Answer:
It depends on what grade you want to get
Explanation:
How did the ruling in kumho tire v. Carmichael affect how expert witness testimony would be accepted?.
The ruling in Kumho Tire v. Carmichael affected how expert witness testimony would be accepted by making it clear that the same standards applied to all expert witnesses, regardless of their area of expertise.
Kumho Tire v. Carmichael was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1999. It was a significant case because it clarified the admissibility criteria for expert witness testimony. The case was about a fatal accident that was caused by a blown-out tire, and the victims' families filed a lawsuit against Kumho Tire Co.
The plaintiffs retained an expert witness to testify that the tire was defective, and it was the reason for the accident. The trial court excluded the expert witness testimony, stating that the expert was unqualified to render an opinion on the tire's design and the defect that caused the blowout. The plaintiffs appealed the decision, and it was overruled by the appellate court, stating that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the expert. The case was appealed again, and it reached the US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court upheld the appellate court's decision to overrule the trial court's decision to exclude the expert testimony. However, they set new rules for the admissibility of expert witness testimony. According to the ruling, the trial judge was the gatekeeper of expert testimony, and it was their responsibility to evaluate the relevance and reliability of expert testimony. The court further stated that the Daubert standard, which had previously applied to scientific testimony, would also apply to all expert testimony.
Learn more about Witness
https://brainly.com/question/32240223
#SPJ11
How to murder sunny in a good way?
Answer:
Attack on Titan style.
Explanation:
why not
Answer:
Murdering someone in a good way isn't a thingExplanation:
Murdering someone / something is never a good thing and there is not a good way to murder someone...
Hope you understand <3
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Answer:
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Explanation:
There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft,
coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of
choice?
A. Capital
B. Profits
C. Resources
D. Wages
Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon
Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?
Let's consider all the choices:
Capital: is a financial asset usually given to help start a company or invest in a company. This doesn't protect against theft, fraud, or coercion as its purpose is to help start not to protect a companyProfits: it is the money made by the company. However, that doesn't protect a company as it only makes a company more vulnerable to theft as dishonest people will find the company more attractive to take advantage of.Resources: by having resources, the companies have ways to evade criminals as they have ways and connections to use their profit and capital and their workers to move past the dangerWages: is the payment made to the workers for their service. This doesn't protect the company as its purpose is to only pay their workers for their service, not to protect the company.Answer: Resources
Hope that helps!
#LearnwithBrainly
Describe situations, in which you might use the services of a lawyer.
Describe how advertisements, news articles, online sources, and personal observations might be used to make wiser buying decisions.
In what types of situations would small claims court and class-action suits be helpful?
Answer:
Describe situations, in which you might use the services of a lawyer.
Legal disputes: Lawyers can help resolve legal disputes between individuals or businesses, such as disputes over contracts, property ownership, or personal injury claims.Criminal charges: If an individual is facing criminal charges, a lawyer can help defend their case in court.Estate planning: Lawyers can assist in creating wills and trusts, as well as providing guidance on inheritance laws.Business matters: Lawyers can help with a range of business matters, including drafting contracts, advising on compliance issues, and representing businesses in legal disputes.Family law: Lawyers can assist with a range of family law matters, such as divorce, child custody, and adoption.Immigration: Lawyers can assist with the complex process of obtaining visas or citizenship, as well as advising on immigration laws and regulations.Describe how advertisements, news articles, online sources, and personal observations might be used to make wiser buying decisions.
Advertisements: Advertisements a valuable sources of information about a product or service. However, they are often biased and designed to sell a product. One way to use advertisements to make wiser buying decisions is to research the product further and read reviews from other customers who have purchased the product.
News articles: News articles can provide valuable details about a product, service, and the company that produces it. News articles can also alert consumers to any potential issues with a product or service, such as recalls or safety concerns. Consumers can make wiser buying decisions and choose products that are safe and reliable by staying informed through news articles.
Online sources: Online sources can provide valuable insights into the quality and reliability of a product or service. They include customer reviews and product comparison websites. Consumers can get a better sense of the pros and cons of a particular product by reading reviews from other customers, .
Personal observations: Personal observations can help make wiser buying decisions. Consumers can get a better sense of its quality and reliability by observing a product in action or using it firsthand. For example, if someone is considering purchasing a car, a test drive can provide valuable insights into its performance and handling.
