Yes, an agreement to work for a person for the lifetime of that person subject to the statute of frauds as If it is possible that a contract with an uncertain completion date will be finished within a year, it is not subject to the Statute of Frauds.
A legal principle known as the statute of frauds mandates that certain kinds of contracts must be executed in writing in order to be legally binding. State laws include statutes of frauds. The statutes of fraud vary from state to state, but they are all constrained. Only some types of oral contracts are covered by statutes of fraud.
Ordinarily, an enforceable contract can be either written or oral, but in some cases, statutes of frauds specify two key conditions that must be met for certain oral contracts in order for them to be upheld. A contract that is subject to a statute of frauds will not be enforceable unless it is documented in writing. It's not necessary for the writing to be an official contract.
Learn more about Statute of Frauds at:
brainly.com/question/29607080
#SPJ4
if a corporation’s stock is traded on the major stock exchanges, the corporation must generally report periodically to a federal agency known as the
The corporation must generally report periodically to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) if its stock is traded on major stock exchanges.
In summary, the SEC is a federal agency responsible for regulating securities markets and protecting investors. Corporations with stocks traded on major exchanges must submit periodic reports to ensure compliance and maintain transparency.
Step by step explanation:
1. The SEC was established in 1934 to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities market. It enforces federal securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
2. Publicly traded corporations are required to register their securities with the SEC. This registration process includes providing detailed information about the company, its management, and its financial condition.
3. Once registered, corporations must submit periodic reports to the SEC. These reports include annual reports (Form 10-K), quarterly reports (Form 10-Q), and current reports (Form 8-K) for significant events. These filings provide investors with important financial data and updates on the company's operations.
4. The SEC reviews these reports to ensure that corporations are adhering to disclosure requirements and providing accurate, timely information to investors. If discrepancies or violations are discovered, the SEC can take enforcement actions against the company or its management.
5. By requiring publicly traded corporations to report to the SEC, the agency aims to promote transparency, prevent fraud, and maintain a fair and efficient securities market, ultimately protecting investors and contributing to economic growth.
Know more about the Securities and Exchange Commission click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9089676
#SPJ11
Josiah is a very likable person, but has been out of trouble, his whole life. He began drinking and taking drugs in high school, his parents him to rehab clinic to break his addictions. Josiah did well for a while, but then got caught up with some friends who were planning to break into a pharmacy to steal drugs. Josiah didn’t want to go along with it, but the idea of getting a large supply of painkillers was just too tempting after the robbery Josiah is arrested. His lawyer says that Joshua does know what is right and wrong, but just can’t stop myself from doing things that are bad. What crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions?
The crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions is self control theory of crime.
The self-control theory of crime, sometimes known as the general theory of crime, is a criminological theory that holds that a lack of individual self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior.
According to the self-control crime theory, people who were ineffectively parented before the age of ten develop less self-control than others of roughly the same age who were reared with better parenting. Low levels of self-control have also been linked to illegal and impulsive behavior, according to research.
Therefore, the appropriate crime theory to explain Josiah's actions is self-control theory.
To learn more on self-control theory of crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27254406
#SPJ1
who watch how to basic here
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately __________ percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016.
Answer:
28 percent
Explanation:
Accidents are caused by a variety of factors such as overspeeding, lack of concentration and mechanical faults. Alcohol impairs the driver in ways such as low concentration and blurry vision.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that alcohol was involved in approximately twenty eight percent of fatal crashes in the US in 2016. This was discovered by several blood alcohol concentration tests done on the drivers.
Mandy volunteered in a month-long sleep study at the university last year. She was asked to participate because of her unusual sleep habits and neurological history. Part of the sleep study included her sleeping in a room inside the lab for the entire month. She was videotaped while she slept. Now, 13 months later, police are trying to charge Mandy with possession and use of illegal drugs. It turns out she was using drugs during her stay at the sleep lab. Her drug use was recorded in the lab videos. She's not sure how or why the police saw the videos. She knew she was being videotaped, although she was told it was only for the study and that no one outside the lab would view the footage.
Would the video evidence be helpful in proving the case? (Answer in one to two sentences. Explain your reasoning.)
No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.
She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.
What is neurology?The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.
The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.
Learn more about neurology, from:
brainly.com/question/7165863
#SPJ1
Which of the following would satisfy the 30 minute break required under the interruption of driving provisions
The 30-minute break might be met by: Taking 30 straight hours off or on the job without using a vehicle. thirty minutes in the sleeping bunk nonstop. 30 continuous minutes are equal to both put together.
