A "unanimous vote" is not precisely defined in Robert's Rules of Order, but regardless of the voting threshold, an abstention is not counted as a vote.
What happens to the vote of an abstention?Abstaining from voting might be seen as modest disagreement of a proposal or as ambivalence about it that does not amount to aggressive resistance. Abstention can also be employed when a person has a certain opinion on a matter, but since the majority opinion is in favor of the opposition, it might not be politically wise for them to vote that way. When a person feels under-informed about the subject at hand or has not participated in pertinent conversation, they may also choose to abstain. A member may be asked to abstain under parliamentary procedure if there is an actual or apparent conflict of interest.To learn more about abstention, refer to
https://brainly.com/question/28183486
#SPJ4
state courts account for about what percent of all court cases in the u.s.?
State courts account for approximately 97% of all court cases in the U.S. These courts handle a vast majority of cases because they possess general jurisdiction, which means they can hear almost any type of case that arises within their state.
This includes both civil and criminal matters, family law issues, property disputes, and probate matters. State courts have the authority to interpret and apply state laws and constitutions. As a result, they handle cases involving state law, as well as local ordinances and regulations. Additionally, state courts address many federal law issues that have a direct impact on the lives of the residents within their jurisdiction.
In contrast, federal courts handle only a small percentage of cases, as they have limited jurisdiction. Federal courts primarily hear cases involving federal laws or constitutional issues, disputes between states or citizens of different states, and cases involving the United States government. Thus, state courts play a significant role in the American judicial system by addressing the vast majority of cases that impact people's lives directly.
To summarize, state courts account for about 97% of all court cases in the United States, and they are critical to the administration of justice as they handle a broad range of legal issues that directly affect the lives of citizens within their jurisdiction.
To learn more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896#
#SPJ11
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
5.The party who is paid by employer to serve under the employer's direction and control is known as:. Single choice.
Answer:
An employee.
Explanation:
An employee can be defined as an individual who is employed by an employer of labor to perform specific tasks, duties or functions in an organization.
The party who is paid by employer to serve under the employer's direction and control is known as an employee.
Basically, an employee is saddled with the responsibility of providing specific services to the organization or company where he is currently employed while being paid a certain amount of money hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly depending on the contractual agreement between the two parties (employer and employee).
Hence, while an employer may be the owner of a business firm or company, an employee is a subordinate employed to provide unwavering services to the employer while also, being professional and diligent at all times.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
the hipaa security rule requires which of the following to achieve compliance?
The HIPAA Security Rule requires covered entities and business associates to achieve compliance.
The HIPAA Security Rule provides national standards to protect individuals' electronic personal health information (ePHI) that is created, received, used, or maintained by a covered entity or business associate.
What is the HIPAA Security Rule?
The HIPAA Security Rule, like the HIPAA Privacy Rule, was created under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The Security Rule outlines the required administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for securing protected health information (PHI).
What does the HIPAA Security Rule require for compliance?
In order to comply with the HIPAA Security Rule, covered entities and business associates must implement the following administrative, technical, and physical safeguards:
Administrative Safeguards: These include the development of a comprehensive risk analysis, risk management plan, workforce training and management, and periodic security evaluations.
Technical Safeguards: These are technical measures put in place to protect ePHI, such as encryption, access controls, firewalls, and malware protection.Physical Safeguards: Physical security measures that restrict access to ePHI, such as locked offices, security cameras, and visitor sign-in sheets.
In conclusion, the HIPAA Security Rule requires covered entities and business associates to achieve compliance by implementing administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect electronic personal health information (ePHI).
Read more about HIPAA at https://brainly.com/question/8109025
#SPJ11
(i) : When an exporter has a contractual dispute with a foreign importer, which legal system, – the exporter’s or the importer’s – has jurisdiction? Explain your answer. (1 mark)
(ii) List the two (2) main types of legal system in the world and briefly explain two (2) differences between them
The contents of the contract, any relevant laws, and any agreements between the parties all play a role in determining jurisdiction in a legal dispute between an exporter and a foreign importer.
(ii) There are two primary categories of legal systems worldwide:
Common Law System: The common law system, which started in England and has since expanded to many other nations, is mostly based on precedents set by courts via their rulings throughout time. Judges are crucial in the interpretation and application of the law.
Civil Law System: The civil law system, which is widely used and evolved from ancient Roman law, is based on extensive legal codes and codified statutes that outline broad guidelines and regulations.
Learn more about the law system, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30852015
#SPJ4
command for creating a revised draft is called? crossword clue
The command for creating a revised draft is called "revising."
