Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Answer:
The Law of Conservation of Mass?
Explanation:
According to a quick internet search, it's called The Law of Conservation of Mass.
Explanation:
HELP FAST PLEASE
i'll mark you brainliest
How do we investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases to understand and influence legal arguments and decisions?
Answer:
There are a few ways to investigate contemporary Supreme Court cases. One way is to read summaries of the cases from a variety of sources, including newspapers, legal journals, and online news sources. Another way is to read the full text of the Supreme Court opinion, which is available online on the court's website. Finally, it is also possible to watch or listen to audio recordings of the oral arguments in the case, which are also available on the court's website.
explain the existence of god through the teleological argument
Answer:
The teleological argument is an attempt to argue for the existence of God, by saying that the existence of order testifies to the existence of someone who has rationally ordered the world for a specific purpose. According to its proponents, the features of the universe are what we would expect if it were the work of an intelligent higher force. That is, the world and its nature, so perfectly organized, can only come from a mastermind who created a perfect system. Therefore, that intelligent force comes from what is called God, which according to each religion varies in shape, personality and image, and can be from a simple natural creative force to a personified being similar to men.
STION:
Officer Masih has taken Hank into custody for possession of cocaine. Officer Masih has information that Hank has concealed a baggie of
cocaine in a body cavity. Officer Masih will conduct a body cavity search.
Whether Hank has been seized or not is determined by the standard of:
a. the court.
O b. the perception of the officer.
O c. a reasonable person.
O d. the perception of the suspect.
Whether Hank has been seized or not is determined by the standard of a reasonable person. Option c is correct.
What caused Hank's custody?In this situation, Officer Masih has taken Hank into custody for possession of cocaine and has information that Hank may have concealed drugs in a body cavity. Conducting a body cavity search would be considered a form of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Therefore, in determining whether a search and seizure has occurred, the courts use an objective standard known as the "reasonable person" standard. If Officer Masih conducts a body cavity search without a warrant or without Hank's consent, it would likely be considered a search and seizure that is subject to the protections of the Fourth Amendment.
Find out more about custody at:
https://brainly.com/question/9212750
#SPJ1
a 3. Find the discount on a $35 basketball that is on sale for 40% off the regular price.
The original prices: 35
Discount Price: 21
What is law ??
____________
Answer:
on my on definition law
Law is the rules and regulation guiding everyone
Answer:
Law is a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate..
Question 10 of 10
What is the constitutional basis for the expressed powers of the federal
government?
A. They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the
Constitution.
B. They were assumed by the writers of the Constitution to be
necessary for the government to function.
OC. They are spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
D. They are directly listed in the Constitution.
Answer:
Explanation:
A. They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the
Constitution.
B. They were assumed by the writers of the Constitution to be
necessary for the government to function.
OC. They are spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
D. They are directly listed in the Constitution.
Please help I am confused
IMPROPERLY INFLATED TIRES CAN RESULT IN:
A. Uneven wear and additional avoidable replacement of tires
B. Inefficient gas mileage
C. Blown out tires and shaking in the steering wheel
D. All of the above
Answer: all of the above
Explanation:
During a criminal trial process, whom does the jury inform after arriving at a verdict?
In a criminal trial process, the jury informs the
after arriving at a verdict.
Answer:
They inform the Defendant of the verdict.
so i need the answers fast pleaseee help me out:/
Answer: 1. False
2. True
3. True
Explanation: For question number one, hearings aren't held to get opinions but to make changes. For question number two, it must past through both chambers. And for question number three, yes the veto can be overridden with a 2/3 vote.
Statutory Law is?
-Laws specifically passed by a governing body that has been created for the purpose
of making laws.
-The Supreme court may declare any statute that goes against the constitution
-consists of those rules and procedures established by regulatory agencies.
-judge is required to follow an earlier court decision when deciding a case with similar
circumstances
Help asappp
If you were given a speeding violation and told to report to court for a hearing, who would MOST likely be listening to your case?
A. a jury of your peers
B. a Supreme Court justice
C. a Justice of the Peace
D. a Federal Magistrate
how to maintain the social order in society?
this is for my paragraph
Answer:
There are several ways to maintain social order in society:
Establishing laws and enforcing them: Having clear laws that are enforced by a legal system helps to establish rules for behavior in society and promotes order.
Promoting social norms and values: Teaching and promoting values such as respect, honesty, and responsibility can help to create a sense of shared purpose and encourage people to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Encouraging positive interpersonal relationships: Building strong, positive relationships within a community can foster a sense of belonging and create a sense of obligation to behave in ways that contribute to social order.
Providing social support and resources: Ensuring that people have access to resources such as education, healthcare, and employment can help to reduce social tensions and promote stability.
