Question 1 (3 points)
(6.03)
Which expression shows a sum of three terms? (3 points)
O a
x3
3 + x + 3
Ob
ос
3x
Od
3(x + 3)

The value of angle LAF in the intersecting chords is determined as  104⁰.

The value of angle LAF is calculated by applying intersecting chord theorem, which states that the angle at tangent is half of the arc angle of the two intersecting chords.

Also this theory states that arc angles of intersecting secants at the center of the circle is equal to the angle formed at the center of the circle by the two intersecting chords.

m∠LAF = ¹/₂ (arc LF + arc YS)

From the diagram, we have arc LF = 160⁰ and YS = 48⁰

m∠LAF = ¹/₂ (160 + 48)

m∠LAF = 104⁰

Thus, the value of angle LAF is calculated by applying intersecting chord theorem.

Learn more about chord angles here: brainly.com/question/23732231

#SPJ1

a.) The value of pulses exported by US in billion would be=30 billion.

b.) The ratio of wheat export of UK to maize export of IND would be= 6:5

For question a.)

To calculate the pulses, the following steps should be taken as follows:

From the bar chart, the value of pulses in billions = 30 billions.

For question b.)

The ratio of wheat export at UK and maize export at IND would be calculated as follows:

The quantity of wheat export at UK = 24

The quantity of maize export at IND = 20

Therefore, the ratio of wheat to maize = 24:20= 6:5

Learn more about ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

The payback period for Project A is 3 years, and the payback period for Project B is also 3 years.

To calculate the payback period for Project A and Project B, we need to determine the time it takes for the cumulative cash flows to equal or exceed the initial investment of $40,000.

For Project A:

Year 1 cash flow: $42,000

Year 2 cash flow: $22,000

Year 3 cash flow: $10,000

To find the payback period, we start by subtracting the cash flows from the initial investment until we reach a cumulative cash flow equal to or greater than $40,000:

Year 1: $40,000 - $42,000 = -$2,000

Year 2: -$2,000 + $22,000 = $20,000

Year 3: $20,000 + $10,000 = $30,000

The cumulative cash flow reaches $30,000 in Year 3. However, it does not exceed the initial investment of $40,000. Therefore, we can estimate the payback period as follows:

Payback period for Project A = 2 years + ($40,000 - $30,000) / $10,000

= 2 years + 1 year

= 3 years

For Project B:

Year 1 cash flow: $40,000

Year 2 cash flow: $21,000

Year 3 cash flow: $15,000

Using the same process as above, we calculate the cumulative cash flows:

Year 1: $40,000 - $40,000 = $0

Year 2: $0 + $21,000 = $21,000

Year 3: $21,000 + $15,000 = $36,000

The cumulative cash flow reaches $36,000 in Year 3, which is greater than the initial investment. Therefore, the payback period for Project B is:

Payback period for Project B = 3 years

For more such questions on payback period visit;

https://brainly.com/question/23149718

#SPJ8

Answer:

7 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

here,

270/18=105/x

x=(105*18)/270

x=7

Chau made $270 for 18 hours of work. At the same rate,  Therefore Chau would have to work 7 hours at the same rate to make $105.

To find out how many hours Chau would have to work to make $105 at the same rate, we can set up a proportion using the given information:

Let x be the number of hours Chau needs to work to make $105.

We know that Chau made $270 for 18 hours of work, so the rate of earnings per hour is:

Rate = Total earnings / Number of hours

Rate = $270 / 18 hours

Rate = $15 per hour

Now, we can set up the proportion:

$15 per hour = $105 / x hours

To find x, we can cross-multiply:

$15 × x = $105

Now, solve for x:

x = $105 / $15

x = 7 hours

So, Chau would have to work 7 hours at the same rate to make $105.

To know more about rate

https://brainly.com/question/119866

#SPJ2

Answer:

10 without repetitions, or 35 with repetitions

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay so basically if you allow repetitions, which would be repeating the same letter more than once, such as AAB, or BBD, or DDD, then there would be 35 total combinations. IF you do not allot repetitions and it has to be answers such as ABC, DEA, CAE, DCB, there would be only 10 possible passwords. Hope this helps. Brainiest is much appreciated

The appropriate  journal entry when the cash is received is: Debit Cash $18,870, Debit Advertising expense $480, Debit Commission expense $2,150, Credit Revenue from consignment sales $21,500.

