Which of the following could be argued by the defendant in a product liability case based on strict liability to limit the dollar amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff?
Answers:
a. The product was based on state of the art design
b. The manufacturer exercised all reasonable care in the manufacture of the product.
c. The user was careless or misused the product.
d. All of the above can be pled to reduce damages.
Answers
The defendant in a product liability case based on strict liability could argue that the user was careless or misused the product to limit the dollar amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Hence, Option c is the correct.
What is product liability?Product liability is a legal term used to describe the liability of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by a product's design, production, and marketing. There are three theories under which a plaintiff can bring a product liability lawsuit: negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability.
In a product liability case based on strict liability, the defendant might claim that the plaintiff was careless or misused the product. This can be argued to reduce the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff.
Strict liability is a legal doctrine that imposes liability on a party without requiring proof of fault. In product liability cases, it means that a manufacturer or seller is strictly liable for any injuries caused by a defective product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not.
Hence, Option c is the correct.
Learn more about Product liability here:
brainly.com/question/30830242
#SPJ11
Related Questions
juvenile means what?
Answers
Answer: A "juvenile" is a person who has not attained his eighteenth birthday, and "juvenile delinquency" is the violation of a law of the United States committed by a person prior to his eighteenth birthday which would have been a crime if committed by an adult.
please give brainlest if this helps!
Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If QuikBilt fails to meet this standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to
Answers
Options are:
A. establish, as a matter of principle, that QuikBilt acted wrongfully.
B. Pure with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.
C. Pure with funds for its loss of the bargain.
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Answer:
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Explanation:
Punitive Damages, often used in a law of tort, when the jury considered the acts of the tortfeasor or defendant to be either intentional, malicious, fraudulent, or violent in nature, and it is designed to do the following:
1. punish a defendant or tortfeasor and
2. discourage further such acts by the defendant or tortfeasor and others.
Therefore, in this case, if QuikBilt fails to meet the agreed standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts. Because such acts is deemed malicious, fraudulent and intentional.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, how is compulsory self-identification not a violation
of the Fourth Amendment?
Answers
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that compulsory self-identification, such as providing one's name to a police officer during a stop, is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it does not constitute a search or seizure
How is compulsory self-identification not a violation of the Fourth Amendment?According to The U.S. Supreme Court, it has held that compulsory self-identification, such as providing one's name to a police officer during a stop, is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it does not constitute a search or seizure.
The Court has reasoned that requiring a person to identify themselves to a police officer is a minimal intrusion on their privacy and is outweighed by the government's interest in ensuring public safety and enforcing the law.
However, there are limitations on the government's ability to compel identification, and the Fourth Amendment still requires that any stop or detention be based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment at:https://brainly.com/question/29617389
#SPJ1
A suspected terrorist is arrested in connection with an imminent terror threat. A bomb has been discovered at a local shopping center.The timer shows that the bomb will detonate in 2 hours. The man in custody is believed to be the bomb maker and the only person who knows how to disable the bomb. You and your partner are brought in to interrogate the suspect. An hour passes, and you haven’t made any progress. Your partner unplugs all of the recording equipment and asks you to leave the room. Twenty minutes later the officer exits the room with the code to deactivate the bomb. You look inside the room to find the suspect unconscious and his face covered in blood. Your partner asks you to back up his story that the suspect became aggressive during the interrogation and that he was simply defending himself. There is no tape to challenge your version of the events. It would be the terrorist’s word against yours.
Would you follow your partner’s instructions? Why or why not? Be sure to include in your answer the ethical and legal consequences of your decision.
Answers
are verbal contracts valid? a. no. unless they are discharged through performance. b. yes. all verbal contracts are valid. c. no. all verbal contracts are void. d. yes. unless they violate the statute of frauds.
Answers
Yes, verbal contracts valid. Unless they violate the statute of frauds. Option D is the correct answer.
