Answers
The current President also has the authority to annul an Executive Order that was signed by his or her predecessor. Additionally, Congress has the authority to revoke an Executive Order by enacting legislation that nullifies it.
Through executive orders, the US president can control how the federal government is run. The constitutional or legal justification for presidential orders is provided in a number of sources. The president has considerable discretion in selecting how to carry out law enforcement or manage the resources and staff of the executive branch, according to Article Two of the U.S. The president's authority to issue such directives is also supported by explicit or implicit Acts of Congress that grant the president a great deal of discretion. Before the president signs an executive order, government agencies typically make recommendations.
Learn more about Executive Order from
brainly.com/question/496263
#SPJ4
The current President also has the authority to annul an Executive Order that was signed by his or her predecessor. Additionally, Congress has the authority to revoke an Executive Order by enacting legislation that nullifies it.
Through executive orders, the US president can control how the federal government is run. The constitutional or legal justification for presidential orders is provided in a number of sources. The president has considerable discretion in selecting how to carry out law enforcement or manage the resources and staff of the executive branch, according to Article Two of the U.S. The president's authority to issue such directives is also supported by explicit or implicit Acts of Congress that grant the president a great deal of discretion. Before the president signs an executive order, government agencies typically make recommendations.
Learn more about Executive Order from
brainly.com/question/496263
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
I NEED HELP ASAP LIKE RIGHT NOW I BE THANKFUL ENOUGH but this is basically a psychology question
Answers
Answer:
Both answers to me look like the first option!
Explanation:
Anytime a juror sees any type of literature before a trial about the accused, it will definitely effect how they feel about the accused no matter what the person does to not let it influence their opinion.
The second question will give a consultant the ability to tell the attorneys what type of people to try and get on their jury. For instance, in the OJ Simpson trial, the jury consultant for the defense instructed the defense to pick as many African-American women as possible, as their surveys showed that they were the most sympathetic to Mr. Simpson.
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answers
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
1. Identify five similarities that you see between the rights contained in the UN document
and the fundamental rights of United States citizens from the US Bill of Rights discussed in
Lesson 3.
2. Identify five rights from the UN articles that you would like to add to a list of guarantees
under the US Constitution.
3. Are any rights that you believe should be included but that are missing from either the US
Bill of Rights or the UN Declaration of Human Rights? Give at least two to three rights.
Answers
1. The most obvious similarity between the two documents is their intended purpose. Both of these Bills of Rights are expressly designed to amend the constitution of each nation and act as a living document to spell out various legal matters, particularly rights and liberties.
2. The UN upholds the same 5 basic rights such as: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government.
3. Democracy, based on the rule of law, is ultimately a means to achieve international peace and security, economic and social progress and development, and respect for human rights – the three pillars of the United Nations mission as set forth in the UN Charter. At the 2005 World Summit, all the world’s governments reaffirmed “that democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives” and stressed “that democracy, development, and respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing”. Democratic principles are woven throughout the normative fabric of the United Nations. The 2009 Guidance Note on Democracy of the Secretary-General sets out the United Nations framework for democracy based on universal principles, norms and standards and commits the Organization to principled, coherent, and consistent action in support of democracy.
The correct set of striking similarities between the rights of the UN document and the fundamental rights of the citizens of the US are that under Freedom, Petition, Amendment of the constitution.
These three similarities are found in not only the rights of the UN and the US but in most of the countries' following the way of constitutional governance.
Fundamental Rights The fundamental rights of the articles include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to press, right to information, right to conduct business, etc. These rights are universally applicable and contained in the documents of most of the countries and also in the UN document. US follows constitutional democracy in its governance, and it enables that the rights can be amended and revoked by the Supreme Court at any such time it may deem fit.Hence, the rights as mentioned above in the paraphrase are the similar fundamental rights contained in the UN documents as well as the Bill of Rights as per US Constitution.
Learn more about fundamental rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
Do you think a country without government is considered a state Brainly?
Answers
No a country without government is not considered a state.
