Answers
A federal court does not have jurisdiction over a case involving a dispute between two residents of the same state. This statement is true.
A federal court is a court that operates at the national level and has jurisdiction over cases that deal with federal law. Federal courts can also hear cases that involve diversity jurisdiction, which is when the parties involved in the lawsuit are from different states or when the dispute involves a federal question that is related to the US Constitution, federal laws, or treaties.A federal court does not have jurisdiction over a case involving a dispute between two residents of the same state because the case does not involve a federal issue.
The case would instead be handled by a state court, which has jurisdiction over cases that deal with state laws and disputes between residents of the same state.In summary, a federal court does not have jurisdiction over a case involving a dispute between two residents of the same state. Such a case would instead be handled by a state court that has jurisdiction over disputes involving state laws and parties from the same state.
For such more questions on federal court:
brainly.com/question/25947870
#SPJ11
Related Questions
the economic role of the legal system might best be described as
Answers
Answer:
The economic role of the legal system might best be described as... establishing the "rules of the game" and acting as a referee when disputes arise among market participants. When an external cost exists in the production of a good, firms tend to... over-produce the good
He sent me a trailer load of wishes what figure of speech is used
Answers
personification type of metaphor/simile
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
1. Critically discuss the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in the UK. Your discussion should include a comparison with the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in ONE other country.
Marks are awarded for:
• Knowledge of methods of assessing seriousness of on-line child abuse, for example, the COPINE Index and Sentencing Advisory Panel scale.
• Knowledge of key legislation providing for on-line child abuse offences taking account of technological capabilities.
• Ability to critically compare effectiveness of methods for investigating and prosecuting on-line child abuse offences in the UK and ONE other country.
Answers
Answer:
I think abuse is bad
Explanation:
honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry
What sort of case would be held first at a state court?
Select one:
a. Video game pirating
b. Child custody argument
c. Treason
d. Bankruptcy declaration
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Treason is very illegal and betraying for a country, and should be dealt with first.
Answer:
The Correct Answer is C. Treason.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!
MARK ME BRAINLEAST!!!
Jessica Grayson is a secretary at Washington High School. She is in charge of ordering janitorial supplies from Joe's Cleaning Center. Jessica is also authorized to write and sign the checks for these supplies. Jessica is friends with Jake Emerson, who works at Joe's. Once a month, Jessica writes an order for $300 worth of supplies that the school really doesn't need. Jake signs the business manager's name from Joe's on the checks and gives them back to Jessica. She cashes the checks and deposits them into her own savings account. Jake makes sure the supplies are never delivered to the school. Are Jessica and Jake both committing a crime? If so, what crime(s)?
Answers
Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement
Jake = Forgery
Both = Conspiracy
Explanation:
• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.
Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.
• Jake's crime is forgery
Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.
• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.
A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.
Olivia is elated that her roof is finally going to be fixed. She waits anxiously for the work to be done, And she waits. And she waits. And she waits. Finally, 4 years and 1 month after the project was originally completed, and 3 months after Sam promised to repair the roof, she reaches out to Sam. He states he's not yoing to do the work because she's barred from filing a lawsuit due to the 4-year statute of limitations on breach of a written contract. Why is Sam mistaken? A. Thisis a tort claim so chat 4 year statute of limetations doebn't apply. B. The roof leak was a latent detect to she has 10 years to file ctain. C. The 5 -year waranty for detects, and Sam's promite to repair the work both loep a lesal yomedy alive. D.The City of Salieas Huilitine Departinent has an ordinance scanting more time to sue solar Panel instillers.
Answers
As the 5-year warranty for defects, and Sam's promise to repair the work, both keep a legal remedy alive, Sam is mistaken.
Sam is mistaken in his belief that Olivia is barred from filing a lawsuit due to the 4-year statute of limitations on breach of a written contract. In this case, the 5-year warranty for defects and Sam's promise to repair the roof extend the legal remedies available to Olivia.
While the 4-year statute of limitations may apply to breach of a written contract in general, the existence of a warranty and a subsequent promise to repair can modify the legal timeframe for seeking recourse. Warranty provisions often provide an additional period beyond the statute of limitations for addressing defects or issues related to the work performed.
In this scenario, Olivia waited for several years, believing Sam would fulfill his promise to repair the roof. By doing so, Sam potentially extended the time period for Olivia to take legal action, as the promise to repair can be considered an acknowledgment of the ongoing contractual obligation.
To know more about warranty
brainly.com/question/31793570
#SPJ11
FILL IN THE BLANK. based on the 1981 u.s. supreme court decision in___, all states are required to provide k-12 education for undocumented immigrants and their children.
Answers
Based on the 1981 U.S. supreme court decision in Plyler v. Doe, all states are required to provide k-12 education for undocumented immigrants and their children.