Legally speaking, verbal agreements can frequently be just as binding as written ones. Although they could be very challenging to regulate, you should take solace in the knowledge that there are relevant state and federal laws that can support the enforcement of such contracts and safeguard your legal rights. Even so, placing your agreement in paper is still the best approach to ensure that all parties are protected. Option D is the correct answer.
A sort of agreement involving two or more parties that is established orally rather than through a written document is known as a verbal contract. Regardless of whether an oral agreement comprises all of the components of a contract or not, there are situations when a physical written contract is required in order for the agreement to be enforceable. Option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
why Allah created you? and why Allah create earth and sky?
Answers
Answer:
allah has created us to worship him only and no one else
The outside wall of the Town Court has a mural of the American flag, Twin Towers, and screeching bald eagle painted on it by members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. One night, Russ Toleum spray paints a message over every aspect of the mural. The message is, “Canada – like America but Better, Eh.” The security cameras on the property clearly pick up Russ’s face and he is charged with defacing public property. Russ claims he was merely adding to the mural that was already there and that his right to free speech has been violated. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answers
Answer:
It is a crime to deface public property, because it isn't yours personally. How would Russ like it if someone spray painted something offensive on his car? They were just expressing free speech! "Free Speech" Is not an excuse to commit a crime, Free Speech is just the liberty of saying what you want whether it's controversial or not.
Explanation:
How does hamilton further define the role of the courts? what line of reasoning does he employ here to support his claim?.
Answers
Hamilton acknowledged that no federal judge could defy the Constitution by imposing his or her will on the people: The assertion that every delegated authority action that goes against the spirit of the commission under which it is exercised is null and void is the clearest principle-based position.
Why did Hamilton support the Supreme Court's creation?In Federalist 78, Hamilton wrote, "Justly regarded as an indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as the citadel of the public justice and the public security."
What was Alexander Hamilton's take on the judicial system?The judicial systempossesses no power over the purse or sword; no indication of the strength or wealth of the community; and cannot tolerate any active resolution."It may truly be said to have only judgment, not FORCE or WILL," Alexander Hamilton writes in The Federalist Papers, No.78.
Learn more about Hamilton here:
brainly.com/question/24714949
#SPJ4
________ refers to an appellate hearing with all judges participating.
Answers
En banc refers to an appellate hearing with all judges participating.
In the field of law, 'en banc' can be described as a common French phrase that is used in the judiciary when all the judges sit together in order to make a verdict on a legal matter.
The meaning of this French term is 'on the bench' and it inclines that all the judges of a bench make a common decision on a particular legal matter.
An en banc usually occurs in the case of an appellate hearing when a former decision by a judge has been asked for revision such that the whole bench of judges participates to revise that decision.
To learn more about judges, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2533637
#SPJ4
Researchers who ascribe to the belief that there are multiple realities to be discovered are known as
Answers
Answer:
yes we evolved from monkeys
Explanation:
The right answer will be "Constructivist". A further explanation is provided below.
The notion whereby students build knowledge instead of merely collecting information mechanically could be known as Constructivist.As humans encounter and think of their surroundings, individuals start building up their personalized visual conceptions and assimilate additional discoveries further into current understanding.
Learn more about Constructivist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14923615
How many calendar days does a new employee have to complete the RBS training program
Answers
Any on-premise alcohol server and manager must be certified by an accredited RBS training provider and pass an ABC exam within 60 calendar days from the first date of employment. The RBS exam is currently available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Punjabi.
