Supporters of, for instance, a bill under floor consideration can file a cloture motion, signed by at least 16 Senators. Two days after the session later, Senators vote on the cloture motion.
On March 8, 1917, in a specifically known session of the sixty-fifth Congress, the Senate agreed to a rule that essentially preserved its tradition of limitless debate. the rule required a two-thirds majority to give up debate and accredited each member to talk for a further hour after that before balloting on the final passage.
If cloture is invoked, total attention of the measure or depend to which it applies is restricted to 30 hours, and a vote happens at the clotured count at the expiration of that time to the exclusion of all amendments not absolutely pending, and all motions besides a movement to reconsider and table, and one quorum name.
Learn more about cloture here: https://brainly.com/question/8514155
#SPJ4
3. What events caused
the expansion of
national power in the
twentieth century?
Answer:
the Southern states had tried to secede from the united states due to disagreements on slavery in the stated which then let to one of the biggest events which was the civil war.
Explanation:
The Writing Requirement: Jason Novell, doing business as Novell Associates,
hired Barbara Meade to work for him. The parties orally agreed on the terms of
employment, including payment of a share of the company's income to Meade,
but they did not put anything in writing. Two years later, Meade quit. Novell then
told Meade that she was entitled to $9,602 - 25% of the difference between the
accounts receivable and the accounts payable as of Meade's last day of work.
Meade disagreed, and demanded more than $63,500 - 25% of the revenue from
all invoices, less the cost of materials and outside processing, for each of the years
that she had worked for Novell. Meade filed a lawsuit against Novell for breach of
contract.
Discuss whether or not there is an enforceable contract (including a discussion on
the Statute of Frauds and any exception -if any - that may apply).
Regarding Barbara Meade's employment with Novell Associates, it is necessary to take into account the enforceability of the oral agreement between Jason Novell and Meade, especially in light of the Statute of Frauds.
A legal concept known as the Statute of Frauds mandates that some transactions must be in writing in order to be enforceable. But the Statute of Frauds has several exceptions that could apply in particular circumstances.
Contracts for the rendering of services are not covered by the Statute of Frauds. As a result, an oral employment contract, like the one between Novell and Meade, may be binding even in the absence of a written agreement.
Learn more about the Statute of Fraud, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30409098
#SPJ1
Differentiate terrorism and activism
Answer:
its a good question.
if you look at wiki definition (well its not necessiailty a source of truth, but it refers largely wat a typical person thinks).....terrorism is defined as use of violence to achieve ones' political goal, which is not really different from activism.
i guess the easy answer is that terrorism is a violent act against the traditional social value; whereas activism is a fight, sometimes violent, against what the society considers as unjustice.
if you want a more thoughtful answer, you can add that sometimes one's definition of activism can be considered as terrorsim by a different person, because different ppl in the society have different social value and priority.
say if some self acclaimed activists run riot on the street, some ppl would consider them as activists; but if you are a store owner who dont agree with their view, their act is an act of terror.
Explanation:
How does the Supreme Court determine whether or not to hear a case?
Answer:
The Supreme Court is the highest court of all the land. There is much discretion, involving a lengthy process for a case to be accepted within this prestigious Court. Much like the President vetoing or accepting a bill to become a law. You see, the Supreme Court determines to hear a case through a unison of votes from at least four Justices. This vote is known as the "Rule of Four". They will review everything from the case's background to how well the case would withstand during the trial. In order to do so, they read the petition for certiorari. Before doing any of this, however, you will need to, of course, file a lawsuit within your district. I wish you luck if you are attempting to bring your case to the supremacy.
The primary sources of public law include _____. Group of answer choices policies and procedures statutes and penal law the law of obligations the law of contracts or torts
The primary sources of public law include statutes and penal law.
Public law is the part of law that governs relations between legal persons and a government, between different institutions within a state, between different branches of governments, as well as relationships between persons that are of direct concern to society. Public law comprises constitutional law, administrative law, tax law and criminal law, as well as all procedural law. Laws concerning relationships between individuals belong to private law.
To know more about constitutional law :
https://brainly.com/question/14918421
#SPJ11
Explain why is law is an instrument which regulate human conducts?
Answer:
Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.
explain 5 sources of nigerian law
When may a minor legally purchase
alcohol?
They are assisting a police officer in the
enforcement of the alcoholic beverage code.
They are in the visible presence of their legal
friends.
They are assisting an adult.
They are diners in a restaurant.
Save
Answer: 21.
Explanation:
The legal age for that is 21, the act being passed 1984.