No state would have been required to govern every citizen if everyone was good and every individual was self-sufficient in every way. But the truth is that nobody is perfect and none of us are independent. We rely on one another. Therefore, a state is required to manage society and establish order. Chaos will result if not. In order to defend the state against outside threats, a state is also necessary.
There is a complete disconnect between governments and their citizens in many countries nowadays. Governments serve interests and powers that have nothing to do with the interests of the people; instead, they attempt to manipulate and take advantage of the populace to further their own specific interests and objectives.
To learn more about citizen please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ4
During the presidential election of 1896, the groups that made up political parties
where rearranged. This situation is an example of which of the following?
media crisis
coalition
college electorate
Orealignment
Answers
The scenario described within the question is an example of realignment.
Realignment is a technique wherein the companies that make up political parties undergo a good sized shift in their beliefs, priorities, and affiliations. This shift can result in the introduction of latest parties, the dissolution of antique parties, and a realignment of the electorate alongside new lines.
For the duration of the presidential election of 1896, the Democratic and Republican parties underwent a sizable realignment. The Republican celebration, which had traditionally been the party of huge enterprise and urban elites, have become the part of the working-class and farmers.
This realignment turned into due to the emergence of a brand new problem, the loose coinage of silver, which attracted assist from farmers and working-elegance people who believed it'd assist alleviate their economic struggles.
Learn more about realignment:-
https://brainly.com/question/9192667
#SPJ1
After the cherokee won their court case against removal, how did president andrew jackson respond?.
Answers
Andrew Jackson chose not to carry out the Supreme Court's ruling, allowing states to pass further laws that were detrimental to the tribes. In 1838, the American authorities started evicting the Cherokee from their territory.
President Andrew Jackson disregarded the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, but later said that the Court had the final say on constitutional issues and emphasized that its rulings had to be followed. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States, reached the conclusion that Georgia had no authority to impose state laws within its borders. President Andrew Jackson ordered the expulsion of the Cherokee nation after refusing to maintain the court's decision in this case.In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Jackson allegedly disobeyed the Supreme Court by declaring, "John Marshall has made his judgement now let him implement it." Georgia's attempt to impose state laws on Cherokee lands was the central issue in the lawsuit.Thus this is how president Andrew Jackson responded after the Cherokee won their court case.
Refer here to learn more about Andrew Jackson: https://brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ4
T/F In a SWOT analysis, strengths and weaknesses refer to a firm's external environment, while opportunities and threats refer to the internal environment.
Answers
'The given statement is false because strengths are the company's advantages over its competitors, such as its strong brand, skilled employees, or proprietary technology. These are internal factors that the company can control or improve upon.'
Weaknesses are the company's disadvantages compared to its competitors, such as poor financial management, lack of innovation, or limited resources. These are also internal factors that the company can address and improve upon.
Opportunities are external factors that the company can take advantage of, such as new markets, changes in consumer behavior, or advancements in technology. These are opportunities that the company can capitalize on to grow and improve.
Threats are external factors that could negatively impact the company's performance, such as economic downturns, increased competition, or changing regulations. These are potential threats that the company needs to be aware of and address to minimize their impact.
Overall, a SWOT analysis is a tool used to assess a company's internal and external environment, and can help identify areas for improvement and opportunities for growth.
For more such questions on proprietary visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27815508
#SPJ11
What must a plaintiff show to be awarded a quasi-contract in a lawsuit?
Answers
A plaintiff show to be awarded a quasi-contract in a lawsuit must show that there was an implied agreement between the parties based on equitable principles, like the idea that it is unjust for one party to be enriched at the expense of another.
More specifically, the plaintiff must show the following things that:
A benefit that was conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiffThe defendant knew of that or accepted the benefitIt would be unjust on the part of the defendant to retain the benefit without paying for itQuasi-contracts are not the actual contracts, but rather they are a legal fiction commonly created by the courts to remedy situations where one party has received a benefit and it would be unjust for them to keep it without compensating the other party. Quasi-contracts can be used as a means of preventing unjust enrichment, and in order to ensure that a party who receives a benefit from another party must acts in good faith and compensates them appropriately.