In this scenario Sarah an employee at ABC corporation is speaking with the HR manager to discuss a concern. Lets listen in. Do you have a minute? Sure. Thanks for making time for me. Not a problem Sarah, how are you? Not so good actually. Really, Whats up? Well I don't want to get anyone in trouble but there is something going on in my department that's making me uncomfortable. Im sorry to hear your uncomfortable are you able to share a little more about whats going on? Well it's a little embarrassing and I want to make sure that what we talk about remains confidential. Before Sarah says anything else. What should the Hr manager inform her of? in text citations and references
In the video, Sarah is an employee at ABC corporation and is speaking with the HR manager to discuss her concern. Something is going on in her department that makes her uncomfortable, and she is embarrassed. She wants to ensure that what she and her HR manager discuss remains confidential. Before Sarah says anything else, the HR manager should inform her of a few things. First, they should be clear that they will try to protect the confidentiality of any harassment allegation to the best ability. The HR manager cannot wholly guarantee confidentiality because an effective investigation cannot be completed without certain information being revealed to the alleged harasser or any person who may have witnessed it. Still, it will only be shared on a need-to-know basis (Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, 1999). Sarah should also be ensured that she will be protected against any retaliation which may occur over her complaint. “Retaliation occurs when employers take punitive actions against individuals who exercise their legal rights” (Valentine et al., 2020, p. 77).
Sarah should be provided with a copy of the policy and complaint procedure, which should be written so that all employees understand and should encourage victims to report any allegations. The policy and complaint procedure should make clear that it will not allow harassment based on sex, race, color, religion, national origin, age, disability, and banned activity. It should cover harassment by anyone in the corporation. There should be a promise that employees will be protected against retaliation and that they will take immediate and corrective action if an investigation shows that harassment has occurred. The HR manager should communicate how seriously they take harassment and encourage employees to report harassment immediately (Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, 1999). Do you agree with this?
Answers
The manager should inform Sarah about the company policy and her rights in its implementation in this regard
How to illustrate the information?Harassment at work is a serious issue, and most businesses have well-defined policies in place to address it. The victim of harassment must have confidence that her complaint will be taken seriously, transparently, fairly, and in a timely manner. She also needs to know that her identity will be kept private and only shared with those who need to know.
In this case, Sarah is dealing with an embarrassing situation at work that is making her uncomfortable, and she has decided to notify the HR Manager of the situation. The HR Manager should reassure her that the complaint will be thoroughly investigated. She should be made aware of the investigation's process and potential next steps. She should be informed about the company policy and her rights regarding its implementation. Sarah's concerns about her confidentiality should be addressed in accordance with policy and with empathy.
Learn more about manager on:
https://brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ1
What does for taking away our charters abolishing our most valuable laws and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments?
Answers
For removing our charters, repealing our most cherished laws, and fundamentally changing the structure of our governments: - For suspending our own legislatures and claiming they have the authority to make all laws on our behalf.
In exchange for deleting our charters, overturning our most significant laws, and fundamentally changing the organization of our governments, the king disbanded colonial laws and legislatures and disregarded customary values and legal precedents. that whenever a form of government begins to compromise their objectives, the people have the right to alter or abolish that type of government. The "right of the people to alter or abolish" their government derives from our intrinsic right to self-governance. The idea of self-governance is relatively new. For overthrowing a neighboring province's free English legal system, establishing an arbitrary government there, and enlarging its bounds to serve as a template and a practical tool for enforcing the same total rule in these colonies:"
Learn more about governments from
brainly.com/question/14724703
#SPJ4
Which five amendments do you consider to be of greatest importance? Write a reason for each one.
Answers
Answer 1,2,8,13 15
Explanation: 1st amendment gives people the rights to religion of their choice, it also gives people the right to speak up for what they believe
2nd amendment allows people to keep and bear arms for one to protect themselves and other around them
8th amendment makes sure people do not get a cruel punishment for something minor
13th amendment allowed slaves to be free, giving them a chance into their own lives
15th amendment makes sure you cannot deny someone the right to vote based on gender or color
Arkansas law makes it illegal to drive, or to be a front-seat passenger, without wearing safety belts? (T/F)
Answers
The given statement "Arkansas law makes it illegal to drive, or to be a front-seat passenger, without wearing safety belts" is true as Arkansas law requires drivers and front-seat passengers to wear safety belts while in motion.
According to Arkansas law, everyone in the front seats and the driver must buckle up when the car is moving. Additionally, when riding in a vehicle, all children under the age of 15 must be properly restrained in a child safety seat or booster seat.
