The law of Congress is likely Constitutional as long as the law does not unnecessarily impede interstate commerce because it strengthens the federal law
As long as the rule does not excessively burden or discriminate against interstate trade, the Virginia Legislature's decision to establish a law requiring employers in Virginia to provide 16 weeks of unpaid leave for family affairs does not necessarily violate the U.S. Constitution. Federal law often prevails over state law when there is a disagreement between the two, according to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Here, Virginia legislation reinforces the federal law by granting employees in Virginia a longer duration of leave, thus they are not inherently at odds with one another.
The courts had interpreted the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which grants Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce, to indicate that state laws that disproportionately burden or discriminate against interstate commerce may be declared unconstitutional. The general rule is that a state law that only governs intrastate activities and does not unfairly or excessively impede interstate commerce is legitimate.
Read more about federal law on:
https://brainly.com/question/25912245
#SPJ4
Select the correct answer.
If the two variables in a given theory move in the same direction, which type of relationship do they share?
O A. negative
OB. positive
O C.
neutral
OD
inverse
Reset
Next
Answer:
B. positive
Explanation:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Attic Dwellers Sometimes, animals like rats, mice, and squirrels will climb into an attic. They like to chew on things. It is not good if they decide to chew on electrical wires. If they do, this can cause a fire. So, it is important to make it hard for these animals to get under your roof. Some people try to get rid of these unwanted house guests by putting out mouse traps in the attic. Others might call an exterminator. This is a person who comes to someone's house to get rid of these animals. 2 An exterminator is a person who goes to someone's house to get rid of rats and mice. Why would someone want to call an exterminator to go into the attic? A. to tell the rats and mice to leave the attic B. to feed the rats and mice in the attic C. to keep the house from catching on fire D. to cut the electrical wires in the house
Answer:
C. to keep the house from catching on fire
Explanation:
Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.
When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.
An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.
In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.
So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire
Franz Joseph Gull suggested that a person's what could predict their criminal tendencies?
Palm
Skull
O Personality
O Genetics
Answer:
skull
Explanation:
Answer: B. Skull
Explanation:
When an appraisal report will be more than four months old on the date of the note and mortgage, what is the appraiser required to do?
When an appraisal report will be more than four months old on the date of the note and mortgage, the appraiser is generally required to provide an update or a new appraisal report.
In general, though, the appraiser may be expected to:
Examine the original appraisal report: The appraiser should extensively examine the original appraisal report to understand the scope of work, methodology used, and considerations taken into account in determining the property value.Conduct a new inspection: The appraiser may need to inspect the property again to assess its present condition, any changes or improvements done since the prior evaluation, and any external variables that may effect its value.Gather and analyse current market data, such as recent sales of comparable properties in the neighbourhood, market trends, and any other relevant information that may affect the value of the property.The appraiser should update the appraisal report with the most accurate and current information available based on the new inspection and updated data.For such more question on date:
https://brainly.com/question/31344901
#SPJ11
Name the ways in which a court order can compel specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract?
Answer:
Specific performance is a type of equitable remedy available in a breach of contract action. It is a remedy based on the concept of fairness. Specific performance recognizes that money may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party in certain situations.
Explanation:
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
in the landmark case, hawkins v. mcgee (the case of the hairy hand), the court determined that the correct measure of damages was:
Answer:
The court held that the proper measure of damages should be based on Hawkins's expected value from the parties' contract — the difference in value between a 100% good hand and the hairy hand that Hawkins actually received.
The City of Sunshine is in the process of bringing a hockey team to the area and will need land on which to build a new arena. The site has been selected and Sunshine officials have offered the homeowners a fair amount for the property where the arena is to be built. What would this action fall under?
Answer:
This action would fall under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain.
Explanation:
Eminent domain is the legal term used to denote the deprivation of ownership of an immovable or movable property by the state, within the framework of the law and against compensation. An overriding purpose serving the common good is cited as the justification for expropriations for traffic, military and other reasons related to state tasks.
Since property is one of the basic rights in market-based democracies, expropriations are only possible there in certain legally regulated exceptional cases. Thus, in America this is reflected in the Fifth Amendment, which establishes that property can only be expropriated for public use and with due compensation.
when thinking about checks and balances and separation of powers, _____ gives congress the ability to check both the president and the supreme court.
