The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.
Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States?
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Yelling fire in a theatre when there is no fire presents which of the following?
A.
Warning
B.
Dilemma
Clear and present danger
OD. Fighting word
A court has personal jurisdiction over a party in which of the following circumstances? Choose 2 answer choices. When a party brings a case in its court When the party’s property at issue in the case exists within the geographic boundaries of the authority of the court When the party lives within 250 miles of the court When the court has already established that the court has subject matter jurisdiction
Circumstances that would allow a court to have personal jurisdiction over a party are:
When the party’s property at issue in the case exists within the geographic boundaries of the authority of the court .When the court has already established that the court has subject matter jurisdiction.When does a Court have jurisdiction?Courts have jurisdiction over the geographical area in which they are present in. If the party's property of residence is in this area, the court will have jurisdiction.
The court will also have jurisdiction if it has been established that they are the ones who handle such subject matters.
In conclusion, options B and D are correct.
Find out more on Court jurisdiction at https://brainly.com/question/7294844.
equality is about treating people with respect for their inherent indignity freedom and uniqueness true or false
Answer:
Explanation:
This statement is true.
Equality is about treating all individuals with respect and recognizing their inherent dignity, freedom, and uniqueness. It means that everyone should have the same opportunities and be treated fairly, regardless of their background, gender, race, religion, or any other personal characteristic. By treating everyone equally, we acknowledge their worth and value as human beings and create a more just and inclusive society.
*****
1. The emphasis on elections in the United States most reflects which constitutional principle
O A. individual rights
O B. popular sovereignty
0 C. checks and balances
o D. separation of powers
Answer:
I think check and balance
Hey guys just wanted to know if Yall can help me to know something, so I was on a soccer game and a kid pushed me on purpose and posed to fight Me but I trowed a punch and knocked him out, he has a purple mark on the face, what the max thing I can get in trouble, can I go to jail? I'm 17 years old by the way, help me out with you guys knowledge
Answer:
ok don't worry, first i dont think youll go to jail and if you do its probably overnight unless you did something worse, then it'll be longer depending on what you did. But i doubt youll go to jail for one punch, maybe get yelled at but you'll be fine
Explanation:
Explain the law that protects underage individuals seeking information on birth control
What is the proper order of a trial
Opening Statements. Witness Testimony and Cross-Examination. Closing Arguments. Jury Instruction.
based on previous supreme court rulings, the form of speech in the image could be limited if it
The kind of speech in the photograph might be restricted if it takes place at a certain location, time, or in a particular way, according to past Supreme Court decisions.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the top court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution directly calls for. The number of Supreme Court justices is not clearly forth in the Constitution; rather, Congress determines the number. Along with the Chief Justice, the President of India has appointed 30 more judges to the Supreme Court of India. Judges of the Supreme Court begin their retirement at age 65. The supreme court is the highest court in the majority of legal systems. The terms "court of last resort," "apex court," and "high (or ultimate) court of appeal" are also used to refer to these courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/28046758
#SPJ4
You are the city manager and the budget is tight. Your options are either to raise taxes and/or fees, cut programs and services, or raise taxes and cut services. Which do you choose? If you are going to cut services, which services do you cut? Once your decision is made, how do you sell your idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As the city manager and knowing that the budget is tight, I would choose to raise taxes and cut programs. The programs I would choose would be the ones that have less impact in the medium to lower classes. I would establish the priorities of the government that clearly are the creation of jobs and health services. I would sell my idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option in that I would tell them that these are temporary measures while the economic situation could be transformed in 6 to 12 months. The government would save some money stopping unnecessary expenditure, and there will be some financial incentives to entrepreneurs and businessmen that decide to create new business in the city.
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
When a psychologist simply records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a – study. The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable – the other. This is the – problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a – controlling both of the observed variables.
Answer:
The Correct approach will be "correlational, causes, directionality and third variable".
Explanation:
Correlational studies are little more than an investigation that is sometimes used throughout psychology as either a preparatory method for gathering information about a particular topic and within circumstances where it would not be sufficient to execute a research project.The method described in the previous section usually includes investigates the relationships between two or even more independent variables.Because then the answer is indeed the correct one.
The correlational studiesis a research where the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical relationship between them.
