The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was a New Deal program created to improve the conditions of poor landowning farmers and sharecroppers.
The program aimed to reduce overproduction and increase farmers' purchasing power by providing subsidies to farmers who agreed to limit the acreage they cultivated. This would in turn reduce the amount of agricultural products on the market, raise prices, and enable farmers to earn more.
The AAA also offered loans to farmers and provided support for agricultural cooperatives.
Furthermore, the program introduced a system of crop rotation that would help improve the soil, protect against soil erosion, and preserve native wildlife habitats.
The AAA was an ambitious attempt to create a better life for farmers by introducing measures that would help ensure their long-term sustainability.
To know more about Agricultural Adjustment Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30108745#
#SPJ11
Ideas about what makes a successful police force have changed throughout US history. For
this activity, you will reflect on the early police force during the colonial era, as well as what
you know about the modern police force.
Create two job descriptions: one for a watchmen in colonial America and one for a modern-
day police officer in your home town. Each job description should contain the following
components:
In the political, reform, and community eras of US history, a successful police force has influenced society. sophisticated technologies, new types of crime, and changing community interactions.
The period between 1840 and 1930 is known as the Political Era of American policing. In the middle to end of the 1800s, major cities established police forces. Urbanisation brought on by the Industrial Revolution coincided with the Political Era of police. Corruption and brutality characterised the Political Era of policing, and the Reform Era emerged as the solution. This new age was mostly pioneered by one police head, head August Vollmer.
Read more about US history at
https://brainly.com/question/28709508
#SPJ1
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back of the pickup is covered with a camper shell. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Answer:
C. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Explanation:
Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.
One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.
Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
When can a person ride in a pickup?The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.
For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.
Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.
who is Prime Minister of world
Answer:
Sirimavo Bandaranaike is prime minister of world.Does gangi have the right to set up this display in front of his office? is this a lawful form of free speech? explain your answer in detail.
The question of whether Gangi has the right to set up a display in front of his office and whether it constitutes a lawful form of free speech depends on various factors, including the specific content of the display, applicable laws, and potential restrictions imposed by the government.
The right to set up a display as a form of free speech is generally protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
However, there are limitations and restrictions on this right. For example, if the content of the display involves obscenity, incitement to violence, or poses a clear and imminent danger, it may not be protected by the First Amendment.
Additionally, local regulations and laws may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on free speech activities. These restrictions aim to balance the right to free speech with other legitimate interests, such as public safety, traffic flow, or the aesthetics of public spaces.
Therefore, it is important to consider whether Gangi's display complies with any applicable local regulations or restrictions.
To determine if Gangi's display is lawful, the specific details of the display, including its content, context, and any applicable local laws or regulations, need to be assessed.
Consulting with a legal professional or reviewing local ordinances can provide a more accurate assessment of the legality of Gangi's display in front of his office as a form of free speech.
Learn more about legal professional here :
https://brainly.com/question/28460407
#SPJ11
Ronald buy a motorbike from natalie for the amount of r35 000.00. natalie takes the money, but does not hand over the motorbike to ronald. can ronald approach the magistrate's court and ask for specific performance of the agreement to the effect that natalie hand over the motorbike to him?
When first accused of committing a crime, a guilty person will most likely deny the accusation immediately repeat the accusation in the form of a question say nothing try to blame someone else
Answer:
repeat the accusation in the form of a question.
Explanation:
A law can be defined as the system of principles, regulations and rules established by legislature, that is adopted in a community, society or country to regulate the actions of its citizens, members or employees.
Thus, law is a tool used by the judiciary, lawyers, individuals, organizations, and even government to ensure everybody is well behaved, non-criminal and civil in their actions. Therefore, a law creates the foundation for ethical behavior.
In circumstances where there are aberration, the law is enforced as a punishment and penalty for wrongdoings or misdeeds.
Generally, there are various types of law and these includes; criminal law, constitutional law, intellectual property law, corporate law, international law, family law, civil law, etc.
Typically, when a person is first accused of committing a particular crime, a guilty person will most likely repeat the accusation in the form of a question. This action is usually done by the guilty party so as to feign ignorance of the purported crime and presumably just hearing of such crime or event for the first time ever.
How were the firefighters in Boston similar to the firefighters in Philadelphia? They were paid. They lived in the communities. They were highly trained. They were educated.