A driver has a window of 8 hours to drive following their most recent time of at least 30 minutes off-duty, in accordance with the FMCSA's 30-Minute Break Rule. A driver was required to take a 30-minute break by the eighth hour after starting their shift in order to resume driving under the previous regulation. A motorist is obligated to take a 30-minute break after 8 hours of continuous driving without a break of at least 30 minutes. Any 30-minute stretch without driving would suffice as a break.
Unless you meet the requirements for an exception, the 30-minute break rule must be followed. For instance, all short-haul drivers and non-CDL drivers operating within a 150 air-mile radius of their starting point are excluded from the requirement.
Learn more about the 30-minute breaks:
https://brainly.com/question/23580537
#SPJ9
FTC versus Wyndham court case as to what appears that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices
•List up to 5-10 items that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices
Wyndham was accused of inadequate data protection practices and violating Section 5 of the FTC Act. List of items that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices include it did not maintain inventory, did not perform regular security audits, did not install firewalls etc.
List of items that Wyndham did not due in regards to what is considered reasonable cybersecurity practices:
1. Wyndham did not maintain an inventory of computers, servers, and other devices connected to its network.
2. Wyndham did not perform regular security audits or conduct vulnerability scans.
3. Wyndham did not install firewalls to protect its network.
4. Wyndham did not require complex passwords for its users or prohibit easy-to-guess passwords.
5. Wyndham did not restrict access to its network by using appropriate authentication controls.
6. Wyndham did not encrypt its stored data or payment card data during transmission.
7. Wyndham did not use a current and up-to-date operating system on its servers.
8. Wyndham did not update its security patches and software regularly.
9. Wyndham did not ensure that third-party vendors used secure protocols for connecting to its network.
10. Wyndham did not establish a formal incident response plan to address security breaches or train its employees on data security practices.
To know more about FTC act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30084927#
#SPJ11
under the residential mortgage lending act, the minimum surety bond required is_____.
Under the residential mortgage lending act, the minimum surety bond required is 0.5% of the aggregate loan amount.
The Residential Mortgage Lending Act may have different minimum surety bond requirements. State specific legislation known as the Residential Mortgage Lending Act controls mortgage lending practices in that state. As a result, there may be regional variations in the minimum surety bond requirement. To ascertain the precise minimum surety bond amount that is required for mortgage lenders operating within that jurisdiction.
According to the Residential Mortgage Lending Act the bond must equal 0.5% of the total loan amount of residential mortgage loans that were originated in the year before.
Learn more about residential mortgage at:
brainly.com/question/33116872
#SPJ4
Why did people protesting the stay-at-home order cite the 2nd amendment? Isn't that the right to bear arms?
Answer:
the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.
Explanation:
they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps
Buying insurance and investing for the future requires spending less in the present. Why is this a hard choice for many people? Would it be a hard choice for you?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a very hard choice for many people because they have been raised in a consumer culture. For these individuals, happiness is buying the latest technology, clothing, or other accessories that is trending. They also want to live life to the fullest that they can afford. It all depends on your mentality towards what is happiness to you. For me personally, It was like this when I was younger but not anymore. When I turned 23 and found out what was possible through compound interest investing and other forms of investments, it became a no brainer to invest all I could at a younger age to have the peace of mind that comes with financial freedom later in life.
Which law illustrates that people with the highest level of skills can command the highest level of pay
Answer:
the law of supply and demand
Explanation:
Issues that arises from LLC
The assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing is called:
Answer:
Joint and several liability.Explanation:
The joint and several liability establishes that assessment would be conducted against a defendant of all the losses or damages despite of the plaintiff's share of the liability/wrongdoing. In joint and several liability, two or more parties share the responsibility of the lawsuit. Every party is liable to the repayment of the total damage and the plaintiff may collect the damage repayment from any or all of them.the delegates at the philadelphia convention turned down the idea of including a list of citizens' rights in the constitution because they believed that_____
Answer:
A bill of rights was not necessary
Explanation:
The delegates at the Philadelphia Convention turned down the idea of including a list of citizens' rights in the Constitution because they believed that a bill of rights was not necessary. Many of the delegates believed that the Constitution itself provided sufficient protections for individual rights, and that a bill of rights would be redundant or even dangerous. Some argued that listing specific rights could be limiting and that including some but not all rights would give the impression that those not listed were not protected. Others feared that listing rights could imply that the federal government had powers beyond those specifically granted in the Constitution. Additionally, some delegates were concerned that if a bill of rights was included, it might lead to future attempts to add more rights or limit existing ones.