Revising is the process of improving the content, organization, and style of a document. It involves re-reading, editing, and making changes to ensure that your writing communicates effectively and clearly. To make a revised draft, start by reading through your work and taking notes about what needs to be revised. Once you have an idea of what needs to be changed, make any necessary edits, rearrange sentences, add/remove details, and make sure the tone of your writing is appropriate. Finally, make sure you proofread your document to ensure it is free of any spelling or grammar errors.
Know more about draft here:
https://brainly.com/question/29443724
#SPJ11
What essential conditions are necessary for a combustion reaction (fire triangle)?
The three essential conditions necessary for a combustion reaction are commonly referred to as the "fire triangle." These three conditions are: Heat, Fuel and Oxygen.
What is combustion reaction?
Combustion reaction is a type of exothermic chemical reaction that occurs between a fuel and an oxidizing agent (typically oxygen), resulting in the release of energy in the form of heat and light. In a combustion reaction, the fuel reacts with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide, water, and other combustion products.
1. Heat: Sufficient heat must be present to raise the temperature of the fuel to its ignition point. This heat can come from sources such as a spark, a flame, or friction.
2. Fuel: There must be a combustible fuel present, such as wood, gasoline, or paper. The fuel provides the material that will be oxidized in the reaction.
3. Oxygen: Oxygen is necessary for combustion to occur. It reacts with the fuel, releasing energy in the form of heat and light. In most cases, air provides the necessary oxygen.
If any of these three conditions are absent or removed, the combustion reaction cannot occur or will be extinguished. For example, removing the heat source, cutting off the fuel supply, or smothering the fire with a fire extinguisher can stop the reaction.
To know more about combustion reaction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23146159
#SPJ1
.What is the difference between a case on point and a case on “all fours”? Why is finding either of these important when researching case law?
Answer: if you put your mom in your room how many of your dads would come back 8
Explanation:
Your first big case is a multiple murder.As defense attorney for Sy Kopath, you have come to the realization that he really did break into a couple's home and torture and kill them in the course of robbing them of jewelry and other valuables. He has even confessed to you that he did it. However, you are also aware that the police did not read him his Miranda warning and that he was coerced into giving a confession without your presence. What should you do? Would your answer be different if you believed that he was innocent or didn't know for sure either way?
Answer: ok he did it
Explanation:The reason is because 1+1 is 2 - 1 thats 3 quick maths.
Mark is a famous syndicated radio personality for talkradio. He has a distinctive voice and manner of speaking. Moretalk hires gordon, who sounds nearly identical to mark, to host a competing show. Moretalk encourages gordon to imitate mark as closely as possible while on the air. Moretalk is most likely to be liable for.
Answer:
Moretalk is liable for voice phishing
What is a contract that has been concluded as a result of undue influence
Explanation:
A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
janet is called for jury duty and is selected for possible service on a jury. however, when the defendant's attorney sees her, he notices that she is wearing a green dress. both the defendant and the defendant's attorney hate green dresses, so they strike her name from the jury. this is:
What is state bar number California?
The state bar number in California is a unique identifier assigned to an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the state. It is a critical component of the California State Bar, which is the state agency responsible for regulating the legal profession in California.
In order to obtain a state bar number in California, an attorney must pass the California Bar Exam and be admitted to the California State Bar. Once admitted, the attorney is assigned a state bar number, which is recorded in the California State Bar's database and is used to identify the attorney in all professional activities.
The state bar number is a crucial tool for the California State Bar in ensuring that the legal profession is regulated and that the public is protected from unethical or unprofessional attorneys.
Attorneys are required to include their state bar number on all legal documents and communications, which helps to ensure that the public can easily verify an attorney's credentials and disciplinary history.
For more about state bar number refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14661666#
#SPJ11
Justin wants to file a suit against mikayla. for a court to hear the case a. the court must issue a deposition. b. the court must have jurisdiction. c. the parties must own property. d. mikayla must agree.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Wet floors, heavy lifting can cause falling, sprains and strain, these are all examples of which hazard?
Wet floors, heavy lifting, and the potential for falling, sprains, and strains are all examples of physical hazards in the workplace.
Physical hazards are conditions or situations that can cause bodily harm, injury, or damage to one's health.
These hazards can result from various factors, such as slippery surfaces, improper lifting techniques, or insufficient safety measures.
Wet floors, for instance, can lead to slipping and falling incidents, which can cause injuries ranging from minor bruises to more severe fractures or concussions.
Heavy lifting, on the other hand, can lead to sprains and strains if workers do not utilize proper lifting techniques or equipment. These musculoskeletal injuries can be painful, debilitating, and may require extensive recovery periods.
