What is president pro tempore in simple terms?.

A prima facie case exists where there seems to be sufficient evidence to convict the defendant.

In legal terms, a prima facie case refers to the establishment of a set of facts that, if taken as true, would support a legal claim or accusation. It means that on the surface, there appears to be enough evidence to suggest that the defendant may be guilty of the alleged offense.

It simply indicates that there is enough initial evidence to proceed with a trial or further legal proceedings. The burden of proof ultimately rests on the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Learn more about defendant, here:

https://brainly.com/question/33436163

#SPJ4

It provides a structure for building theories of history from solid foundations. The correct option is B.

The main objective of historical research methods is to gather data from primary and secondary sources.

The Teach University established the GATHER approach, which aims to reach a conclusion regarding a historical research that can be solidly substantiated.

After gaining a general understanding of the investigation, answering any difficult issues, and triangulating the data, the H stands for "Hypothesize a preliminary solution."

It provides a structure for building historical theories on solid foundations.

Thus, the correct option is B.

For more details regarding historical research, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15992796

#SPJ1

Answer:

Pros: She will learn from her mistake. Cons: It could be difficult to pay the fine and still be able to get essentials.

Answer:

it is

Explanation:

When people are coerced, deceived, or forced to do work or provide services against their will, this is known as forced labor.

This kind of crime is committed both domestically and internationally. Work in the home. Industries include mining, quarrying, construction, and brick kilns. Assembling, handling, and bundling are parts of the assembling system. Two of the most prevalent forms of sexual exploitation are prostitution and sexual exploitation.

The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or reception of individuals for the purpose of profit by means of force, fraud, or deception is known as human trafficking. Men, women, and children of all ages and backgrounds can be harmed by this crime, which takes place worldwide.

The victim and the trafficker have a relationship of constant exploitation and commodification, from which the trafficker makes money. People who set out to be smuggled can become victims of trafficking while they are traveling and are exploited once they arrive at their destination. The TIP Office argues that this word should be banned because it refers to the act of detaining someone against their will in order to exploit them.

Learn more about justice class :

brainly.com/question/30695448

#SPJ4

1. The current administration's immigration policy has impacted the federal government's economic, security, and humanitarian policy by reinforcing national security while failing to marry the economic and humanitarian disasters and benefits of immigration.

2. Before 9/11, immigration was regarded as a humanitarian way of national openness and was never a security concern.

3. The current immigration policy has mandated the United States to create the Department of Home Security, charged with ensuring safe land borders with Canada and Mexico.

4. Following the creation of the Department of Home Security, the dignity accorded to migrants, whether legal or illegal, has been completely lost on the altar of physical and economic security.

5. The COVID pandemic worsened the U.S. immigration policy because it imposed outright border closures. As a result, the closures brought untold hardships to migrants, who were left stranded at the Canada and Mexico borders with humanitarian catastrophes.

Immigration is the international movement of people who leave their countries of origin to reside in another country or become citizens.

Many reasons for immigration include:

Learn more about the United States' current immigration policy at https://brainly.com/question/20544005

#SPJ1

The given statement "autonomy is one of the five basic principles that thiroux states can be applied to human morality" is True (because autonomy is one of the five basic principles of human morality, according to philosopher James P. Thiroux).

The other four principles are beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity. Autonomy refers to the ability of individuals to make their own decisions and act according to their own values and beliefs. It is the principle of respecting people's autonomy that underlies the idea of informed consent in medical and research contexts.

Autonomy is a fundamental aspect of human dignity, and respecting it is essential for upholding human rights and promoting ethical behavior. Thiroux's five principles are widely recognized and utilized in ethical decision-making, and they provide a framework for understanding and evaluating moral choices in a variety of contexts.

By considering the principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, individuals and organizations can make ethical decisions that prioritize human well-being and promote social responsibility.

For more question on justice

https://brainly.com/question/4537505

#SPJ11

Convicted criminals whose sentences increase during their prison term due to a change in the law have been illegally subjected to ex post facto law.

Ex post facto is a Latin term that means "after the fact." In law, it refers to a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the enactment of the law.

The U.S. Constitution specifically prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws. This means that the government cannot punish someone for an action that was not a crime when they committed it, or increase the punishment for an action that was a crime when they committed it.

Therefore, if a criminal's sentence is increased during their prison term due to a change in the law, it would be a violation of the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.

To know more about Convicted criminals, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/19990011#
#SPJ11

Answer:

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. Among other things, this law authorizes EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and public welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants. One of the goals of the Act was to set and achieve NAAQS in every state by 1975 in order to address the public health and welfare risks posed by certain widespread air pollutants. The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the state, in order to achieve these standards. The Act was amended in 1977 and 1990 primarily to set new goals (dates) for achieving attainment of NAAQS since many areas of the country had failed to meet the deadlines. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act addresses emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Prior to 1990, CAA established a risk-based program under which only a few standards were developed. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments revised Section 112 to first require the issuance of technology-based standards for major sources and certain area sources. "Major sources" are defined as a stationary source or group of stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year or more of a hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of a combination of hazardous air pollutants. An "area source" is any stationary source that is not a major source. For major sources, Section 112 requires that EPA establish emission standards that require the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of hazardous air pollutants. These emission standards are commonly referred to as "maximum achievable control technology" or "MACT" standards. Eight years after the technology-based MACT standards are issued for a source category, EPA is required to review those standards to determine whether any residual risk exists for that source category and, if necessary, revise the standards to address such risk.