Additionally, texting and emailing while operating a moving vehicle are illegal in Arkansas. It is allowed to make phone calls on a handheld device, but only when the driver is using a hands-free system. Fines and/or points on the driver's license may be assessed for violations of these laws.
Learn more about Arkansas law at:
brainly.com/question/31229577
#SPJ4
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
what should I do today
Answers
Answer:
sumthin fun
Explanation:
have a kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk day
Answer:
Do something you will not regret, hang out with friends or spend time outside
Explanation:
Have fun!
based on the way they deliver their instructions, do you think the judge believes the defendant is guilty or innocent? how can you tell? *
Answers
It is not appropriate to make assumptions about a judge's beliefs based on the way they deliver their instructions as it is their duty to remain impartial and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented during the trial.
Judges are required to maintain an impartial stance throughout a trial, and they are responsible for ensuring that the trial is fair and just for both the prosecution and defense.
It is their duty to instruct the jury on the relevant laws and guide them in their deliberations to ensure that their verdict is based solely on the evidence presented in court.
Therefore, the way a judge delivers their instructions does not necessarily reflect their personal beliefs or opinion on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Judges are expected to remain neutral and fair, regardless of their personal beliefs or biases.
To know more about trial here:
https://brainly.com/question/249570
#SPJ4
a courts decision establishes what type of law?
Answers
Answer:
The law that has been evolved from the decisions made in appellate courts and judicial precedent, is known as common law or sometimes as case law. The common law system gives pre-eminence to the common law, as it considers unfair to treat the same facts in a different manner in different situations.
Order the steps in a lawsuit chronologically
= Voir dire
= The defendant's case
= The discovery process begins
= Jury instructions
= Service of process on the defendant
= The settlement conference
= File the complaint
= The plaintiff's case
= Judgment
= Closing arguments
Answers
Answer:
The Trial Process
This webpage presents an overview of the formal processes and proceedings in any civil trial and a link to separate webpage that presents the specific chronology of events in the Woburn Toxic Trial. Links are also available to videoclips of Ohio State University students performing these tasks in a mock trial.
There are four main stages to a trial. In sequence, they are:
Pleading Stage - filing the complaint and the defense's motions.
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts.
Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.
Post Trial - concluding arguments, judge's charge to the jury, jury deliberations, announcement of judgment, motions for new trial or appeal.
Pleading Stage
Filing a Complaint - In civil proceedings the complaint is the official engagement of the plaintiff with the defense regarding the proposed "injustice" caused by the defense. This is a formal document submitted by the plaintiff to the court having jurisdiction over the complaint.
Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.
Motions to Dismiss - These are the defense's response or answers to the plaintiffs complaint. The responses are typically filed as motions and are intended to dismiss the claims expressed in the complaint.
Motion for Judgment - Following the defendants response to the plaintiffs claims, the parties can either choose to settle or request a judgment based on the evidence presented, or the court can decide to continue toward resolving conflict at trial. If there is no judgment made, the case proceeds to the pre-trial stage.
Pretrial Stage
Discovery or Finding of Facts - There are generally two aspects of discovery. One consists of a series of questions, known as interrogatory questions, which are posed by the plaintiff's attorney to the defendant's attorney. The other consists of recording a witnesses sworn testimony, known as a deposition. Depositions typically take place outside the courtroom, before a court recorder, with opposing counsel asking questions of the witness.
Motion for Summary Judgment - At the conclusion of discovery, the court will typically review the facts of the case and determine if there is sufficient merit to proceed to trial or to encourage the parties to settle. If the finding of facts determines the case to be frivolous or non-substantiated, the case is dismissed.
Pretrial Order - If a substantial basis for the case is determined, the court will meet with and notify the parties of the trial schedule.
The Trial
Jury Selection - From a pool of potential jurors, individuals are questioned in a process known as voire dire to determine suitability to serve as impartial juror in the specific case. The judge and counsel for both parties are involved in voire dire process, with each party trying to impanel individuals who may be sympathetic to their cause.
