Under the voting rights act of 1965, the federal government was given the power to review any changes to voting laws, specifically targeting to increase the number of voters who are registered in areas where discrimination has a history.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed by Congress with the goal of increasing the number of voters registered in areas where there had been a history of discrimination. The legislation prohibited literacy tests and authorized the appointment of Federal examiners in certain jurisdictions with a history of voter discrimination (and gave them the authority to register eligible citizens to vote).
The U.S. Attorney General or the District Court for Washington, DC had to give their "preclearance" before these jurisdictions could alter their voting practices or procedures. Through this law, the federal government acquired the authority to register voters previously held by state and local officials.
Since the Reconstruction era, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) marked the most significant statutory change in the relationship between the federal and state governments regarding voting. As such, it was immediately contested in court. The Supreme Court handed down a number of significant rulings upholding the legality of the law between 1965 and 1969.
The question is incomplete, complete question "under the voting rights act of 1965, the federal government was given the power to review any changes to voting laws, specifically targeting what factors?"
Learn more about Voting Rights Act at:
brainly.com/question/6826755
#SPJ4
How does a prosecutor decide whether or not to file charges?
Answer:
la suficienta de probe
Explanation:
suppose the state of california has elected an incumbent representative to the house of representatives who has suggested that he knows what is best for the citizens of california in his district and will use his experience and knowledge to achieve his goals. this representative is playing the
This state representative is playing the trustee role.
What about trustee?In this system, constituents choose their representatives to serve as "trustees" for their community. This autonomy, often known as a free mandate, gives these "trustees" the freedom to consider and act however they see right, in accordance with their own conscience, even if doing so means defying the express wishes of their voters. The term "trustee" refers to a member of congress who casts a vote based more on the interests of the nation as a whole than on the desires of individual constituents. A trustee is a person or business that holds and manages assets or property for the benefit of another party. For a number of reasons, such as in the event of bankruptcy, for a nonprofit organisation or for a trust fund, a trustee may be chosen.This state representative is playing the trustee role.
To know more about trustee, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15605675
#SPJ4
What is the purpose of discovery?
A. to prove the other party is liable
B. to make the other party admit certain acts
C. to prove the other party is guilty
D. to narrow issues for trials
The purpose of discovery is: C. to prove the other party is guilty
What is Discovery and its purpose?Discovery can be defined as the process in the law of court that is use to prove that a party is guilty and this is done by showing the evidence that will be tender in the law of court to the party involve before the trial begins.
A party who discover a more evidence must tend to present the evidence or disclose the evidence to the party involve.
Therefore we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Learn more about trial here:https://brainly.com/question/4559559
#SPJ1
Answer: To narrow issues for trials
Explanation: I just took the test
question during the investigation of a large gambling operation, the police obtained a warrant to search a bookie's home based on the affidavit of an informant. the informant was a rival bookie who had never acted as an informant before, and much of the substance of the rival's information came from third-party sources. during the search, the police seized a variety of gambling evidence, including betting slips and a check from the defendant. the bookie and the defendant were arrested for violating the state's gambling laws, and separate trials were ordered. at a suppression hearing for the bookie, the court held that the search warrant for the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause and suppressed introduction of the evidence seized. the defendant moved to suppress introduction of the betting slips and the check on the same basis. if the court agrees that the search warrant of the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause, should the defendant's motion be granted?
Yes, the defendant's motion should be granted. Since the search warrant for the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause, the evidence seized during the search is inadmissible.
The defendant submitted a motion to suppress the evidence, contending that LASD's initial search of his residence infringed on his Fourth Amendment rights because LASD's assistance in the execution of the inspection warrant served as justification for carrying out a criminal search, making an arrest, and opening an investigation. Therefore, "Yes" is the response to the issue of whether police can search your home without a warrant. Only very seldom, without a warrant, may the police enter your private home or place of business. He contended that because the following criminal search warrant was issued as a direct result of the initial illegal search, all evidence seized and the results of that search should be removed from use at the trial.
To know more about illegal refer :
brainly.com/question/30451144
#SPJ4
True or False. if an appellate court concludes that the trial court's ruling was incorrect and remands the case, the appellate court will conduct the new trial or hearing.
The statement you indicate is false: an appellate court does not conduct new trials or hearings. Instead, if an appellate court concludes that the trial court's ruling was incorrect and remands the case, the trial court will conduct the new trial or hearing.
What is the appellate court?An appellate court is a higher court that reviews the decisions of lower courts, such as trial courts.
If an appellate court finds that the trial court made an error, it may remand the case, which means sending it back to the trial court for further proceedings.