In what types of situations would small claims court and class-action suits be helpful?
Small claims court and class-action suits can help in different situations. Small claims court handles disputes involving small amounts of money, usually up to a few thousand dollars. It is an option for individuals seeking to resolve a legal issue without the high costs and formalities of traditional court proceedings. Small claims court may help when an individual has a dispute with a landlord, a contractor, or a vendor, or when there is a breach of contract.
On the other hand, class-action suits are typically used when a large number of people have been harmed by the same company or entity in a similar way. They allow a group of people to jointly pursue a lawsuit against a common defendant. Class-action suits may help in situations where there has been a product defect causing widespread harm. They may also help where a company has engaged in fraudulent or deceptive practices, affecting a large number of consumers.
[Why struggle with questions, essays, and research papers like this one? You get them instantly through proffrank01[at]gm ail. c om. Score maximum points with outstanding papers. Cheers!!]
In both cases, the goal is to provide individuals with an avenue for seeking justice and resolving disputes in a fair and efficient manner.
Explanation:
Yelling fire in a theatre when there is no fire presents which of the following?
A.
Warning
B.
Dilemma
Clear and present danger
OD. Fighting word
Which of the following best describes what an associate’s degree is with respect to the criminal justice system? It is the first degree one can achieve after high school. It is associated with fulfilling criminal law tasks. It is the final degree candidates must achieve before applying for a job. It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training. ANSWER ASAP
Answer:
The Correct Answer Actually is :
It is the most common requirement and often accompanied by further academic work or training.
Explanation:
Just took the test 100%
Leroy ordered a DVD player for his son's birthday. While the manufacturer guaranteed that it would ship the player within ten business days, the player was not shipped until three months after Leroy placed his order. By the time the DVD player arrived, Leroy's son's birthday had long since passed. When the player arrived, Leroy refused to sign for it. Under these circumstances:
The manufacturer is automatically revested with title to the DVD player.
When the player arrived, Leroy refused to sign for it. Under these circumstances: the manufacturer is automatically revested with title to the DVD player.
A producer is a person or agency that produces finished goods from uncooked materials by using the usage of diverse gear, device, and procedures, after which sells the products to consumers, wholesalers, distributors, stores, or to other manufacturers for the production of greater complicated goods.
Production is defined because the advent of latest products, both from uncooked materials or additives. Examples of producing consist of automobile businesses, bakeries, shoemakers and tailors, as all of them create merchandise, instead of supplying services.
Learn more about manufacturer here:https://brainly.com/question/26373900
#SPJ4
State constitutions also establish their own procedures for amending their state constitutions.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The special Constitution alteration procedures used by States are: a State-wide referendum, special majorities in the Parliament. an absolute majority (or, in other words, a majority of the total number of the members of the House concerned: a two/thirds majority, or a combination of the two.
Using the democracy standard, in your own words, explain how federalism constrains democracy in five ways.
Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .
1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.
For more similar questions on federalism:
brainly.com/question/12835949
#SPJ11
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
Imagine you are a sales representative for a large profitable pharmaceutical company you are assigned to a fast selling medication ( drug A) as a sales representative, should you continue selling medication? Explain
Medical law and ethics class
The individual, who is a sales representative, should not continue selling medication.
What are the responsibilities of a pharmaceutical sales representative?The primary tasks of a Pharmaceutical Sales Representative are to serve clients by selling pharmaceutical items and addressing their needs. They travel regularly within their designated zone to make presentations and teach about the company's drugs at hospitals and doctor's offices.
The course addresses specific legal, ethical, and medical challenges that arise in medical practice and research. It focuses on questions of consent, autonomy, and the patient's and other interested parties' best interests, as well as how they overlap with other fields of law, including as tort, criminal, and personal property law.
Therefore, The sales agent should not continue selling medication since he lacks information about the medications and the type of medication.
Learn more about Pharmaceutical Sales here:
https://brainly.com/question/841596
#SPJ1
Which of the following provisions are typically in an operating agreement for a limited liability company (LLC)? Choose 2 answers.
a. whether the dissociation of a member, such as by death or departure, will trigger dissolution of the LLC
b. how membership interests may be transferred
c. the advertising plan for the company
d. a record of the company's assets and debts
The provisions that are typically in an operating agreement for a limited liability company are:
a. whether the dissociation of a member, such as by death or departure, will trigger dissolution of the LLC
b. how membership interests may be transferred
What is a limited liability company?A limited liability company (LLC) can be described as the business entity that prevents individuals from being liable for the company's financial losses as well as the debt liabilities howver in case where there is business failure, the liability is assumed by the company insteafd of the constituent partners or shareholders.