Opening Statements - Statements to the jury made first by the plaintiffs' attorney and then by the defense attorneys setting up the circumstances and rationale of the legal complaint (plaintiffs) and the reasons for dismissing the claim (defense).
Click here to see a videoclip of opening statements from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Plaintiff Testimony - The first part of the actual trial proceeding consists of the plaintiffs presenting their witnesses and experts to present the arguments and justifications for the complaint. The defense is permitted to cross-examine each witness in an attempt to dismiss, discredit, or disprove the witnesses statements.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Defense Testimony - After the plaintiffs' case is presented, the defendants present their case in much the same way using witnesses and experts that present direct testimony, followed by cross examination by the plaintiffs' counsel.
Click here to see a videoclip of cross examination from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Redirection and Recall - At the discretion of the judge, each witness can be redirected after cross examination by either the counsel. If critical information is not divulged during the initial testimony, counsel can request to recall a witness to the stand for additional questioning and cross examination.
Closing Arguments - Counsel for the plaintiffs and defense summarize their clients positions to remind the jurors of the facts presented in their case and to convince the jurors of veracity of their cause. Closing arguments are typically intended to be dramatic and pointed for effect.
Click here to see a videoclip of direct testimony from one of the Ohio State mock trials.
Explanation:
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
Discuss Saudi judicial system that is followed by basic trial
procedures (in 300 to 500 words)
Answers
Saudi Arabia is an Islamic state, and its judicial system for both criminal and civil cases is based on Islamic law (Shari'ah). The King is at the apex of the legal system, serving as the final court of appeal and a source of pardon.
Saudi Arabia's legal system is based on Sharia, Islamic law based on the Qur'an and the Sunnah (traditions) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Sharia's sources also include Islamic scholarly consensus formed after Muhammad's death. Its interpretation by Saudi judges is influenced by the mediaeval texts for the literalist Hanbali school of Islamic law. Saudi Arabia is the only Muslim country that has adopted Sharia in its uncodified form. This, combined with a lack of judicial precedent, has created significant uncertainty about the scope and content of the country's laws.
Learn more about Saudi Arabia, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15174193
#SPJ4
analyze the cases and in a few sentences explain how you would rule it
Case 1: A server at a restaurant believed that he was a victim of racial discrimination. He filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC (the administrative agency that enforces federal laws against discrimination) in October 2005. For reasons that are unclear, neither the employee nor the EEOC took any other action regarding the case until October 2011, when the EEOC finally decided that the employee was a victim of racial discrimination and gave him permission to file a lawsuit (all federal discrimination cases must be investigated by the EEOC before a person can file a lawsuit). The server filed a lawsuit in December 2011. The employer’s attorneys argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed because of the lengthy (six-year) delay and the employee’s failure to prompt the EEOC to take action sooner. This, they argued, put the defense at a disadvantage. Should the court allow this case to proceed under these circumstances? Why or why not?
Case 2: After a jury awarded a plaintiff $300,000 in damages in a sexual harassment case, a federal district court judge reduced the award to $50,000. The judge did so because at the time of the jury’s verdict, the plaintiff employer had twenty-five employees, and Title VII (of the Civil Rights Act—a federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination) caps damages for employers with no more than 100 employees at a maximum of $50,000. However, four years earlier, when the harassment occurred, the employer had 247 employees. Was the judge correct in capping damages awarded to the plaintiff based on the employer’s size at the time of the jury’s verdict rather than at the time when the discrimination occurred? Why or why not?
Answers
Case 1: The court should allow the case to proceed despite the delay caused by the EEOC.
Case 2: The judge should have capped damages based on the employer's size at the time of discrimination.
Case 1: Despite the protracted delay, the court should permit this case to continue. Although the six year delay is significant, the EEOC not the employee, is primarily to blame for it. It would be unfair to punish the employee for the agency's inaction, and the defense can still make their cases and present their supporting documentation during the court proceedings to refute the discrimination claim.