According to Plyler vs Doe case, all the public schools were told not to charge fees from illegal immigrants for public education. It clearly stated that education is a primary necessity which must be provided to all the children. While education may not be a fundamental right under the US Constitution, education is included in the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. When the children of illegal immigrants could not provide the proof that they have entered the country under legal permission, they are forced to quit the school and also pay fees of the schooling.
Learn more about Plyler v. Doe at:
brainly.com/question/3191407
#SPJ4
What do you believe are TWO important skills/qualities of a Probation Officer and WHY??
Answers
Answer:
mldn3bbekhxwhl2hclwcj
List the different sources of law in our modern day legal system. What are they? How are they enacted? What do they control or regulate?
Answers
Answer:
hwjh3g2hshueuueueueejueuueueuejejuueeuue
Explanation:
hy 2hhwhwu1uwuhwhwwhhwhjwhehehshhsh
Which of the following best describes the GNU General Public License (GPL) that is associated with the Linux kernel source code?You can freely utilize, but not change, the Linux source code.The Linux source code remains freely availableto anybody who wants it.You need to pay a yearly fee to access and change the Linux source code.The Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications.
Answers
The source code for the Linux kernel is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use. The correct option is b).
Software programmes issued under the GNU GPL are allowed to be used, studied, shared, and modified for free.
Everybody who wants it can still access the Linux source code without paying anything. Those who use the Linux source code for non-commercial purposes can continue to do so for free.
A free software licence known as the GPL allows users to run, copy, distribute, study, change, and otherwise improve software that is covered by the GPL.
The GPL assures that any software updates or enhancements are also made available under the GPL for the benefit of others.
The Linux kernel source code is licensed under the GPL, which means that users have the freedom to use, study, share, and modify the software code. The GPL does not require users to pay a yearly fee to access or modify the Linux source code. Instead, it requires that any changes made to the code be released under the GPL.
Therefore, the Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications, but it can be modified and redistributed under the GPL.
To learn more about General Public License here:
https://brainly.com/question/30453074#
#SPJ11
complete question
Which of the following best describes the GNU General Public License (GPL) that is associated with the Linux kernel source code?
a) You can freely utilize, but not change, the Linux source code.
b) The Linux source code remains freely available to anybody who wants it for non commercial use.
c) You need to pay a yearly fee to access and change the Linux source code.
d) The Linux source code remains free to those who use it for non-commercial applications.
Which of the following is a question of fact?
A. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
B. Whether pre-meditation is necessary for a first-degree murder conviction.
C. Whether speech is protected by the First Amendment.
D. What is necessary for service of process?
E. Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light and also what is necessary for service of process?
Answers
The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.
For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means
Question of Fact is simply known as when a speaker wants to persuade people about how to interpret facts that was presented.In law, question of fact, focus on questions that must be answered by the act of one's reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising drawn from those facts. it is also known as a question for the jury in a jury trial or for the judge in a bench trial. Fact questions are evidentiary questions in nature and are often concern with who, what, where, and when.From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct
Learn more about question of fact from:
https://brainly.com/question/13857186
A group of parents sues the local school board, asking that their children's school be desegregated. Is this state federal, and where should this case be appealed
Answers
Yes, this state is federal and the case should be appealed in front of the federal court.
In the US, school desegregation is a highly debated topic. When a group of parents sues the local school board, asking that their children's school be desegregated, it raises questions about whether this case is a state or federal matter, and where it should be appealed.
In this situation, the case would be considered a federal matter and would be heard in a federal court, specifically a US District Court. The reason for this is that school desegregation falls under the purview of the federal government, as it is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.
This clause prohibits states from denying citizens equal protection under the law, and has been used in a number of landmark court cases related to civil rights and racial equality. Therefore, any lawsuit related to desegregation of schools would be heard in a federal court and would be subject to the jurisdiction of federal laws and regulations.
To learn more about federal, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1951874
#SPJ11
A Sargent span of control is over who:
Answers
2. Do you think imprisonment is the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated a law? Why or why not
Answers
Answer:
Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.
T/F to dissolve a marriage, a court needs: to dissolve a marriage, a court needs: in rem jurisdiction personal jurisdiction of both spouses subject-matter jurisdiction
Answers
The statement is true because in order for a court to dissolve a marriage, it needs to have both in rem jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction of both spouses, as well as subject-matter jurisdiction.
In rem jurisdiction refers to the court's authority over the marriage itself, which is usually determined by the location where the marriage was performed or where the couple resides.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority over the individuals involved, meaning that the court must have the power to make decisions that will affect both spouses. Finally, subject-matter jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to hear cases related to the dissolution of marriage.
Without all three types of jurisdiction, a court cannot legally dissolve a marriage.
