Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
Paralegal Sam carelessly performs legal research by failing to update a court’s decision to find out if the state court of appeals or state supreme court reversed the decision that he found. This is an example of a breach of which ethical rules?
Answer: Competence and Diligence
Explanation:
Competence: It’s expected of a lawyer to provide competent representation to a client.
Diligence: It’s required of a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness when representing a client.
What Competence represents here is having the required legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation required to represent a client. And diligence is carrying out a proper and detailed research while representing the client.
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
brainliest...... plz answer for points
Answer:
what is the question insert photo or type
Answer:
thanks
Explanation:
"provide comparative analysis between the deregulation introduced by
the reagan and clinton administrations."
During the Reagan administration, there was a significant change in the regulatory climate of the United States. The Reagan administration saw deregulation as a way to reduce government spending, create economic growth, and eliminate red tape.
The Reagan administration's deregulatory efforts aimed to reduce the government's regulatory role, reduce costs, and increase efficiency. Deregulation was intended to increase competition and innovation while reducing prices. The Reagan administration deregulated the banking, airlines, and transportation industries. Airlines were allowed to set their prices, leading to more competition and lower prices.
The banking industry was deregulated, leading to the creation of new financial products and services. The transportation industry was also deregulated, leading to more competition and innovation. The Clinton administration followed in Reagan's footsteps and also implemented deregulation. The Clinton administration deregulated the telecommunications industry, leading to the creation of new technologies and services. The Clinton administration also deregulated the financial industry, leading to an increase in competition and the creation of new financial products.
In conclusion, both the Reagan and Clinton administrations implemented deregulation to reduce government spending, increase competition, and stimulate innovation. Deregulation led to the creation of new products, services, and industries and lower prices. Overall, deregulation has played an important role in the growth of the American economy, with positive and negative consequences. It was a significant change in the regulatory climate, with its effects still felt today. This response is around 200 words.
To know more about economic growth visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29621837
#SPJ11
Question
What are the two major political parties in the
U.S.?
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
under our criminal laws that exist today, white-collar crime is not punishable by imprisonment.
true or false
False. Under current criminal laws, white-collar crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, and insider trading are punishable by imprisonment.
In fact, the penalties for these types of crimes can be quite severe, with some offenses carrying sentences of more than 20 years in prison. However, the punishment for white-collar crime is not always as straightforward as it is for other types of criminal offenses. For example, fines, community service, and probation may also be imposed in addition to imprisonment.
Additionally, the level of punishment for white-collar crimes may depend on the severity of the offense and the amount of money or property involved. Overall, while white-collar crime may not always be punished with imprisonment alone, it is certainly considered a serious criminal offense under current laws.
Learn more about crimes here:
brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ11
15 A search warrant can force someone to have surgery to retrieve a bullet as long as probable cause exists. QA True B. False Reset Next
The answer to the question which asks if a search warrant can force someone to have surgery to retrieve a bullet as long as probable cause exists is:
No, it cannot.What is a Search Warrant?This refers to the judicial order which allows law enforcement officials to enter a property and execute a search based on reasonable or probable cause.
With this in mind, we can see that a search warrant does not have to do with the removal of a foreign object from the body of a person as this is completely illogical and can endanger the live of the person.
Read more about search warrant here:
https://brainly.com/question/3228820
Answer:
false
Explanation:
I took the quiz
In recent decades, new justices have most commonly been
appointed from…
a. Lower federal courts
b. State supreme courts
c. Executive agencies
d. Academia
In recent decades, new justices have most commonly been appointed from: a. Lower federal courts.
This statement is correct. Over the past few decades, it has been more common for new justices to be appointed from lower federal courts. Many Supreme Court justices have previously served as judges in federal circuit courts or district courts before being nominated to the Supreme Court.
This pattern allows presidents to evaluate their judicial records and experience before considering them for the highest court in the land. However, it is important to note that justices have also been appointed from other backgrounds, including state supreme courts, executive agencies, and academia, but the trend of selecting justices from lower federal courts has been more prevalent in recent years.
To know more about federal court:
https://brainly.com/question/32812355
#SPJ4
Do you think problem-solving courts are beneficial? Why or why not?