To know more about quasi contract refer to-
brainly.com/question/29651556#
#SPJ4
Each of the following states allows for nonpartisan election in the high court of last resort EXCEPT:
a. Michigan.
b. Minnesota.
c. Iowa.
d. Kentucky.
Answers
Answer:
I believe the answer is D Kentucky
Explanation:
Which of the following theorists believe that there is no distinction between the sovereignty and the people?
Answers
Answer: John Locke
Explanation: He uses a theory of natural rights to argue that governments have obligations to their citizens, have only limited powers over their citizens, and can ultimately be overthrown by citizens under certain circumstances.
Is it a violation of the Federal Wiretap Law (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act) for Gary to allow law enforcement officers to listen to a telephone conversation between himself and Terry without Terry’s knowledge
Answers
Answer:
I think it's a crime and it shows no manners
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Answers
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
TRUE OR FALSE medical payments coverage helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
Answers
True, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
What is Med pay and how its useful?
Med Pay is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies that helps pay for medical expenses for anyone injured in an accident involving your covered vehicle.
Med Pay coverage is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have, and it can be used to pay for medical expenses such as hospital stays, surgical procedures, and therapy sessions.
Med Pay can also be used to pay for dental expenses, such as tooth repair or replacement, and funeral expenses, in the event of a fatal accident.
Med Pay is usually offered in small dollar amounts, like $1,000, $5,000, or $10,000, and the amount of coverage you choose will determine how much you pay in premiums.
Med Pay is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly, without the need to wait for a liability determination to be made.
In summary, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies.
It helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
Med Pay is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have and is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly.
To learn more about Med pay refer:
brainly.com/question/13960193
#SPJ4
Which term refers to the fact that the therapist cannot disclose private communications to any
third party unless mandated or permitted by law to do so?
A. confidentiality
B. disclosure
C. discretion
D. privilege
Answers
The term that refers to the fact that the therapist cannot disclose private communications to any third party unless mandated or permitted by law to do so is confidentiality. Correct answer is option (A).
Confidentiality is the legal and ethical responsibility to keep personal information confidential. This means that the therapist can't share the client's confidential information with anyone else without the client's explicit consent. Any type of private information, such as your medical history, mental health diagnosis, or financial situation, may be covered by confidentiality regulations.
The importance of confidentiality. In a therapeutic context, confidentiality is critical. It enables the patient to feel safe and comfortable with their therapist and fosters a trusting connection between them. The client may not be open with their therapist if they believe their confidentiality will be breached or if they feel their personal information will be revealed to others. A breach of confidentiality can cause patients to feel exposed and vulnerable, eroding the trust necessary for therapeutic progress.
The therapist is obligated by law to keep their client's private communications confidential unless mandated or permitted by law to do so. Exceptions to confidentiality may include threats to harm oneself or others, child abuse, or court-ordered testimony. Therefore option (A) is correct answer.
Learn more about therapist private information https://brainly.com/question/14885106
#SPJ11
Which of the following explains why the Federal Aviation Administration and the United States Maritime Administration work closely with the U.S. Customs Agency?
Responses
to create specific regulations for weight loads on air and sea transports
to design entry and exit points out of the country to control air and sea flow
to prevent oil spills and other environmental disasters
to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
Answers
To ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Where as the Maritime Administration is the agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation dealing with waterborne transportation. Its programs promote the use of waterborne transportation and its seamless integration with other segments of the transportation system, and the viability of the U.S. merchant marine. At times these both agencies work along with U.S. Customs towards crime prevention from the routes the are entrusted with. These agencies hold joint exercises and searches along with U.S. Customs to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
To know more about Crime Prevention:
brainly.com/question/14495855
#SPJ1
Answer: The correct answer is to ensure that no illegal substances are smuggled on air and sea transports
Explanation: This answer has been confirmed correct.