Learn more about marriage https://brainly.com/question/31599141
#SPJ11
The legal system of the 1800s depended on testimony regarding physical evidence from scientists of what profession?
Answers
Answer:
Pathology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic pathology studies the disease of crime.
Explanation:
Quizlet yeah
III . Think and write: Which statements refer to civil laws and which statement refer to criminal laws
1) A law that deals with people’s rights . ______
2) A law that is designed to protect people from others . _________
3) With this law, disputes are settled by a jury. __________
4) A law that deals with people who break national laws. ________
5) A law that is designed to keep society safe . ___________
Answers
1) A law that deals with people’s rights—civil law.
2) A law that is designed to protect people from others—criminal law.
What is Civil law?Civil law is an international legal system that has its roots in mainland Europe. Roman law serves as the intellectual foundation for the civil law system, and its key concepts have been codified into a referable system, which is the main source of legislation.
3) With this law, disputes are settled by a jury-Civil law.
4) A law that deals with people who break national laws-Criminal law.
5) A law that is designed to keep society safe—Civil law.
The corpus of law that deals with crimes are known as criminal law. It forbids behavior that is deemed to pose a threat to, be detrimental to, or otherwise pose a risk to the possessions, health, safety, and moral well-being of others, including oneself.
Therefore, statements related to civil laws and criminal laws are stated above.
Learn more about Civil law, here;
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
The law relating to the employment relationship is based on the traditional law called master and servant, which evolved into the law of agency. True or False
Answers
Answer:
only for points sorry.....
What specifically does this research offer regarding the issue
and how does this relate to the policymaking role of government?
(topic is age restrictions on guns
Answers
Research on age restrictions on guns informs policymakers on the effectiveness of regulations in reducing firearm-related incidents involving minors.
The policy making process is aided by research on the effects of age restrictions on the possession of firearms. It offers empirical proof of the effectiveness of age restrictions in lowering incidents involving minors and firearms. With the help of this research, policymakers are now able to decide on the right age ranges for purchasing, possessing and owning firearms.
Policymakers can create comprehensive policies that balance individual rights with public safety by taking into account elements like maturity levels, risk factors and societal implications. The research aids government policymaking by providing direction for the creation of laws and rules governing the accessibility of firearms for various age groups with the ultimate objective of addressing issues with respect to gun violence, youth safety and responsible gun ownership.
Learn more about policy making at:
brainly.com/question/12671085
#SPJ4
As we get into the materials we start with a question, "why" do we need laws? Please explain with several examples from the news as to the purpose and functions of law in society.
Answers
In order to preserve order, safeguard individual rights, and foster a just and peaceful cohabitation, laws serve a variety of objectives and tasks that are fundamental to society.
The framework for preserving public safety and order is established by laws. For example, traffic regulations control vehicle movement and guarantee the safety of motorists and pedestrians.
To protect people's liberties and rights, Laws are created. They offer a framework for the legal defense of human rights, including the rights to life, liberty, and property.
For settling conflicts and disagreements in a fair and unbiased manner, laws offer a method. To resolve disagreements between people, groups, in a society, or even nations, courts interpret and apply the law.
Learn more about Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15439594
#SPJ4
Read through the United Thermostatic Controls Case 3-3 in the textbook
Identify all of the stakeholders in this case. Identify their interests and United’s obligations to satisfy those interests from an ethical perspective.
Describe the ethical and professional responsibilities of Tony Cupertino as a CPA and CIA. How do these responsibilities effect whom Cupertino should approach in United based on the organization chart?
Assume you are in Cupertino's position and know you have to do something about the improper accounting in the Southern sales division. Consider the following in crafting a plan how best to voice your values and take appropriate action:
How can you get it done effectively and efficiently? What do you need to say, to whom, and in what sequence? What will the objections or push-back be and, then, What would you say next? What data and other information do you need to make your point and counteract the reasons and rationalizations you will likely have to address?
Answers
Stakeholders in the United Thermostatic Controls case include:
1. Employees: Their interest lies in job security, fair treatment, and a safe work environment. United has an ethical obligation to provide a fair and conducive workplace for its employees.
2. Customers: Their interest is in receiving quality products and fair pricing. United is ethically obligated to provide reliable products and transparent pricing to satisfy their customers' interests.
3. Shareholders: Their interest is in maximizing profits and ensuring the company's long-term success. United is ethically obligated to provide accurate financial reporting and make decisions that enhance shareholder value.
4. Suppliers: Their interest is in timely payments and a mutually beneficial relationship. United has an ethical obligation to pay suppliers on time and maintain fair and transparent dealings.
As a CPA and CIA, Tony Cupertino has ethical and professional responsibilities. These include maintaining professional competence, objectivity, integrity, and confidentiality. Cupertino should approach the appropriate individuals in United's organizational chart, such as the CEO or CFO, to address the improper accounting in the Southern sales division.