The system of checks and balances in the United States gives Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court through its powers of impeachment, oversight, and the power of the purse. This allows Congress to hold the President and federal judges accountable for their actions, and to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.
The legislative branch, which is represented by Congress, has several key powers that allow it to check the actions of the other two branches. One of these powers is the ability to impeach the President and other federal officials, including judges. This means that if Congress believes that a President or judge has committed a serious crime or abuse of power, it can vote to remove that person from office.
Another important power of Congress is the ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch and its agencies. This means that Congress can review and investigate the actions of the President and his or her administration, and can hold hearings to question officials about their policies and actions. This allows Congress to ensure that the President and his or her administration are acting in the best interests of the American people.
Finally, Congress has the power of the purse, which means that it controls the federal government's budget and can use this power to influence the actions of the President and other federal officials. By controlling the budget, Congress can direct funding to specific programs and agencies, and can also use the threat of cutting funding to exert pressure on the President and other officials to take certain actions or to change their policies.
All of these powers, along with the power to pass laws and approve appointments, give Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court. This helps to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful and that the powers of government are balanced between the three branches.
Learn more about the United States government and politics here: https://brainly.com/question/28152248
#SPJ4
What conclusion and recommendation can you make on the issue of gbv to the communities
Answer:
Different recommendations and conclusion can be drawn on human rights violation in government and communities.
Explanation:
1-Foremost thing that government can do is the legislation to control the human rights violation and this law should be applicable on all the people belong to any community. Government also make human rights violation issue a part of their policy so that every government could understand before hand.
2-Communities should run campaign so that people understand their human rights and can complain against such violations.
Human right violations happens all over the world but individuals and government need to work together to stop and eradicate such violations
what is the main characteristic pf a rubuttable presumption?
Answer:
A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:
Rebuttable presumption: Both in common law and in civil law, a rebuttable presumption is an assumption made by a court that is taken to be true unless someone comes forward to contest it and prove otherwise.
For Example
a defendant in a criminal case is presumed innocent until proved guilty.
Whose financial goals are most likely impacted by the event described?
A) chen invests half her money in nonliquid assets.
B) tina is underinsured and at fault in a car accident.
C) ben has adequate insurance and emergency savings
D) rodrigo invests in low-risk stocks and keeps 20 percent of his income liquid..
What is risk? Why is it important to learn to manage risk? Specifically, give examples of how insurance, consumer protections, strategies to reduce fraud and identity theft, and estate planning help you manage risk.
Risk can be described as a situation which has the probability of exposure to danger.
It is the possibility of something bad happening and most times, it involves uncertainty about the effects/implications of an activity with respect to something that humans value, often focusing on negative, undesirable consequences.
Its is important to learn to manage risk because it provides empowerment to a business with the necessary tools so that it can adequately identify and deal with its occurrence.
How does Insurance Help Reduce RiskThe major way through which insurance helps to reduce risk is by transferring any negative outcome of the insured item/service to the company that issues the policy. This is done by paying an insurance premium rather than a potential amount due to loss or damage.
The idea of insurance protects individual and organization against fraud and identity theft. This is because they put security mechanism in place to identify and mitigate the effect of such loss.
Learn more about Insurance at https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ1
apply three criminological theories to explain why someone would offend upon release from incarceration. Please be specific in your response and demonstrate that you understand both the theory and material.
Answer:
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
Explanation:
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
80 inches^2
which kind of court would handle a criminal case in which the accused is charged with illegally acquiring guns in mexico and selling them to someone in california?
A criminal case involving the illegal acquisition of guns in Mexico and their sale to someone in California would typically be handled by a federal court, specifically the United States District Court for the district where the crime occurred.
The reason for this is that the crime falls under federal jurisdiction because it entails breaking both state and federal laws as well as crossing international and interstate borders.
Federal offences, such as the unlawful importation or exportation of firearms, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal court system, as do other federal offences.
As a result, the matter would be heard and decided by a federal court.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/740707
#SPJ11
Which of the following is a main reason why some states were not in favor of ratifying the US Constitution?
Some states were not in favor of ratifying the US Constitution as it did not include the bill of rights.
They feared that without the bill of rights, the new national government would threaten individual liberties/
The 1787 Constitutional Convention drafted the document, which required ratification by nine or more state conventions.
A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.