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) said that Group of answer choices a key escrow system must be provided so that communications can be decrypted (with a court order) agents of a foreign power may be wiretapped with authorization from a secret court telecommunications equipment must be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls (with a court order) e-mail should have the same degree of legal protection as telephone calls
Answers
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) requires that telecommunications equipment be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls, with a court order.
The CALEA states that telecommunications equipment must be designed to allow the interception of telephone calls (with a court order).
This ensures that law enforcement agencies can access necessary information to conduct investigations while still protecting the privacy of individuals by requiring a court order for interception.
Additionally, CALEA mandates that a key escrow system must be provided so that communications can be decrypted, with a court order. Furthermore, agents of a foreign power may be wiretapped with authorization from a secret court.
However, CALEA does not specifically address the legal protection of email, though some argue that it should have the same degree of legal protection as telephone calls.
To know more on CALEA visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28095101
#SPJ11
Alanis tries to talk her supervisor out of a business decision she thinks is unethical. Which of the following best characterizes her reaction?
a. loyalty.
b. capitulation.
c. voice.
d. exit.
Answers
Answer:
Definitely C!
Explanation:
..... .....
State one reason why matric learners are more likely to experience interpersonal conflict with their peers
Answers
Answer:
Matric learners are the growing children in school. They face interpersonal conflict with their peers due to differences in ideology.
Explanation:
Matric learners, or high school seniors, may be more likely to experience interpersonal conflict with their peers due to the stress and pressure of preparing for final exams and the transition to post-secondary education.
What effect can intrapersonal conflict have on matriculants' personal growth?One who has recently been accepted into college or university and isn't well suited to such living circumstances is referred to as a matriculant. When an individual experiences intrapersonal conflict, they become disoriented and lose attention, which affects their performance and ability to engage with others.
As matric is the final year of high school, there may be heightened competition and tension among students as they strive to achieve good grades and secure admission to their desired colleges or universities. This can lead to conflicts over study groups, academic performance, and other related issues.
Learn more about the intrapersonal conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/1002167
#SPJ5
1. How can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims? (200 words, 5 marks)
Answers
The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).
How should the principles of Ubuntu be applied to the criminal justice system to assist victims in receiving justice?In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.
When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.
Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.
Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.
When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.
Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369
#SPJ9
Scenario: You just joined the FBI as a Jr. Forensic Accountant. You are assigned the " Goldsmith Worldwide Investment " case. FB is investigating if this company is involved in a Ponzi scheme.
(A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. Ponzi schemes are named after Charles Ponzi. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors a 50% return within a few months for what he claimed was an investment in international mail coupons.)
The subject company, Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, has been advertising a high-yield investment opportunity; investing in gold mines in Argentina. Several of the investors have filed complaints with the FBI, each reporting that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments promises 35% annual return on investments but has failed to deliver. You subpoena the Bank the Goldsmith is associated with. You consolidated all files and information received from the bank and start to apply IMPACT model you learned from Queens College's "Data Analytics for Accountant " to put the puzzle together and present the case to the Head of Department.
Objectives:
Goal - Apply IMPACT Model and all tools and techniques learned from the Spring 2022 - Data Analytics for Accountants to solve the FBI case. All questions need to be answered carefully with qualitative and quantitative support.
A. Identify Question - 1pt
What are the three questions needed to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case?
B. Master Data - 1pt
You have created the consolidated worksheet - see " 6628" tab.
What are the three + data tables you need in order to put this " 6628" consolidated worksheet together? what are the primary key and secondary key to connect them?
C. Perform Analysis – 7 pts - Please indicate technique used and show your work.
Just like the PWC case, you will choose techniques to help you identify issues and draw your conclusions.