Our American borders are unsecure and at this time we have no control over who crosses. In my humble opinion this is very dangerous, but the fact remains that there are a larger percentage of American citizens who hold to the idea that there should be no borders on any country, and everyone should be able to cross into any country they wish and live anywhere they wish. I want you to make a strong argument to the opposite and try to convince people that we should have a border and should not prevent anyone from entering the country.
1. Make as strong of an argument as you can for 'no border control'.
2. Research Venezuela and tell us what the process is for entering that country legally and becoming a citizen there
Answer: The government owns us and controls us
Explanation:
The Salem Witchcraft Trials were (in)famous for their reliance on the use of “Spectral Evidence.” What is Spectral Evidence? How would the Federal Rules of Evidence deal with Spectral Evidence today?
Spectral Evidence was testimony in which witnesses claimed that the accused appeared to them and did them harm in a dream or a vision
The Federal rules of evidence will most likely not admit spectral evidence because it is impossible to refute such evidence.
What was the Salem Witch trials?The Salem witch trials was a trial that occurred during the time of colonial administration in Massachusetts between early 1692 and mid-1693.
The Salem Witch trial saw the execution of 20 people who out of 200 were accused of practicing witchcraft which was at that time regarded as the the devil's magic.
In 1711, colonial authorities pardoned some of the accused and compensated their families
The origin of the Salem witch trials occurred when a group of young girls in Salem Village, Massachusetts, claimed to be possessed by the devil and accused several local women of witchcraft.
The evidence presented by these girls were regarded as Spectral Evidence because it deals with the spiritual.
In todays legal practice, Federal rules of evidence will most likely not admit spectral evidence because it is impossible to refute such evidence.
Learn more about Salem Witch Trials at https://brainly.com/question/24750226
#SPJ1
The fcc prohibits radio and television stations from airing what types of content between 6 a. M. And 10 p. M. ?.
Indecent and profane content is prohibited on broadcast TV and radio between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.
Obscene content doesn't have assurance by the Main Revision. For content to be controlled vulgar, it should meet a three-pronged test laid out by the High Court: It should engage a typical individual's lascivious interest; portray or depict sexual direct in a "evidently hostile" way; and, taken all in all, need serious scholarly, imaginative, political or logical worth.
Indecent content sexual or excretory organs or exercises in a manner that is evidently hostile however doesn't meet the three-prong test for vulgarity.
Profane content incorporates "horribly hostile" language that is viewed as a public disturbance.
Factors in deciding how FCC rules apply incorporate the particular idea of the substance, the hour of the day it was communicated and the setting in which the transmission occurred.
to know more about FCC rules click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11356675
#SPJ4
Indecent and profane content is prohibited on broadcast TV and radio between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.
Obscene content doesn't have assurance by the Main Revision. For content to be controlled vulgar, it should meet a three-pronged test laid out by the High Court: It should engage a typical individual's lascivious interest; portray or depict sexual direct in a "evidently hostile" way; and, taken all in all, need serious scholarly, imaginative, political or logical worth.
Indecent content sexual or excretory organs or exercises in a manner that is evidently hostile however doesn't meet the three-prong test for vulgarity.
Profane content incorporates "horribly hostile" language that is viewed as a public disturbance.
Factors in deciding how FCC rules apply incorporate the particular idea of the substance, the hour of the day it was communicated and the setting in which the transmission occurred.
to know more about FCC rules click here:
brainly.com/question/11356675
#SPJ4
Which of the following contracts must be written?
A. An agreement to purchase a necklace
B. An agreement to walk someone's dog
C. An agreement to buy a house
D. An agreement between friends
Answer: C - An agreement to buy a house
Explanation:
The overall trend in the history of the trial courts in California has been
a. to improve services to the public by streamlining the court system
b. to create more and more courts below the superior court level
c. to reduce the number of judges in the state of California
d. to move away from the criminal cases to deciding only civil cases
The overall trend in the history of the trial courts in California has been to improve services to the public by streamlining the court system.
The Calif. Court system has 3 levels: the California Supreme Court, the Courts of attractiveness, and the Superior Courts. These courts are ruled by three distinct judicial bodies: the Judicial Council, the Commission on Judicial Performance, and the Commission on Judicial Appointments.
The California Supreme Court is the state's highest court. it's the authority to review the choices of the Courts of Appeal and its decisions are binding on all alternative California state courts. The court is seated in San Francisco and conducts sessions in l. a. and Sacramento. The Supreme Court has one justice and 6 associate justices who are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments.