When psychologist records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a correlational study.The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable causes the other and this is the directionally problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a third variable controlling both of the observed variables.Read more about correlational study
brainly.com/question/4272060
Is monitoring employee’s online behavior by companies ethical? Should a company fire an employee if they find their information on social media detrimental to its image? ''
Answer:
With privacy laws put into place, it's not ethical for employers to view personal information through emails but is absolutely possible if need be, provided that the employer has a solid policy in place informing employees that no information sent or received on company equipment is private.
I personally don't believe that a company should fire an employee over a social media post UNLESS what they're doing is illegal or dangerous. However, employers can fire employees for anything, including their social media posts.
As a result of having no power to collect taxes under the Articles of Confederation, the confederal government could only raise funds by doing which of the following?
Select one:
A. borrowing money on credit
B. taxing the individual states
C. regulating internal trade
D. raiding Canadian mines
Answer:
borrowing money on credit
Explanation:
The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.
Do you have to pay for therapy in jail? like if you get therapy while your in jail, is it payed by you or the government
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
what is the difference between double jeopardy and habeas corpus?
The Double Jeopardy and Habeas Corpus are two distinct legal concepts that have no relation to each other.
Both habeas corpus and double jeopardy are legal notions having distinct functions in the criminal justice system. An explanation of each follows :Double jeopardy is a legal principle that prevents someone from being prosecuted for the same crime twice after they have previously been either guilty or acquitted. This protection is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United reads Constitution, which reads, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Double jeopardy essentially stops the government from bringing additional cases against the same defendant for the same offence, protecting people from harassment or multiple sentences for the same conduct.
A legal word known as "habeas corpus" translates to.
Learn more about Habeas Corpus here:
https://brainly.com/question/29748417
#SPJ11
Statistics show how twice the number of people are employed in private security than in
public law enforcement in the United States. Discuss why the disparity is likely and what
the implications are for public security.
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
It is expensive to fund more police. Need to fill in gap left by police. Getting into police is relatively difficult. Why are there more private security than Police?As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired. There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to. Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be a. justifiable b. excusable c. criminal d. felonious
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be: excusable. The correct option is B
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident refers to an unintentional killing that occurs due to a lawful act conducted without any intention to harm. It is not considered a criminal act because there is no intent to cause harm or commit a crime. Therefore, it falls under the category of excusable homicide.
Excusable homicide is different from the other options provided:
a. Justifiable homicide refers to a killing that is legally justified, such as in self-defense or to protect others.
c. Criminal homicide is the act of unlawfully causing the death of another person, which can be either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances.
d. Felonious homicide is a category of criminal homicide that involves a death occurring during the commission of a felony, such as a robbery or kidnapping.
In summary, a homicide committed by misadventure or accident is classified as excusable because it involves an unintentional killing without any intention to harm or commit a crime.
To know more about homicide, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30638493#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be
a. justifiable
b. excusable
c. criminal
d. felonious
ANSWER QUICK
How do Amendments 9 and 10 limit the power of the federal government?
Explanation/answer:
9th:
gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power
10th:
Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.
Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.
Which is the committee formed by the US Attorney General in 1981
The US Attorney General formed the ___________________ coordinating committee (LECC) in 1981 to faculae cooperation and coordination across law-enforcement agencies at all levels
Explanation:
The law enforcement coordinating committee
hope it helps please mark as brainliest
is the use of two-way mirrors permitting the observation of restrooms illegal per se under california criminal law?
A crime is committed by anybody who instals or any two-way mirror that allows observation of any lavatory, bathroom, washroom, shower, locker room, fitting room, motel room, or hotel room after April 1, 1970
This section does not apply to state or local public penal, correctional, custodial, or medical facilities that are used by, or for the treatment of, individuals who are committed or voluntarily confined to such facilities, or who voluntarily receive treatment there; or private custodial or medical facilities that are used by, or for the treatment of, individuals who are committed or voluntarily confined to such facilities, or who voluntarily receive treatment there. A building used by a state or local law enforcement agency, a public or private educational institution, or any of the aforementioned locations.
lean more about california here:
https://brainly.com/question/13238995
#SPJ4
what is the most best law in the world
Answer:
The Russian one :))
[it's my opinion only]
Does the Constitution do an adequate job correcting the issues of the Articles of Confederation? Why or why not?
90 second response
Answer:
YESS
Explanation:
The Constitution addresses the main problems facing the Articles of Confederation. (weak national gov.)
For example, the government had no power to tax, this meant they could only raise funds if the states willingly donated money. The national government could not fund military forces which lead to the inability to suppress Shay's rebellion.
