having a basic understanding of financial management, including knowledge of important financial concepts and how to read financial statements.To know more about financial data visit:
brainly.com/question/24080976
#SPJ1
What is Jurisdiction? Give an example of IMPROPER use
of jurisdiction
Answers
Jurisdiction refers to the authority or power of a court or legal body to hear and make decisions on a legal matter.
What does jurisdiction refer to in the legal context?Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority or power of a court or legal body to hear and make decisions on a specific legal matter. It establishes the boundaries within which a court can exercise its authority. Jurisdiction can be based on various factors, including geographical location, subject matter, or the parties involved.
An example of the improper use of jurisdiction can occur when a court or legal body exceeds its authority or acts outside the scope of its designated jurisdiction. This can happen when a court hears a case that does not fall within its geographical or subject matter jurisdiction. For instance, if a local municipal court attempts to preside over a complex international trade dispute, which is typically under the jurisdiction of a specialized international trade court, it would be an improper use of jurisdiction. Such a case could result in legal complications and potentially lead to the invalidation of the court's decisions.
Jurisdiction and its proper use: Jurisdiction is a fundamental concept in the legal system as it ensures that cases are heard and decided by the appropriate court or legal body. It helps maintain order and fairness in the administration of justice. Courts have specific jurisdictional limits, and parties must ensure that their cases are filed in the correct jurisdiction to ensure a fair and lawful process. Understanding jurisdictional requirements and ensuring compliance is crucial to avoid procedural issues and ensure the enforceability of court decisions.
Learn more about Jurisdiction
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
Answers
2. She should be arrested, for trying to steal. Even though she said she forgot it was there, she attempted to put it in her car and steal it. So this has to be a lie, she was indeed trying to steal the lipstick.
I didn’t think much about my answer but maybe you could use these as ideas for your Anders