However, the appellate court does not conduct the new trial or hearing itself. Instead, the trial court will conduct the new trial or hearing in accordance with the appellate court's instructions.
Another question of appellate court in https://brainly.com/question/29614649
#SPJ11
District attorneys are the _________ chief prosecutor for a local government unit.
District attorneys are the government's chief prosecutor for a local government unit. Local government refers to the lowest tiers of public administration within a given sovereign state.
This is a broad phrase. In this usage of the word "government," a level of administration that is both geographically localised and has constrained authority is particularly mentioned. Contrary to national government, the term "local government" is always used specifically to refer to the operations of sub-national, first-level administrative divisions (which are typically known by names such as cantons, provinces, states, oblasts, or regions), while "government" is typically only reserved for a national administration (which may be referred to as a central government or federal government). Local governments often only carry out the duties that are officially delegated to them by law or what a higher authority directs them to do. In unitary governments, local government normally sits at the second or third tier of government, while in federal states, it usually sits at the third or fourth tier.
Learn more about local government here
https://brainly.com/question/29763298
#SPJ11
Which form of media is also a public forum?
examples of designated public forums include municipal theaters and meeting rooms at state universities.
you switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do
Answer:
I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die
Explanation:
Which phrase from the Constitution gives Congress implied powers of lawmaking?
O Supremacy clause
O Due process clause
O Expressed powers clause
Necessary and proper clause
Answer:
Necessary and Proper Clause.
Explanation:
Quote Article I, Section 8, Clause 18: [The Congress shall have Power...] to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof." [Emphasis added].
~
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution is "the supreme law of the land", and that if there are conflicts of interests with future laws, that the Constitution will take priority.
The Due Process Clause establishes that the government cannot casually take away the natural rights of a citizen unless authorized by the law. Essentially, the citizen would only relinquish their rights to life, liberty, and property if they willingly break laws set by the US government.
The Expressed Powers Clause establishes the rights given to Congress, which includes the power to create taxes for citizens, and to conduct foreign relations, such as treaties, maintenance of a military for foreign affairs, and regulation on foreign trade.
~
A tombstone ad is permitted in Regulation D offerings
Hello. The full question is:
A tombstone ad:_________
a. is permitted in Regulation D offerings.
b. is an offer to sell securities.
c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.
d. all of the above
Answer:
c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.
Explanation:
Tombstone is a type of advertisement that presents a list of organizations that are involved in a new specific offer, promoting a wide range of options to the consumer. In addition, this type of advertisement is very efficient in showing important information about the offer, even before the effective date of registration.
Una persona por su condición que es migrante en busca de trabajo en una fábrica de procesamiento de pescado es sometida a desprecio e irrespeta su condición de mujer; ¿Qué derecho de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, la ampara para garantizar su condición humana?
Answer:
El derecho a la igualdad.
Explanation:
La declaración universal de derechos humanos establece que todas las personas son iguales y tienen los mismos derechos en los campos político, social y económico. Así, es incorrecto que una persona sufra discriminación, desprecio, prejuicio y cualquier otro tipo de injusticia por razón de su género, religión, opción sexual, edad, color, entre otros.
En este caso, podemos decir que si a alguien se le falta el respeto en el trabajo por ser mujer, se está vulnerando el derecho a la igualdad y esto podría tener consecuencias reales.
need help I have a driver Test coming soon
Answer:
I'm not sure what state you live in, but for Florida, this would be false.
Explanation:
In Florida, it would be 30, not 35.
congress impeached president johnson for violating which law?
List two requirements to become a state supreme court judge
Answer:
NONE
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Pls mark brainliest :}
And have an amazing day <3
The Fed BUYS securities using Open Market Operations. What will this do to the money supply?
no change likely
increase it
decrease it
If the Fed buys securities using Open Market Operations, this will B. Increase money supply.
What are Open Market Operations?Open Market Operations (OMO) is a frequently employed instrument utilized by the Federal Reserve (the Fed) to modify money circulation.
Through buying securities, such as Treasury bills or government bonds, from banks, the Fed elevates their reserves. Subsequently, this augmentation heightens the provision of finance available to businesses and consumers, allowing more funds to enter the economy, thus enlarging its monetary supply.
Find out more on Open Market Operations at https://brainly.com/question/14256204
#SPJ1
If the suspects have been further charged with a criminal offence in Court, briefly explain what will happen during the prosecution stage in the criminal proceeding.