Sheffield corporation entries

Debit Cash $18,870

[$21500-($480+ ($21500×10%))]

Debit Advertising expense $480

Debit Commission expense $2,150

(21,500×10%)

Credit Revenue from consignment sales $21,500

Debit Cost of goods sold $13,888

[($20400+$2000)×62%]

Credit Inventory on consignment $13,888

Therefore  journal entry when the cash is received is: Debit Cash $18,870, Debit Advertising expense $480, Debit Commission expense $2,150, Credit Revenue from consignment sales $21,500.

Learn more about journal entry here:https://brainly.com/question/14279491

#SPJ1

Nate has a deductible of $1,000, which means he is responsible for paying that amount out of pocket before his insurance coverage kicks in. The cost of repairing his car is $7,000, which exceeds his deductible.

However, Nate's collision coverage limit is $5,000, which is the maximum amount his insurance will cover for repairs.

Since the cost of repairs exceeds Nate's coverage limit, he will have to pay the difference between the coverage limit and the actual repair cost.

In this case, Nate's out-of-pocket expenses would be $7,000 (repair cost) - $5,000 (coverage limit) = $2,000.

Therefore, Nate will have to pay a total of $2,000 out of pocket for this claim, which includes his $1,000 deductible and the additional $1,000 that exceeds his coverage limit.

For such more question on collision

https://brainly.com/question/7221794

#SPJ8

Based on the calculations, the amount of money she invested is equal to $3,520.

First of all, we would assign variables to the amount of money that he invested at different interest rates as follows:

Since Lydia invested the same amount of money in both stocks, we have:

x = y     ....equation 1.

At the two interest rates, the total amount Lydia gets is given by:

0.11x + 0.14y = 440     ....equation 2.

Solving the equations simultaneously, we have:

0.11y + 0.14y = 440

0.25y = 440

y = 440/0.25

y = $1,760.

Thus, the total investment is given by:

Total investment = 1760 + 1760

Total investment = $3,520.

Read more on interest rates here: https://brainly.com/question/16793428

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We are asked to graph an inequality . y≥2x - 3

The boundary line of our given inequality will be a solid line as we have greater than or equal to ≥ sign.

The boundary line of our given inequality would be .y=2x - 3

Now, we will test point (0,0) to shade in the correct region as:

0≥2(0)-3

0≥0-3

0≥-3

It should look something like this:

Based on the given data, we can Reasonably infer that most knitters use some kind of specialty yarn and that there is a higher preference for boucle yarn compared to other specialty yarns among the surveyed knitters.

Based on the given data, we can make the following inferences:

b. Most knitters use some kind of specialty yarn:

Since the total number of knitters surveyed is 100, and each knitter was asked about their preference for specialty yarn, we can infer that most knitters (if not all) use some kind of specialty yarn. This is because all the surveyed knitters were specifically asked about their preference for specialty yarn, indicating that specialty yarn is commonly used among knitters.

c. More knitters like boucle yarn than other specialty yarns:

According to the data, 40 knitters preferred boucle yarn, which is more than the number of knitters who preferred any other specialty yarn. Therefore, we can infer that among the surveyed knitters, there is a higher preference for boucle yarn compared to other specialty yarns.

The other statements cannot be reasonably inferred from the given data:

a. The data does not provide information about the number of knitters using sequin yarns compared to fuzzy yarns. We only have information about the preference for boucle, mohair, and metallic yarns.

d. The data does not provide information about the preference of 500 knitters or the comparison of boucle yarn to other specialty yarns among a larger population.

e. The data does not provide information about the preference for metallic yarn compared to plain yarn among the surveyed knitters. The data only includes information about the preference for boucle, mohair, and metallic yarns.

In conclusion, based on the given data, we can reasonably infer that most knitters use some kind of specialty yarn and that there is a higher preference for boucle yarn compared to other specialty yarns among the surveyed knitters.

For more questions on Reasonably .

https://brainly.com/question/29929099

#SPJ8

To find the solution to the system of equations represented by the two lines based on the given tables of ordered pairs, you can follow these steps:

For such more question on equations

https://brainly.com/question/22688504

#SPJ8

The given set is (3, 4, 5, ...} is infinite set.

A set with an infinite number of elements is one that cannot be numbered. A set that has no last element is said to be endless. A set that can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with a suitable subset of itself is said to be infinite. No issue with the in-class assignment.

The stars in the clear night sky, water droplets, and the billions of cells in the human body are just a few examples of endless sets of objects that surround us. A set of natural numbers, however, serves as the best illustration of an infinite set in mathematics. There is no limit to the amount of natural numbers.

