how were global kingdoms and empire built? what conditions favor empire building?

In Cuba, Fidel Castro overthrew the government through a revolution.

Castro performed a significant part in the Cuban Revolution after returning home by commanding the Movement in a guerilla war against Batista's army from the Sierra Maestra. Castro became Cuba's prime minister and seized both military and political authority following Batista's coup in 1959.

It started with the attack on the Moncada Barracks on July 26, 1953, and concluded on January 1, 1959, when Batista was forced from power and revolutionaries, commanded by Che Guevara and Fidel Castro's proxies Ral Castro and Huber Matos, respectively, took the cities of Santa Clara and Santiago de Cuba.

In the Cuban Revolution, Fidel Castro and a related group of rebels overthrew Fulgencio Batista's reigning regime, removing him from office on January 1, 1959. Castro, who was already a prominent member of Cuban society, later held the position of prime minister from 1959 to 1976.

To learn more about Fidel Castro

https://brainly.com/question/27854198

#SPJ1

The samurai's role in Japanese society did not primarily involve helping peasants escape unfair tax systems or promoting pacifism and religious meditation.

Instead, their role revolved around supporting the daimyos and providing security, as well as occasionally supporting the emperor against ruthless daimyos. The samurai were a distinct social class in feudal Japan that emerged during the Heian period (794-1185). Initially, they served as warriors and fought on behalf of their respective daimyos, who were feudal lords.

The primary duty of the samurai was to protect their lords and their domains, engaging in battles and conflicts as necessary. They underwent rigorous training in martial arts, swordsmanship, and strategy, developing exceptional skills on the battlefield.

While their primary role was military, samurai also served administrative functions during periods of relative peace. They were involved in governance, overseeing land distribution, collecting taxes, and maintaining social order. Samurai acted as advisors to their daimyos, providing counsel on political matters and serving as administrators of their domains.

know more about samurai's here:

https://brainly.com/question/361705

#SPJ8

Answer:

President Nixon believed his Vietnamization strategy, which involved building up South Vietnam's armed forces and withdrawing U.S. troops, would prepare the South Vietnamese to act in their own defense against a North Vietnamese takeover and allow the United States to leave Vietnam with its honor intact.

Explanation:

cuz, rasin

Answer:

A law that is unconstitutional is one that violates the principles and provisions of the supreme law of the land, which is the constitution. Such a law may infringe on the rights and freedoms of the people, or exceed the powers and limits of the government. The remedy for a law that is unconstitutional is to challenge it in a court of law, where judges can review its validity and compatibility with the constitution. If the court finds that the law is indeed unconstitutional, it can declare it null and void, and prevent its enforcement. This process is known as judicial review, and it is an essential mechanism for upholding the rule of law and protecting democracy.

MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!

Answer:

A filibuster is a political tactic whereby one or more members of a legislative body extend the discussion of proposed legislation in an effort to postpone or completely obstruct decision-making.

Explanation:

Answer:

Correct Answer:

b. attracting the attention of men

Explanation:

Grimke, as one of the fashionista in the fashion world lived her life to the fullest. She was able to be trendy in the cloths that are fashionable during her early life which on the long run attracted ment to her.

In her reflection, she was able to see that, most women into trendy fashion, their lives revolves around attracting men to themselves

Answer:

B. attracting the attention of men

Explanation:

Answer:

2. The Caribbean Islands

Explanation:

Hope this helps

I think the main causes of World War II in Europe include the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, the rise of fascist ideologies, the failure of diplomacy and collective security, and economic and social instability.

They created a volatile environment that led to the outbreak of the most destructive war in European history.

Learn more about the Treaty of Versailles at brainly.com/question/3604628

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

Whately felt that American Colonists should contribute to the preservation of the advantages they have received. ... According to Dickinson, Parliament was justified in imposing the Stamp Act on the colonies. Why did he object to the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts?

The Dawes act was meant to encourage Native Americans to assimilate into white society. Thus, option A is correct.

An act can be defined as a part where an action is been taken. It can be regarding the matters or the prevailing matters that are harming the citizen or are taken for the upliftment of the citizen.