Case 2: In basing the damages cap on the employer's size at the time of the jury verdict, the judge erred. The proper strategy should take into account the employer's size at the time of the discrimination, as that is when the Title VII violation occurred. The cap's intention is to limit damages for smaller employers but it should be determined by the size of the employer at the time of the harassment in order to make sure the plaintiff is fairly compensated for their losses.
Learn more about EEOC at:
brainly.com/question/31559733
#SPJ4
why isn't full employment the same as zero unemployment
Answers
Answer:There are different types of unemployment, and some are unavoidable or even necessary for a functioning labor market.
Explanation:At any given time, jobs are being created and destroyed as industries evolve, and the transition from old jobs to new is not seamless.
This branch has the Supreme Court and District Courts.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial Branch
Answers
Answer: judicial branch
Explanation:
Which of the following criteria is necessary to qualify as a dependent of another taxpayer? (Check all that apply.)
a. Must be a citizen of the U.S. or a resident of the U.S., Canada, or Mexico
b. Must NOT be required to file a tax return of his own
c. Must be considered both a qualifying child and a qualifying relative
d. Must NOT file a joint return unless there is no tax liability on the couple's return and no tax liability on either return if they filed separately
e. Must be considered either a qualifying child or a qualifying relative
Answers
The correct option is A. Must be a citizen of the U.S. or a resident of the U.S., Canada, or Mexico criteria are necessary to qualify as a dependent of another taxpayer.
A taxpayer is an individual, business, or organization that is required by law to pay taxes to the government. Taxes are levied on income, profits, property, goods and services, and other forms of economic activity. The funds collected from taxpayers are used by the government to fund public services such as infrastructure, education, healthcare, social welfare, national defense, and other programs that benefit society as a whole.
The amount of taxes that a taxpayer is required to pay is determined by the tax laws and regulations of the country or jurisdiction in which they reside or operate. Taxpayers are generally required to file tax returns and make payments to the government on a regular basis, usually annually or quarterly. Failure to comply with tax laws can result in penalties, fines, and legal action.
To learn more about Taxpayers visit here:
brainly.com/question/14782474
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
what was the supreme court’s main decision in palko v. connecticut? palka was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy. palka’s sentence should be reversed. palka could not be convicted because of his fifth amendment rights. palka’s conviction and execution should be upheld.
Answers
In the case of Palko v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court's main decision was that Palko's conviction and execution should be upheld. The correct option is D.
The principal conclusion reached by the Supreme Court in Palko v. Connecticut was that Palko's conviction and execution should stand. The Fifth Amendment's ban on a person being tried twice for the same crime is at issue in this case, which deals with double jeopardy protection. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment was not applicable to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court concluded. As a result, Palko's conviction and execution were ruled appropriate under the given situation.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Palko v. Connecticut here:
https://brainly.com/question/14000842
#SPJ4
wrongdoers should compensate victims (pay them money) for their damages and losses. this refers to which of the following punishment goals?
Answers
Restitution (compensating victims) for damages and losses is punishment's goal.
Restitution Purpose and Importance?The idea of wrongdoers compensating victims for their damages and losses refers to the goal of restitution or compensation. Restitution aims to restore or make amends for the harm caused by the wrongdoer by requiring them to provide compensation to the victim.
It is a form of punishment that focuses on repairing the harm rather than solely punishing the offender.
The goal that refers to wrongdoers compensating victims for their damages and losses is restitution. Restitution seeks to restore the victim by requiring the wrongdoer to pay them monetary compensation. It aims to address the harm caused and provide some form of reparation for the losses suffered by the victim.
By imposing this requirement, the justice system acknowledges the need for the offender to take responsibility for their actions and make amends to the victim. Restitution serves as a form of punishment that focuses on repairing the damage caused and assisting the victim in recovering their losses, rather than solely punishing the wrongdoer.
Learn more about Restitution
brainly.com/question/31027325
#SPJ11