Answers
“Lobbying” means communicating at once or soliciting others to talk with any respectable or personnel in the legislative or executive department of government or in a quasi-public business enterprise, for the cause of influencing any legislative or administrative movement.
Solicit business manner to actively searching for commercial enterprise or paintings from a consumer, either by beginning the services, advertising the offerings, or encouraging a discussion about one's offerings.
Solicitation” or “solicit” denotes a conversation initiated via or on behalf of a lawyer or law company this is directed to a selected individual the attorney is aware of or reasonably must know wishes legal offerings in a particular count number and that offers to provide, or fairly may be understood as offering to offer, prison.
Learn more about soliciting here https://brainly.com/question/14139236
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What is the focus of strain theory?
Answers
Answer:
Strain theory is a sociology and criminology theory developed in 1938 by Robert K. Merton. The theory states that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (such as the American dream), though they lack the means.
Explanation:
Which is a reason ethics are important to law enforcement?
Answers
Answer:
Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.
Explanation:
Which organization is primarily responsible for controlled substance and narcotics enforcement at the
federal level?
Answers
Federal agencies, primarily the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), enforce federal controlled substances laws in all states and territories, but the majority of drug crimes known to U.S. law enforcement are dealt with at the state level. give me brainliest pls
In the lawsuit referred to where a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine, is suing the Federal Government and the DEA, what can the defendants use to win this case
Answers
Answer:
The options are;
A. Commerce clause
B. The Separation of powers clause
C.The First Amendment
D. The Supremacy clause
The answer is D. The Supremacy clause
Explanation:
In the lawsuit which involved a 12 year old girl prone to seizures and taking marijuana as medicine suing the Federal Government and the DEA, the defendants are the Federal Government and DEA and the only way they can win the case is by applying the Supremacy clause which states that Federal laws are superior to State laws.
Although some states have legalized the use of marijuana, the Federal Government still considers the use of marijuana as illegal.
Which of the following statements limitations, prohibitions, and challenges is false?
Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government
Answers
The false statement among the limitations, prohibitions, and challenges listed is: "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government."
In reality, one of the primary reasons for classifying information is to protect national security, not to prevent embarrassment to the government. The classification system is designed to safeguard sensitive information that, if disclosed, could potentially harm the country's interests, compromise intelligence sources, or endanger individuals. Classifying information is governed by specific criteria and guidelines that prioritize national security concerns over potential embarrassment. The U.S. government has established clear procedures and standards for determining what information should be classified and the level of classification required.
In summary, the false statement is that "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government." Classification of information primarily aims to protect national security rather than prevent government embarrassment.
To know more about national security, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2639721
#SPJ11
managing security operations
Answers
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answers
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
Answers
Answer:
possibly
Explanation:
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answers
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
Define the term gender imbalance and state two negative effects that this may have in the workplace?
Answers
Answer:
Gender inequality is the social process by which men and women are not treated equally.
..
..
Gender discrimination has a significant impact on mental and physical health worldwide. It can limit peoples' access to healthcare, increase rates of ill health, and lower life expectancy. While it is true that women live longer than men on average, they experience higher rates of ill health during their lifetimes.
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answers
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you'd be successful prosecuting using this rule.
Answers
Hello. You did not report the case Keith is involved in, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor can use the felony murder rule to prosecute someone as possibly guilty of a first-degree murder. This is because the felony murder rule states that there are murders that occur accidentally, or during dangerous activities, and these murders are classified as first-degree murder.
Every judge has the power to decide the cases before him/her without having to follow the decisions of any other judge or court.
Answers
Answer:
Judicial power is the power “of a court to decide and pronounce a judgment and carry it into effect between persons and parties who bring a case before it for decision.”
The final step in obtaining a Learner's Permit is:
A. Touching your nose while walking a straight line
B. Obtaining a Certificate of Enrollment from your school
C.Showing proof of residence
D. None of the above
Answers
Read Case Study 3 and discuss the current or potential legal and/or regulatory issues apparent in this fact pattern that might impact a public offering. Case Study 3 Both Fred's family and the business have rebounded from their prior issues. Jane sought counseling for her gambling issues and has worked hard to mend her relationships with the family. Prior to cashing the forged checks from Jane, Don was struck by lightning and experienced a spiritual enlightenment. He willingly returned the checks to Fred and Sally and promptly joined the Peace Corps. Likewise, when the church found out the donated check was a forgery, it was immediately returned. Bob's wife (also Sally's best friend) found out about Bob's online sabotage and promptly remedied the situation. Once Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup was back on track, the company's growth was exponential. Featured on a widely viewed talk show starring a prominent doctor, online orders and demands from big-box chains nationwide skyrocketed. Fred and Sally have been told that now would be an ideal time to take Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup public. The only distressing issue at hand involves Tammy, a local girl who had been working as a delivery girl for the company. She applied for Jane's former job as bookkeeper. Fred and Sally hired Ted, an experienced accountant, instead, and Tammy has filed a claim of sex discrimination against the company and Fred personally. Fred and Sally are seeking your advice regarding Tammy and the possibility of taking the company public. Complete a legal analysis of the given facts, including the following elements. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: 1. II. Evaluate three current or potential legal and/or regulatory issues apparent in this fact pattern that might impact a public offering. Determine whether Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup is in compliance with government regulations involving public offerings by analyzing relevant laws and using the appropriate legal test and facts given. Support your conclusions and provide recommendations to improve compliance and strategies for corporate growth. III.