Maintaining effective communication and dialogue: Having open lines of communication and encouraging dialogue can help to resolve conflicts and promote understanding and cooperation among different groups in society.
Explanation:
Which private security professional, also called a bodyguard, usually works for celebrities?
guards usually provide services to celebrities and famous personalities.
Answer:
Celebrity
Explanation:
Is Steiner legally obligated to repay faber the $200
Answer:
Explanation:
It's impossible to determine whether Steiner is legally obligated to repay Faber the $200 without more context and information about the situation. In general, legal obligations arise from contracts, agreements, or other legal arrangements between parties. If there was a contract or agreement between Steiner and Faber that established an obligation for Steiner to repay the $200, then Steiner may be legally obligated to do so. However, if there was no such agreement or legal arrangement, then Steiner may not have a legal obligation to repay the money. Ultimately, the determination of legal obligations would depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the situation, as well as the applicable laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction.
CORRECT IS BRAINLIEST
what is popular sovereingty?
Popular sovereignty refers to the principle that ultimate political power resides with the people, who have the authority to govern themselves.
Popular sovereignty is the principle that political power rests with the people. It asserts that the government's authority is derived from the consent and will of the governed.
In this concept, citizens have the right to participate in decision-making, including electing representatives and voting on important matters.
Popular sovereignty is closely associated with democracy, where the legitimacy and actions of the government depend on the support and involvement of the people. It emphasizes that the government should serve the interests and needs of the citizens.
Overall, popular sovereignty refers to the principle that ultimate political power resides with the people, who have the authority to govern themselves.
To learn more about sovereignty:
brainly.com/question/28254648
Answer:
Popular sovereignty is government based on consent of the people. The government's source of authority is the people, and its power is not legitimate if it disregards the will of the people. Government established by free choice of the people is expected to serve the people, who have sovereignty, or supreme power.
The jury in Dare County finds a defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. The defendant maintains their innocence and does not agree with the jury’s ruling. What court would be the next step for the defendant to make their case?
A) Court of General Jurisdiction
B)Appellate Court
C)State Supreme Court
D)Supreme Court of the United States
PLEASE HELP
Answer:
Appellate court
Explanation:
trust
The next step for the defendant to appeal the verdict would be to an appellate court. The appellate court reviews the lower court's decision. The correct option is B.
What is an appellate court?An appellate court is a higher court that has the authority to review and reconsider decisions made by lower courts. The purpose of the appellate court is to ensure that lower courts have applied the law correctly and that the decision was made based on proper legal procedures.
The appellate court does not retry the case or review the evidence presented at the lower court; instead, it reviews the record of the lower court to determine whether the trial court made an error in applying the law or procedure.
An appellate court would be the next step for the defendant to make their case. Thus, the ideal selection is option B.
Learn more about an appellate court here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766399
#SPJ3
what order do these go in:
increased social control
occurrence of a turning point
weighing the costs and benefits of leading
a criminal life
structured lifestyle
Louise Pulsifer owned a farm that she wanted to sell and ran an ad in the local newspaperAfter Russell Gillespie agreed to purchase the farm , Pulsifer wrote him a letter stating that she would not sell it. He sued her to enforce the contract, and she raised the defense of the statute of frauds. The letter she had signed did not contain any of the terms of the sale. Gillespie, however, claimed that the newspaper ad could be combined with her letter to satisfy the statute of fraudsWas he correct?
If the owner doesn't sell the house, he can sue.
What Is the Frauds Statute?Several types of transactions are required to be in writing in accordance with a legal doctrine known as the statute of frauds. The transactions that are most typically covered by the statute of frauds include contracts lasting a year or more, agreements involving goods worth more than $500, and the sale of property..
The statute of frauds' goal is to stop fraud and other wrongdoing. These goals are frequently referred to as evidential and cautionary. The statute of frauds serves as evidence by offering proof of the existence of a valid, binding contract. The statute of fraud's cautionary purpose is to encourage each party to be more careful, intent, and serious in their dealings.
To know about frauds statute visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6806950
#SPJ1
explain term sadness
bye :-(
Answer:
Sadness is a type of bad feeling
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
what legal requirements when selecting a firearm for hunting
If motor skills are distorted by drugs or alcohol, this may result in ...
A. greater intelligence.
B. improved driving performance.
C. unsteadiness and stumbling.
dio that thou are often
Answer:
I think its c
Explanation:
yea its c 99.98% positive
describe how a law is made in victoria, australia
Answer:
hope this helped
Explanation:
A Bill (a draft Act) is debated in Parliament to create new laws. It becomes an Act if it is passed by a majority in both houses of Parliament. Victorian Acts apply to people who live in Victoria, as well as courts and judges. Commonwealth Acts apply throughout Australia, as well as to federal courts and judges.
