pet police. millie breeds german shepherd dogs. bernard, who lives down the street, took in a stray dog loosely identified as a corgi-plus. the dog, casanova, would definitely be classified as a mixed breed. bernard allowed casanova to roam freely. unfortunately, casanova went to visit millie's pure-bred german shepherd. puppies resulted which were shepherd and corgi-plus puppies. millie was incensed. she started a campaign to round up all of the stray dogs, including casanova, and haul them off to the animal shelter. she picked up a few cats as well. she posted signs all over the neighborhood saying that no animal, neither dog, cat, nor fowl, should come into her yard and that she was going to begin shooting the next time, period. understandably, bernard and some of the other neighbors take offense. bernard comes to millie's house while she is working in the yard. he walks behind her and shoves her. millie did not see him coming. millie turned around and proceeded to have a heated conversation with bernard. millie drew her fist back and told bernard that she was going to punch him in the nose. millie started to punch bernard but he stepped back, and all she managed to do was jab him in the shoulder, causing no actual pain. sally, who was going by on the street, saw millie attempting to hit bernard. sally came over and grabbed millie's hands, pinning millie's hands behind her back. assuming that millie sues sally, what would be the most likely result at trial?

Option (b), As a witness for the prosecution in a criminal trial, Harry has been asked to testify. There is a first-degree murder trial going on. Harry claimed to have seen Shawn, the accused, close to the crime scene. Circumstantial evidence is what this is.

In a case involving circumstantial evidence, the evidence must only support the guilt of the accused, and the Court must carefully analyze each and every circumstantial option that is given to it as proof.

A fingerprint discovered at the crime scene is an example of circumstantial evidence, which relies on an inference to connect it to a finding of fact. Direct evidence provides immediate confirmation of a claim's veracity as opposed to indirect evidence or assumptions, which need to be further supported.

Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact from which the court may infer other facts. If an attack took place there around 6:15 p.m., you may mention in your testimony that you observed the suspect walking down O'Connell Street at that time. In that case, you are offering suppositional evidence to the court.

Learn more about circumstantial evidence: https://brainly.com/question/14263276

#SPJ1

AR 600-20 covers the policies and responsibilities of command, which address various aspects essential for maintaining a professional and effective Army. These aspects include the Well-being of the force, military discipline and conduct, the Army Equal Opportunity (EO) Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program.

The Well-being of the force ensures that soldiers have access to the necessary resources and support for their physical, emotional, and mental health. This holistic approach contributes to a more resilient and combat-ready force.

Military discipline and conduct are crucial for maintaining order and efficiency within the Army. AR 600-20 outlines standards for behavior, addressing issues such as insubordination and misconduct, while fostering a culture of professionalism and respect.

The Army EO Program aims to promote equal opportunity and eliminate discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin. This program helps create an inclusive environment where everyone is treated fairly and has the opportunity to excel.

Lastly, the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program provides support to victims of sexual assault, ensuring their safety and well-being. This program emphasizes prevention, education, and appropriate response to sexual assault incidents, fostering a safe and respectful Army community.

In summary, AR 600-20 establishes guidelines and policies for command responsibilities, focusing on the well-being of soldiers, military discipline, equal opportunity, and support for sexual assault victims to maintain a professional and effective Army.

You can learn more about Military discipline at: brainly.com/question/30208301

#SPJ11

The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.

The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.

As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.

To learn more about Indonesia, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31792781

#SPJ4

Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.

In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.

Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.

To know more about law:

brainly.com/question/30133385

#SPJ4

The following options are true about the type of people elected to the presidency of the United States:

a. Most presidents come from positions outside of Congress.

b. Only three presidents have been elected to the office when currently holding the position of US senator.

Option a is true because historically, the majority of U.S. presidents have come from positions outside of Congress. Many presidents have held positions such as governor, military officer, or had careers in law, business, or other fields.

Option b is also true because only three presidents have been elected to the presidency while currently serving as U.S. senators. These presidents are Warren G. Harding, John F. Kennedy, and Barack Obama.

Option c is false. While there have been presidents who served in Congress before becoming president, it is not accurate to say that most presidents have been political insiders from Congress.

Option d is false. Several governors have become president of the United States throughout history, so it is not accurate to say that no governor has ever become president.

Therefore, the correct options are a and b.

To read more about John F. Kennedy click here

https://brainly.com/question/13721861

#SPJ11

Answer:

Make sure the gun is unloaded

Explanation:

Safety is first priority

The court would look to statutory law, case law, constitutional law, and possibly international law to determine the correct place for a lawsuit to be brought by analyzing the concept of personal jurisdiction and the relevant legal principles governing it.

The court would look to various sources of law to determine the correct place for a lawsuit to be brought, specifically, the concept of "personal jurisdiction" or the court's authority over the parties involved in the case. The sources of law that the court would typically consider include:

know more about constitutional law here:

https://brainly.com/question/31042023

#SPJ11

1. As the parole officer for a single mother with three hyperactive, attention-deficit disorder young children, I think that C. One should do what is best for everyone.

