the court will suspend, restrict, delay or revoke your driving privileges for one year if you are convicted of being a habitual truant from school.

The Nevada Enabling Act required that the Nevada Constitution be drafted.

The Nevada Enabling Act, enacted in 1864 by the U.S. Congress, was a crucial step in Nevada's path towards statehood. It established the necessary conditions for Nevada to establish its own state government. Among the provisions outlined in the act was the requirement for Nevada to draft and adopt a state constitution.

This constitution would serve as the foundational document for the governance of the state. In response, the people of Nevada proceeded to draft and ratify their constitution later in 1864. This milestone marked an essential component in fulfilling the criteria set forth by the Nevada Enabling Act and ultimately led to Nevada's admission as the 36th state of the United States.

Learn more about the Nevada Enabling Act

brainly.com/question/28275016

#SPJ11

Answer:

Citizens United v. FEC

Article Talk

Language

Watch

Edit

"Citizens United" redirects here. For the political organization, see Citizens United (organization). For other uses, see Citizens United (disambiguation).

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It was argued in 2009 and decided in 2010. The court held 5-4 that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.

The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. FEC that corporations are people and abolished sensible political donation caps, allowing a select few wealthy donors and special interests to utilize dark money to sway elections.

For the purpose of overseeing and upholding the Federal Election Campaign Act, the Federal Election Commission was founded in 1975. The sources and sums of contributions that can be used to support federal elections are restricted by this law, and it also mandates that the sources and use of all contributions be made public.

The Federal Election Commission ruled that companies could be prohibited from using political advertisements. For independent expenditures and electioneering communications, the Court affirmed the reporting and disclaimer requirements. The prohibition on corporate contributions was unaffected by the Court's decision.

Learn more about the united v. Federal election commission here:

https://brainly.com/question/20364118

#SPJ4

The way that GPS monitoring be used to overhaul the American bail system is that GPS monitoring  the will help take down the location of their wearers and as such there is no need to physically check on the wearer.

Some of the unintended negative consequences of allowing defendants to go “free on GPS monitoring” before trial is that they may escape or even commit a greater crime.

Social psychologists created ankle monitors for the first time in the 1960s in an effort to provide young offenders with constructive reinforcement. In the 1980s and early 1990s, the justice system began to employ them.

Ankle bands, ankle shackles, and tethers are common examples of electronic monitoring devices that use GPS tracking systems to follow the whereabouts of their wearers. This includes those who are going through immigration procedures, are on probation or parole, or are awaiting trial.

Note that studies has demonstrated that those under GPS monitoring saw much lower recidivism rates than those under traditional supervision.

Learn more about GPS monitoring  from

https://brainly.com/question/9795929
#SPJ1

Answer:

Criminal law deals with punishing and rehabilitating offenders.

what does this mean?

Answer:

uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol

Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Student loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses  while  scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.

When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.

Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.

Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893

Answer:

George Mason

have to add things so it will let me answer

it is

As per the given question, convicted murderer of four family members, James Kahler, appealed his guilty verdict all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, questioning whether the execution of the mentally ill person violates the 8th Amendment.

However, he didn't win the case. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of executing a convicted murderer even if they were mentally ill. In that particular case, they said there was no “national consensus” against it, which was one of the criteria set forth in previous Supreme Court rulings. James Kahler was sentenced to death in Kansas in 2011.

You can learn more about U.S. Supreme Court at

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ11

Answer:

I do not understand your question.

Please be more clear on what you want to be answered.

Please and Thank you!

Explanation:

Answer:

WE

Explanation:

The city of Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, see a self-serving purpose in passing an ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes because:

The city council is said to be trying to stop having litigation that is brought by or as a result of  visitors and residents visit. This is based on the fact that if or when they injured themselves on the town's rustic sidewalks and trails when they are  wearing high-heeled shoes.

An ordinance is known to be passed due to any case of an emergency and it is one that needs a two-thirds vote of the whole governing body for passage.

The city did pass the ordinance prohibiting the wearing of two-inch-heeled shoes to avoid any form of litigation.

Learn more about California from

https://brainly.com/question/26015261

Answer:

I don't know but it sounds interesting

Explanation:

Under Right Wing Totalitarianism the government endorses private ownership of property and a market-based economy but grants little or no political freedom.

Right-Wing A right-wing totalitarian dictatorship is one that is authoritarian or even at times totalitarian. Right-wing dictatorships are frequently characterized by appeals to traditionalism, the preservation of law and order, and the promotion of nationalism. They defend their ascent to power by arguing that they are necessary to preserve a conservative status quo, frequently in contrast to communism.

Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Estado Novo, Francoist Spain, and a number of military dictatorships that controlled different Latin American nations during the Cold War are notable instances of right-wing autocracies.

Learn more about Right Wing Totalitarianism:

brainly.com/question/30565309

#SPJ4

The political system that endorses private ownership of property and a market-based economy while granting little or no political freedom is known as authoritarian capitalism or state capitalism.