Answer & Explanation:
During the prosecution stage in the criminal proceeding, the prosecutor will present evidence to the court in order to prove that the accused committed the charged criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutor may call witnesses, present physical evidence, and provide any other relevant evidence to the court. The accused has the right to cross-examine the prosecutor's witnesses and present their own evidence and arguments in their defense. After both sides have presented their case, the judge or jury will determine if the prosecution has proven the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If the accused is found guilty, the judge will sentence them to a punishment that is appropriate for the severity of the offense.
one important question in a particular criminal trial was whether the defendant had actually been present during an important meeting the victim had with several business partners, during which the victim said something that created a motive for murder. determining whether the defendant had been present is an example of a:
Determining whether the defendant had been present is an example of a Relevant Factual Issue.
In order to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant, the court must determine if the defendant was present at the meeting in question. This requires an examination of the evidence provided by both the prosecution and the defense to determine if the defendant was present at the meeting.
If the defendant was present at the meeting, it could create a motive for the murder and provide evidence of guilt. If the defendant was not present, it could provide evidence of innocence. The court must determine the truth of this factual issue in order to reach a conclusion in the case.
To know more about court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
Can the president pardon someone convicted of treason
Yes, the US President does have the power to pardon a person who has been under the conviction of treason.
The presidential powers have been an exclusive right that can be held only by the person holding the position, as such. Since the national president has substantial powers in many aspects, he or she may also pardon someone by using the power of clemency for someone who has been convicted of treason. However, this power does not extend its scope for criminal offenses. So, it can be said that the president does possess this exclusive power.
Learn more about presidential powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/3962141
#SPJ4
the statutes in all 50 states that govern the practice of medicine are called
The statutes in all 50 states that govern the practice of medicine are called medical practice act.
The state grants the privilege of being able to practice medicine. Each state has laws and rules that outline how medicine is to be practiced as well as the duties of the medical board in overseeing that profession. An official state statute known as a medical practice act lays forth these rules.
The state statutes that regulate the practice of medicine and specify the boundaries and obligations of medical practice in Texas are found in the Texas Medical Practice Act, also known as the Texas Occupations Code, Title 3 Health Professions.
State medical boards use licensure to verify that all practicing doctors have the necessary education and training and adhere to accepted norms of professional conduct while treating patients.
To know more about medical practice act visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13025626
#SPJ4
what is the maximum fine that can be levied for committing a felony?
A felony is an offense which when is declared and proven beyond reasonable by a jury of their respective peers to be a felony or, if not declared to be a misdemeanor, is punishable, without proof of previous conviction, with death, or with imprisonment for three years or more penalties however vary from states to states.
Penalties for a California Felony Conviction for instance include imprisonment in a state prison or county jail, and a fine up to $10,000. However, the judge has the discretion to sentence a defendant to formal felony probation.
Consider learning more about civil cases here
https://brainly.com/question/12868966
#SPJ4
Describe two ways how social media platforms are abused
Answer:
reasons is because Uninvited, awful photos are sent to you, and you are expected to repay the favor. It makes you feel obligated to send in obscene movies. Takes your passwords or forces you to reveal them to them. Constantly texts you, making you feel as if you must have your phone with you at all times for fear of being penalized.
Explanation:
can i please get brainlest?
state law specifies that public schools are not liable for the negligent acts of employees (such as coaches or athletic trainers). this is an example of:
State law specifying that public schools are not liable for the negligent acts of employees, such as coaches or athletic trainers, is an example of statutory immunity.
Statutory immunity is a legal concept that shields certain entities, such as government agencies or officials, from liability for certain actions or omissions. In this case, the state law provides public schools with immunity from liability for the negligent acts of their employees, specifically coaches or athletic trainers.
This means that if a student-athlete is injured due to the negligent actions of a coach or athletic trainer, the public school is not responsible for any damages that may result. Instead, the injured student-athlete would need to pursue legal action against the individual employee, who may or may not have insurance or assets to cover the damages.
Statutory immunity is intended to protect government entities from excessive liability and encourage them to continue providing important services without fear of being sued for every mistake or accident. However, it can also create situations where injured parties are unable to obtain compensation for their injuries.
To know more about statutory immunity, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14656630#
#SPJ11
Which of the following skills are vital
for clerical mathematical support in
order to accurately maintain files so
they are ready when the company
needs them?
A. Organization
B. Communication
C. People
A. Organization u gave to organise things
Consider Antigone's equating "final Justice" with the "immortal unrecorded laws of
God." How might a kind of "Euthyphro question" be applied to that idea, and how
might Socrates react?
Socrates, the Socratic Method is a dialogue between the teacher and the students, which is instigated by the continual questioning and investigation of the teacher. This dialogue is an effort to investigate the underlying beliefs that shape the student's views and opinions. Socrates, the Socratic Method was named after Socrates.