Learn more about infinite here

https://brainly.com/question/3928632

#SPJ9

Answer:

50 species every day

Step-by-step explanation:

The correlation coefficient for the data is given as follows:

r = 0.53.

Hence there is an association between the variables that is positive and not strong.

The correlation coefficient is an index between -1 and 1 that measures the relationship between two variables, as follows:

The correlation coefficient is obtained inserting the points of a data-set into a correlation coefficient calculator.

From the table given at the end of the answer, the points are given as follows:

(43, 99), (21,65), (25, 79), (42, 75), (57, 87), (59, 81).

Inserting these points into a calculator, the equation is given as follows:

r = 0.53.

Meaning that the relationship between the variables is positive and not strong.

More can be learned about correlation coefficients at https://brainly.com/question/16355498

#SPJ1

Answer: $120

Step-by-step explanation:Quick maths.

Answer:

64

Step-by-step explanation:

The Ratio of Blue to White drops is 2:8

16*4=64,... 16:64 Have a nice day!

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, \(H_0\) : \(\mu\) = 3.3 billion years      

Alternate Hypothesis, \(H_A\) : \(\mu\neq\) 3.3 billion years

(b) The conditions necessary to use this test is that the data must follow a normal distribution and we know about the population standard deviation.

(c) The value of z-test statistics is 1.77 and the P-value is 0.0768.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is: A theory predicts that the mean age of stars within a particular type of star cluster is 3.3 billion years, with a standard deviation of 0.4 billion years. (Their ages are approximately normally distributed.) You think the mean age is actually greater, and that this would lend support to an alternative theory about how the clusters were formed. You use a computer to randomly select the coordinates of 50 stars from the catalog of known stars of the type you're studying and you estimate their ages. You find that the mean age of stars in your sample is 3.4 billion years.

Suppose you doubt the assumption that the mean age of the stars is 3.3 billion years, but you don't know whether the true mean age is less or greater than 3.3 billion years.

Let \(\mu\) = population mean age of the stars

(a) Null Hypothesis, \(H_0\) : \(\mu\) = 3.3 billion years      {means that the population mean is 3.3 billion years}

Alternate Hypothesis, \(H_A\) : \(\mu\neq\) 3.3 billion years      {means that the population mean is different from 3.3 billion years, i.e. the true mean age is less or greater than 3.3 billion years}

(b) The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z-test statistics because we know about the population standard deviation;

                          T.S.  =  \(\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} } }\)  ~ N(0,1)

where, \(\bar X\) = sample mean age of stars = 3.4 billion years

            \(\sigma\) = population standard deviation = 0.4 billion years

            n = sample of stars = 50

The conditions necessary to use this test is that the data must follow a normal distribution and we know about the population standard deviation. And the conditions are satisfied here.

(c) So, the test statistics =  \(\frac{3.4-3.3}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{50} } }\)

                                         =  1.77

The value of z-test statistics is 1.77.

Also, the P-value of the test statistics is given by;

                P-value = P(Z > 1.77) = 1 - P(Z \(\leq\) 1.77)

                              = 1 - 0.9616 = 0.0384

For the two-tailed test, the P-value is calculated as = \(2 \times 0.0384\) = 0.0768.

The probability of the baseball player getting exactly 4 hits out of 10 times at bat is approximately 0.161, or 16.1%.

To calculate the probability of a baseball player getting exactly 4 hits out of 10 times he was up at bat, we need to use the binomial probability formula.

The binomial probability formula is given by:P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k hits

n is the total number of trials (in this case, the player's 10 times at bat)

k is the number of successful trials (in this case, 4 hits)

p is the probability of success in a single trial (in this case, the player's batting average, 0.298)

(1 - p) is the probability of failure in a single trial

Plugging in the values:

P(X = 4) = C(10, 4) * (0.298)^4 * (1 - 0.298)^(10 - 4)

Using the combination formula C(n, k) = n! / (k! * (n - k)!):

P(X = 4) = 10! / (4! * (10 - 4)!) * (0.298)^4 * (1 - 0.298)^(10 - 4)

Calculating the values:

P(X = 4) ≈ 0.161

For more such questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/1834572

#SPJ8

Introducing numeracy to young children can be done through various types of equipment and resources that engage their senses and make learning math concepts more interactive and enjoyable.

Here are some different types of equipment commonly used to introduce numeracy to young children:

Thus, by incorporating a variety of equipment and resources, educators and parents can create a rich learning environment that supports children's numeracy development and fosters a positive attitude towards math.