Under authoritarian capitalism, the government retains control over political power, limiting or suppressing political opposition, and restricting citizens' civil liberties, such as the freedom of speech, assembly, and association. This type of political system is often characterized by a strong and centralized government, with limited separation of powers, a lack of independent judiciary, and the absence of a free press.

In such an economic system, private individuals and corporations may own and operate businesses, but the state controls key industries, such as energy, telecommunications, and banking, and often intervenes in the market to protect its interests. This model has been observed in countries such as China, Russia, and Vietnam, where economic liberalization has accompanied authoritarian political systems.

Critics of authoritarian capitalism argue that it can lead to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a small elite, erode civil liberties, and impede long-term economic growth by stifling innovation and competition.

To learn more about authoritarian capitalism

https://brainly.com/question/24654901

#SPJ4

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

Helen, a regular customer, needs to send money to her grandsons best friend after receiving an emergency call. Their car broke down while traveling across country. We can ask her the following questions:

-Is your grandchild all right? Why didn't he call you directly?

- Do you get to visit or speak with your grandson and his buddy frequently? Aren't you blessed to be so near to them?

We must assess the situation and pose the inquiry in order to determine whether or not Helen is a scam victim. It is quite improbable that her grandson's best friend will call her for assistance rather than the grandchild himself. Because they are so close and frequently interact, they are familiar enough with one another to ask for such assistance, so why not the grandson. If their grandchild can ask for assistance himself and they know their friends well, then the claim is legitimate; otherwise, she may have fallen victim to deception.

We can learn more about such situations here:
https://brainly.com/question/15540434#

#SPJ4

Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.

Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.

To learn more about American Unions, refer: https://brainly.com/question/2025366

#SPJ9

Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent a gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.

Early organized labor was frequently suppressed by legislation and judicial rulings and received no support from the government. According to the "conspiracy doctrine" of the late 1700s, the majority of collective activities are unlawful because they go against the interests of the general public.

In the early 1800s, organized trade and industry labor had little success in securing better pay and working conditions, as noted by Fossum (2012), but courts continued to obstruct the majority of collective endeavors.

Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.

To learn more about American Unions, refer: brainly.com/question/2025366

#SPJ9

Under current law, unreimbursed employment-related expenses of employees are Limited to two percent of AGI. The correct option is C.

The current law generally places a cap on the amount that employees can spend on unreimbursed employment related expenses. Only the portion of these costs that exceed 2% of the person's adjusted gross income (AGI) is deductible. This means that the total of the unreimbursed expenses are not tax deductible if they do not exceed two percent of AGI.

The excess amount can be claimed as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of the person's tax return, though if the expenses go over this cap. It's important to keep in mind that recent changes to the tax code may have an effect on this provision so it's always advisable to seek specific advice from a tax expert or consult the most recent tax regulations. The correct option is C.

Learn more about adjusted gross income at:

brainly.com/question/1931633

#SPJ4

A is the right response option. Before any questioning starts, the Miranda warnings must be read. The warnings need to be repeated if the interrogation is halted for an extended period of time. The defendant in this case might contend that after spending three hours alone in the questioning room, he was entitled to a new Miranda warning.

Answer option B is inaccurate since there is no legal necessity that a waiver of a defendant's Miranda rights must be in writing, even though it must be aware, informed, and voluntary.

Because lying about a co-confession conspirator's or engaging in other forms of interrogator deception do not by themselves constitute an involuntary confession, answer option C is false.

Answer option D is erroneous because the defendant did not express his wish for counsel to be present in a clear-cut manner, as is necessary to invoke counsel under the Fifth Amendment. The police are not compelled to stop questioning the suspect, ask more questions, or get more specific about whether they wish to exercise their right to counsel if the suspect makes a vague comment about it.

To know more about Amendment, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12124635

#SPJ4

The Reign of Terror was a period of the French Revolution                                                                                                                                                 Following the French Revolution, when the nation's lower classes overthrew the longstanding Bourbon monarchy, the country established its First Republic in 1792.

The new Republic was shortly afterwards overthrown by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1799, whose imperial government would fall in 1815. The Reign of Terror  was a period of the French Revolution when, following the creation of the First Republic, a series of massacres and numerous public executions took place in response to revolutionary fervor, anticlerical sentiment, and accusations of treason by the Committee of Public Safety. the revolutionary war, fears of foreign invasion, rumours about counter-revolutionary activity, assassination plots and zealots in the government were all contributing factors.  

To know more about French Revolution, visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/27833385

#SPJ4

A broker was found guilty of trust fund conversion b an administrative law judge. Each of the following is an action that the Commissioner could take against the broker, except sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties (option c).

A broker has been found guilty of trust fund conversion by an administrative law judge. The Commissioner has several options available to them to take action against the broker. These options include restricting, revoking, or suspending the broker's license or suing the broker in criminal court for the injured parties. However, the option that is not available to the Commissioner is to sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties.

The reason for this is that the Commissioner does not have the authority to bring criminal charges against the broker. The Commissioner's role is to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the industry, but criminal charges are the responsibility of law enforcement agencies. If the injured parties wish to pursue criminal charges against the broker, they would need to file a complaint with the appropriate law enforcement agency.