To voice his values and take appropriate action, Cupertino should follow a step-by-step plan. He should gather relevant data and information to support his concerns, prepare a clear and concise statement of the issue, and present it to the appropriate individuals in a sequence that ensures the message is heard. Cupertino should anticipate objections or push-back and be prepared with counterarguments and data to address them effectively.
In summary, Cupertino should approach the issue with professionalism, integrity, and a well-prepared plan to effectively voice his values and take appropriate action.
know more about Shareholders.
https://brainly.com/question/32134220
#SPJ11
Question 1: Does this new law violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? If it does, what section(s) and why?
Answers
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the Charter of Rights and Freedoms law.
Explanation:
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:
freedom of expression,right to equality, andright to privacy, etc..
Officers have been called to the scene of an altercation outside a crowded restaurant. Two men were evidently arguing over a sports event. The argument escalated, with both men throwing punches. By the time officers arrived on the scene, one man was holding his nose, which was profusely bleeding. The other was nursing a quickly blackening eye. Several people loitered around the entrance to the club. After speaking with both men on the scene, officers leave without making an arrest. What is the MOST likely reason for their choice in this situation?
Neither man wanted to press charges.
There were no witnesses to verify the fight.
There was no video camera footage of the fight.
The officers did not see evidence of a crime.
Answers
Answer:
Neither man wanted to press charges.
Explanation:
I'll just say why the other answers are wrong
B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club
C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.
D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.
John and Mary were on their way home from the store when their car stalled in the middle of an intersection. Although the intersection was well lit, a car going in the same direction struck the rear of their car. At the same time, another vehicle also struck their car in the front right side. Both John and Mary were injured from the collisions. The first vehicle driver had no insurance on his vehicle. The second vehicle did have insurance but only had the minimum amount of liability coverage required by the state. John and Mary were both injured severely and spent many weeks in the hospital causing both a large hospital bill and also missing work for many months. John and Mary did have full insurance coverage with medium high limits. What type of coverage from John and Mary’s insurance policy would provide insurance coverage for them in the case of the other vehicle driver’s insufficient coverage? Be specific and state the reason for your answer.
Answers
If the driver of the other car had insufficient insurance, John and Mary's uninsured/underinsured motorist policy would provide them with insurance coverage. It aids in paying for medical costs and missed earnings due to the accident.
John and Mary's insurance policy should include uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, which would protect them if the other car driver's coverage was insufficient. This coverage is intended to protect policyholders in the event of a collision with a motorist who does not have insurance or has insufficient insurance coverage.
The first motorist in this case had no insurance, and the second driver had only the bare minimum of liability coverage. Because John and Mary have full coverage with medium-high limits, their uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage should cover their medical expenses and lost wages as a result of the accident.
Learn more about insurance:
https://brainly.com/question/30291521
#SPJ1
Article for the constitution which included the full faith and credit clause ensures
that
Answers
Tandem mass spectrometry combines the use of a gas spectrometer and a _____.light spectrometry
light spectrometry
mass spectrometry
component spectrometry
magnetic spectrometry
Answers
Tandem mass spectrometry is the use of a gas spectrometer in conjunction with a d) mass spectrometry.
Tandem mass spectrometry, commonly known as MS/MS or MS2, is an instrumental analysis technique in which two or more mass analyzers are linked together utilizing an additional reaction step to boost their ability to examine chemical samples. The examination of biomolecules such as proteins and peptides is a common use of tandem MS.
A given sample's molecules are ionized, and the first spectrometer (named MS1) separates these ions based on their mass-to-charge ratio (commonly expressed as m/z or m/Q).
Ions with a specific m/z ratio are chosen from MS1 and subsequently broken into smaller fragment ions, for example, through collision-induced dissociation, ion-molecule interaction, or photodissociation.
To know more about tandem mass spectrometry:
https://brainly.com/question/11311173
#SPJ1
Correct question:
Tandem mass spectrometry combines the use of a gas spectrometer and a _____.
a) component spectrometry
b) magnetic spectrometry
c) light spectrometry
d) mass spectrometry
Question 1 (1 point)
This format is a layered image file used in Adobe Photoshop.
TIFF (Tagged Image File Format)
JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group)
BMP (Bitmap)
O PSD (Photoshop Document)
Answers
Answer:
PSD
Explanation:
How does the government of a traditional new England small town differ from the government of a large modern city
Answers
College students please help!
American media has focused its attention on counterterrorism efforts abroad while virtue ignoring issues of domestic security. What role, if any, do you think the American media should play in domestic security?
Answers
Answer:
I feel as though they should essentially advertise is we need this type of security to feel safe though counterterrisom is something to be focusing upon if we can't feel safe in our own home's what's the point of it at all.
Explanation:
i really hope this helped you out.