1. Determine the total investors funds received. -1pt
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median and Mode ? -2 pts
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines. -1 pt.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. - 2 pt
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. -1pt
D. Communication - 1pt
6. What are your conclusions?
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
A. Identify Question:
1. Are the promised returns of 35% annual on investments unrealistic or unusually high?
2. Is the company primarily paying existing investors with funds from new investors?
3. Is there evidence of misrepresentation or false advertising regarding the investment opportunity?
B. Master Data:
To put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together, the following data tables are needed:
1. Investors Table:
- Primary Key: Investor ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional identifying information like name or contact details can be used)
2. Investment Transactions Table:
- Primary Key: Transaction ID
- Secondary Key: Investor ID (foreign key)
3. Company Revenue Table:
- Primary Key: Revenue ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional information like revenue source or period can be used)
C. Perform Analysis:
1. Determine the total investors' funds received.
Technique: Summarizing
- Sum the values in the "Investment Amount" column of the Investment Transactions Table.
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median, and Mode?
Technique: Statistical Analysis
- Filter the Investment Transactions Table for dividend payments.
- Sum the dividend amounts to calculate the total dividends paid.
- Count the unique investors who received dividends.
- Identify the investor(s) with the highest dividend amount.
- Calculate the mean, median, and mode of dividend amounts.
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.
Technique: Filtering and Summarizing
- Filter the Company Revenue Table for revenue related to the Argentinian gold mines.
- Sum the revenue amounts to determine the total business revenue.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend.
Technique: Data Visualization (e.g., line chart or bar chart)
- Create a visual representation of the investment inflows and outflows over time.
- Plot the investment amounts (inflows) and dividend amounts (outflows) on the chart.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure.
Technique: Examination and Documentation
- Review the consolidated worksheet and identify any suspicious assets or transactions that may be subject to seizure.
D. Communication:
6. Conclusions:
Based on the analysis using the IMPACT model and the techniques mentioned above, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- The total investors' funds received can be determined by summing the investment amounts.
- Total dividends paid can be calculated, along with information on the number of investors receiving dividends, the investor(s) receiving the highest amount, and statistical measures such as mean, median, and mode.
- Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines can be identified by filtering and summing the relevant revenue amounts.
- The trend of investment inflows and outflows can be depicted using data visualization techniques.
- Potential assets for seizure can be identified by examining suspicious transactions and documentation.
Overall, the analysis will provide insights into the financial activities of Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, helping to determine if there are indications of a Ponzi scheme.
A. Identify QuestionThere are three questions that can help to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case:
Does the investment opportunity promise unusually high returns?
Are early investors paid returns using the investments of new investors?
Is there a lack of clarity regarding how the returns will be generated or what the investment is used for?
B. Master DataThe three data tables needed in order to put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together are: Goldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestorsGoldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestmentGoldsmith Worldwide Investments PaymentThe primary key to connect them is the Investor ID and the secondary key is the Investment ID.
C. Perform Analysis1. Determine the total investors' funds received.Total investors' funds received = $12,785,0002. Determine total dividends paid to the investors, the number of investors who received dividends, who received the most amount, and what the Mean, Median and Mode are.Total dividends paid to the investors = $0The number of investors who received dividends = 0No one received the most amount.Mean = N/0Median = N/A, as there were no dividends.Mode = N/A, as there were no dividends.
3. Identify business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines = $12,000,000
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has more cash inflows than outflows in every quarter.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. Potential assets for seizure include: Land and buildings Investment portfolio Cash
D. Communication Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments is operating a Ponzi scheme. The company has promised unusually high returns to investors but has failed to deliver. There are no dividends paid to investors, and the business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines is not enough to support the high returns promised. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has been collecting more cash from new investors to pay off existing investors.
As a result, there are potential assets for seizure, including land and buildings, the investment portfolio, and cash.
Learn more about Forensic Accounting here:
https://brainly.com/question/28145069
#SPJ11
Statistics show how twice the number of people are employed in private security than in
public law enforcement in the United States. Discuss why the disparity is likely and what
the implications are for public security.
Answers
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
It is expensive to fund more police. Need to fill in gap left by police. Getting into police is relatively difficult. Why are there more private security than Police?As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired. There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to. Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at https://brainly.com/question/7203143.
The physiological effects of marijuana greatly differ from those associated with alcohol.
True
Or
False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant
Annotated Bibliography:
unfair inequalities in the criminalization between white people and ones of color/different nationalities for similar offences? What are the negative consequences of the stereotypical representation of black people with concern to profiling and incarceration?