To minimize the risk of physical hazards, employers should implement safety measures such as regular floor maintenance to prevent wet or slippery surfaces, providing training on proper lifting techniques, and ensuring the use of appropriate safety equipment.
Employees should also be encouraged to report any unsafe conditions or practices to management, so that preventative measures can be taken.
In conclusion, wet floors and heavy lifting are examples of physical hazards in the workplace, which can lead to falling, sprains, and strains.
It is essential to address these hazards through appropriate safety measures to protect the well-being of employees.
For more questions on: health
https://brainly.com/question/31169138
#SPJ11
The time allowed for one party to sue another and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit are examples of ________.
The time allowed for one party to sue another and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit are examples of Statute of limitations.
Statute of limitations is defined as the time allowed for one party to sue another, and the rules of law governing the process of a lawsuit. It refers to the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated after the occurrence of a particular event or incident.
The term statute of limitations applies to a wide range of legal proceedings and provides a time frame within which legal proceedings may be commenced.
It sets out time limits within which legal proceedings must be commenced after the cause of action arises.It refers to the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated after the occurrence of a particular event or incident.
A statute of limitations is typically enacted by a legislative body and varies depending on the nature of the case. The statutes of limitations vary from one jurisdiction to another and may be dependent on the nature of the lawsuit and the relevant laws of that jurisdiction.
In conclusion, the statute of limitations is the time limit within which legal proceedings may be initiated, and the rules governing the process of a lawsuit. A statute of limitations is typically enacted by a legislative body and varies depending on the nature of the case.
Learn more about statute of limitations here https://brainly.com/question/30666158
#SPJ11
When first accused of committing a crime, a guilty person will most likely deny the accusation immediately repeat the accusation in the form of a question say nothing try to blame someone else
Answer:
repeat the accusation in the form of a question.
Explanation:
A law can be defined as the system of principles, regulations and rules established by legislature, that is adopted in a community, society or country to regulate the actions of its citizens, members or employees.
Thus, law is a tool used by the judiciary, lawyers, individuals, organizations, and even government to ensure everybody is well behaved, non-criminal and civil in their actions. Therefore, a law creates the foundation for ethical behavior.
In circumstances where there are aberration, the law is enforced as a punishment and penalty for wrongdoings or misdeeds.
Generally, there are various types of law and these includes; criminal law, constitutional law, intellectual property law, corporate law, international law, family law, civil law, etc.
Typically, when a person is first accused of committing a particular crime, a guilty person will most likely repeat the accusation in the form of a question. This action is usually done by the guilty party so as to feign ignorance of the purported crime and presumably just hearing of such crime or event for the first time ever.
*****
1. The emphasis on elections in the United States most reflects which constitutional principle
O A. individual rights
O B. popular sovereignty
0 C. checks and balances
o D. separation of powers
Answer:
I think check and balance
Explain how the prompt below is an example of checks and balances between the three branches of government. “You just got pulled over by a police officer. He writes you a ticket for texting while driving. The only problem is you didn’t have your cellphone at the time, because you lost your phone on vacation with your family the week prior! There is nothing you can do in the moment about receiving the ticket, but... there is something you can do about having to pay the fine. In fact you may be a like to have the ticket removed from your record altogether!” Explain below how checks and balances may save your wallet money and your driving record.
Answer:Cause they can’t check it and if your doing good it helps
Explanation:
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
__________ is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Generally, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court because it is considered unreliable and lacks the safeguards that come with live testimony and cross-examination.
One reason why hearsay is impermissible is that it deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the original statement. Cross-examination is a critical part of the legal process as it allows the opposing counsel to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony. When hearsay evidence is presented, however, the opposing counsel cannot question the original speaker about the circumstances under which the statement was made or any other relevant information that may impact its reliability.
There are some exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized hearsay exception or when it is used for a non-hearsay purpose, but generally speaking, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.
learn more about Hearsay here
https://brainly.com/question/31668354
#SPJ11
here continues to be much discussion surrounding special interests and their ability to influence policy, especially when the result does not serve a larger public interest. How big a concern is this? Are there examples you can think of where such interest group activity may be a benefit to policy development?
Answer & Explanation:
The influence of special interests on policy development is a significant concern, as it can lead to policies that primarily serve the interests of a few influential groups rather than the larger public interest. The concern arises when special interest groups use their resources to shape public policy in their favor, often at the expense of other groups or society as a whole.
One example of special interest activity that may be a benefit to policy development is when interest groups represent underrepresented or marginalized groups and advocate for their needs and rights. For instance, advocacy groups that focus on environmental protection, civil rights, and labor rights often lobby policymakers to advance policies that promote the welfare of their constituents. Such groups can provide policymakers with useful insights into issues that affect these groups and shape public opinion and policy in their favor.