This is further explained below.
Who is Socrates?Generally, The most useful true knowledge, according to Socrates during the trial, consists in realizing that you are ignorant of everything.
Socrates prioritized education throughout his life because he held the view that "the power to distinguish between good and wrong lay in people's motivation today, not in society."
For Socrates, getting to know someone was the most important aspect.
The Socratic method often referred to as the Elenchus method, the elenctic method, or the Socratic debate is a cooperative arguing discussion style focused on questions and responses that draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions.
See here for additional information about Socrates:
https://brainly.com/question/12714002
#SPJ1
To
establish a preemie fe case for intentional towards liability it is
generally necessary that the plaintiff proves the following act
___________by defendant and act by causation
To establish a preemie fe case for intentional towards liability it is generally necessary that the plaintiff proves the following act, intent by defendant, and act by causation.
What is intentional tort liability?Intentional tort liability refers to legal responsibility or culpability for an intentional act that causes injury to another person or damage to their property. The intentional torts that are most common include battery, assault, trespass, and defamation. The party committing an intentional tort is generally aware of the consequences of their actions, and they intend to cause harm or damage to the plaintiff.
How to establish a preemie fe case for intentional towards liability? To establish a preemie fe case for intentional towards liability, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:Act: The defendant must have performed an act that caused harm or injury to the plaintiff.Intent: The plaintiff must show that the defendant intended to cause harm or injury to them.
Causation: There must be a direct link between the defendant's act and the plaintiff's harm or injury.Example: Suppose John walks up to Mary and punches her in the face. If Mary files a lawsuit against John for battery, she must prove that John committed the act, intended to cause harm to her, and that the act caused her injuries.Therefore, to establish a preemie fe case for intentional towards liability, it is generally necessary that the plaintiff proves the following act, intent by defendant, and act by causation.
to know more about intentional visit
https://brainly.com/question/33631665
#SPJ11
What are five situations in which it is legally permissible for co's to use Force
Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.
1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.
2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.
3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.
4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.
5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.
It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.
Know more about Enforcing laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ11
This bracelet CONSTRICTS my arm. CONSTRICTS also mean:relievespainssqueezesprevents
Constricts also means squeezes.
The other words do not fit the proper meaning, and squeezes best fits the context in this sentence.
I hope this helps! :)
What happens if the Supreme Court declines to review a case ?
If an appeal is denied by the supreme court the lower court's decision stands.
When the Supreme Court rejects review, what does it mean?The Court generally denies petitions without further remark or explanation. The Court's decision not to accept the case for review by denying a petition for a writ of certiorari does not reflect the Court's opinion on the case's merits; it just indicates that the petition was denied.
What might cause the Supreme Court to refuse to review a case?The Court is likely to decline review if the lower court likewise rejected the party on a different basis, if there is any uncertainty about the Court's authority to consider the issue, or if the Court would have to settle another complex factual or legal issue before it could decide the one at hand.
To know more about judicial review visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5338039
#SPJ4
under crime insurance, which of the following persons is not a custodian?
A. Sales clerk; B. Janitor; C. Partner; D. Named insured
Under crime insurance, the person who is not considered a custodian is the C. Partner.
In crime insurance, a custodian typically refers to individuals who have physical control or responsibility over the insured property. They are entrusted with the care, custody, and control of the property. The purpose of crime insurance is to protect against losses resulting from criminal acts such as theft, embezzlement, or forgery.
Among the options given, a sales clerk, janitor, and named insured can all be considered custodians depending on their roles and responsibilities. A sales clerk may handle merchandise, a janitor may have access to the premises, and a named insured may have control over the insured property.
However, a partner is not typically categorized as a custodian in the context of crime insurance. Partners usually have an ownership interest in the business rather than direct custodial responsibilities.
To know more about crime insurance
brainly.com/question/32156541
#SPJ11
A county in which us state passed a law granting protective rights to sasquatch?.
Answer:
Washington
Explanation:
In a groundbreaking move, the state of Washington passed a law granting protective rights to Sasquatch, also known as Bigfoot, within its borders.
Located in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, Washington has long been associated with Sasquatch sightings and folklore. The legislation, championed by local conservationists and cryptozoology enthusiasts, aims to safeguard the habitat and well-being of this elusive creature.
The law establishes protected areas where Sasquatch sightings have been reported, prohibits hunting or harming Sasquatch, and encourages scientific research to study and understand these enigmatic beings.
This historic step showcases Washington's commitment to preserving its rich natural heritage and fostering coexistence with its legendary inhabitants.
Learn more about protective rights here
https://brainly.com/question/13570563
#SPJ2