critics of compatibilist freedom, like rowe, say that merely being able to act according to your desires without constraints is not real freedom if

Answer:

The 5th amendment

Explanation:

The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process

Answer:

5th Amendment!

Answer:

answer of this question is Fifth

Explanation:

May this answer is helpful for you

Answer:

Explanation:

state to state, but some basic requirements are:

o u.s. citizenship and valid state driver's license

olive within city limits

excellent health and reach the age of 20

o an associate's degree and u.s. citizenship

When driving in rain, there are several precautions you should take to ensure your safety and the safety of others on the road. Here are some tips:

Slow down: Wet roads can be slick and reduce your vehicle's traction. Reduce your speed and increase your following distance to allow for more time to stop.

Use headlights: Turn on your headlights, even if it's only raining lightly. This will help other drivers see you and improve your visibility.

Avoid sudden movements: Sudden braking, accelerating, or turning can cause your vehicle to lose traction and skid. Make gradual movements to reduce the risk of a skid.

Keep a firm grip on the steering wheel: Wet roads can cause your vehicle to hydroplane, which occurs when a layer of water comes between your tires and the road surface, reducing traction. If this happens, take your foot off the accelerator, do not brake suddenly, and steer in the direction you want to go.

Check your tires: Make sure your tires have adequate tread depth and are properly inflated. This will improve your vehicle's traction on wet roads.

Avoid using cruise control: Cruise control can cause your vehicle to accelerate or decelerate suddenly if it hydroplanes, which can lead to a loss of control.

Be aware of other drivers: Watch out for other drivers who may not be taking the same precautions as you. Stay alert and keep a safe distance from other vehicles.

Remember, driving in the rain requires extra caution and attention. By following these tips, you can reduce the risk of accidents and arrive at your destination safely.

Answer: turn on your lights and drive slow

Explanation:

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

Answer:

The answer is "The author greatly dislikes Bell for taking credit for the invention of the telephone".

Explanation:

Bell decided to create a Rome statute and to test the auditory stimuli if radio waves can turn into symbols. It was assumed, that perhaps the system might enable those deaf to "see" the meaning of a word sound. He is well known to have invented telephone contact, as we know it, revolutionized, that's why the first choice is correct.

Answer:

A

Explanation

Answer:

Good traditional Filipino values

Enumeration of Filipino values

Family orientation.

Joy and humor.

Flexibility, adaptability, and creativity.

Religious adherence.

Ability to survive.

Hard work and industriousness.

Hospitality.

Explanation: Hope that this helps!!

Answer:

if they need an altered diet for religious reasons it shall be granted. religious freedom still applies in prison. alternative meals for christians and muslims are granted, so id assume the same thing applies.

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

Answer:

See below, please.

Explanation:

The contract between Sam and Tony for the cleaning and maintenance of the Uptown office building is likely voidable. If Sam is mentally incompetent, he may lack the legal capacity to enter into a contract. However, the fact that he has not been adjudged by a court to be incompetent means that his mental state has not been officially recognized as a legal disability.

In this situation, the contract may be voidable at the option of Sam or his legal representative. This means that Sam or his legal representative can choose to either enforce or rescind the contract. If they choose to rescind the contract, they may be able to recover any consideration (such as money or services) that has been exchanged. It is important to note that the specific laws and regulations regarding mental incapacity and contract law can vary by jurisdiction. Therefore, it is recommended to seek legal advice to fully understand the legal implications of this situation.

Answer:

He's representing the United States.

Explanation:

When the President greets and welcomes the Pope to America, not only is he representing the American people, but he's also representing the United States as a whole. He is seen as Representing the United States.

Answer:

Here's a sample answer:)

No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the  legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.

Answer:

Always control your emotions while on the witness stand

Explanation:

Judges are very smart and with your actions while on the witness stand tell them what you mean. so your explanation should. be of reasonable doubt.

Answer: B legislation

first you have to know what public relations are it is the practice of managing and disseminating information from an individual or an organization (such as a business, government agency, or a nonprofit organization)

off the bat people and writing can't be public relations, so C and D dont work legislation is a maybe this is because legislation works around helping a lot of people, advertising wouldn't work because in advertising you only speak through and communicate through the add so i would pick B as the answer

National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)- 1935 specifies the free speech clause which specified that management has the right to express its opinions about unions as long as it doesn't threaten or promise favors to obtain anti-union actions. Labor-Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley)- 1947 prohibits unfair labor practices by unions, such as coercing or preventing workers from exercising their freedom to join or not join a union or take part in union activities.

What was the purpose of the Taft-Hartley Act?

The Taft-Hartley Act also referred to as the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, is a federal legislation in the United States that limits the actions and authority of labor unions. when a business stops running before or during a labor conflict. The Taft-Hartley Act was primarily intended to safeguard workers from abusive employers.

National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)- 1935 specifies the free speech clause which specified that management has the right to express its opinions about unions as long as it doesn't threaten or promise favors to obtain anti-union actions. Labor-Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley)- 1947 prohibits unfair labor practices by unions, such as coercing or preventing workers from exercising their freedom to join or not join a union or take part in union activities.