Answer:
They are assisting a police officer. A minor may only legally purhase alcohol under certain standings, most likely with a court order or will a law enforcement officer.
Explanation:
YOU GET 25 POINTS!!!
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the country. It has the power to interpret the meaning of laws according to the Constitution and to apply laws in court cases. Another duty of the court is to make sure all the branches of government operate within their limits. Supreme Court decisions have had an important effect on our society, both past and present. The Supreme Court protects civil freedoms and rights guaranteed to all citizens by making sure that laws are applied fairly to all groups.
Which word is a synonym of duty
achievement
principle
behavior
responsibility
Congress frequently establishes the jurisdiction of the federal courts. However, in specific circumstances, such as when there is a dispute between two or more US states, the Supreme Court is granted original jurisdiction, and this authority cannot be rescinded by Congress.
What is the Supreme Court's role in the Constitution?Article III's opening clause states: "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may by law from time to time ordain and create.
What are the Supreme Court's authority?Any civil or criminal case may be transferred at the Supreme Court's request from one State High Court to another State High Court.
To know more about Supreme Court visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Answer:
three synonyms for duty
burden.
business.
charge.
chore.
commission.
commitment.
contract.
function.
Explanation:
which ever one sounds the closest to one of ur answers im pretty sure its responsibility cuz
the state or fact of having a duty to deal with something or of having control over someone.
"a true leader takes responsibility for their team and helps them achieve goals"
Controversial slogans may be permitted if:
as a result of the development shown on this graph, prices will most likely .
The graph presented depicts the changes in the sales of coffee and tea in the USA between 2010 and 2020 because It is clear that there is a significant decline in the purchase of coffee.
As a result of these developments, prices will most likely vary in the future.The graph shows that the price of coffee will decrease in the future due to a decline in demand. It is predicted that customers will switch from coffee to tea, leading to a decrease in demand for coffee. As a result, coffee prices will decrease to attract more customers and regain their market share.
Additionally, companies will try to maintain their profit margin and ensure that they are getting a return on investment. This would mean increasing prices to cover production and overhead costs. In conclusion, the changes shown on the graph are likely to lead to a decrease in coffee prices and an increase in tea prices.
Learn more about decline in demand: https://brainly.com/question/1105224
#SPJ11
Answer:
rise
Explanation:
The nationwide suspicious activity reporting (sar) initiative (nsi) was established to: choose one enhance tracking of financial reporting requirements establish a unified approach to gather, document, analyze, and share terrorism-related suspicious activities provide local and state law enforcement agencies with a method to report sars on protest activities connect fusion centers to foreign country law enforcement agencies
The nationwide suspicious activity reporting (SAR) initiative was established for terrorism-related suspicious activities activities provide local and state law enforcement agencies with a method.
What is Suspicious Behaviour Reporting?A Suspicious Behaviour Reporting (SAR), as used in financial regulation, is a notification made by a financial institution regarding suspicious or possibly suspicious activity.In general, any financial transaction that the financial institution does not understand is unusual for that particular client or appears to be done solely for the purpose of concealing or obscuring another, a separate transaction must be reported.The specific criteria used to determine when a report must be made vary from country to country.The report is submitted to the nation's financial crime enforcement agency, which is often a specialized organization created to gather and analyze transactions before reporting them to the appropriate law enforcement.Suspicious Behaviour Reporting is the obligation of the financial institution's front-line workers to spot transactions that might be suspect.To learn more about Suspicious Behaviour Reporting with the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28179565
#SPJ4
Describe the relationship between investigative hearing days and party control of the House and presidency
A description of the responsibilities the offices of the House General Counsel and Senate Legal Counsel played in these investigations is included in the report's conclusion.
What are examples responsibilities?
An obligation to complete a task is one example of a responsibility. Your parents, for instance, anticipate that you will brush your teeth. It is your job to clean your teeth every day since it is "a responsibility" to do so. Another illustration is that your teacher anticipates you to complete your homework promptly and to the best of your ability. Therefore, it is your duty to complete your assignment and do it to the best of your ability.
A duty could be how you are required to behave. For instance, if you go play at the park, your parents anticipate that you won't play in a way that endangers you or another else.
Know more about conclusion visit:
https://brainly.com/question/78686
#SPJ1
What economic indicator(s) would signal a need for expansionary policy? explain how lowering the discount (interest) rate would help to stimulate the economy.
There are a few economic indicators that could signal a need for expansionary policy, including a decrease in GDP growth, rising unemployment rates, low levels of consumer and business confidence, and a decline in inflation rates. These indicators suggest that the economy is not growing at a desirable rate, and that expansionary policy measures may be necessary to stimulate growth.