The Calif. Courts of Appeals are California's intermediate courts of proceedings review. California has six appellate districts: the first proceedings District, San Francisco; 2d proceedings District, Los Angeles; the third proceedings District, Sacramento; the fourth proceedings District, San Diego; the fifth proceedings District, Fresno; and the sixth proceedings District, San Jose. The California legislative assembly apportions the number of judges for every district.
Learn more about the Court System here: https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
in what way can victims of crime be better assisted and empowered in the criminal justice system?
Answer:
By having strong evidences mostly regarding his case or/and witnesses of course
Explanation:
Which of the following are ways sensitive information can be leaked?
Select the 3 answer options that apply.
Unencrypted emails
Cyber attacks
Overheard conversations
Proper document disposal
Answer:
Unencrypted emails
cyber attacks
overheard conversations
Explanation:
If the person disposed of the document properly, then no information would be leaked.
Ummmmm........I have a little kid mad at me for doing nothing wrong ;^;
(All I said was that if you don’t now the answer don’t answer and put “i dunno the answer” bc that’s stupid and rude to the person who asked the question) *shrugs*
Answer:
Maybe just ignore them.
Explanation:
They'll get mad, but you won't respond so they'll stop it, hopefully.
What if your person did not have the legal capacity to (fill in the blank). What difference would this have made on their achievements? Who all would this affect? Explain in 5 sentences
the person is Kareem Abdul Jabar
Answer:
they would not be able to be represented. it would effect everyone involved
Explanation:
The Bureau of Consumer Protection is one part of the Federal Trade Commission. How do regulatory agencies like these impact consumers? How do they affect businesses?
Any incorrect or silly answers will not be accepted, this isn't a joke
Answer: The bureau of consumer protection is an organization that protects the rights of consumers.
Explanation:
The bureau of consumer protection collects complaints from consumers. It conducts investigations on the sale and purchase of goods or services and fraudulent and unfair business practices.
The bureau of consumer protection is a regulatory agency, which develops the rules to maintain the fair marketplace by educating the consumers. The unethical business practices in which consumers are being cheated are sued by the bureau.
QUESTION #2 [10 points]: Look at the graph below depicting the total correctional population in the
United States between the years 2006-2016 and answer the questions below the graph.
FIGURE 1
Total population under the supervision of
U.S. adult correctional systems, 2006-2016
Number (in millions)
I
7
Total
6
5
Probation
4
3
2
-Prison
1
Parole
Jail
0
06
"10
'15 16
Note: Estimates may not be comparable to previously published
BJS reports because of updated information or rounding. See
Methodology for details.
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Annual Probation Survey
Annual Parole Survey, Annual Survey of Jails, and National
Prisoner Statistics program, 2006-2016.
Answer:
I do not understand your question.
Please be more clear on what you want to be answered.
Please and Thank you!
Explanation:
a defamation suit for a famous person is harder to win than a defamation suit for a regular person. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A defamation suit is the act of attacking one's reputation, although someone could defame someone, it isn't easy to prove for non famous people, as they wouldn't have to worry about being affected Income-wise or in General, although it's an unfair assumption, our criminal justice systems do has it's flaws.
How did city infrastructure in the early 20th century affect the modernization of firefighters? (Check all that
apply.)
AThe training for firefighting opened more job opportunities.
B The city became the main overseer of all firefighting duties and jurisdictions.
CTechnology changes brought improvements to fire engines.
DWater hydrants and reservoirs were planned with the city's development.
Answer: all of them apply
Explanation:
How does the uniform commercial code differ from the common law of contracts?
Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).
Explanation:
Answer:
Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.
Explanation:
Select the correct answer.
Which situation represents the direct benefits of taxing citizens?
A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
O B.
the price of smartphones and personal computers decreases
OC.
the number of African Americans serving on corporate boards of directors increases
O D. a Hispanic woman becomes the first woman entrepreneur in the construction industry
Answer: A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
Explanation:
Corporal injury to spouse - Is it same as domestic violence?
Yes, Corporal injury to spouse - Is it same as domestic violence as-
The term "corporal injury" in criminal law refers to any physical harm that results in a traumatic condition. This usually refers to a visible or verifiable injury, no matter how minor or serious.
A physical wound caused by force is referred to as a corporal injury.
