this landmark u.s. supreme court case held that evidence of officer credibility as a witness may be considered exculpatory evidence and should be given to the defense during discovery.

The standard Ryan is most likely to remind jury of is that the prosecution  must prove beyond reasonable doubt that his client is guilty.

Therefore option b. is correct.

According to the question, Ryan acknowledges that the robber fits his client's description and that his client was out on foot in the area when the crime occurred.

He does, however, remind out that neither a weapon nor any stolen property was discovered on his client at the time of their arrest.

Hence, the prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty in the absence of strong evidence.

Both prosecutors and attorneys are employed by the legal system and may appear in court, but their duties and obligations are distinct. Prosecutors represent the government in criminal trials, whereas attorneys can represent people, corporations, or organizations in both criminal and civil actions.

To know more about a Prosecutor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12057544

#SPJ1

The answer would B:   The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that his client is guilty.

Answer:

a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket

b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy

c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case  involving two different states

d) Family court: a couple getting divorce

e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl

Explanation:

a) Traffic court: a person who wants to dispute a speeding ticket

A Traffic court is court used for the handling of cases regarding traffic cases.

b) Bankruptcy court: a company declaring bankruptcy

A bankruptcy court is a type of federal court that deals with matters relating to bankruptcy.

c) US supreme court: a company that wants to appeal a case  involving two different states

The supreme court is the highest federal court having jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases.

d) Family court: a couple getting divorced

The family court us a court to where matters relating to family law are handled.

e) Juvenile court: a crime by a 12-year-old girl

Juvenile Court is a court that deals with under-age defendants who violate any federal, state or municipal law, and any child who is abused, neglected or dependent.

The case and the court that would most likely hold jurisdiction to hear about it

Therefore,

Learn more about court:

https://brainly.com/question/15818332

Externally, geopolitical conflicts and tensions with other world powers such as China and Russia could pose a significant threat to the United States. The incentives driving this threat include competition for resources, influence and geopolitical dominance.

Changing incentives will require diplomatic efforts, dialogue and cooperation to build mutual trust and find common ground on global issues.

Whereas Internally, the polarization and fragmentation of society can pose a grave threat to the United States. The stimuli that fuel this threat include politics, economic inequality, and identity.

Changing incentives would mean focusing on shared values ​​to foster dialogue, empathy, bridge divides and foster a sense of national unity and social cohesion. 

To learn more about threats faced by U.S:

https://brainly.com/question/22059453

#SPJ4

Answer:

law enforcement

Explanation:

Answer:

y=3

Explanation:

There is no Supreme Court case in 1869 that voted Texas' secession from the Union. Instead, Texas seceded from the Union on February 1, 1861, by a secession convention held at the Independence Convention. This led to the Civil War, which lasted from 1861 to 1865.

The Supreme Court had a few cases that dealt with secession and the Civil War, but none voted for Texas' secession.The Supreme Court cases that dealt with the Civil War include:Ex parte Merryman (1861): This case dealt with the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus by President Abraham Lincoln. The Supreme Court ruled that only Congress has the power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, not the President. However, Lincoln ignored the ruling and continued to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.Ex parte Milligan (1866): This case dealt with the trial by military tribunal of Lambdin P. Milligan, who was accused of aiding the Confederacy during the Civil War.

The Supreme Court ruled that the military tribunal had no jurisdiction to try Milligan because civil courts were still functioning in Indiana, where Milligan was from.Texas v. White (1869): This case dealt with the ownership of U.S. government bonds that were sold by Texas during the Civil War. The Supreme Court ruled that Texas had never actually seceded from the Union, so it still remained a part of the United States. Therefore, the bonds sold by Texas were void, and the federal government had the right to take possession of them.

To know more about Texas' secession visit-

brainly.com/question/30246213

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.

The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.

While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.

To learn more about vote visit:

https://brainly.in/question/20481185

#SPJ13

Answer: to test the drug content in the blood

Explanation:Option C

Answer: Poeple are bias, there going to creat something that benefit ls them and not everyone, also if one person creates their own law everyone else will want to do it to which would destroyed our economy

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Yes, Vivian has a competent loss and lost money.

Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable

Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.

Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.

Therefore,  a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable

Learn more about money here:

https://brainly.com/question/22984856

#SPJ2

Option A: The effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing is that they suffer a severe financial loss, which discourages them from doing the offense again.

Companies that are found guilty of price fixing can face severe financial consequences as a result of fines, which can act as a strong deterrence to such offenses in the future.

Depending on the seriousness of the offense and the size of the organization implicated, these fines may reach millions or even billions of dollars. The notion is that the fine must be severe enough to deter the corporation from repeating the same anticompetitive behavior.

The objective is to deter the corporation from participating in unlawful acts that hurt customers and other businesses rather than forcing them out of business.

Learn more about price fixing at

https://brainly.com/question/13062335

#SPJ4

The question is -

What is the effect of fines on companies who are found guilty of price fixing?

a. They take a huge financial hit, deterring them from repeating the crime.

b. The fine they pay is much less than the profit they made from their crime.

c. They must refund all the money they made from their crime.

d. The fine is a penalty that causes most of them to go out of business.

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

Answer:

An authorized insurer is an individual or a company with approval from the responsible authority, as per the state, to conduct the business of issuing insurance coverage in a given state.

Answer: Adam could consult with Sally regarding cancellation fees, considering the exchange had already begun.

Explanation: When Adam purchased the service, even though he originally agreed on 6 windows for $1,000, he still met a mutual agreement with Sally to pay the additional $200. Once the work is finished, Adam can no longer be reluctant to pay, especially when prompted reasonably.

Answer:

Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.

Explanation:

The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) was passed in 1984 and addressed various factors. One of its major functions was to address the nation's scarcity of organs for transplantation. It was enacted to improve the nation's organ transplantation system and to address the problem of organ shortages.

This Act also established the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which is responsible for coordinating organ transplantation and overseeing the distribution of organs to those in need.

NOTA also addressed several other important factors related to organ transplantation. It prohibited the sale of organs and established penalties for individuals engaged in illegal organ trafficking. This provision was intended to protect the integrity and ethical considerations of organ transplantation.

Overall, the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) played a crucial role in addressing the scarcity of organs for transplantation in the United States by establishing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and implementing regulations to ensure fair and ethical practices in organ allocation and transplantation.

You can learn more about NOTA at: https://brainly.com/question/24128652

#SPJ11

Answer:

Please write english I don't understand vietnamese word

Explanation:

Mobile technology allows the police access to important information, without restricting them to a desk or office. all of the following are examples of mobile technology except Taser.

Tasers are Conducted Energy Devices that are used to incapacitate persons so that they can be approached and handled in an unresisting and thereby safe way. Axon, previously TASER International, sells it. At 55 m/s, it launches two tiny barbed darts designed to pierce the skin and remain attached to the target.

Other examples of policy-related technology include:

Learn more about Mobile Technology:
https://brainly.com/question/28862784
#SPJ1

Mobile technology allows the police access to important information, without restricting them to a desk or office. all of the following are examples of mobile technology except .Taser

Mobile technology refers to devices and services that are designed to be portable and used on the go such as smartphones tablets laptops and mobile apps mobile technology

enables people to access information communicate and perform various tasks from anywhere with an internet connection it has revolutionized the way people work learn and interact with each other and has become an essential part of daily life for many individuals and businesses

Read more on Mobile technologyhttps://brainly.com/question/29889840

#SPJ1

Roman jurists were able to provide a systematic framework for Roman law because of their education, method of work and social context.

In the first place, they received a higher education in law in schools such as the one founded by Sextus Aelius Africanus and this education was generally grounded in Greek and Roman philosophy.The method of work used by the Roman jurists, which was known as responsa prudentum, contributed to the systematic nature of Roman law. These jurists, who were often scholars, would interpret and clarify previous legal decisions that had been made and issue responsa which could be relied upon by judges when they encountered similar legal problems. These responsa were not legally binding but they were considered authoritative.