However, there was also significant opposition to the Constitution because of the lack of a bill of rights. Many anti-federalists argued that a bill of rights was essential to protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government. As a result, when the Constitution was ratified, several states included a call for a bill of rights as a condition for their approval. The first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, were added to the Constitution in 1791.
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments againat capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.
Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.
In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.
To know more about Capital punishment here
https://brainly.com/question/28180014
#SPJ1
2. Locate two examples of programs used to promote the community policing philosophy from two different police departments in
Indiana (one program from each department).
Based on your understanding of Affirmative Action Supreme Court cases, what should be the impact of the Strict Scrutiny test on the future of Affirmative Action Programs?
Answer:
How does strict scrutiny relate to affirmative action?
For the unfamiliar: A race-conscious policy satisfies strict scrutiny if it 1) furthers a compelling (i.e. necessary) state interest, and 2) is “narrowly tailored” such that the policy minimizes, to the extent possible, differential treatment on the basis of race.
Explanation:
stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Answer: very expensive store
Explanation:
The idea that before choosing to commit crime, people who have committed crimes
evaluate the benefits and costs of the contemplated criminal act and their choice is
structured by the fear of punishment falls under
theory of criminology.
integrative
rational choice
developmental
trait
The idea that people who have committed crimes evaluate the benefits and costs of the contemplated criminal act and their choice is structured by the fear of punishment falls under the rational choice theory of criminology.
The rational choice theory assumes that individuals are rational actors who make decisions based on a cost-benefit analysis. When it comes to crime, individuals weigh the potential benefits of committing a crime against the potential costs, including the risk of punishment. According to this theory, if the benefits outweigh the costs, individuals are more likely to commit a crime.
Rational choice theory also suggests that individuals engage in crime for reasons other than financial gain, such as revenge or emotional gratification. The theory suggests that individuals make choices based on their personal preferences and circumstances.
Overall, the rational choice theory of criminology posits that individuals make choices based on their self-interest, and that criminal behavior is no exception.
what trend has been observed in the congressional oversight power in recent years?
In recent years, there has been an increase in the exercise of congressional oversight power.
Congress has always had the power to oversee and investigate the executive branch, but in recent years there has been a growing trend of Congress using this power more frequently and more assertively. This trend can be seen in several ways.
First, there has been an increase in the number of congressional hearings and investigations. Committees in both the House and Senate have been holding more hearings on a wide range of issues, from foreign policy to environmental regulations to financial misconduct. This increased activity reflects a desire by lawmakers to exercise their oversight power and hold government officials accountable.
Second, there has been a greater willingness by Congress to use subpoenas to compel testimony and document production. This has been especially true during the current administration, where there have been numerous high-profile investigations into alleged wrongdoing by members of the executive branch. This use of subpoenas is an important tool in congressional oversight, as it allows lawmakers to obtain information that might not otherwise be provided voluntarily.
Finally, there has been a greater willingness by Congress to take enforcement action against executive branch officials who refuse to comply with congressional requests for information. This has included holding individuals in contempt of Congress and pursuing legal action in the courts.
Taken together, these trends suggest that congressional oversight power is being exercised more frequently and more aggressively than in the past. While some may argue that this reflects a desire by lawmakers to score political points, others see it as an important way to ensure that the executive branch is held accountable to the American people.
Learn more about congressional oversight power: https://brainly.com/question/29869353
#SPJ11
Which of the following initial written agreements is NOT legally
binding?
A) Memorandum of understanding
B) Letter of intent
C) Mixed document
D) Impossible to determine
Answer: A) Memorandum of understanding
Explanation:
TRUE/FALSE. marcus garvey advocated for the niagara movement, which fought for civil rights for african americans. pan africanism, which was a movement to unify all people of african descent. the naacp, which worked to end segregation and violence against african americans. the talented tenth, which was the idea that well-educated individuals would lead the fight for equality.
Marcus Garvey was a proponent of pan-Africanism, a movement that sought to unite all African ancestors.
The choice B is right.
Marcus Garvey was who?In 1914, Marcus Garvey established the Universal Negro Improvement Association. This was in Jamaica and was made up of black people who were a part of Africa's history and culture.
The movement that Marcus Garvey supported required the African people, particularly their ancestors, who were thought to share common interests, to unite. In terms of the current political and cultural situation, it developed into a movement. Mainly, it was meant to keep the people of African ancestral groups united and working together.
To learn more about African ancestors here:
https://brainly.com/question/7458964
#SPJ4
What year did Jean Piaget publish his cognitive development theory?