It doesn't matter how much force is used. Furthermore, it makes no difference if the force was applied with a weapon or even a firearm. Even whether the force resulted in a minor or severe bodily injury is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is whether the force the victim was subjected to resulted in a traumatic injury of some kind. Many more states have amended their criminal laws to remove outdated terminology like "corporal injury" and replace it with clearer definitions of the crime's elements.
To know more about "corporal injury here
https://brainly.com/question/15020391
#SPJ4
Which rehabilitation programme would you apply to mr x if he were to be incarcerated and why do you think that programme will be effective in rehabilitation
The most recently developed theory of punishment is that of rehabilitation, which holds that the goal of punishment is to provide the offender with therapy and training so that he would be able to reintegrate into society and function as a law-abiding member of the community. I would prefer this type of rehabilitation programme for Mr.x.
Why is rehabilitation better than incarceration?Addicts who are in recovery usually conduct less expensive crimes. They are also typically arrested less frequently. The cost of obtaining addiction treatment is becoming more accessible thanks to healthcare reforms. Reduced expenses for law enforcement and the courts will result from declining crime rates and fewer arrests.
To know more about rehabilitation programme visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22182314
#SPJ9
Due process requirements entitle an individual to "notice" and a "hearing" if he or she is deprived of a liberty or property interest.
True
False
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Bobby takes out a home loan to purchase a new house in Miami, FL. Assuming Bobby gets to keep equitable title to the property while the lender takes legal title, what will happen if Bobby defaults on the loan?
* Since Bobby holds equitable title to the property, the lender can never foreclose on the property.
* Since the lender holds legal title, they can quickly take back the property.
* The lender will initiate the judicial foreclosure process.
* The lender will initiate the non-judicial foreclosure process.
If Bobby defaults on the home loan, the lender who holds legal title to the property can initiate the foreclosure process. This means that they can take back the property and sell it to recover the amount owed on the loan.
When Bobby took out the home loan, he agreed to give the lender a security interest in the property as collateral for the loan. The lender holds legal title to the property until Bobby repays the loan in full. However, Bobby has equitable title to the property, which means that he has the right to use and occupy the property while making payments on the loan. If Bobby defaults on the loan, the lender has the legal right to initiate the foreclosure process and take back the property. The lender may choose to initiate either a judicial or non-judicial foreclosure process depending on the state laws and the terms of the loan agreement. In a judicial foreclosure process, the lender must file a lawsuit against Bobby to obtain a court order allowing them to foreclose on the property. In a non-judicial foreclosure process, the lender can sell the property without going through the court system. if Bobby defaults on the home loan, the lender can initiate the foreclosure process and take back the property. The specific foreclosure process will depend on the state laws and the terms of the loan agreement.
to know about foreclosure process visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32109364
#SPJ11
Is it a violation of the Federal Wiretap Law (Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act) for Gary to allow law enforcement officers to listen to a telephone conversation between himself and Terry without Terry’s knowledge
Answer:
I think it's a crime and it shows no manners
An attorney hired a recent law school graduate as an associate. For the first six months, the associate was assigned to draft legal documents that the attorney carefully reviewed and revised before filing. However, shortly after the associate was admitted to the bar, the attorney told the associate that he would be going on vacation the following week and was assigning her the representation of the landlord in a housing case that was going to trial while he was away. The associate had never conducted or observed a trial before and, because she had not previously worked on any housing cases, she was unfamiliar with the relevant law and procedure. She did not believe that she would have enough time to learn everything that she needed to know, but she was reluctant to decline the assignment. Before the trial began, she met with the landlord and disclosed that this would be her first trial, but the landlord did not object. Although the associate prepared diligently, the landlord lost the trial. Is the attorney subject to discipline
Lawyers are required to deliver proficient advocacy to their clients as part of their professional duties. To provide capable representation, one must possess the appropriate expertise, aptitude, meticulousness, etc.
What is the case about?If a lawyer delegates a complicated case to a new colleague without sufficient monitoring or assistance, it may give rise to doubts about the lawyer's fulfillment of their responsibility to be proficient.
In the situation above, the lawyer entrusted an inexperienced associate with the responsibility of leading or witnessing a trial for the first time. Moreover, the associate lacked knowledge about the appropriate legislation and protocol concerning matters related to housing.
Learn more about attorney from
https://brainly.com/question/29731616
#SPJ4