Lowering the discount rate, which is the interest rate that the Federal Reserve charges banks to borrow money, can help to stimulate the economy by making it cheaper for banks to borrow money and therefore easier for them to lend money to consumers and businesses. When banks have easier access to credit, they can increase the amount of lending and stimulate economic growth. Additionally, lowering the discount rate can help to decrease the cost of borrowing for consumers and businesses, making it more attractive for them to invest and spend money, which can further stimulate economic activity. In summary, lowering the discount rate can help to stimulate economic growth by making it easier and cheaper for banks, consumers, and businesses to borrow money and invest in the economy. This is one of the many tools that can be used as part of expansionary policy to encourage growth and mitigate economic downturns.
to know about expansionary policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29768971
#SPJ11
Chris is an atheist. The town of Niskayuna has erected its annual “Holiday Spectacular” lawn decorations in front of the town hall. This includes a Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Frosty the Snowman, a giant dreidel, and three wise men and an angel. Chris works at the town hall and is subjected to the “Holiday Spectacular” Every. Single. Day. He is highly offended by the display’s religious overtones and feels uncomfortable while at work with the display right outside his office window. Chris sues the town for violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answer:
Christmas has basically always been religious, it's in the name. If he's offended, he can find another job or move. But just because one person doesnt like something doesnt mean they should act out this way about it.
Explanation:
In cases where informed decision makers such as trained medical staff or governmental officials agree that a research study has the potential to benefit a large number of people, written informed consent from participants is not needed.
The correct answer is False. Written informed permission from participants is not necessary when knowledgeable decision makers, such as skilled medical personnel or government authorities, concur that a research project has the potential to be helpful to many people.
A fundamental tenet of research ethics is informed consent. Its goal is to ensure that human participants can enter research freely (voluntarily), that they are fully informed of what it means to participate, and that they provide consent before entering the study.
Respect for people demands that subjects be given the option to decide what will or won't happen to them, to the extent that they are capable. When appropriate criteria for informed consent are met, this option is granted.
Read more about decision makers at
https://brainly.com/question/29035403
#SPJ4
How is a concurring opinion different from a dissenting opinion?
1. A concurring opinion explains why a justice disagrees with the majority decision, but abstains from ruling on the case, while a dissenting opinion describes the feelings of the majority.
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
3. A concurring opinion asserts that two similar cases should be aligned and ruled on together, while a dissenting opinion insists that the case being heard is singular and unique.
4. A concurring opinion demands that all justices rule in the same way on a case, while a dissenting opinion explains the differing opinions of justices who ruled the same way on a case.
Answer:
2. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority.
Explanation:
Answer:
what she said
Explanation:
Under which circumstances would parol evidence be admissible? (Choose ALL that apply.) a. To show that one of the parties made a material misstatement that induced the other party to agree to the terms of the contract . b. To explain the meaning of an ambiguous term in the contract c. To present evidence of statements made during the negotiation that are contrary to the terms in the contract d. To present evidence that one of the parties threatened economic duress in order to induce the other party to agree to the terms of the contract
Parol evidence refers to any external evidence, such as oral or written statements, that is offered to interpret or supplement the terms of a written contract. The admissibility of parol evidence varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.
Parol evidence can be admissible under certain circumstances which are as follows:
a) To show that one of the parties made a material misstatement that induced the other party to agree to the terms of the contract:
In case any party made any material misstatement that the other party relied on, then parol evidence can be admissible to show the intention of parties towards the misstatement. This helps to prove whether the statement made by the party was intentional or unintentional and if it was intentional, then the other party has the right to bring a claim against the party who made the misstatement.
b) To explain the meaning of an ambiguous term in the contract:
If a term or phrase used in the contract is ambiguous and the parties are unable to understand the true meaning of that term, then parol evidence can be admissible to explain the meaning of that term. This helps to avoid any confusion between the parties and helps to reach a mutual understanding of the term.
c) To present evidence of statements made during the negotiation that are contrary to the terms in the contract:
If there is any discrepancy between the statements made during the negotiation and the terms mentioned in the contract, then parol evidence can be admissible to explain the true intention of the parties. This helps to prove that the parties did not intend to agree on the terms that are mentioned in the contract and there was some mistake or misunderstanding.
d) To present evidence that one of the parties threatened economic duress in order to induce the other party to agree to the terms of the contract:
If any party threatens economic duress in order to induce the other party to agree to the terms of the contract, then parol evidence can be admissible to show the intention of the party. This helps to prove that the party acted unfairly and with the intention to force the other party to agree to the terms of the contract. Therefore, it is admissible in such a case.