It should be noted that the Limited liability make a provision whereby the assets as well as the debts of the business can be seen to be separate from the personal assets as well as the debts of the company's owners and if there is any bankrupcy, creditors cannot therefore go after the owners' personal assets.
Theefore, option A and B are correct.
Learn more about limited liability company at:
https://brainly.com/question/14023701
#SPJ1
what legal protection does the exclusionary rule outline?
Answer: It prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that provides protection against unlawful searches and seizures by law enforcement officials.
It is a doctrine that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. The rule is based on the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Under the exclusionary rule, if evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, such as through an illegal search or seizure, it cannot be used against the defendant in a criminal trial.
This means that even if the evidence would have been otherwise admissible and could have contributed to the defendant's conviction, it must be excluded from the trial.
The exclusionary rule serves as a deterrent to law enforcement officials who may be tempted to violate individuals' Fourth Amendment rights in the pursuit of evidence.
It also upholds the principle that the ends do not justify the means, and that law enforcement officials must follow the law and respect individuals' constitutional rights.
There are some exceptions to the exclusionary rule, such as the good faith exception and the inevitable discovery exception. The good faith exception allows for the admission of evidence obtained in good faith, even if the search or seizure was later found to be unlawful.
The inevitable discovery exception allows for the admission of evidence that would have been discovered lawfully, even if it was initially discovered unlawfully.
Overall, the exclusionary rule is an important protection against unlawful searches and seizures and serves as a check on law enforcement officials to ensure that they uphold individuals' constitutional rights.
For more question on "Exclusionary Rule" :
https://brainly.com/question/30108382
#SPJ11
When was the Constitution Act enacted?
A)1981
B)1982
C)1868
D)1867
What did the Constitution Act do?
A) Made Canada a fully independent nation
B) Unified the 10 provinces of Canada
C) Fully repatriated the constitution
D) Reorganized Canada into a federation
Answer:
i think it is B I'm not sure
The three main sources of international law are treaty, custom, and
.
government
general principles of international law
commerce
country allegiance
Answer:
General principles of international law
Answer:
general principles of international law
Explanation:
got it right on exam
it is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer? 12 21 8 18 submit answer
It is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
What is law?The precise definition of law, which is a set of rules created and enforced by social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, has long been debated.It has been described as both a science and an art form. State-enforced laws can be enacted by a group legislature or a single legislator, resulting in statutes; by the executive via decrees and regulations; or by judges via precedent, typically in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals may enter into legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that use alternative dispute resolution methods to traditional court litigation. A child under the age of 18 cannot, for example, ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.Therefore, it is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.
Know more about laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
It is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer?
a. 12
b. 21
c. 8
d. 18
T/F : according to donaldson and dunfee, the right to personal freedom is an example of a hypernorm.
True. According to Donaldson and Dunfee, the right to personal freedom is an example of a Hypernorms.
Hypernorms are universal ethical principles that transcend cultural, societal, and organizational boundaries. The right to personal freedom is considered a fundamental human right and is accepted across various cultures and societies, making it a hypernorm.
According to Donaldson and Dunfee's theory of ethical decision-making, hyper norms are universal ethical principles that are widely accepted across cultures and societies. The right to personal freedom, which encompasses individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and association, is considered a hypernorms because it is a fundamental value that is recognized and respected by most cultures and legal systems around the world. Therefore, the statement that the right to personal freedom is an example of a hypernorm is true.
Learn more about Hypernorms: https://brainly.com/question/13735426
#SPJ11
In this chapter, we quoted a legal expert as saying, “In the adversary system the goal of the advocate is not to determine the truth but to win . . ..” Does this mean that prosecutors and defense attorneys should behave unethically in court? Why or why not? Give an example of rules that are in place to ensure that prosecutors and defense attorneys act ethically in court proceedings.
Since In the adversary system the goal of the advocate is not to determine the truth but to win . .” It does not mean that prosecutors and defense attorneys should behave unethically in court, it just mean that they hard to do what they need to do so as to win their case in a legal manner through questioning and use of evidence.