Explanation: im just different

The correct answer is: law made when judges decide cases and then follow those decisions in later cases.

Common law is a body of law that is derived from judicial decisions, rather than from statutes or constitutions. It refers to legal principles and rules that have been established over time through the decisions of courts, rather than through legislation or other forms of official action. Common law originated in England and was later adopted in various forms by other countries, including the United States. Under the common law system, judges are considered to be the primary source of legal authority, and their decisions help to shape and refine the law over time.

Learn more about United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/1527526

#SPJ11

Answer: D all future generations

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is D.

Explanation:

i hope this helps. Dont now how to explain it but  know this is the correct answer.  

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is 1.

Explanation:

200/200

=1

Answer:

The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.

Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.

The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.

In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.

[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]

In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.

Explanation:

For a case to be heard in the supreme court, a minimum of four justices must vote to hear the case. The supreme court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine justices must vote to accept the case.

The Supreme Court of the United States is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution. There are now nine Justices sitting on the Court. Each Justice must be selected by the President and confirmed by the Senate before assuming office. Justices often keep their positions for life if they behave properly.

The Supreme Court is given original and appellate jurisdiction, according to the Constitution. Original jurisdiction refers to a case being heard by the Supreme Court as the first and only time. The Constitution only grants original jurisdiction in matters involving conflicts between states or between ambassadors and other senior ministers. Having appellate jurisdiction gives the Court the power to examine rulings from subordinate courts.

To learn more about supreme court click here:

https://brainly.com/question/20008586

#SPJ4

Answer:

paralegals are more involved with actual technicalities of the low.

Explanation:

whereas are is legal assistance under take border tasks

Group of answer choices.

a. Warning by the human resources department.

b. No consequences.

c. Loss of administrative credential.

d. An angry parent.

Answer:

a. Warning by the human resources department.

Explanation:

Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.

Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.

A possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee would be to receive a warning by the human resources department.

If an employee working in an organization such as a school is found to act in an unprofessional manner towards a colleague, pupil or a parent, it is expected that the human resources department calls such a person to order through a query, warning in order to serve as a deterrent to others and to avoid a repeat of such behavior in the future.

A website is an online source which is responsible for the data content it has and some websites are questionable, while some others are verifiable.

With this in mind, the following are characteristics to know a questionable website:

The characteristics of a credible website include:

Read more about website integrity here:

https://brainly.com/question/3733655

Answer:

$1,575

Explanation:

Calculation for the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019

Based on the information given the maximum or highest amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be the amount of $1,575 reason been that a person or an individual which age is less than the age of 50 can have a maximum contribution of the amount of $6,000 for either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 in which it can not in any way exceeds the earnings and secondly Investment income are not contributed to IRA which means that in the case of Victoria the amount of $1,575 will be contributed to either a traditional or Roth IRA while the amount of $100 which was earned as a result of her interest from her saving account will not be contributed.

Therefore the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be $1,575

The following option that includes a provision that requires public companies to set policies to allow executive political party compensation to be taken back if it was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards is d.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a federal law that was implemented by Congress in 2010 in response to the global financial crisis of 2008. The law consists of 16 sections, each of which seeks to enhance the transparency and accountability of financial markets, minimize systemic risk, and enhance consumer protection. It is one of the most significant financial regulatory reforms in the United States since the Great Depression.The Dodd-Frank Act contains many provisions, including executive compensation clawback rules, which require publicly traded firms to recover executive compensation that was based on inaccurate financial statements that did not comply with accounting standards. The Act also contains provisions that seek to strengthen the U.S. financial system's transparency and accountability.

Learn more about  political party here:

https://brainly.com/question/30901480

#SPJ11

Answer:

Wait is that true? if so thats freakin gnarly. They must be freakin hot under all that

Answer:

yes ik that and all the gear they have to wear 75 pounds

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Provide Revenue

2. Income and payroll

3. Sales and Property

Explanation:

Took the test this is correct :)

Federal, state, and local governments tax their citizens to collect Provide Revenue for various programs and services. The federal government’s main income sources include  Income and payroll taxes, while state and local governments rely heavily on Sales and Property taxes.

The county, sometimes known as a borough in Alaska and a parish in Louisiana, and municipalities, frequently referred to as cities or towns, are the two main layers of local administration. Towns are created from counties in a number of states.

The objective is to raise money to assist both community services and local infrastructure expansion and improvements. To expand the breadth of their official community plan, their role in guiding community growth, and their control over land use, local governments may start a community's economic planning operations.

State Government: The United States is made up of the District of Columbia, a few territories, and 50 states. The federal government is referred to as the "United States Government" or "Federal Government." County governments exist in each state.

Thus, Provide Revenue, Income and payroll taxes, and Sales and Property.