Therefore all the option are correct.
Know more about negotiation here:
https://brainly.com/question/31257448
#SPJ8
Are there limits to the right to cure? Does a breaching party have the right to cure the breach, or can the non-breaching party proceed directly to a damage claim?
Answer:
The overview of the particular question becomes demonstrated in the following portion on the clarification.
Explanation:
There seem to be limitations to something like the obligation to heal. Here rational duration seems to be the limit. An infringing party shall have the opportunity to remedy the infringement regardless of any non-confirmation given the period to fix or rectify the infringement having not terminated unless the infringing community notifies the non-infringing party of its determination to remedy the infringement and therefore remedies the infringement throughout the defined timeframe limits.Furthermore, if there would be an infringement resulting from non-conformance but perhaps the infringing party believes that there would be no infringement and the solution would be appropriate also if the infringing party seasonally shall notify the non-infringing party that perhaps the infringing party seems to have a reasonable amount of time to remedy the infringement.Therefore one thing becomes significant, the role including its defaulting party isn't constrained to healing by verifying requirements if it is suggested that fitting for the intent of healing is also part of the contract, therefore the party must ensure that healing suits the intention as well.
One of the following is not a model of democracy:
a. Classical democracy
O b. Protective democracy
OC.
O d.
Developmental democracy
None of the above
From the above list, no option is referred to as a model of democracy. Thus the correct answer is D, none of the above.
What do you mean by democracy?Democracy is the process of choosing the representatives of government with the willingness of the citizens through elections. This representative works for the welfare of society.
There are various types of democracy models have been introduced to implement better functioning and decision making. These democracy models are participative democracy, direct democracy, representative democracy, and so on.
Therefore, the correct option is D, none of the above is a model of democracy.
Learn more about democracy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13158670
#SPJ1
each year, nearly twice as many people are ____ as are ____.
Each year, nearly twice as many people are killed in automobile accidents as are murdered. Option A is the correct answer.
When a vehicle collides with another vehicle, a person, an animal, road debris, or another moving or stationary barrier, such as a tree, pole, or building, the result is a traffic accident, also known as a motor vehicle collision (or car crash if vehicles are involved in the collision). Option A is the correct answer.
Accidents involving cars frequently result in harm to individuals and things, and also financial expenses to civilization and those impacted. The most hazardous condition that individuals encounter on a regular basis is road travel, although the number of casualties from such accidents receives less media coverage than that of other, less common sorts of disaster.
Learn more about Accident here:
https://brainly.com/question/1475503
#SPJ4
The complete question is, "Each year, nearly twice as many people are ____ as are ____.
a. killed in automobile accidents; murdered
b. kidnapped; killed in automobile accidents
c. murdered; kidnapped
d. murdered; killed in automobile accidents
Utah College adopted a policy designed to produce a more diverse student body. Under the policy, the college uses a selection index on which an applicant may score a maximum of 150 points. Those whose point totals are 100 or above are certain to be admitted; those with fewer than 75 points are likely to be rejected; and those with between 75 and 99 points may or may not be accepted, the likelihood of admission increasing with their scores. Of the 150 possible points, up to 110 may be awarded for academic performance factors, including high school grade point average, standardized test scores, and quality of the high school. Up to 40 additional points may be assigned for other, non-academic factors, such as in-state residency, alumni relationships, personal essay, and personal achievement or leadership. Most of these nonacademic factors carry a low number of points (e.g. 3 for an outstanding essay, 5 for personal achievement or leadership, and 10 for in-state residency). However, any applicant who is an underrepresented minority receives 20 additional points. Is the Utah College student diversity policy constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment?
a)No, because race cannot be considered at all in college admissions.
b) Yes, because the policy does not reserve any seats for underrepresented minorities.
c) Yes, because obtaining a more diverse student body qualifies as compelling interest.
d) No, because race is weighed very heavily as a plus factor that is dispositive in most cases.
Answer:
Im guessing you know the answer already??
Sorry im in need of points.
Explanation:
whoops
What is superficial equity failing to build
to take time to build equity-centered knowledge and fluency, leading to behavioral shifts without understanding deeper meaning or historical context
What is the meaning of Chinese Exclusion Act?
The Chinese Exclusion Act was a federal law in the United States that prohibited Chinese immigrants from entering the country for a period of 10 years, from 1882 to 1892.