2. In the expanded view of duty, especially with respect to protecting society, resolving the situation of this woman without filing a violation report might be more ethical.

An ethical duty is the responsibility to recognize, interpret, and act upon multiple principles and values based on given standards.

However, being ethical does not imply that ethical guidelines must be followed blindly.  Some circumstances demand different approaches to achieve what is best for everyone involved.

Thus, ethical responsibility demands that the parole officer deals with each case with courage, fairness, and integrity.

Learn more about ethical principles at https://brainly.com/question/14334089 and https://brainly.com/question/18401975

#SPJ1

Answer:

200 million dollars.

Explanation:

The Sherman Law is an anti-trust law implemented in the year 1980 to outlaw market monopolization and anticompetitive agreements among businesses and corporations. The Sherman Antitrust Act states that corporates that violate the law would be subjected to a fine of about 100 million dollars per violations.

Therefore, if LMNOP Corp. has been convicted of two distinct and separate violations under the the Sherman Act, LMNOP may be fined as much as 200 million dollars for these two violations.

Question:

A(n) ________ is a person authorized by the state or county to do certain legal tasks like certifying contracts.

Answer:

Notary

The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.

hence, option C is correct.

What is writ of certiorari?

This is a request that the Supreme Court can order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. In this if atleast 4 judges hear the case it will be heard and discussed. It can be applied by any member of public.

Sometimes it is also called as judicial Writ. It can be granted when amounts to abuse of discretion or lack or excess of jurisdiction. It cab be granted in any civil, criminal or judicial cases.

Hence, The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.

hence, option C is correct.

To learn more about writ of certiorari from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/12106865

#SPJ4

Answer:

dang, thanks for free points tho

Explanation:

Answer:

Free answer dude-

Explanation:

The testimony cannot be used. A witness cannot support their testimony until after they have been impeached, according to a party. As a result, (D) is accurate.

The sister's prior statement, which is consistent with her evidence in court, is being used here by the plaintiff's attorney to show that she is being truthful. Due to the fact that the sister has not been impeached, the testimony is not admissible in this case.

(A) is untrue. A past, consistent statement may be used to disprove allegations that a witness is lying out of bias or to restore the credibility of a witness whose reliability has been questioned on unrelated, non-character grounds. Since the sister's credibility has not been questioned in this instance, there is no justification for enhancing it.

(B) is incorrect. Although the comment wouldn't be considered hearsay if it weren't being used to support the witness's credibility, it is nonetheless inadmissible because it was illegally supplied.

(C) is untrue. There is no evidence that the plaintiff's attorney used any deceptive tactics. Furthermore, a direct examination may occasionally allow leading questions (e.g., when the witness is hostile).

To learn more about defendant visit;

https://brainly.com/question/30499612

#SPJ4

The consequences of court organization in approximately clear terms are fair hearings and fair judgements. The court organization provides room for an individual to get his voice or case heard at different court for example appeal court or appellate court if not satisfied with the previous judgement.

There are different court organizations and there are different perspectives for classifying courts. Basically, differences must be established between criminal and civil courts, courts of general jurisdiction and that of limited jurisdiction, and so also appellate and trial courts. There are also constitutional, federal, and transnational courts.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.

learn more about court organization: https://brainly.com/question/25682397

#SPJ1

The complete question goes thus:

Discuss the consequences of court organization in approximately clear terms.

Answer: the advancement of technology

Explanation: A P E X

Answer:

C.  In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.

Explanation:

Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.

One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.

Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when  In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.

The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.

For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.

Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.

The areas of stress that may have to affect the work of policemen would be:

This is the term that is used to refer to the emotional feeling that is caused by the tension that a person would feel. The stress that they feel would make them to react in ways that may show their displeasure and frustration at given events.

The ways that the stress that the police officers feel can be reduced is when they are let to have fewer hours of work on the field. We know that the work that they do is stressful enough.

When they are adequately compensated and let to have vacation and off days. This would help them to regain their strength.

Also giving them the ability to have enough medical attention that they need is also a way to help the police officers.

Read more on stress here: https://brainly.com/question/11819849

#SPJ1

Answer:

I don't know how we can help you its just asking what you have learned, appreciate and discovered

Explanation:

Answer:

A medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare. ... This allows an agent (a trusted friend or family member) to make important and necessary healthcare decisions if the individual becomes incapacitated or unable to communicate or participate in care.

Answer:

A medical power of attorney or medical POA is a durable power of attorney for healthcare.

Explanation:

I hope it helps! Have a great day!
Lilac~

Answer:

jury nullification

Explanation:

looked it up

A (novation) is a method of discharging a contract in which a third party becomes bound upon a promise to the obligee.