Over time, the responsa became codified and this eventually resulted in the formation of a systematic framework for Roman law. Finally, the social context of the Roman Empire also contributed to the systematic nature of Roman law. Roman law was seen as a way of unifying the diverse groups that made up the empire and creating a sense of commonality between them. This was especially important since the Roman Empire was constantly expanding and absorbing new territories. Therefore, a uniform and systematic legal framework was essential for the successful governance of the empire.

To know more about Roman law click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28281504

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

Explanation:

alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant

Carrie may be able to argue both trespass to land and negligence in her case against the city airport. The correct answer is option-a.

Trespass to land occurs when someone intentionally enters onto another person's property without permission. In this case, the airport's planes are repeatedly flying over Carrie's property without her permission, which could be seen as a form of trespass.

Negligence, on the other hand, involves a failure to exercise reasonable care in a situation that results in harm to someone else. The airport may be found negligent if they failed to take reasonable measures to minimize the noise and disturbance caused by the planes flying over Carrie's property.

Carrie may not have a strong case for attractive nuisance or invasion of privacy, however. Attractive nuisance applies to situations where a property owner has something on their property that is dangerous to children and may attract them to enter the property.

Invasion of privacy involves an unreasonable intrusion into someone's private life. Neither of these terms seem to fit the situation described in the question.

Therefore, the correct answer is option-a.

For more question on property

https://brainly.com/question/30897115

#SPJ11

The Supreme Court has held that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to certain situations. However, in a specific case, the Court ruled that using a thermal imaging device from a public vantage point to monitor heat radiation constituted a search requiring a prior warrant.

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, there are exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's application.

In the case mentioned, the Supreme Court found that the use of a thermal imaging device qualified as a search under the Fourth Amendment. This case, known as Kyllo v. United States (2001), involved law enforcement using a thermal imaging device to detect the amount of heat radiation emanating from a person's home. The Court ruled that this action constituted a search because it revealed private information about the interior of the home that could not be obtained through ordinary public observation.  For example, the Court has held that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to certain activities or situations where individuals have a diminished expectation of privacy.

The Court further held that such a search using a thermal imaging device from a public vantage point required a prior warrant, as it intruded upon a protected area within the home. The decision emphasized the importance of maintaining the privacy of the home and ensuring that law enforcement activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals. Therefore, while the Fourth Amendment may not apply to certain situations, in the case of using thermal imaging devices to monitor heat radiation, a warrant is required to comply with constitutional protections.

To learn more about supreme court click here; brainly.com/question/29759733

#SPJ11

Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.

Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.

Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.

Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.

Learn more about immigrants here:

https://brainly.com/question/28791683

#SPJ6

Families, media, peers, schools, religions, work and legal systems are some of the agents of political socialization.

Agents of political socialization or sometimes referred to as institutions of socialization,  work to influence and shape people's political and economic norms, opinions and values.

Political socialization usually refers to the process where someone acquires a political value, behaviour, and attitude. Political socialization helps how individuals act and think in the political sphere of life. More simply, it informs that which political parties people get involved in, for which party people vote for, and why do people do so.

To know more about political socialization refer to-

brainly.com/question/12190718#

#SPJ4

Complete question

What is an agent of political socialization?

Enhances navigation, aids flight planning, facilitates course corrections, helps avoid restricted areas, assists in emergency situations.

Finding distances in a coordinate plane is helpful to a pilot in several ways:

By utilizing distances in a coordinate plane, pilots can enhance their situational awareness, ensure accurate navigation, and make informed decisions for safe and efficient flight operations.

Learn more about emergency situations

brainly.com/question/32245575

#SPJ11

Answer:

The lawyer's statement means Heidi's lawsuit is frivolous.

Explanation:

Precedents in the courts of law are previously established cases whose judgements can be referenced in successive case. In the case above, Linda is the defendant because the burden of proof lies on her. She needs to put up a defense to contest the accuracy of her lawsuit.

When the lawyer tells her that precedent supports her defense, it means that previously established cases on that matter support Linda's case. Therefore, Heidi's lawsuit against Linda was frivolous and lacked merit. Linda has a high chance of winning the case.

Answer:

ARAT PO ML HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAH

Explanation:

BUHATIN KITA HAHAHAHAHAH