Dawes act was implemented to ensure that the people are the ones who knew to native America would fill off the list and be a part of the community. Make them a part of the community they were given farming and land for that matter.

Therefore, option A is the correct option.

Learn more about act, here:

https://brainly.com/question/20345762

#SPJ1

Answer: Thebes

Explanation:

There was a general sentiment amongst most Greeks during the second Persian invasion of Greece by King Xerxes that Thebes was a Mede-loving city-state which meant they they have pro-Persian sentiments.

This is why when a general of Xerxes' needed to retreat from Athens, he retreated to Thebes where they rested for the winter. The Greeks defeated him and entered Thebes where they killed anyone they judged to be pro-Persian.

Answer:

Originally published anonymously, “Common Sense” advocated independence for the American colonies from Britain and is considered one of the most influential pamphlets in American history. ... At the time Paine wrote “Common Sense,” most colonists considered themselves to be aggrieved Britons.

Explanation:

The difference between a photograph taken by an eyewitness to an event and painting depicting the same event is that the is a primary source because the photographer is present during the actual event while the painting created later from the event is a secondary source based on the primary source.

Basically, a primary sources refers to a direct and firsthand experience about an event, person or object.They are often an original materials on which a research is based such as Memoirs, diaries, interviews and surveys.

Also, a secondary sources means any interpretations, analysis, evaluation and summary of primary sources such as textbooks, bibliographies, reference books, magazine articles etc.

Read more about sources

brainly.com/question/1956124

#SPJ1

The Kingdom of Kush came to an end as it was conquered by the Kingdom of Axum.

In the fourth century CE Axum a kingdom in modern day Ethiopia, succeeded in subduing Kush. Axum's dominance over the Red Sea trade routes, which gave them a tactical advantage over Kush, is probably what led to this conquest. The Nubian dynasty came to an end with Axum's conquest of Kush, and the Christian Axumite dynasty took its place.

After that, Ethiopian culture and religion started to have a bigger impact on the area. The conquest by Axum was a significant factor in the Kingdom of Kush's eventual demise, even though there were other factors, such as climate change and economic instability, that also played a role.

Learn more about Kingdom of Kush at:

brainly.com/question/18970095

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

From the mid-1800s on, communism began slowly rising around the globe in both fame and notoriety. As the ideas spread and developed, new questions on morality and the meaning of human existence emerged creating the political and social environment that we still live in today.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

hope that helps !!

Answer:

C.Nelson Mandelain 1962 Nelson Mandela was arrested because he was against the apartheid government laws.

According to Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, Congress could not forbid the "importation" of those born before 1808. The Act "to prohibit the importation of slaves in any port or place within the jurisdiction of the United States, from and after the first day of January [1808]" was passed twenty years later.

To learn more about the Constitution, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/453546

Answer:

dizziness/pain

specially headache but it's not here

Theodore Roosevelt - Political ideology: Progressivism, Diplomatic style: Big Stick diplomacy. William Howard Taft - Political ideology: Conservatism, Diplomatic style: Dollar Diplomacy

The political ideologies and diplomatic styles of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft had significant impacts on both U.S. expansion overseas and domestic politics during their respective presidencies. Roosevelt, known for his progressivism, believed in the government's role in regulating and reforming big business, advocating for conservation of natural resources, and championing social and labor reforms. His diplomatic style, often referred to as "Big Stick diplomacy," involved asserting American influence and power on the world stage through a strong military and interventionist approach, exemplified by the construction of the Panama Canal and his efforts to negotiate peaceful settlements in international conflicts. On the other hand, Taft, who succeeded Roosevelt, held conservative political beliefs and favored a more cautious approach to government intervention in the economy. His diplomatic style, known as "Dollar Diplomacy," emphasized using American economic influence to promote U.S. business interests abroad and expand American markets. Taft focused on economic development and investment in Latin America and Asia, promoting American businesses and investments overseas as a means of expanding U.S. influence and avoiding military intervention. These differing political ideologies and diplomatic styles of Roosevelt and Taft had implications both internationally and domestically. Roosevelt's progressivism and Big Stick diplomacy helped shape U.S. foreign policy and expand American influence overseas, but also led to controversies and criticisms. Meanwhile, Taft's conservatism and Dollar Diplomacy approach had implications for U.S. economic policies, international relations, and domestic politics, as his policies were often seen as favoring big businesses and elicited mixed reactions from the public and political allies. The contrasting approaches of Roosevelt and Taft contributed to the evolving landscape of U.S. expansionism and diplomatic relations during the early 20th century, shaping the course of U.S. history in significant ways. Overall, Roosevelt's progressivism and Big Stick diplomacy were characterized by a more interventionist approach, while Taft's conservatism and Dollar Diplomacy approach were marked by a more cautious and economically-driven approach.