What is the adversary approach?This system is where an impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgment in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.
In its most basic form, an adversarial system settles disputes by presenting opposing points of fact and law to a neutral, often uninvolved arbiter, who then chooses which side prevails.
Hence, a method to conflict in which the harder, more aggressive negotiator prevails and the more accommodative loses. The adversarial strategy encourages rivalry among negotiators.
Learn more about adversary system from
https://brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ1
If a college athlete sues her public university claiming a Due Process Clause violation in the way a disciplinary proceeding was implemented, the majority rule that the court is likely to apply holds that student-athletes __________. (page 335)
If a college athlete sues her public university claiming a Due Process Clause violation in the way a disciplinary proceeding was implemented, the majority rule that the court is likely to apply holds that student-athletes are entitled to no greater due process rights than any other student in a university.
The university must provide the minimum requirements of due process according to the United States Constitution. This includes notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires states to provide due process of law when they deprive a person of life, liberty, or property.
In the case of college athletes, This would mean that public universities must provide some kind of hearing process before revoking a student-athlete's scholarship. Content loaded from page 335.
Learn more about university Visit : brainly.com/question/1086066
#SPJ11
which of the following statements about congress’s oversight capacity is accurate?
Congress’s oversight capacity can be viewed in the context of budgetary constraints.
Congress has extensive powers that extend to numerous areas such as oversight, impeachment, and lawmaking. Congress has the authority to conduct investigations, conduct hearings, and review executive branch activities.
Congress uses its oversight powers to ensure that the executive branch follows through on its obligations. Congressional investigations may also assist in the creation of new legislation and help legislators understand how to allocate funds. Congress’s oversight capacity can be viewed in the context of budgetary constraints.
Thus, the accurate statement about Congress’s oversight capacity is that it can be viewed in the context of budgetary constraints. Congress has broad oversight powers that enable it to conduct investigations, conduct hearings, and review executive branch activities.
To know more about impeachment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1619173
#SPJ11
What are the two levels of federal courts?
Answer:
the trial court and the appellate court.
Explanation:
Your welcome
What legal term is applicable to the accused party in the given scenario? Journalist Larry David was arrested for laundering drugs. The court has appointed a lawyer to fight for David on his behalf. In the courtroom, the judge and jury address David as the
Since Journalist Larry David was arrested for laundering drugs and the court has appointed a lawyer to fight for David on his behalf. In the courtroom, the judge and jury would address David as the defendant.
What is a judicial system?A judicial system is also referred to as a legal system and it can be defined as the system of law courts that administer justice, especially by adjudicating legal disagreements, disputes, infractions, interpreting laws, defending the accused, as well as applying the appropriate law in legal cases such as civil and criminal cases.
Generally speaking, there are four (4) stages of the legal (judicial) process within a Judicial system and these include the following:
PretrialTrialDispositionAppealsWho is a defendant?In a criminal case such drug laundering, a defendant can be defined as a legal terminology that is used to describe or refer to an individual who is accused of committing a crime, and brought before the judge and jury by a prosecutor.
Read more on defendant here: brainly.com/question/10459518
#SPJ1
in criminal law the term corpus delicti most generally means
In criminal law, the term corpus delicti most generally means the body of evidence that proves a crime has been committed.
The phrase is derived from Latin and means "the body of the crime". It refers to the physical evidence that demonstrates the commission of a crime, such as the victim's body in a homicide case or the stolen property in a burglary case.
In order for a defendant to be convicted of a crime, the prosecution must establish the corpus delicti. This means that they must prove that a crime has occurred and that the defendant is responsible for it. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to establish the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt.
In some cases, establishing the corpus delicti can be difficult. For example, if there is no body in a homicide case, the prosecution may need to rely on circumstantial evidence to prove that a murder has occurred. However, without physical evidence, it may be challenging to establish the corpus delicti.
Overall, the term corpus delicti is an essential concept in criminal law, as it serves as the foundation for establishing the guilt of a defendant. Without it, a conviction cannot be secured.
To know more about criminal law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32272183
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
sixty-six-year-old alex is in the process of retiring from his position as the head of litigation in a law firm. over the next six months, he will oversee cases of the younger associates and work part time editing legal briefs, and then he will exit the firm. alex is doing for his firm before he retires.