The term novation occurs when a third party agrees to take over the obligations and responsibilities of a contract, essentially replacing the original party. A typical example of novation in property law is when a tenant passes the lease over to another person making him or her responsible for rent payments and any property damages according to the original lease contract.

The new party assumes all liabilities and benefits of the original agreement, while the original party is released from any further obligations. Novation can be an effective way to resolve disputes or change the terms of a contract without voiding the entire agreement.

Read more about Contract at brainly.com/question/13037087

#SPJ11

Answer:

draw yourself and introduce yourself with a simple sentence

like for example

j'aime l'art et la façon dont vous pouvez y exprimer votre opinion (i love art and the way you can speak your mind in it )

than like draw you painting a piece of art

hope this helps

Pressure from family, friends, and society can negatively impact a grade 12 learner in a number of ways.

The expectation to perform well academically can lead to stress and anxiety, which can interfere with a student's ability to concentrate and perform well on exams.

Generally, A student in grade 12 may have a lot of negative effects as a result of the pressure they feel from their family, peers, and society. The pressure placed on students to achieve high academic standards may result in feelings of stress and worry, which can impair a student's ability to focus and cause them to underachieve in their schoolwork.

In addition, the pressure that students feel to conform to the expectations of society, such as choosing a particular career path or college to attend, can cause students to lose sight of their own interests and goals, which can result in feelings of dissatisfaction and a lack of motivation to continue their education.

In addition, the pressure that people feel to comply to certain societal standards may also contribute to feelings of inadequacy and a lack of self-esteem in individuals.

Read more about  social pressure

https://brainly.com/question/6690016

#SPJ1

Answer:

a. There is a contract between the band manager and the massage thereapist because the elements of a contract (mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality) are fully satisfied.  However, it is a conditional contract.  The condition for executing the contract was missing as a result of the occurrence of the unforeseen event.

b. The contract was not breached.  It was frustrated because an unforeseen event occurred and prevented the contract from being performed as agreed.  The band manager can still rearrange the massages to be performed at a different time.

Explanation:

Though the massage therapist heavily discounted the rate of the massages, there is still adequate consideration because she was using the opportunity to satisfy her excitement to meet the band members while at the same time collecting some fees for her work.  A contract may be frustrated with the occurrence of an unforeseen event after the contract is entered, especially when the event is not within the control of the parties as in this case.

Answer:

The answer is True!

Explanation:

Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.

Answer:

True

"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."

Option C. Physician practices these entities is considered a covered entity.

A covered entity, as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, refers to certain organizations or individuals that are required to comply with HIPAA regulations in order to protect the privacy and security of individuals' health information. Out of the entities listed, the one considered a covered entity is Physician practices

Physician practices, including individual doctors and medical groups, are generally considered covered entities under HIPAA. These entities provide medical services directly to patients and handle protected health information (PHI) as part of their regular operations. PHI includes any individually identifiable health information, such as medical records, treatment history, and health insurance information.

Consultants, billing agencies, and accountants, on the other hand, are not automatically considered covered entities under HIPAA. While they may come into contact with PHI in their work with healthcare providers, their status as covered entities depends on the specific circumstances and the nature of their relationship with the healthcare organization.

If these entities perform functions or activities that involve the use or disclosure of PHI on behalf of a covered entity, they may be considered "business associates" under HIPAA and would need to comply with certain requirements to protect PHI.

It is important to note that the determination of whether an entity is a covered entity or a business associate under HIPAA can be complex and may require a case-by-case analysis. Organizations should consult legal and regulatory experts to ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations based on their specific roles and responsibilities.

Know more about  PHI here:

https://brainly.com/question/14423306

#SPJ8

Answer:

Then he the trial will be postponed to a later date or until he understands the charges

Answer:

Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy on October 31, 1963, the Act was the first of several federal policy changes that helped spark a major transformation of the public mental health system by shifting resources away from large institutions towards community-based mental health treatment programs

Explanation:

Hope it helps

The OJ Simpson trial was one of the most high-profile criminal trials in American history, and it was closely followed by millions of people around the world.

OJ Simpson was charged with the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, was able to dismantle the prosecution's case in a number of ways. First, they argued that the LAPD had mishandled the evidence and contaminated the crime scene, raising doubts about the reliability of the forensic evidence.

They also argued that the prosecution's star witness, LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, had a history of racism and had planted evidence to frame Simpson. This argument was supported by audio recordings in which Fuhrman used racist language.Furthermore, the defense team was able to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors by presenting alternative theories of the crime.

To know more about criminal click here

brainly.com/question/30428746

#SPJ11

Manpower in medical field includes geographic distributions, age and gender division. It also covers the need for and hiring of both professional and allied health staff, as well as their current and foreseeable supply, distribution, and assignment and use.

Learn more about Manpower here:

https://brainly.com/question/23960324

#SPJ9