Answers
Before going public, Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup must address legal and regulatory concerns, including discrimination claims, past legal problems, and regulatory compliance. Seeking guidance from legal and financial experts and reviewing financial records and internal controls can help reduce risks.
There are several legal and regulatory issues apparent in Case Study 3 that may impact a public offering for Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup. First, there is the issue of the discrimination claim filed by Tammy.
If the claim is found to have merit, it could potentially impact the company's reputation and expose them to liability. This could affect the company's ability to attract investors or obtain regulatory approval for a public offering.
Second, the prior legal issues involving Jane's embezzlement and Don's involvement in cashing forged checks could also be a concern for investors. These issues could potentially impact the company's financial stability and expose them to legal liabilities, which could affect their ability to secure investment funding.
Finally, there is the issue of regulatory compliance. Before pursuing a public offering, Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup must ensure that they are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. This includes regulations regarding financial reporting, disclosure requirements, and corporate governance.
To ensure compliance and minimize legal risks, Fred and Sally should seek the advice of legal and financial professionals. They should review their financial records and internal controls to ensure that they are secure and that there are no potential legal or regulatory issues.
They should also review their hiring practices to ensure that they are in compliance with employment laws and regulations.
In summary, there are several legal and regulatory issues that Fred's Miracle Cough Syrup must consider before pursuing a public offering. These include potential liability for discrimination claims, prior legal issues involving embezzlement and forgery, and regulatory compliance.
To minimize legal risks and ensure compliance, Fred and Sally should seek the advice of legal and financial professionals and conduct a thorough review of their financial records and internal controls.
To know more about legal refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31746210#
#SPJ11
May I have help on question 3 on The drivers sign Test I’ll give you brainliest
Answers
Answer:
it is providing you and advance notice that the incoming speed limit that it would be 45MPH
Explanation:
whenever you see one of those signs with a speed limit with a arrow pointing top it is saying that futher ahead speed limit will be 45 or whatever number it has.
Having to do all the work is an example of a(n)
A. disadvantage to society of using authority
B. disadvantage to the user of using authority
C. advantage to society of using authority
D. advantage to the user of using authority
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
, Studio GFF hid your b ok gift but no you don't need to
A public high school publishes a weekly newspaper as part of its journalism class. The student editor-in-chief of the paper wrote an article supporting the legalization of marijuana and showed it to his faculty advisor. The advisor told the editor that while this issue was receiving a lot of media attention in their community, in order to discourage drug use, school policy prohibited the paper from including any drug-related articles. The advisor then told the editor not to include the article in any edition of the paper.
A few days later, the editor and faculty advisor were preparing to upload the electronic files for the paper to their printer. The advisor was momentarily called away, and the editor quickly replaced an article on clothing styles with his article on the legalization of marijuana. When the paper came out, the article was the talk of the school. After a brief investigation, the student was removed from his position as editor-in-chief. The student brought suit against the school, claiming that his removal was a violation of his First Amendment rights under color of law.
How should the court rule on this issue?
Answers
The court should rule that the student’s First Amendment rights under color of law have been violated.
The First Amendment prohibits Congress from making any law “respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
According to the above scenario, the school newspaper was created as part of the journalism class, so the newspaper is a school-sponsored activity. When a school sponsors a student activity, the school has the right to limit what is expressed in the activity. The First Amendment does not prevent school officials from setting high standards of civility and discourse for student speech within the school or preventing speech that might disrupt the educational environment.
The school’s decision to prohibit drug-related articles in the newspaper does not violate the First Amendment because it has been held that the First Amendment does not protect all speech or student speech that is inconsistent with the educational mission of the school.
When the student replaced the approved article with an article that was forbidden by school policy, it was a violation of school policy. The school was correct to remove the student from his position. The student could have published the article in a newspaper that was not school-sponsored, but he chose to take a risk, knowing that he was acting against school policy.
Therefore, the court should rule that the student’s First Amendment rights under color of law have been violated by the school policy and that the school was justified in removing the student from his position.
learn more about First Amendment rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/30962980
#SPJ11
Outlines use____ to identify various levels of information. A numbers. B Roman Numerals . Cletters . Dall of these
This is from leadworthy also plss help
Answers
no no no no no nooo no nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Answers
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts is ________.