Explanation:
1974 is when jean piaget published his devolpmwnt theory
Answer:
1953
Explanation:
When is a confession not a confession? When is it’s involuntary, coerced or downright false? Provide examples from the Confession Tapes documentary
In the Confession Tapes documentary, several cases are highlighted where confessions may not be reliable or accurate due to being involuntary, coerced, or false.
Here are a few examples:
1. Case of Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns: In this case, the two defendants were accused of a triple murder. The documentary examines how their confessions were obtained after lengthy interrogations, involving psychological pressure, manipulation , and false promises of leniency. The confessions were later retracted, and the defendants claimed they were coerced into confessing to a crime they did not commit.
2. Case of Adrian Thomas: Adrian Thomas was accused of killing his infant son. The documentary explores how his confession was obtained through a prolonged and intense interrogation, during which the police used manipulative techniques, fed him details of the crime, and coerced him into confessing. The confession was later ruled inadmissible in court due to its involuntary nature.
3. Case of Russell Williams: Russell Williams, a former Canadian military officer, confessed to multiple crimes, including ual assault and murder. However, the documentary delves into the circumstances surrounding the confession, suggesting that it may have been coerced or obtained under duress due to the extreme psychological pressure exerted on him during the interrogation.
These examples highlight the potential issues with confessions when they are obtained through coercive tactics, psychological manipulation, or under duress. It underscores the importance of ensuring that confessions are voluntary, informed, and free from undue influence or coercion to maintain their reliability and accuracy.
Learn more about manipulation here:
https://brainly.com/question/28459068
#SPJ11
How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened between the time of this case and today that make it less likely this will happen? Is it likely that something similar might happen in our criminal justice system today?
Answer:
After filing the first post-Janus First Amendment labor law challenge in the United States Supreme Court, The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief in support of a related challenge, Miller v. Inslee, that calls on the U.S. Supreme Court to recognize that laws forcing recipients of government benefits to accept union representation are unconstitutional. As it did in its brief in Bierman v. Dayton, Buckeye argues that the lower courts have improperly exempted such “exclusive representation” schemes from scrutiny under the First Amendment.
“In its Janus ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court raised serious questions about the constitutionality of forced exclusive representation, and in three legal cases, The Buckeye Institute has outlined why it is unconstitutional to force public employees to be represented by unions that advocate against their interests,” said Robert Alt, president and chief executive officer of The Buckeye Institute. “Like Buckeye’s clients, Katherine Miller—a Washington state childcare provider—should not be forced to speak through a government union with which she disagrees.”
The Miller case, brought by National Right to Work Foundation, raises similar claims to Buckeye’s cases—Uradnik v. Inter Faculty Organization, Reisman v. Associated Faculties of the University of Maine, and Thompson v. Marietta Education Association—and challenges state laws which force individuals, in this case state childcare providers, to allow a government-designated union to speak for them.
Explanation:
Alanis tries to talk her supervisor out of a business decision she thinks is unethical. Which of the following best characterizes her reaction?
a. loyalty.
b. capitulation.
c. voice.
d. exit.
Answer:
Definitely C!
Explanation:
..... .....
Driving requires a high degree of
in the driving environment.
a)
b)
c)
distraction
carelessness
awareness
Answer:
Awareness
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
nice
nice
Explanation:
nice
While on their way home from a ball game a driver and his passenger stopped at an all night gas station
The driver and his passenger made a stop at an all-night petrol station on their way home after a baseball game.
The driver refuelled the vehicle, and the passenger made the purchases. They spotted a group of people gathering around a car in the parking lot who appeared to be having a heated debate as they left the business. The driver and passenger immediately concluded their transaction, returned to their car out of concern for their safety, and then sped away from the petrol station to continue their trip home.
learn more about passenger here :
https://brainly.com/question/26143594
#SPJ11
how did the defense dismantle the prosecution’s case against oj?
The OJ Simpson trial was one of the most high-profile criminal trials in American history, and it was closely followed by millions of people around the world.
OJ Simpson was charged with the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, was able to dismantle the prosecution's case in a number of ways. First, they argued that the LAPD had mishandled the evidence and contaminated the crime scene, raising doubts about the reliability of the forensic evidence.
They also argued that the prosecution's star witness, LAPD detective Mark Fuhrman, had a history of racism and had planted evidence to frame Simpson. This argument was supported by audio recordings in which Fuhrman used racist language.Furthermore, the defense team was able to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors by presenting alternative theories of the crime.
To know more about criminal click here
brainly.com/question/30428746
#SPJ11