In summary, while the Commissioner has several options available to them to take action against a broker who has been found guilty of trust fund conversion, suing the broker in criminal court for the injured parties is not one of them. The correct option is c.

The complete question is:

A broker was found guilty of trust fund conversion b an administrative law judge. Each of the following is an action that the Commissioner could take against the broker, except:

a) restrict the broker's license

b) revoke the broker's license

c) sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties

d) suspend the broker's license

For more about trust fund:

https://brainly.com/question/30979602

#SPJ11

Answer:

Circular flow of income is a theory that states that economy is a system of dependencies, flows of goods, services, factors of production and payments between all participants of economic life. It shows how the exchange process works, in which the government, enterprises, and households participate.  

Households are fed by streams of payments in the form of wages, pensions and other similar benefits. Then they dispose of their income in such a way that they return some of the streams in the form of taxes, some leave as savings, in return for which they receive services and goods of public interest. The remaining stream of payments after these operations is passed back to enterprises (as a result of the purchase of goods and services).  

Businesses, like households, spend part of their income on taxes and savings, receiving in return government investment from the state. Businesses obtain streams of labor and production services from households and can therefore produce goods.

Answer:

As consumer spending increased, less savings were placed in the financial sector. This resulted in reduced business investment. The government also spent less, meaning it injected less money into the economy. There was a trade deficit because imports were greater than exports. This means there was more leakage through imports than there was money injected through exports.

Explanation:

edmentum

Answer:

A command or authorization to act in a particular way on a public issue given by the electorate to its representative

Explanation:

'The president had a clear mandate to end the war'

Answer:

the 3 types if voting is plurality, majority, and proportiona representations

Explanation:

Most criminal and civil cases can be decided by a petit jury, which is a jury of citizens that determines the guilt or innocence of a person during a trial. The term "petit" comes from the Latin word "pletus," which means "full." A petit jury is typically composed of 12 jurors, but it can be smaller in some cases.

In the United States, the right to a trial by jury is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. This means that a person accused of a crime has the right to have their case decided by a jury of their peers. The jury is responsible for determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

A petit jury is also used in some civil cases. In these cases, the jury is responsible for determining whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages from the defendant. The size of the jury in a civil case can vary, but it is typically smaller than a petit jury in a criminal case.

To know more about petit jury:

https://brainly.com/question/31832474

#SPJ4

Federalists published the Federalist papers in publications in New York City. The Federalists issued a series of 85 articles in newspapers in New York City urging adoption of the Constitution in response to vehement Anti-Federalist opposition to a powerful national government.

They favoured indirect elections for public employees, longer term constraints for those in office, weaker state governments, a strong central government, and representational democracy rather than direct democracy. The term "federalist" was initially applied in 1787 to designate the proponents of the freshly written Constitution who highlighted the federal nature of the envisaged union. Between October 1787 and May 1788, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison penned 85 essays that make up The Federalist, also known as the Federalist Papers. After the Jay Treaty was signed in 1794, the Federalists, who were known for their advocacy of a strong national government, placed an emphasis on fostering friendly relations with Britain on the diplomatic and commercial fronts.

Learn more about Federalists here

https://brainly.com/question/267094

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.

Answer:D

Explanation:

Diversion, intervention, and community-based programming are different types of programs that are designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges. Here are the differences between them:

Diversion: Diversion is a type of programming that is designed to help individuals who have been arrested or charged with a crime. The goal of diversion is to avoid formal prosecution by diverting the individual into a program that addresses the underlying issues that led to the criminal behavior. Diversion programs may be administered by the courts, nongovernmental organizations, or other community organizations. For example, a drug court may offer diversion programs for individuals who have been arrested for drug-related offenses. The program may involve counseling, drug testing, and other forms of support to help the individual overcome their addiction and avoid future criminal behavior.

Intervention: Intervention is a type of programming that is designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges such as substance abuse, mental health issues, or family problems. The goal of intervention is to intervene early before the individual's problems escalate and lead to more serious issues such as criminal behavior. Intervention programs may be administered by schools, social service agencies, or other community organizations. For example, a school may offer an intervention program for students who are struggling with their grades or behavior. The program may involve counseling, tutoring, and other forms of support to help the student overcome their challenges and succeed in school.

Community-based programming: Community-based programming is a type of programming that is designed to address the needs of a specific community. The goal of community-based programming is to empower individuals and communities to take control of their own lives and address the challenges that they face. Community-based programming may be administered by community organizations, nongovernmental organizations, or other groups. For example, a community may develop a program to address the issue of homelessness in their community. The program may involve providing housing, job training, and other forms of support to help homeless individuals get back on their feet.

In conclusion, diversion, intervention, and community-based programming are all important types of programs that are designed to help individuals who are experiencing challenges. Each program has its own unique goals, and may involve different organizations and individuals in the delivery of services. By understanding the differences between these programs, we can better understand how to support individuals in need and build stronger, more resilient communities.

To know more about nongovernmental organizations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30092510

#SPJ11