The problem-solving courts are beneficial or not may depend on numerous factors, like any kind of the specific needs of the community, the availability of any resources, and also the effectiveness of the court's programs and its interventions.
What are problem-solving courts?Problem solving courts are referred to as specialized courts that specifically aim to address all the underlying issues which usually contribute to any type of criminal behavior. These types of courts often offer treatment, counselling, and various other support services to help the defendants overcome challenges like addiction, mental illness, and homelessness.
Advocates practicing in these types of problem-solving courts usually argue that they can help in reducing recidivism rates, save money on incarceration costs, and also went on to provide more effective and compassionate justice.
Various researches has shown that problem-solving courts can be a very effective tool in reducing recidivism rates for certain type of populations, including drug offenders, veterans, and people with mental illness.
Apart from this, critics of these problem-solving courts often argue that these courts may be too lenient on offenders and that they also kind of divert resources away from traditional criminal justice approaches.
To know more about court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30039981
Yes, problem-solving courts are beneficial because it helps in the rehabilitation of selected defendants.
What is the problem-solving courts?The problem-solving courts can be described as the court that helps in the supervision of the treatment as well as the rehabilitation of the defendants .
It should be noted that the court do help in the process of helping people especially in the behaviour of the people and how tyhey can be reintroduced into the society so that theycab change their behaviour in the sense that the can become a new person and a better person.
Learn more about courts at:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
What does the Constitution reflect of the country's founders?
their vision
their optimism
their future planning
their protective powers
Answer:
their vision
Explanation:
A low risk environment is a condition when
Lightly-traveled, two-lane roads in the city or in rural or suburban areas are generally considered to be Low-Risk Environments. In these areas, the speed limit is usually restricted to 35 mph or less and there are fewer right-of-way conflicts.
Hope this helps :P
Brainliest? ^///^
The american law institute established the law model penal code to unife criminal law across tge 50 states. how many staes have adopted the entire code
As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).
The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.
Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.
The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.
To learn about Model Penal Code visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
Why has the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws?
The Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) has faced severe criticism over its enforcement of campaign laws due to several reasons.
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the perceived lack of effectiveness and efficiency in the TEC's enforcement actions. Critics argue that the TEC has failed to adequately investigate and penalize violations of campaign laws, leading to a sense of impunity among those who may be engaging in questionable campaign practices. The commission has been criticized for being slow in processing complaints and for its limited resources, which may hinder its ability to thoroughly investigate and take appropriate actions.
Another point of criticism is the perception of political influence or bias within the TEC. Some argue that the commission is susceptible to political pressures or that its members may have affiliations or loyalties that compromise their objectivity. This raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the enforcement process, undermining public trust in the TEC's ability to regulate campaign finance and ethics.
Furthermore, there have been criticisms regarding the transparency and accountability of the TEC's actions. Critics claim that the commission's decision-making processes lack transparency, making it difficult for the public to understand the rationale behind its enforcement actions. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the perceived leniency of penalties imposed by the TEC, with critics arguing that they may not serve as sufficient deterrents for potential violators.
The complexity and ambiguity of campaign finance laws in Texas have also contributed to the criticism faced by the TEC. Some argue that the laws themselves are convoluted and open to interpretation, creating challenges for consistent enforcement. The lack of clear guidance and the complexity of reporting requirements can create confusion among candidates, political committees, and donors, leading to unintentional violations that are then subject to TEC scrutiny.
Overall, the severe criticism faced by the Texas Ethics Commission over its enforcement of campaign laws stems from concerns regarding its effectiveness, perceived political influence or bias, transparency, and the complexity of campaign finance laws. Addressing these concerns and ensuring a more robust and fair enforcement process will be essential for rebuilding public trust in the TEC's ability to uphold ethical standards and enforce campaign finance regulations effectively.
Learn more about Texas Ethics Commission here
https://brainly.com/question/14318950
#SPJ11
When studying business law, students should also study ethics in a business context. According to your text, ethics is the study of
1Religious behavior and decisions.
2Financially rewarding behavior and decisions.
3Culturally acceptable behavior and decisions.
