should pretrial detainees and convicted offenders be kept in the same institution? explain.

Answer:

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

That's the right answer D.

Yh ✌❤❤

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.

Answer:

possibly

Explanation:

We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.

However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.

Yes, that is correct. Copyright law provides protection for original works of authorship, including but not limited to literary, musical, dramatic, and artistic works.

This protection grants the author the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, and create derivative works based on their original work. The purpose of copyright law is to encourage creativity and innovation by providing authors with the legal tools to control the use and distribution of their works. It is important to respect copyright law and obtain permission or a license before using someone else's copyrighted material.

To learn more about protection
https://brainly.com/question/29987482
#SPJ11

One way an applicant can satisfy the related post-secondary education requirement for a broker's license is by completing a degree program in a relevant field. Depending on the jurisdiction, the specific educational requirements may vary, but a common requirement is a minimum level of post-secondary education.

Applicants can fulfill this requirement by earning a degree in fields such as real estate, business, finance, or a related discipline. This typically involves completing a bachelor's degree program at an accredited college or university. The coursework in these programs often covers topics relevant to the real estate industry, including real estate law, property management, finance, marketing, and ethics.

By completing a degree program in a related field, applicants can demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of the key concepts and principles necessary for a career in real estate brokerage. Prospective brokers should review the specific educational requirements set by the licensing authority in their jurisdiction to ensure compliance.

Answer:

It means due process, which is the fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially a citizen's entitlement to notice of a charge and a hearing before an impartial judge.

Hope this helps :)

Answer: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a major case challenging Environmental Protection Agency regulations of greenhouse

Explanation:

The activist advocate M.C. Mehra v/s. Union Of India AIR 1988 SCR (2) 583* filed a writ petition ordering the closure of a number of polluting tanneries near Kanpur.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a federal government agency established by the Nixon Administration to protect human health and the environment. The EPA develops and enforces environmental laws, inspects the environment, and provides technical assistance to reduce threats and aid in recovery planning.

Thus, The Court ruled that if the EPA wants to continue its inaction on carbon regulation, it must do so in accordance with the Act, which requires it to consider "whether greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change."

Learn more about Environmental Protection Agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/13055175

#SPJ2

Answer:

I believe it is 0.08

Explanation:

The federal government has pressured state governments to enact merit employment systems through various means.

Here are a few ways in which this pressure has been exerted:

Federal Funding: The federal government can use its financial leverage by tying funding for certain programs or grants to the implementation of merit employment systems. By making funding contingent on adopting merit-based hiring practices, the federal government encourages states to comply with the requirement to secure financial support.

Legislation and Regulation: The federal government can pass legislation or promulgate regulations that require state governments to adopt merit employment systems for specific sectors or industries. These laws or regulations create a legal obligation for states to implement merit-based hiring practices, and failure to comply may result in penalties or loss of federal funding.

Incentives and Recognition: The federal government can offer incentives or recognition to states that voluntarily adopt merit employment systems. This can include providing technical assistance, sharing best practices, or acknowledging states that demonstrate progress in implementing merit-based hiring practices. By highlighting the benefits and advantages of such systems, the federal government encourages states to follow suit.

Monitoring and Reporting: The federal government can establish oversight mechanisms to monitor and report on state governments' adherence to merit employment systems. This can involve conducting audits, requesting data and reports, and assessing compliance. By holding states accountable and publicizing the findings, the federal government encourages states to maintain or improve their merit-based hiring practices.

It is important to note that the specific methods and approaches used by the federal government to pressure state governments may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the particular circumstances surrounding the implementation of merit employment systems.

Learn more about federal government here:

https://brainly.com/question/14858877

#SPJ11

The Legislative Brand consist of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Answer:

Surveillance: With the rise of technology, there is an increasing concern about government surveillance and the potential violation of Fourth Amendment rights. This includes issues such as the use of facial recognition technology, warrantless searches of electronic devices, and the collection of data from social media platforms.

Border Searches: Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have broad authority to conduct searches at the border, including searches of electronic devices without a warrant. This has raised concerns about the potential violation of Fourth Amendment rights, particularly for citizens and legal residents who are returning to the country.

No-Knock Warrants: No-knock warrants allow law enforcement officers to enter a person's home without first announcing their presence. This can lead to dangerous and violent encounters and has been the subject of controversy and legal challenges.

Qualified Immunity: Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that protects government officials from being held personally liable for constitutional violations, including violations of the Fourth Amendment. Critics argue that this doctrine has led to a lack of accountability for law enforcement officers who engage in misconduct or violate citizens' rights.

Explanation:

The rational investigation of the underlying principles of being and knowledge is epistemology.

An epistemology is the study of knowledge. It is primarily concerned with what we can know about the world and how we can know it.

Epistemology or the theory of knowledge, is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with knowledge. Epistemology is considered a major subfield of philosophy, along with other major subfields such as ethics, logic, and metaphysics.

The rational investigation of the underlying principles of being and knowledge is epistemology.

Learn more about epistemology  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29889004

#SPJ1

Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:

Answer:

42.354%

Explanation:

To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.

5082 ---- 100%

2154 ----- x

x = (2154 * 100) / 5082

x = 42.354%

Answer:

By keeping them out of hazardous jobs

Answer:

In simple words, Crime legislation is an offence-related area of law. It forbids behaviour that is viewed as dangerous, hazardous and sometimes jeopardising the land, health , safety and spiritual well-being of others, including one's own self.

Criminal law differs significantly by territory and varies from common law, within which there is more focus on resolving disputes and market financing than on retribution or reintegration.

Criminal process is a formalised legal action that verifies the conduct of a felony and requires the perpetrator to be convicted or rehabilitated.