Learn more about political ideologies here:

https://brainly.com/question/23081489

#SPJ1

Answer:

President Theodore Roosevelt:

President William Howard Taft:

Explanation:

Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy was a direct approach to gaining imperialistic goals, whereas Taft's Dollar Diplomacy used more subtle means. Roosevelt believed in self-determination; Taft would not appoint African Americans to federal jobs.

hope this helps <3

A general overview of the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations.

The United States' decision to join an international organization is typically influenced by a combination of political, economic, and strategic factors. Historically, the United States has been actively involved in various international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and many others. Support for America joining an organization can come from different quarters.

It often depends on the perceived benefits and alignment of objectives. Supporters of U.S. inclusion may include policymakers, diplomats, internationalists, business leaders, and advocates of global cooperation. They believe that participating in international organizations allows the United States to promote its interests, exercise influence, foster diplomatic relations, and address global challenges through multilateral cooperation.

On the other hand, opposition to U.S. involvement in an organization can also exist. Critics may argue that membership could compromise national sovereignty, limit policy autonomy, or impose burdensome financial obligations. Opposition may come from political factions, isolationists, skeptics of international cooperation, or those who believe that the organization's agenda or actions contradict U.S. interests or values.

It is important to note that the specific political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the organization and the particular context surrounding U.S. involvement. the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations, considering some specific examples.

United Nations (UN): The United States played a pivotal role in the establishment of the UN in 1945 and has been a member since its inception. Supporters of U.S. membership emphasized the need for collective security, international cooperation, and the promotion of peace and stability.

They believed that active participation in the UN would enhance American influence, provide a platform to address global challenges, and safeguard U.S. interests. However, there have been critics who argue that the UN infringes on national sovereignty or that it is biased against U.S. interests, leading to occasional opposition from certain political factions.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): The United States was a founding member of NATO in 1949. Supporters of U.S. involvement saw NATO as a means to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War, protect European allies, and promote stability in the region. NATO has generally enjoyed broad bipartisan support in the United States, with proponents highlighting its importance for transatlantic security cooperation.

However, some critics argue that NATO burdens the United States with disproportionate military and financial commitments, leading to occasional debates about the costs and benefits of U.S. participation World Trade Organization (WTO): The United States has been a member of the WTO since its establishment in 1995. Supporters of U.S. membership view the WTO as a vital platform for promoting global trade, reducing barriers, and resolving trade disputes. They argue that U.S. participation helps protect American businesses, ensure market access, and enforce fair trade practices.

Opposition to the WTO or specific trade agreements can arise from those who believe they negatively impact domestic industries or workers, leading to debates over trade policy and the balance between free trade and protectionism. It is important to note that the political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the specific organization, geopolitical context, and prevailing domestic political dynamics. Different administrations or political parties may hold varying perspectives on the value of international organizations and their alignment with U.S. interests.

To know more about political background ,click

brainly.com/question/30687787

Answer:

The Constitution names the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate. In addition to serving as presiding officer, the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast in presidential elections.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Constitution names the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate. In addition to serving as presiding officer, the vice president has the sole power to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally presides over the receiving and counting of electoral ballots cast on presidential elections.

Answer:

Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. ... The cotton economy would collapse. The tobacco crop would dry in the fields.

Explanation:

The method that I can use to collect data about this construction is the excavation and extraction of elements of the place. This method is the most suitable for this type of archaeological activities. The most relevant data could be findings within the structure, its age, writings or carvings on its foundations, or construction techniques.