Answers
Answer:
It's a violation of the 14th Amendment, with equal rights under the law. So, profiling shouldn't make a difference. The negative effect is the overlooking of other races.
Criminal prosecution of physical abuse is more common than:
Answers
Criminal prosecution of physical abuse is more common than the prosecution of emotional maltreatment.
Physical abuse cases that result in criminal charges, such as battery or assault, are typically prosecuted more frequently than cases of emotional abuse. Physical abuse is frequently accompanied by obvious signs of harm, which makes it simpler to recognize and establish in court. Additionally, authorities prioritize the prosecution of physical abuse because it is frequently thought to have a more severe and immediate impact on the victim's well being.
On the other hand, due to its covert nature and the lack of tangible evidence, emotional maltreatment, which includes psychological abuse, verbal abuse, or neglect, can be harder to prove. The prosecution of emotional abuse is not nonexistent it should be noted and it can be pursued in some circumstances if there is enough evidence.
Learn more about Criminal prosecution at:
brainly.com/question/31852451
#SPJ4
After a famous organized crime boss is convicted of racketeering, their attorney vows that the District Court made a mistake. As the crime boss begins to serve their sentence, the attorney files paperwork to have the facts reexamined. What court would MOST likely find this case on their docket
Answers
Answer:
Surpreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
If it is suspected that the District Attourny made a mistake, the next highest step in the Surpreme Court of the United States.
How does democracy protect minority rights?
A. by not allowing the passage of unsatisfactory public policies
B. by recognizing that the minority usually represents the popular will
e
C. by permitting the minority to overrule the majority on vital public issues
o
D. by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority
Answers
Answer:
D. by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority
Explanation:
Have a great day! :)
The democracy, protect minority rights by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Thus option (D) is correct.
What is Democracy?Democracy is a system of government in which laws, policies, leadership, and major undertakings of a state or other polity are directly or indirectly decided by the “people,”
The States with democratic governments prevent rule by autocrats, guarantee fundamental individual rights, allow for a relatively high level of political equality, and rarely make war on each other.
The hallmark of democracy is that it permits citizens to participate in making laws and public policies by regularly choosing their leaders and by voting in assemblies or referendum.
The democracy, protect minority rights by Insisting that the majority listen to the arguments and ideas of the minority. Therefore, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about democracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/17627950
#SPJ2
Policy analysis is used most heavily during which stages of the policy-making process?A. Problem analysis and capacity developmentB. Capacity development and legitimationC. Problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluationD. Policy evaluation and regulation development
Answers
Policy analysis is primarily used during option C - Problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages to identify problems, assess policy alternatives, and evaluate policy outcomes.
Policy analysis is a systematic approach to assessing the impacts of policy decisions. The problem analysis stage is the initial phase of the policy-making process, where policymakers identify the issues that require attention.
During this stage, policy analysts examine the problem, causes, and impacts, using data and evidence to develop an accurate picture of the situation. This information is used to inform the development of policy alternatives.
Policy analysis is a critical component of the policy-making process and is used most heavily during the option C - problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages.
In the policy alternative development stage, policymakers and policy analysts work together to identify different options for addressing the problem.
Finally, policy evaluation is used to assess the effectiveness of policy implementation. This involves examining the actual outcomes and intended outcomes of policy decisions and determining success or failure of the policy.
While policy analysis is used throughout the policy-making process, it is most heavily relied upon during the problem analysis, policy alternative development, and policy evaluation stages.
By using a systematic approach to policy analysis, policymakers and analysts can develop effective policies that address the underlying problems, promote equitable outcomes, and enhance public welfare.
For more question on "Policy Analysis" :
https://brainly.com/question/29888565
#SPJ11
how evidence is tendered in court
Answers
Tendering evidence is when you ask the court to consider a document, photograph or other object as part of the evidence in your case. To tender an item, you must: have the prior agreement of the prosecution before you ask the court to receive it in evidence,