It was the first federal law to specifically target a group of immigrants based on their nationality. The law was enacted due to anti-Chinese sentiment and competition for jobs, especially in the western states, and it was motivated by the belief that the Chinese were culturally and racially inferior. The law was later expanded and made permanent until it was finally repealed in 1943. The Chinese Exclusion Act had far-reaching impacts on the Chinese community in the United States and remains a significant event in American history.
Learn more about Chinese Exclusion Act here :
https://brainly.com/question/513896
#SPJ4
نعلم ان الحملة الفرنسية علي العالم العربي كانت عدوانية إذا كيف اسهمت في اليقظة الفكريي والأدبية؟
Examples of agreements that violate government statutes and are unenforceable by the courts are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributers. True False
It is a false statement that an examples of agreements that violate government statutes are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors.
What is a government statutes?This refers to the law that is enacted by a legislature which guides some states affairs such as Civil right Act etc
However, the statement that an examples of agreements that violate government statutes are contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors is a false statement.
Read more about government statutes
brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ1
Contracts for the selling of alcohol by licensed distributors are not examples of agreements that violate government statutes, as stated.
What is the agreement?The term 'agreement' in legal terms refers to a promise/commitment or a series of reciprocal promises that serve as consideration for the parties to a contract.
However, the idea that contracts for the sale of alcohol by licensed distributors are examples of agreements that violate government statutes is False.
Learn more about Agreements:
https://brainly.com/question/27245732
#SPJ1
luca what is a court
Answer:
A court is something that you go in front of to judge if you are guilty of a crime or innocent it is also to determine what your punishment will be for said crime
There are many different types of courts.
Explanation:
Jenna, a paid preparer, is preparing a return for her neighbor and close friend, Gerald. Gerald wishes to claim the head of household filing status using his daughter, Sara, as a dependent. Jenna knows that Sara lived with Gerald's ex-wife (Sara's mother) all year. However, when she asked him about this, Gerald replied: "Oh, I understand that you have to ask that. Sara lived with me all year." Then he gave Jenna a knowing wink.
Jenna should choose which statement:
A. Document her question and Gerald's answer and prepare the return claiming the filing status.
B. Call Gerald's wife and verify that she will not file a return using the head of household status.
C. Decline to prepare Gerald's return with the requested filing status.
D. She may not ignore her personal knowledge, no matter what Gerald says.
Jenna should Decline to prepare Gerald's return with the requested filing status. The Correct option is C.
In this scenario, Jenna, as a paid preparer, has knowledge that Sara, the claimed dependent, lived with Gerald's ex-wife (Sara's mother) all year. Despite Jenna's knowledge, Gerald insists that Sara lived with him and requests Jenna to prepare the return claiming the head of household filing status.
As a tax preparer, Jenna has a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the tax return. It is important to adhere to the tax laws and guidelines provided by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In this case, if Jenna knowingly prepares a return with inaccurate information, such as claiming the head of household status when Sara did not live with Gerald, it could be considered fraudulent.
Therefore, the appropriate course of action for Jenna is to decline to prepare Gerald's return with the requested filing status. She should explain to Gerald that based on the information she knows, he does not meet the requirements for claiming the head of household status, and it would be inaccurate to do so. It is important for Jenna to maintain her professional integrity and comply with the tax regulations, even if the taxpayer insists otherwise.
Learn more about tax regulations
https://brainly.com/question/14418787
#SPJ11
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
A) To show how primitive human beings lived before they formed societies.
B)To determine the natural rights of human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
C)To show that all governments represents at least marginal improvements to the state of nature.
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
E)To show the rights to property obtains in the state of nature but not in civil society.
Answer:
b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
The purpose in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.
What is natural rights?Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.
These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about natural rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2
You’re given an assignment to write a brief for your supervising attorney, in a lawsuit
between two local businesses over payment of a construction contract totaling $100,000.
In preparing this document, it’s important that you educate the judge on
A. the procedural rules of your state court system.
B. the law applicable to the case in question.
C. the difference between substantive law and procedural law.
D. the constitutional standards for admitting evidence.
Based on the peculiarity of rule of law in different localities and the content of this question, when preparing this document, you must educate the judge on the procedural rules of your state court system.
What are the Procedural rules of the state court systems?The term Procedural rules of the state court systems are used to describe the law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the state court system.
Generally, it is believed that state court systems follow their own state rules of civil procedure which may be widely different from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP).
Therefore, since the court case involved two local businesses, and to ensure there is fairness, the Judge should be aware of the procedural rules of your state court system to determine the right judgment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the. the correct answer is option A. "the procedural rules of your state court system."
Learn more about the procedural rules here: https://brainly.com/question/28560902
#SPJ1