For more details regarding numeracy, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32253551

#SPJ1

Part A: The equation that could be used to determine the length of each of the five pieces of wood cut by Warren is: x + 0.7 = 4.5

Part B: The equation from Part A is correct because it takes into account the total length of the wood (4.5 feet), as well as the amount of wood that is left over (0.7 feet).

Part C: the length of each of the five pieces of wood cut by Warren is 3.8 feet.

It is made up of two mathematical objects, with an equals sign (=) between them. Equations are used to represent relationships between unknown variables and can be solved to find their values.

Part A:

The equation that could be used to determine the length of each of the five pieces of wood cut by Warren is: x + 0.7 = 4.5, where x is the length of each piece of wood.

Part B:

The equation from Part A is correct because it takes into account the total length of the wood (4.5 feet), as well as the amount of wood that is left over (0.7 feet).

This equation can be used to calculate how much wood Warren has cut off from the original 4.5 feet of wood, which is the length of each of the five pieces of wood.

Part C:

Solving the equation from Part A:

x + 0.7 = 4.5

Subtract 0.7 from both sides:

x + 0.7 - 0.7 = 4.5 - 0.7

x = 3.8

Therefore, the length of each of the five pieces of wood cut by Warren is 3.8 feet.

For more questions related to length

https://brainly.com/question/28322552

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

A 45° angle is complementary to angle

45°+x°=90°

I hope it helped U

stay safe stay happy

The quotient is 2x^2-5 and remainder is -4

The necessary steps are:

p(x)= 6x^3 + 4x^2 - 15x−14

∴ degree of p(x) is 3.

g(x)=3x+2

∴ degree of g(x) is 1.

∴ degree of quotient q(x)=3−1=2,

and degree of remainder r(x) is zero.

Let, q(x)=ax2+bx+c (Polynomial of degree 2) and r(x)=k (constant polynomial)

By using division algorithm, we have

p(x)=[g(x)×q(x)+r(x)]

=6x^3 + 4x^2 -15x−14 = (3x+2)(ax2 + bx +c)+k

=3ax^3 + 3bx^2 + 3cx + 2ax^2 +2bx+2c+k

∴6x^3 + 4x^2 - 15^x - 14 = 3ax^3 + (3b+2a)x^2 + (3c+2b)x + 2c+k

We have cubic polynomials on both the sides of the equation.

∴ Let us compare the coefficients of x^3, x^2 ,x and k to get the values of a,b,c.

6=a, it is the coefficient of x^3 on both sides

4=3b+2a, it is the coefficient of x^2 on both sides

-15=3c+2b, it is the coefficient of x on both sides

−14=2c+k, it is the constant term on both sides

∴ the quotient is 2x^2 - 5 and the remainder is -4.

learn more about division at

https://brainly.com/question/25289437

Answer:

The 99% confidence interval for the true average speed of a thunderstorm in his area is between 13.56 miles per hour and 16.44 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the standard deviation for the sample, which means that the t-distribution is used to solve this question.

The first step to solve this problem is finding how many degrees of freedom, we have. This is the sample size subtracted by 1. So

df = 13 - 1 = 12

99% confidence interval

Now, we have to find a value of T, which is found looking at the t table, with 12 degrees of freedom(y-axis) and a confidence level of \(1 - \frac{1 - 0.99}{2} = 0.995\). So we have T = 3.0545

The margin of error is:

\(M = T\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} = 3.0545\frac{1.7}{\sqrt{13}} = 1.44\)

In which s is the standard deviation of the sample and n is the size of the sample.

The lower end of the interval is the sample mean subtracted by M. So it is 15 - 1.44 = 13.56 miles per hour

The upper end of the interval is the sample mean added to M. So it is 15 + 1.44 = 16.44 miles per hour.

The 99% confidence interval for the true average speed of a thunderstorm in his area is between 13.56 miles per hour and 16.44 miles per hour.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Find equations of each line using two points on each and then determine the inequalities.

Points

The slope is:

The y -intercept is 2.

The line is:

The shaded region is to the right and the line is solid, so the inequality is:

Points:

The slope is:

The line is:

The shaded region is to the left and the line is not solid, so the inequality is:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

With function transformation, added/subtracted numbers outside of the x always mean the function is being translated up/down. In this case, since the 2 is being replaced with a 4, the new function is 2 units higher than the previous function.

Answer:

Here!! Hope i helped.