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
2 points
Which of the following cases led to fears that Hispanic people would be
racially profiled by law enforcement and was later modified by Supreme
Court ruling?*
Arizona v. US (2012)
Mayorkas v. International Law Lab (2020)
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (2020)
Department of Homeland Security v. New York (2020)
The answer should be Arizona v. United States (2012). One of the main points brought up by this ruling was an Arizona state-law making it a crime for being unlawfully present in the United States. This made it more likely for a Hispanic person to be racially profiled by law enforcement.
I hope this helps! :)
Ques-5 satyagarhis
wins battle through
non violence explain with examples
طلسمشفع ععصيام
طو
Answer:
Ghandi
Explanation:
Ghandi fought peacefully but stood up for what he believed in.
Why is it extremely important that people have confidence in the court system
Answer:
If you aren't confident it can make you/your client look suspicious
Explanation:
Better Call Saul is an American crime and legal drama television series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould. Part of the Breaking Bad franchise, it is a spin-off, prequel and sequel to Gilligan's previous series, Breaking Bad. Set primarily in the early-mid 2000s in Albuquerque, New Mexico, the series develops Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk), an earnest lawyer and former con artist, into an egocentric criminal defense attorney known as Saul Goodman. Also shown is the moral decline of former police officer Mike Ehrmantraut (Jonathan Banks), who becomes a violent fixer for drug traffickers to support his granddaughter and her widowed mother. The show premiered on AMC on February 8, 2015, and concluded on August 15, 2022, after six seasons consisting of 63 episodes.
At the start of the series, Jimmy struggles financially while he mostly works on court-appointed cases as a public defender. His romantic interest and former colleague, Kim Wexler (Rhea Seehorn), is an attorney at Hamlin, Hamlin & McGill (HHM), a law firm co-owned by Jimmy's brilliant but unwell brother, Chuck McGill (Michael McKean) and Chuck's law partner, Howard Hamlin (Patrick Fabian). After hiring Jimmy as legal representation, Mike provides advice and security for Nacho Varga (Michael Mando), an intelligent drug dealer who later becomes a mole for Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito), a drug lord and legitimate businessman as owner of the Los Pollos Hermanos fast food establishment. Their operations are disrupted by members of the murderous Salamanca family, including Lalo Salamanca (Tony Dalton). Odenkirk, Banks, and Esposito reprise their roles from Breaking Bad, as do many others who make guest appearances.
Better Call Saul has received critical acclaim, with particular praise for its acting, characters, writing, direction, and cinematography; many critics have called it a worthy successor to Breaking Bad and one of the greatest television series of all time, with some deeming it superior to its predecessor.[5][6][7] It has garnered many nominations, including a Peabody Award, 46 Primetime Emmy Awards, 15 Writers Guild of America Awards, 14 Critics' Choice Television Awards, six Screen Actors Guild Awards, and four Golden Globe Awards. At the time of its airing, the series premiere held the record for the highest-rated scripted series premiere in basic cable history.
A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to charging these activities as the crimes they constitute, the activities would also constitute the criminal act of intentional furtherance of the goals of organized crime. Among the enumerated activities was the interstate distribution of cocaine. The statute’s constitutionality has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The defendant was arrested by federal agents after having driven a truck containing cocaine from Florida to Illinois, where he delivered his illicit cargo as directed. At trial, the defendant is convicted of interstate distribution of cocaine in violation of federal law, and convicted of a violation of the federal statute above. How may the defendant be sentenced?
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
What do the DoJ statistics in the video regarding law enforcement practices in Ferguson reveal?
A)black citizens were engaged in most violent crime incidents
B)racial profiling was a fairly uncommon practice
C)white police officers were overtly racist in their encounters with civilians
D)black citizens were disproportionality targeted by police
Answer:
please help help me me my question
The DoJ statistics reveal that (D) black citizens were disproportionately targeted by police.
The civil rights investigation into the Ferguson Police as well as the municipal courts were initiated by the Department of Justice after the shooting of Michael Brown on August 9, 2014. The event sparked widespread protest against the unlawful practices of the police, mostly about racial discrimination against the black community.
The findings of the investigation showed that aside from racist tones over the policing practices, there are also several findings that show that the police used courts to get more revenue. These DoJ findings report that 68% of the court cases about black people were more likely to be less dismissed. This means that the race of a person is largely responsible for the seriousness of a case. Also, blacks were twice likely to be stopped and searched by the police as compared to whites.This clearly shows the racial divide, the racist discrimination that the Ferguson police as well as the courts hold, against the black community. Thus, the correct answer is option D.
Learn more about racial discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/4932896
Please choose the most common units of astronomical distances used in astronomy. Choose three.
Feet (ft)
Parsec (pc)
Centimeters (cm)
Miles (mi)
Light-year (ly)
Meter (m)
Astronomical Unit (AU)
Solar-year (sy)