The Anti-Federalists wrote a number of essays and made a number of speeches against ratification of the Constitution in order to counter the Federalist effort.
James Madison proposed twelve amendments during the First Congress in 1789, which were ratified. Ten of them were approved by the states, went into effect in 1791, and are now commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights.
To know more about the ratification of the constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30007168
#SPJ4
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
Explain the theory of natural law, including the major arguments provided
for the judges to actually hear a case, called , 4 of the 9 justices have to agree to hear it. this is called the .
Answer:
Explanation:
Where the executive and legislative branches are elected by the people, members of the Judicial Branch are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the Judicial Branch, leaves Congress significant discretion to determine the shape and structure of the federal judiciary. Even the number of Supreme Court Justices is left to Congress — at times there have been as few as six, while the current number (nine, with one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices) has only been in place since 1869. The Constitution also grants Congress the power to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court, and to that end Congress has established the United States district courts, which try most federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals, which review appealed district court cases.Federal judges can only be removed through impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction in the Senate. Judges and Justices serve no fixed term — they serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate. By design, this insulates them from the temporary passions of the public, and allows them to apply the law with only justice in mind, and not electoral or political concerns.Generally, Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal courts. In some cases, however — such as in the example of a dispute between two or more U.S. states — the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction, an authority that cannot be stripped by Congress.The courts only try actual cases and controversies — a party must show that it has been harmed in order to bring suit in court. This means that the courts do not issue advisory opinions on the constitutionality of laws or the legality of actions if the ruling would have no practical effect. Cases brought before the judiciary typically proceed from district court to appellate court and may even end at the Supreme Court, although the Supreme Court hears comparatively few cases each year.Federal courts enjoy the sole power to interpret the law, determine the constitutionality of the law, and apply it to individual cases. The courts, like Congress, can compel the production of evidence and testimony through the use of a subpoena. The inferior courts are constrained by the decisions of the Supreme Court — once the Supreme Court interprets a law, inferior courts must apply the Supreme Court’s interpretation to the facts of a particular case.
What is another term for alcohol dependence?
Answer:
It can be alcohol abuse or alcoholism.
In the context of the four foundations on which laws are based around the world, civil or code law:
A. comes from the Marxist socialist system.
B. is derived from Roman law.
C. is the foundation of the legal system in the United States.
D. continues to influence regulations in former communist countries.
The context of the four foundations on which laws are based around the world, civil or code law is derived from Roman law. Therefore the correct option is option B.
A legal system based on written legal codes and derived from the Roman law is known as civil or code law. It is one of the most important legal systems in the world.
The use of written legal rules that are arranged into comprehensive legal systems characterizes civil law regimes.
The American legal system, which is founded on common law, is not also based on the civil law.
Therefore the correct option is option B.
For such more question on law
https://brainly.com/question/9722764
#SPJ11
what two practices are legal, but sometimes viewed as anticompetitive and possibly in violation of the clayton act?
Two practices that are legal but are sometimes viewed as anticompetitive and possibly in violation of the Clayton Act are Price discrimination and Tying arrangements.
Price discrimination: This refers to the practice of selling the same product or service to different customers at different prices. While price discrimination is not illegal in and of itself, it can be viewed as anticompetitive if it is used to give certain customers an unfair advantage over others.
For example, if a company were to offer a lower price to a large customer that has significant bargaining power, this could be seen as anticompetitive behavior that harms smaller competitors.
Tying arrangements: This refers to the practice of requiring customers to purchase one product or service in order to obtain another. Tying arrangements are legal if they are based on legitimate business reasons, such as ensuring compatibility between products.
However, if tying arrangements are used to force customers to purchase products they do not want or to limit competition, they may be viewed as anticompetitive and in violation of the Clayton Act.
Both of these practices are considered to be potentially anticompetitive because they can limit competition and harm smaller competitors. However, whether they are in violation of the Clayton Act depends on the specific circumstances surrounding the practice, such as the market share of the company engaging in the practice and the effect of the practice on competition in the relevant market.
To know more about Clayton Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/28075969
#SPJ4
The sponsor should obtain from the investigator/institution a statement obtained from the irb/iec that it is organized and operates according to ______ and the applicable laws and regulations.
The sponsor should obtain from the investigator/institution a statement obtained from the IRB/IEC that it is organized and operates according to the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the applicable laws and regulations.