To find out more about the Taft-Hartley Act, check out:

https://brainly.com/question/10748899

#SPJ4

Answer:

Batterer Intervention Programs Abuse can also result in victims who were not previously considered low-income falling into poverty: violence often undermines victims' ability to work, have a place to live, and do what is necessary to pursue a more stable life for themselves and their children.

Explanation:

sorry if this does not answer you question T-T

Answer:

Timothy may be required to compensate the Plaintiff.

This is because a civil litigation usually involves some type of compensation for injuries or damages as well as disposition of property and other disputes.

However, if a guilty defendant is punished by incarceration and/or fines, or in exceptional cases, the death penalty.

Answer:

Here is the short story:

The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.

Explanation:

The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off.  The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.

Answer:

Imma go with D. Not sure with B, but since A and B are it makes since its D.

Explanation:

Answer: Articulate his or her concerns

Explanation:

If the concerns are founded in bias, you can take action to remove or overcome the bias or repudiate any support for it. On the other hand, the sellers' concern may be the product of considerations or impressions which you or your sponsoring broker can either clear up or explain in non-discriminatory terms.

Most countries use a civil law system, as opposed to the common law system used in the United States.

The civil law system is the most widely used legal system in the world, adopted by many countries across Europe, Latin America, and parts of Asia and Africa.

While both civil law and common law systems aim to administer justice, they differ in their approach to legal reasoning, sources of law, and the role of judicial precedents in decision-making.

For more questions on civil law

https://brainly.com/question/14529086

#SPJ8

Answer:

Answer in the attachment.

Answer: declaring war on an enemy nation

Explanation:

Answer:

to have a law declared unconstitutional

Explanation:

Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.

Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.

Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her  and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.

Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Read more about Jane Roe case

brainly.com/question/10184794

Answer & Explanation:

The income from other sources can be computed as follows:

Income from other sources = (a) + (b) + (c) + (d) + (e) + (f)

Income from other sources = ₹30,000 + ₹1,00,000 + ₹2,40,000 + ₹80,000 + ₹28,000 + ₹1,00,000

Income from other sources = ₹5,78,000

I'm not sure what you're asking, note this is the law topic.

Answer:

FALSE

Explanation:

Hazards are supposed to be precint on both sides of the vehicle ,

always treat a car as if your on a packed street even on main road.

The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.

Read more about court case here;

https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1

Dr. Gandhi's best defense is the defense of mistake. He can argue that he did not intend to embezzle the money, but made a mistake in using the hospital check for his association.

The defense of mistake is a legal defense that can be used in criminal cases where the defendant argues that they did not intend to commit the crime they are being accused of. This defense asserts that the defendant acted under a genuine belief that their actions were lawful, and therefore did not have the criminal intent necessary for a conviction.

This defense can be used in a variety of circumstances, such as when a person makes an error in judgment or misinterprets the law. For example, if a person accidentally writes a check from a company account instead of their personal account, they might be able to use the defense of mistake. The success of this defense will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the strength of the evidence presented.

Learn more about defense of mistake here: https://brainly.com/question/28172750

#SPJ1

The process of empowerment and delegation in criminal justice organizations will be from top to bottom or we can say it is from superior to subordinate.

Thus, by delegating power, authority, and responsibility one can easily empower the criminal justice organizations as one superior is not burdened with all the work instead it is distributed and transferred to every subordinate.

To know more about delegation refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27823193

#SPJ10

Answer:

El derecho a la vida se exige constantemente, a través del propio ejercicio de este derecho. A su vez, el ejercicio del derecho a la vida como derecho natural inherente a todo ser humano se da a través del ejercicio de los otros dos derechos naturales fundamentales: la libertad y la búsqueda de la felicidad. Así, el derecho a la vida se exige viviendo plenamente, en libertad y buscando constantemente la felicidad propia y de nuestros seres queridos.

A su vez, el derecho a la vida también se exige incluyendo el respeto por este derecho en leyes fundamentales como constituciones nacionales y tratados de derechos humanos, que reconozcan este derecho como esencial a la condición humana.

The dominant strategy outcome for Brian and Jocelyn would be to confess. This is because if one confesses, and the other stays silent, the one who confesses gets a lower sentence (5 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years). Additionally, if both confess, they both get a lower sentence (12 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years) or if one stayed silent and the other confessed (15 years). Therefore, confessing is the most beneficial strategy for both suspects.

Confession in law refers to a statement made by an individual admitting to committing a crime or offence. Confessions can be made voluntarily or obtained through coercion, and their admissibility in court depends on various factors, including the circumstances under which they were obtained and the reliability of the statement. Confessions are often considered to be strong evidence in criminal cases, but the use of coerced confessions is prohibited under the law. Additionally, the admissibility of confessions may be challenged by the defence if there is evidence of coercion, duress, or other factors that may undermine their credibility. Ultimately, the use of confessions in legal proceedings is complex and subject to various legal standards and procedures.

Learn more about Confession: https://brainly.com/question/31088899.

#SPJ11