Alex is doing Bridge work for his firm before he retires.
You might have a bridge job just before or during retirement. Not everyone enjoys full-time retirement, but they also don't want to continue in their old career. Bridge jobs let retirees slowly shift to full-time retirement life by letting them work fewer hours or in a different, often less stressful career.
The majority of (U.S.) retirees now work for pay after they retire from their major/longer-term job, a phenomenon referred to as bridge employment. Retirement can take many forms, as can bridge employment, which is sometimes considered a form of partial retirement spanning the period from full-time work to full retirement.
To learn more about Bridge employment visit here; https://brainly.com/question/15556729?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Which of the following means of dissent is against the law?
A.
threatening the life of a leader
B.
writing to a government representative
C.
participating in a peaceful protest
D.
signing a petition for change
A) threatening the life of a leader
To write to a government representative is encouraged if the matter is of importance. This is done by those who are trying to argue a point, for example people protesting a new law or company. This is perfectly legal.
The right to peaceful assembly or protests is protected under the First Amendment. This is legal.
Signing a petition is also perfectly legal, as no physical harm is involved to another person.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Threatening the life of a leader is illegal
2: When passing another vehicle, you are allowed to exceed the speed limit by?
a) O 10 mph.
b) O 5 mph.
c) O 3 mph.
d) O 0 mph.
Answer: 10 mph
Explanation:
The passing of another vehicle, are allowed to exceed the speed limit by 10 mph. Thus, the option (a) is the correct.
What is vehicle?
Transport of persons and products from one location to another is referred to as using a “vehicle.” When traveling somewhere else, the automobile is useful. The car satisfies the necessities and necessities of the bare minimum. Different kinds of vehicles exist, including cars, buses, boats, spaceships, trucks, and airplanes.
The legal maximum speed for cars has been set by the government. The car was moving at a 45 km/h excess. People who use vehicles must adhere to the government's tight speed restriction requirement. The government is authorized to travel 10 to 15 mph faster than the posted limit.
Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on vehicle, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ2
where do we go after we die?
Answer: We all go underground but what you think you might go in the afterlife or after death is entirely up to your belief.
Answer:
What happened to everyone who was here? And when we die I would hope to say we go to purgatory which is like waiting to get into heaven ...
Explanation:
A vendor has agreed to clean your hotel carpets at a very competitive price. In a telephone conversation with you, the vendor states that if it gets the contract, members of its staff will "do your home carpets once a year" as a thank you. Apply the seven criteria for ethical behavior to this situation.
The vendor's offer may raise ethical concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and the potential for conflicts of interest.
It would be advisable to carefully evaluate the implications and consider alternative options that align with ethical principles.
To assess the ethical implications of the vendor's offer, let's apply the seven criteria for ethical behavior:
1. Common good: The vendor's offer of cleaning your home carpets once a year as a thank you may not directly contribute to the common good. It seems more like a personal benefit offered in return for the hotel contract, rather than a broader societal benefit.
2. Rights: The offer does not appear to violate any fundamental rights, but it may raise concerns about fairness and potential conflicts of interest if the vendor's staff prioritize your home carpets over other customers or their primary responsibilities.
3. Fairness: Offering an additional service for free as a thank you could be seen as unfair to other vendors who may have bid on the contract. It may create an unfair advantage and compromise the principle of fair competition.
4. Harm: The offer does not directly cause harm. However, if the vendor's staff neglect their regular duties or other customers in favor of fulfilling their "thank you" promise, it could lead to dissatisfaction and harm the overall business.
5. Transparency: The vendor's offer should be transparently communicated to all stakeholders involved, including other potential vendors, hotel management, and customers. Failure to do so may be considered misleading or unethical.
6. Trust: The offer may undermine trust if it suggests that the vendor's staff might prioritize personal interests over their professional obligations or if the vendor's bid was based on the expectation of future personal benefits.
7. Ethical leadership: Hotel management should demonstrate ethical leadership by carefully considering the vendor's offer and ensuring that decisions prioritize fairness, transparency, and the long-term interests of the hotel and its customers.
Overall, the vendor's offer may raise ethical concerns regarding fairness, transparency, and the potential for conflicts of interest. It would be advisable to carefully evaluate the implications and consider alternative options that align with ethical principles.
learn more about goods here:brainly.com/question/12802278
#SPJ11