Shay's rebellion was a protest attack held by a group of poor farmers.
Depending on the circumstances, a loaded gun can be submitted into evidence.
Answer:
The decision to submit a loaded gun into evidence depends on the specific circumstances and the relevant laws and regulations governing evidence handling and preservation in a particular jurisdiction. Generally, the handling of firearms as evidence follows strict protocols to ensure safety and prevent accidents or harm.
In some cases, a loaded gun may be submitted into evidence if it is necessary to preserve its state or to establish its functionality. For example, in a criminal investigation involving a shooting incident, it may be crucial to preserve the gun in the exact condition it was found, including being loaded, to accurately determine its role in the event.
However, it's important to note that proper safety precautions and protocols must be followed when handling loaded firearms as evidence. This typically involves working with trained professionals, such as forensic experts or law enforcement officers, who are knowledgeable in firearm handling and safety procedures. Special care must be taken to ensure that the firearm remains secure and that the necessary precautions are in place to prevent accidental discharge.
Ultimately, the decision to submit a loaded gun into evidence is subject to the judgment of law enforcement agencies, forensic experts, and the legal system, considering the specific circumstances, applicable laws, and safety considerations.
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Drug Users will have ____ psychological changes
A. Mild
B. Significant
C.no
Answer:
significant
Explanation:
Answer:
Drug users will have Significant psychological changes
Explanation:
The reason for this is that certain drugs can harm the brain devouring important elements of control
Question 1
__ is important to law enforcement, because police officers have the right to deprive people of their liberty.
A unethical behavior
B Ethical behavior
Misuse of force
D) Use of force
2. Should a person have a right to privacy in his/her personal identifying information and transaction history a business obtains from electronic payment systems? Should a person be able to restrict any or all sharing of his/her personal identifying information and transaction history with any third-party entities, including the government and business partners?
Debate exists on whether individuals should have privacy rights over personal data obtained by businesses from electronic payment systems.
There is ongoing discussion about whether people should have a right to privacy regarding their personal identifying information and transaction history that businesses obtain from electronic payment systems. Advocates for privacy contend that people should have control over their data and be able to limit how it is shared with outside parties such as the government and commercial partners.
They think that the right to privacy safeguards against the potential misuse and exploitation of personal data. Opponents of data sharing on the other hand, assert that specific exclusions and restrictions are required for factors like national security and fraud prevention.
A complex issue that necessitates careful consideration of legal, ethical and societal ramifications is how to strike a balance between privacy rights and legitimate business and governmental interests. Laws governing privacy may be applied differently in different jurisdictions.
To know more about electronic payment systems here
brainly.com/question/32588199
#SPJ4
There is a murder of the civil rights leader, who did not advocate violence. You know that there will be many riots, and many innocent people, including children and elderly, will be killed, if the murderer is not found today.
A homeless person wanders into town that day. He has no family, no friends, no job, and no connections. You know that if the homeless man is framed for the crime, and he is immediately tried and executed, you can subvert the riots, and guarantee peace in the town. . If you don't, then you know that there will be riots, and many innocent people will die. These are your only two options, and you must act today.
what would you advise that the sheriff do, and why? Is your decision consistent with the Categorical Imperative, or with Utilitarianism? Develop your answer as a defense of your choice, but also as a defense of one or the other of these moral theories.
Answer: You should frame the homeless man, It may not be pretty and it may result in the death of one, but the deaths of many will have been avoided. Its mainly a greater good type of thing.
To show breach of duty, a plaintiff may rely on evidence of any of the following except:A. Res ipsa loquiturB. Violation of a statuteC. A "Good Samaritan" lawD. Custom or usage
To show breach of duty, a plaintiff may rely on evidence of any but not a "Good Samaritan" law.
Hence, the correct option is C.
A "Good Samaritan" law has nothing to do with breach of duty, it is a statute that exempts licensed doctors and nurses, who can voluntarily render emergency treatments, due to liability of ordinary negligence in an emergency or clash. In order to prove the breach of duty it must be show facts of case, and (based on these facts) that the defendant acted unreasonably. Proof of what happened may be established by either direct or circumstantial evidence. A Good Samaritan law is a legal protection provided to those who helped the victim of any accident from legal interventions.
To know more about "Good Samaritan" visit-
brainly.com/question/21908960
#SPJ4