For more information about local governments, click here

https://brainly.com/question/11688631

#SPJ5

A person is persuaded to rent or sell a dwelling in a specific neighborhood because members' race, religion, or national origin are moving in the scheme is called Blockbusting.

Blockbusting was a business practice in which realtors and developers persuaded white residents in a particular area to sell their property at a price below market value. This was accomplished by intimidating homeowners by telling them that racial minorities would soon move into the neighborhood. have used this technique in

Updated 10/28/2019. Blockbusting is the practice of real estate agents persuading homeowners to sell their homes at lower prices out of concern that the neighborhood's socioeconomic demographics will change and home values ​​will decline.

Learn more about Blockbusting https://brainly.com/question/14977132

#SPJ1

Answer:

Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.

There are several ways to reduce the backlog of criminal cases, including:

Increase funding and resources for the justice system: Additional funding can be used to hire more judges, prosecutors, public defenders, and court staff, and to provide technology and infrastructure upgrades to help streamline processes.

Implement alternative dispute resolution programs: Alternative dispute resolution programs, such as mediation and arbitration, can help reduce the number of cases that go to trial, freeing up resources to focus on more complex cases.

Improve case management and scheduling: Better case management practices can help courts move cases through the system more efficiently. This can include better scheduling of hearings and trials, streamlining administrative processes, and using technology to manage and track case information.

Expand plea bargaining options: Plea bargaining can be an effective way to reduce the number of cases that go to trial. By expanding the range of plea bargaining options available to defendants, prosecutors, and judges, more cases can be resolved quickly and efficiently.

Implement specialized courts: Specialized courts, such as drug courts, mental health courts, and domestic violence courts, can help address specific types of cases more efficiently and effectively than traditional courts.

Increase access to legal services: Many defendants cannot afford legal representation, which can contribute to case backlogs. By increasing access to legal services, such as through public defenders or pro bono programs, defendants can receive legal assistance and representation, which can help cases move more efficiently through the system.

Overall, reducing the backlog of criminal cases requires a multifaceted approach that involves increasing resources, improving processes, and implementing new programs and practices to help move cases through the system more efficiently.

U.S. v. Moon case is about the illegal distribution of controlled substances by a physician named Moon. As per the facts of the case, the physician was engaged in illicit activity and providing controlled substances to his patients without any legitimate medical purposes.

According to the textbook reading and the precedent case law, it is concluded that Moon committed a criminal act by breaking the rules and regulations associated with the medical profession. Furthermore, he committed several torts that are as follows: Medical Malpractice: The physician Moon committed medical malpractice by illegally prescribing controlled substances to his patients without any legitimate medical reason or purpose.Negligence: Moon was negligent while prescribing controlled substances to his patients without keeping in mind the legitimate medical reasons or purposes.Battery: The physician Moon committed battery by providing harmful drugs to his patients that caused physical harm to their bodies.The mentioned torts and criminal acts committed by the physician Moon are not permissible under the United States laws and regulations. Moon's unethical and illicit behavior resulted in serious harm to his patients, thus the court found him guilty of the charges brought against him.In conclusion, it can be inferred that Moon's behavior was highly unethical, and he failed to follow the laws and regulations of his profession. The precedent case laws suggest that prescribing controlled substances to patients without any legitimate medical reason or purpose is illegal and considered a serious offense.The physician, in this case, was found guilty of breaking the laws and committing several torts. Therefore, the judgment against him was appropriate and justified.The physicians are accountable for their conduct and actions, and they must follow the legal and ethical standards associated with their profession. The U.S. v. Moon case serves as an example of how serious the consequences can be if physicians violate the laws and regulations governing their profession.

To Know More about committing visit:

brainly.com/question/29385308

#SPJ11

Law that is legally binding on parties who agree to it, such as a contract, is known as primary law. The answer is c.

Primary law is a law that is created by a legislature and is binding on all citizens. It can be either criminal or civil law. Criminal law deals with offenses against the state, while civil law deals with disputes between individuals.

A contract is an example of a primary law. It is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. The terms of the contract are enforceable by the courts.

Public law is a law that regulates the relationship between the government and its citizens. It includes laws such as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the criminal code.

Procedural law is a law that governs the process of how the courts operate. It includes laws such as the rules of evidence and the rules of civil procedure.

Therefore, the law that is legally binding on parties who agree to it, such as a contract, is known as primary law. The correct option is C.

To know more about primary law, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31989161#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals. Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.Law can provide justice to the victims and punish those who are responsible for unlawful actions. In courts, a law is used to settle conflicts among the people. The main function of law is to ensure all-round development of people by providing security, peace, and protection.

According to the details above, it shows that during a visit to his significant other in Addis Ababa, Obanga from Bishoftu town came across Bokassa, a proficient mechanical expert.

Obanga notified Bokassa that his automobile had sustained significant damage and was currently stationed in Adama, while he had been on the lookout for a skilled technician.

Bokassa proposed the notion of fixing the car for a sum of 10,000 Birr, on the precondition that Obanga would take care of the expenditures involved in procuring the required replacement parts. Obanga joyfully agreed to the proposal.

Learn more about  business   from

https://brainly.com/question/24553900

#SPJ1