4Socially responsible behavior and decisions.
5Good or right behavior and decisions.
Answer: 4. Socially responsible behavior and decisions.
Explanation:
Ethics is the study of the norms and principles of behavior that are acceptable in society. They are usually unspoken and represent what is expected of people even if the law does not explicitly state it.
Ethics are meant to be socially acceptable instead of religious or cultural because society today has people of various religious and cultures so a general approach is needed. Culture and religion do however play a major part in ethics.
When may a minor legally purchase
alcohol?
They are assisting a police officer in the
enforcement of the alcoholic beverage code.
They are in the visible presence of their legal
friends.
They are assisting an adult.
They are diners in a restaurant.
Save
Answer: 21.
Explanation:
The legal age for that is 21, the act being passed 1984.
Answer:
They are assisting a police officer. A minor may only legally purhase alcohol under certain standings, most likely with a court order or will a law enforcement officer.
Explanation:
Stop bullying! Stop The HATE! ITS NOT NICE! The Girl you just called fat? She has been starving herself & has lost over 30lbs. The Boy you just called st.pid? He has a learning disability & studies over 4hrs a night. The Girl you just called ugly? She spends hours putting makeup on hoping people will like her. The Boy you just tripped? He is abused enough at home. There's a lot more to people than you think. Put this as your status if you're against bullying! STOP THE HATE EVERYONE!!!
Answer:
Ur right
Explanation:
We should never bully anyone
Answer:
That's sweet but learn to put a TW lol
Explanation:
mary lee luskin, who is diverted? case selection for court-monitored mental health treatment, 23 l.
Professor Luskin is a social analyst whose research and teaching interests revolve around trial courts as institutions that influence the distribution of value in society, as well as discretionary decision-making in court-related settings.
She has been interested in how the community context affects the work of limited jurisdiction courts, as well as the potential of such courts as accessible, economical, and responsive local institutions of justice.
Her most recent research focuses on the reactions of courts and criminal justice agencies to mentally ill defendants and offenders, as well as the responses of mentally ill defendants to their experiences in the criminal justice system, including participation in an inter outcome study of mental health courts.
To know more about mental health treatment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29583810
#SPJ4
making decisions based on standards learned from parents or society’s laws is consistent with which level of moral reasoning?
The conventional level of moral reasoning is consistent with making decisions based on societal standards and learned from parents.
Making decisions based on moral principles acquired from parents or social norms is consistent with the common moral reasoning level. At this point, people uphold societal norms and laws in an effort to preserve social harmony and order. They consider the demands and viewpoints of their family, friends, and community and place a high value on conformity and approval from others.
The desire to be perceived as a good or "law-abiding" person influences moral judgments and the emphasis is placed on performing obligations, showing respect for authority, and abiding by accepted norms.
However, the conventional level of moral reasoning is constrained because it disregards individual rights and justice as well as critically questions societal norms. Although higher stages of moral development offer more sophisticated and nuanced moral reasoning, this stage is still significant.
Learn more about moral reasoning at:
brainly.com/question/30437162
#SPJ4
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
Match the words with the descriptions. European minority ethnic group living in Europe located in Italy continent on which Europe is located located in the Western subregion of Europe location of first European civilization island located on the Iberian Peninsula location of the majority of the European population
Romanians are a European minority ethnic group.
An ethnic group, also known as an ethnicity, is a group of people that identify with one another based on features that distinguish them from other groups. Shared customs, ancestry, ethnicity, language, history, society, nation, religion, or the way individuals are treated in their local community are examples of these qualities.
Ethnicity can be viewed as a socially imposed or hereditary concept. A person's shared cultural heritage, ancestry, origin myth, history, nation, language, or dialect, symbolic systems such as religion, mythology, and ritual, food, clothing style, art, or physical appearance are often used to determine ethnic membership.
To know more about Ethnic group here-
https://brainly.com/question/29775634
#SPJ4
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
Which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? Group of answer choices Compensatory damages Liquidation damages Punitive damages Incidental damages Exemplary damages
The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.
Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.
In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.
Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11
As an early childhood education caregiver, what would be a challenge of working with a helicopter parent
Answer:
As a caregiver you can't always do that because you are busy with other children but you can tell the parent that you can give them a review at the end of the day when they will pick up their child.
hope this helps!
On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
you buy several large firecrackers and take
them home. A police officer notices them in
your car on a routine traffic stop. She cites you
for possession of an illegal explosive device,
which is a felony in your state. Possession of
fireworks in the neighboring state is not a
crime. Can this be a defense for you?
Answer:
no it can't be
Explanation:
because in your state they're illegal and by you trying to take them home from a state that they are legal in makes it illegal
This cannot be a defense because you, as a citizen of your state, are required to know what is legal or illegal. And carrying the fireworks even if they've been bought from other states, does not make it legal to be used in another state. What is illegal stays illegal, irrespective of where the items were procured.
State laws may differ from one state to another. So, what one finds or accepts legal may not be the same for another, which is why it is necessary to know and understand the law of a state.
In the given scenario, firecrackers are deemed illegal in one state whereas the same does not apply in the neighboring state. By procuring firecrackers from the legal state, the buyer, in this case, myself, has the right to use the firecrackers whenever and wherever I want in that state. But as the devices are illegal in my home state, I am not legally permitted to bring them home, even though I bought them from another state. The rule of the law does not carry over to another state. This means that just because I got the firecrackers from a state that legalizes it does not mean I can bring them home in my state where it is illegal.So, bringing them or trying to bring them home is still illegal according to my state laws. Thus, there is and can be no defense for me.
Learn more about difference in state laws here:
brainly.com/question/4672838
A structure for managing a department or unit is called what?
It starts with an O and it’s 3 words.
( I’m in public safety )
For police officers, there are three main types of patrol strategies:directed patrol, active patrol, and random patrol.
When they are on active patrol, patrol officers should take advantage of every opportunity to find, detect, observe, and prevent the unusual event.
What are the two types of police service theories?
The Durkheim and Weberian approaches are two distinct viewpoints on the police.Every one of these viewpoints centers around an alternate center component of the police:the police's moral-symbolic role and the capability to use force.
What are the responsibilities of the local law enforcement agencies?
Nearby Police incorporates metropolitan, area, ancestral, and territorial police that get authority from the neighborhood overseeing body that made it.The primary objective is to provide patrol services, investigate local crimes, and uphold the jurisdiction's laws.
Learn more about police here:
https://brainly.com/question/26085524
#SPJ13
Question 1:
Alcohol is a drug that works as a _____ affects your thinking abilities.
Answer:
Depressant.
Explanation:
Alcoholism is a disease in which the body becomes dependent on ethanol. It is characterized by a constant desire to consume alcohol. There is no control over the amount of alcohol consumed, leading to multi-day drinking processes. If, for some reason, alcohol consumption is stopped (money runs out, health deteriorates), withdrawal symptoms develop - from sweating to alcohol psychosis, for example. In more severe cases, alcoholic psychosis can be fatal. There is a clear link between oxidative damage and inflammation and alcohol-related diseases such as brain dysfunction, musculoskeletal disorders, lung changes, increased severity of infections, malnutrition and cardiovascular disease or cancer.
In a criminal trial, the 5th Amendment requires the accused person to testify.
True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
I have the answer now .
yayyyyyy congrates, good job hope you have a great day
During job interviews, potential employers often ask candidates to describe a time where they have demonstrated their initiative and/or results-driven skills. This week, you’ll have a chance to practice.
Answer:
The definition is defined throughout the clarification subsection below and according to the condition given.
Explanation:
Throughout my college, there may have been a dilemma that the students had to tackle, which would have been our university canteen behind every college. A dustbin all over the inside of the cafeteria was used by the learners who ate throughout the college canteen to take possession of the garbage. Yet I noticed that certain students took some more of the nutrition that would have been taken away common parking area and began eating elsewhere.The participants sometimes used to knock through one corner when there is not a particular dustbin available throughout the parking structure, that further can't produce a pleasant scene mostly on the university campus. They sometimes used completely disregard something and carry on, although most of the participants continued to see something like this. I considered this quite troubling after I saw something and took the chance to tackle this issue and contact the accountable heading off the college.