The distinction between primary and secondary liability for a signed negotiable instrument lies in the level of responsibility and liability that each party holds.

Primary liability refers to the original obligation of the party who signs the negotiable instrument, such as a check. This party is typically the maker or drawer of the instrument. By signing the instrument, they create a direct obligation to pay the amount stated on the instrument to the holder or payee. In other words, they are primarily responsible for the payment.

On the other hand, secondary liability refers to the liability of parties who did not sign the instrument but become responsible for payment under certain circumstances. This includes parties such as endorsers and guarantors. If the primary party fails to fulfill their obligation, these secondary parties can be held liable and are responsible for making the payment.

Now, let's evaluate the statement: "A party can never be held liable for a negotiable instrument if he or she did not sign the check." This statement is not entirely accurate. As mentioned earlier, secondary parties, such as endorsers and guarantors, can be held liable for the payment of a negotiable instrument, even if they did not sign the check. However, it is important to note that primary liability rests with the party who initially signed the instrument.

Moving on to the similarities and differences between transfer and presentment warranties:

Transfer warranties arise when a person transfers a negotiable instrument to another party. These warranties are assurances made by the transferor (the one transferring the instrument) that they have the right to transfer the instrument, the instrument is genuine and has not been altered, and that there are no known defenses or claims against it. In other words, transfer warranties ensure that the transferee receives a valid and enforceable instrument.

Presentment warranties, on the other hand, arise when a negotiable instrument is presented for payment or acceptance to the party who is obligated to pay or accept it. These warranties are made by the presenter of the instrument and assure the party who is obligated to pay that the instrument has not been altered, that the presenter has the right to enforce the instrument, and that the presenter has no knowledge of any unauthorized signatures or alterations.

Both transfer and presentment warranties serve to protect the parties involved in a negotiable instrument transaction by providing assurances about the validity and enforceability of the instrument. However, the main difference lies in when these warranties come into play. Transfer warranties are made at the time of transfer, while presentment warranties are made at the time of presenting the instrument for payment or acceptance.

I hope this explanation clarifies the distinction between primary and secondary liability, evaluates the given statement, and highlights the similarities and differences between transfer and presentment warranties. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!

To know more about ,  liability   visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14921529

#SPJ11

The victims are reluctant to contact the police after occurrences because Damage to victims' bodies, brains, emotions, and finances may result, and they may never fully recover.

Because threats against them or members of their family, victims and witnesses may be hesitant to provide information and evidence. Where persons who interact with the criminal justice system are particularly vulnerable, this worry might be compounded. For instance, additional efforts must be made to guarantee that children are protected and assisted effectively by the criminal justice system due to their age and developing levels of maturity. Victims are more willing to assist the criminal justice system in bringing criminals to justice if they receive appropriate and sufficient care and assistance.

Know more about the criminal justice system at: https://brainly.com/question/28913925

#SPJ4

In the legal dispute, Sati presents proof that the written terms are false. The likelihood is that the court will:

d. exclude the evidence.

⇒ Evidence is something or information used to increase or decrease the likelihood that a fact exists. Testimony, written papers, visual or audio recordings, DNA tests, and other tangible artifacts are all examples of evidence. As evidence must be admissible under the applicable jurisdiction's rules of evidence in order to be brought to the court, courts cannot admit all evidence. The Federal Rules of Evidence apply to evidence in federal court. Evidence that is irrelevant, hearsay, or otherwise unadmissible may be rejected by the court. The standards by which a court decides what evidence is admissible at trial are known as the "rules of evidence," as the name suggests. Federal courts in the United States adhere to the Federal Rules of Evidence, whereas state courts typically adopt their own rules.

To learn more about evidence , visit:

brainly.com/question/23323608

#SPJ4

If the class wants to show historical changes, they should choose the following options during their evaluation.

The historical graph is important because it helps to show information and data over time as well as the trends in the data.

These options would be best because while carrying out studies on population, past data would also be used to show the changes, decline or growth in the population.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/13103333?referrer=searchResults

A class researching the world's population would like to include a graph that shows historical changes. They have information from several online media resources.

Which options should they choose during their evaluation process? Check all that apply.

a professor who publishes world population research in a journal

a United Nations report that analyzes trends in the world's population

a nonprofit that tracks how the world's population affects policy de

Answer:

B,C,D

Explanation:

According to the details above, it shows that during a visit to his significant other in Addis Ababa, Obanga from Bishoftu town came across Bokassa, a proficient mechanical expert.

Obanga notified Bokassa that his automobile had sustained significant damage and was currently stationed in Adama, while he had been on the lookout for a skilled technician.

Bokassa proposed the notion of fixing the car for a sum of 10,000 Birr, on the precondition that Obanga would take care of the expenditures involved in procuring the required replacement parts. Obanga joyfully agreed to the proposal.

Learn more about  business   from

https://brainly.com/question/24553900

#SPJ1

Answer:Problem-Solving Policing A type of policing that assumes that crimes can be controlled by uncovering and effectively addressing the underlying social problems that cause crime.

Explanation:

A type of policing that assumes that many crimes are caused by existing social conditions within the community and that crimes can be controlled by uncovering and effectively addressing underlying social problems.

The law that specifically prohibits payments to foreign officials in order to attain business is known as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1977 that prohibits individuals and businesses from making payments or offering bribes to foreign officials in order to secure or retain business advantages. The FCPA applies to U.S. companies, foreign companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges, and individuals who are U.S. citizens or residents. Its primary aim is to prevent bribery and corruption in international business transactions and promote fair and ethical practices.

The FCPA includes provisions related to accounting transparency, internal controls, and anti-bribery measures, and it is enforced by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To know more about international business, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28452807

#SPJ11

Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:

Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.

Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.

Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.

Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.

Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.

learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996

#SPJ1