Answers
Answer:
Hello.
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts are Probation followed by Placement.
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
Answers
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
Mawby and Walklate looked at victimology as a social phenomenon. They broke victimology into three strains. Review these strains and discuss which strain you believe in the most and why.
Answers
Victimology was examined by Mawby and Walklate as a social phenomena. Positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology are some of the three subtypes that they fall under. The majority of the time, support positive victimology.
What is victimology?
The term "victimology" is the study of crime victims. The field of victimology critically examines and perpetrator of the crime.
There are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology. They believe in most of the time as positive victimology because they contributed in socio-culture and dominant individual thy focuses tends to be interpersonal crime.
As a result, there are three positive victimology, radical victimology, and critical victimology.
Learn more about on victimology, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27625447
#SPJ1
Why do the police feel that Michelle committed $uicide?
Answers
Answer:
It depends on what killed her, but I need more evidence
Explanation:
5. Which of the following is not part of a personal search?
O A. Check the prisoner's mouth and ears
O B. Sweep your fingers around the prisoner's waistline
O C. Check the prisoner's hari
O D. Check the inner linings of the prisoner's clothes for damage or tampering
Answers
Answer:C
Explanation:
Explanation:
In police searches they do not touch the prisoner’s hair because most prisoner’s hair are either shave if it’s too long, or too short for something dangerous to be hidden. Of course, some prisons may check but to stay safw i’d say C.
Hope this helps!
___________ promotes the recognition of ideologies. A. Social controlc. Ethnocentrismb. Social movementd. War.
Answers
The acceptance of ideologies is encouraged through social movements.
What exactly are social movements?
Networks of unofficial relationships involving a variety of people, groups, and/or organizations involved in political or cultural issues are referred to as social movements. These interactions are based on a commonality of collective identities. The American civil rights movement, second-wave feminism, the LGBT rights movement, environmental activism and conservation initiatives, opposition to mass surveillance, etc. are illustrative instances. They frequently focus on subjects that are outside of the classroom but nonetheless pertinent. Reform movements, revolutionary movements, reactionary movements, self-help organizations, and religious movements are the primary categories of social movements. Social movements frequently need to draw sizable populations in order to be successful.
To learn more about social movements refer to
https://brainly.com/question/20416654
#SPJ4
you witness a car accident where one car runs a red light and hits another vehicle. when police arrive, they find you and two other people who witnessed the accident. what are they likely to do?they will separate the witnesses and interview them individually.they will ask the witnesses to share stories and have only one person report back on the consensus.they will interview the three witnesses together but allow them each to tell their story.they will release all of the witnesses because what they saw really doesn't matter.
Answers
Give the police the pertinent information about the accident you witnessed when they arrive, along with your contact details.
A statement is an account of the event that is recorded orally, in writing, or sporadically on camera. In court, a statement may be included as evidence. The officer will inquire about the situation in great detail before making any comments. Witness statements are recorded by the police. If you know about a crime, you can call the police to give a statement by dialling the emergency numbers.
Both the victim and a bystander may experience emotional distress in a car collision. Staying at the scene of an accident and reporting what you saw are the recommended course of action.
Learn more about witness here:
brainly.com/question/14252498
#SPJ4
EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 4864 TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLICING SYSTEM IN THE PHILIPPINES?
Answers
Lay the groundwork for the nation's urgently required police reforms. Prevents crimes, looks into them, and prosecutes perpetrators. Utilize the authority granted by the Philippine Constitution and relevant legislation.
What is pertinent laws?
The term "Pertinent Laws" refers to the laws that the State of Carolina, the County of Dorset, the United States government, and other governmental bodies have codified or promulgated that are relevant to the owning, sale, use, and promotion of the Property.
Therefore,
EXPLAIN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 4864 TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLICING SYSTEM IN THE PHILIPPINES?
Lay the groundwork for the nation's urgently required police reforms. prevents crimes, looks into them, and prosecutes perpetrators. Utilize the authority granted by the Philippine Constitution and relevant legislation.
To learn more about pertinent laws from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13213746
#SPJ9
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answers
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
would it have made a difference to the court if the posters had implied that montana endorsed the sjm news?
Answers
If the posters had implied that Montana endorsed the SJM news, it could have made a difference to the court in a potential lawsuit. Using a company's name or brand to promote or endorse a product or service without permission can violate trademark laws, which protect a company's intellectual property rights.
If Montana had not permitted its name to be used in the posters, and it was implied that the company endorsed SJM news, Montana could argue that the posters infringed on their trademark rights. Using Montana's name without permission could be considered false advertising and potentially damage the company's reputation, which could result in financial damages.
In addition to potential legal consequences, implying that Montana endorsed the SJM news could harm the company's reputation and lead to negative publicity.
To know more about intellectual property rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/169200
#SPJ4