However, the problem arises when special interests use their influence to promote policies that only serve their narrow interests, even if such policies are not in the best interest of the larger public. This can lead to a situation where policies are created to benefit only the few, at the expense of the larger public interest.
In conclusion, while special interest group activity can be beneficial in promoting the interests of underrepresented groups, it is crucial to ensure that such groups do not unduly influence policymaking in their favor, to the detriment of the larger public interest. Policymakers must be vigilant and ensure that policies are developed through a fair and transparent process that prioritizes the broader public interest.
Question 2
What should you leave with a friend or relative before a long outing on the
water?
A
float plan
B
boat registration certificate
С
operator's license
D
insurance policy
As
pport
Submit Answer
Answer:
A. Float plan
Explanation:
A float plan can be defined as a written statement containing the details about an intended boat trip which is filed with a friend, siblings, or relatives.
Generally, float plan is a collection of details about your boat, number of people on board (crew and passengers), a safety equipment being used, expected or intended destination, and when you expect to get there.
Hence, before a long outing on the water, you should leave a float plan with your friend or relative.
The purpose of having a float plan is to assist the search and rescue personnel in locating victims in the event of a boat accident, mishap or emergency.
In a nutshell, a float plan is a life saving document which is used to locate victims in the shortest possible time during a boat emergency.
which jurisdiction(s) could prosecute andrew for the kidnapping and murder of
The jurisdiction(s) that could prosecute Andrew for the kidnapping and murder of a person would depend on where the crime was committed and where the victim was from.
If the crime was committed in one state, but the victim was from another state, both states could have jurisdiction to prosecute Andrew. Additionally, if the crime crossed state lines, the federal government could also have jurisdiction to prosecute Andrew.
In general, jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. In criminal cases, jurisdiction is typically determined by the location where the crime was committed.
However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as when a crime is committed across state lines or when the victim is from another state. In these cases, multiple jurisdictions may have the authority to prosecute the offender.
Therefore, the specific jurisdiction(s) that could prosecute Andrew for the kidnapping and murder of a person would depend on the specific facts of the case. However, it is possible that multiple jurisdictions could have the authority to prosecute him, including the state where the crime was committed, the state where the victim was from, and the federal government.
To know more about jurisdictions, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714#
#SPJ11
Which part of the Constitution did the Supreme Court make mostly irrelevant in the Slaughterhouse cases?
Answer:
I think it's the Fourteenth Amendment
Explanation:
voters in north carolina approve a new state constitution, after which the ocean city council passes new ordinances, the north carolina department of parks and recreation issues new rules, and the ocean city chamber of commerce sends out new instruction. sources of law do not include
Answer:
Explanation:
Sources of law do not include instructions from the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce. While the Chamber of Commerce can provide guidance and recommendations to its members and the community, it does not have the legal authority to create or enforce laws.
The sources of law in this scenario include:
The new state constitution approved by voters in North Carolina. This is a fundamental source of law that establishes the framework for government and the legal system.
The new ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council. These are local laws that are created and enforced by the city government.
The new rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation. These are administrative regulations that are created by government agencies to implement and enforce laws and policies.
Overall, sources of law include constitutional provisions, statutory law, administrative law, and common law, which are created through court decisions. Instructions or guidance from private entities such as the Chamber of Commerce do not hold the force of law.
Yes, voters in North Carolina approved a new state constitution.
This new constitution affects many aspects of law, including ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council, rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation, and instructions sent out by the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce.
Sources of law do not include the new state constitution, ordinances, rules, and instructions mentioned above, but rather come from the U.S. Constitution, state laws, state court decisions, and federal laws and regulations.
These sources are all recognized as legitimate forms of law and can be used to help interpret and make decisions.
To know more about federal laws click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447#
#SPJ11
A key element of the corpus delicti of a crime is the identity of the person who committed it. True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
In a federal system of government:
1)the federal government holds all the power.
2)a monarch holds all the political power.
3)capitalism is against the law.
4)states can pass laws and hold elections.
5)dictatorships are common.
What tactic did famous crime bosses like Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino MOST likely use to keep order in their organizations?
An act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino
Who is Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino?Edward Teach was one of the most fear sea pirates and Carlo Gambino was the head of a crime organization in U.S.
An organized crime means a continuing criminal enterprise that works by profiting from an illicit activities.
In conclusion, the act of committing organized crime are the tactics used by crime bosses such as Edward Teach and Carlo Gambino.
Read more about organized crime
brainly.com/question/8451608