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) is a body that is formally designated to ensure the protection of human subjects' rights and welfare in clinical trials. It is the IRB/IEC's responsibility to review, approve, and supervise a clinical trial protocol and conduct to ensure that it is scientifically sound and ethically acceptable.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is an international ethical and scientific quality standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials involving human subjects. It is a standard for ensuring that clinical trials are conducted in compliance with the applicable laws, regulations, and ethical standards.
Learn more about Investigator
https://brainly.com/question/29572545
#SPJ11
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
When entering the interstate on a short entrance ramp where there is no acceleration lane, you should:
- Immediately enter the far-right traffic lane on the interstate and speed up to match the flow of traffic.
- Use the shoulder of the main road to get up to the speed of traffic.
- Speed up and enter the interstate only after you have identified a gap in traffic.
When entering the interstate on a short entrance ramp where there is no acceleration lane, you should speed up and enter the interstate only after you have identified a gap in traffic.
It's crucial to be cautious and properly integrate with the flow of traffic while using a short entry ramp without an acceleration lane to reach the interstate. Once you have located a break in the traffic that is wide enough for you to merge safely, you should accelerate, and only then should you join the highway.
An accident risk might be increased if you attempt to speed up to keep up with the flow of traffic as soon as you join the highway. Similarly, it is typically not safe to accelerate on the main road's shoulder because doing so might endanger other drivers and pedestrians.
Learn more about interstate entrance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167643
#SPJ6
What is a contract that has been concluded as a result of undue influence
Explanation:
A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
The authority granted to a licensed producer is provided via the? A. producer's apparent authority. B. written contract. C. Law of Agency D. Principal Capacity.
Answer:
C. Law of Agency
Explanation:
The law of agency is an area of commercial law dealing with a set of contractual, quasi-contractual and non-contractual fiduciary relationships that involve a person, called the agent, that is authorized to act on behalf of another to create legal relations with a third party
The authority granted to a licensed producer is provided via the C. Law of Agency
What is the law of agency ?The Law of Agency is a legal principle that allows one person (the principal) to appoint another person (the agent) to act on their behalf.
The agent has the authority to do things on behalf of the principal, such as making contracts, signing documents, and taking other actions that are necessary to carry out the principal's wishes.
In the case of a licensed producer, the principal is the state or government agency that issued the license. The agent is the producer, who is authorized to produce and sell cannabis products.
Find out more on the law of agency at https://brainly.com/question/30999823
#SPJ2
Sometimes people are angry for ____ reasons
Sometimes people are angry for various reasons.
People can be angry for a multitude of reasons, such as feeling frustrated, experiencing a perceived injustice, or facing obstacles to their desires or goals. Anger can arise from personal, interpersonal, or societal factors, and it serves as an emotional response to express dissatisfaction or assert boundaries.
To learn more about anger, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3545347?referrer=searchResults
~~~Harsha~~~
Hallar todas las θ entre 0 0
y 360 0
para la función circular que es igual al valor indicado. secθ=−2 a. −2π/3,4π/3 b. 2π/3,π/6 c. 3
2π
, 3
4π
d. 3
π
, 3
La función secθ=-2 no tiene soluciones en el intervalo de 0 a 360 grados.
Learn more about función here:
brainly.com/question/24122774
#SPJ11
Which of the following is true of quid pro quo harassment?
A. It involves mocking an individual's sexual orientation.
B. It refers to an individual gaining benefit in return for a sexual favor.
C. It involves making hiring decisions based on the gender of the applicant.
D. It involves harassment against people based exclusively on the factor of age.
E. It involves dating in the workplace.
Quid pro quo harassment is a type of sexual harassment that involves an individual receiving a benefit or avoiding a negative consequence in exchange for a sexual favor.
This type of harassment occurs when someone in a position of power, such as a supervisor, requests sexual favors from an employee or applicant in return for a job benefit, such as a promotion or a raise. This type of behavior is considered illegal and a violation of workplace policies and laws. Quid pro quo harassment creates a hostile work environment and can have severe psychological and emotional consequences for the victim. It is important for employers to have clear policies and procedures in place to prevent and address this type of harassment, and to provide training for all employees to understand what is considered inappropriate behavior in the workplace.
Learn more about harassment here:
https://brainly.com/question/30473616
#SPJ11