Archeology is a term that refers to the science that focuses on the study of changes in societies, from the first groups of humans to the current ones through material remains.

The most appropriate archaeological method for this situation would be excavation because it allows us to discover the elements that are buried in the foundations of these structures. Additionally, they allow us to fully visualize these foundations to discover the construction method and some additional traces such as engravings or carvings.

The most relevant data that we could use to know what this structure is and what it was used for is the materials that were used, what was the construction method, what particular characteristics it has, among others.

Learn more about archeology in: https://brainly.com/question/4289892

#SPJ1

Answer:

Without knowing the specific context and dates referred to in the question, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, assuming that the question is referring to a specific event during the American Civil War, it is possible to speculate on some reasons why Jefferson Davis might have chosen not to send reinforcements to a besieged town.

During the Civil War, the Confederacy faced significant challenges in terms of resources and manpower. The Confederacy was often stretched thin, particularly in the later years of the war, and was forced to make difficult choices about where to allocate its limited resources. As a result, Davis may have decided not to send reinforcements to a besieged town because he believed that the Confederacy simply did not have the resources to spare.

Another factor that may have influenced Davis's decision was the political and military situation at the time. Depending on the specific event in question, Davis may have been facing pressure from other Confederate leaders or from the public to focus on other priorities, such as defending the capital or winning a major battle. Additionally, Davis may have been concerned about the potential consequences of sending reinforcements, such as leaving other areas vulnerable to attack or further depleting the Confederacy's already-limited resources.

Overall, the decision not to send reinforcements to a besieged town during the Civil War likely involved a complex set of factors, including resource constraints, political pressure, and military considerations.

During the American Civil War, Jefferson Davis chose not to send reinforcements to Vicksburg during the siege because the Confederate army was also facing critical battles in other regions, such as Gettysburg in the east. Davis likely prioritized allocating resources to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it difficult to provide immediate assistance to Vicksburg.

Given these circumstances, Davis likely calculated that diverting resources from other critical fronts would be unwise and opted to concentrate efforts elsewhere.

Note: The complete question is:

Jefferson Davis called Vicksburg the "Nail that holds the Confederacy together" because it linked western Confederate states (LA, TX, AR) to eastern Confederate states. Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)

For more questions on American Civil War:

https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ8

Answer:

c : Th Jobs available to them did not pay very much

Answer:

According to the graph we can conclude that the losses in Civil War (combined data) were practically the same as the losses of American soldiers in all other wars together. This is just a proof of how devastating this war was for the United States.

Explanation:

We can see from the graph that when we combine numbers that more than 600 000 people died in the Civil War. On the other side we can also that less than 700 000 Americans died in all other wars that they participated in. And take into account that United States participated in WW1 and WW2 among other conflicts.

Answer:

Considering the fact that the artist called them "maniacs", they most likely thought of them poorly. Thought they were morons, terrible people, something along the lines of that. The person obviously doesn't agree with their thoughts and ideas. But overall, they thought of them poorly.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

1. attack on Pearl Harbor

2. United States entered World War II

3. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066

4. Korematsu v. United States was decided

Explanation:

I got it right

The events in order are as follows:

On December 7, 1941, Japan staged a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Japan did not want the interference of the United States Pacific Fleet with its planned military actions in Southeast Asia against overseas territories.

World War II was considered as a global war which lasted from 1939 to 1945. The war involved the great powers which formed the two opposing military alliances- the Axis and the Allies powers.

On December 7, 1941, the Japanese bombed the Pearl Harbor, thus United States declared war on Japan. Three days later, after Germany and Italy declared war on it. Thus, the United States became fully engaged in the Second World War.

On February 19, 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order. This order authorized the evacuation of all persons who deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to relocation centers further inland.

Korematsu v. United States was a landmark decision made on December 18, 1944 by the Supreme Court of the United States which upheld the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II.

Hence, the answer was given and explained above.

To learn more about Pearl Harbor, World War II and Executive Order here:

https://brainly.com/question/884458

https://brainly.com/question/11852928

#SPJ2