What is the GCF of 12 and 48​

Answer:

\( \sf \large \: m=−1\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's solve your equation step-by-step.

m/2 =m+5/10

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

1/2m=m+1/2

Step 2: Subtract m from both sides.

1/2m−m=m+1/2−m

−1/2m=1/2

Step 3: Multiply both sides by 2/(-1).

(2/−1)*(−1/2m)=(2/−1)*(1/2)

m=−1

Answer-

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

yes, because no matter what value you plug in for x, you'll always get the same y.

For instance, if you plug in 3 as the value for x, y will always be 1.  This is true for every x, so this is a function.

Answer:

x/9=3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11 is the GCF for both 22 and 55.

Step-by-step explanation:

I looked it up.

Step-by-step explanation:

2 squared plus 2 =5

5+2x =7x

7x-3 = 4x

Answer:

336

Step-by-step explanation:

8(8+34)

use distributive property

64+272

The wavelength of the n = 4 standing wave is 3.5cm.

Standing Waves:

A standing wave is a stationary wave, which means that the wave oscillates in time but the peak amplitude does not move in space. This can happen in a stationary medium from an interference due to two waves traveling in opposite directions. For a harmonic wave, the string's displacement in the y-direction from the x-position and time t can be calculated by using the expression

y(x ,t)=2Asin(2πxλ)cos(ωt)

where A is the maximum displacement in the y-direction, λ

is the wavelength, and ω is the angular frequency. Given a taut string of length L, and assuming the the driving force is at x=0, the boundary conditions are

y(0,t)=0y(L, t)=2Asin(2πLλ)cos(ωt)=0

Given the latter boundary condition, a standing wave occurs when sin(2πLλ)=0=sin(nπ). The condition for the standing wave is then of the form n=2Lλ.

The condition where the standing wave occurs is given by the expression n=4Lλ, where n is a positive integer value, L is the string length, and λ is the wavelength. We calculate the wavelength of an n=4 standing wave as follows:

λ=4Ln=4(7 cm) / 2

= 14 /2

= 3.5cm.

To know more about "standing wave"

Refer this link:

https://brainly.com/question/14265256

#SPJ4

B. Both functions are decreasing, but function g is decreasing at a faster average rate on that interval.

Let's clarify the comparison between the functions f(x) and g(x) and explain the rates of decrease more accurately.

The given table represents the values of function g(x) for different values of x: x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4.

The corresponding values of g(x) are 75, 43, 27, 19, and 15, respectively.

Function f is described as an exponential function that has an initial value of 64 and decreases by 50% as x increases by 1 unit.

However, we don't have the specific values of f(x) for the interval [0, 4].

So, we cannot compare the exact values of f(x) and g(x) directly.

Now, let's compare the average rates of decrease between the two functions:

For function f, we know that it decreases by 50% as x increases by 1 unit. This means that for every unit increase in x, the value of f(x) decreases by half of its previous value.

On the other hand, for function g, we can observe the values in the table. As x increases from 0 to 1, g(x) decreases from 75 to 43.

This is a decrease of 32, which represents a decrease of (32/75) \(\times\) 100% ≈ 42.67%.

From the given information, we can conclude that function g is decreasing at a faster average rate compared to function f on the interval [0, 1].

However, without further information or additional data points, we cannot make a definitive comparison for the entire interval [0, 4].

Therefore, the correct statement regarding the comparison of the two functions on the interval [0, 4] would be:

B. Both functions are decreasing, but function g is decreasing at a faster average rate on that interval.

For similar question on functions.

https://brainly.com/question/27915724  

#SPJ11

Let t be the number of minutes talked. The cost of the first plan can be represented by:C1 = 0.22t

The cost of the second plan can be represented by:C2 = 0.11t + 34.95.To find the number of talk minutes that would produce the same cost for both plans, you need to set the two equations equal to each other and solve for t.0.22t = 0.11t + 34.950.11t = 34.95t = 318.18

Therefore, the two plans will have the same cost if you talk for 318.18 minutes.

Know more about cost of the first plan here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588642

#SPJ11

Answer:

4 solutions counting any possible multiplicity

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that if one considers the Complex Number System, a polynomial has as many solutions (including multiplicity) as its degree.

So in this case, where we are considering a polynomial of order 4 Notice that the term \(-\,33\,x^4\), is in reality the leading term (term with the highest power of the variable) of this polynomial.

Therefore, in the Complex Number System, this polynomial would have 4 solutions.

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-2+3-7

0=5x-9+3

0=5x-6

6=5x

x=6/5

Answer:

84.13

Step-by-step explanation:

4+4=8

14-8=6

the area of a circle is A=πr^2

A=π3^2

=28.27

divide is by 2 cos its a semi circle

28.27/2

14.13+(5x14)

14.13+70=84.13

The statement "the expected value of an unbiased estimator is equal to the parameter whose value is being estimated" is true.

An estimator is a function of the sample data used to estimate the value of a population parameter. An estimator is said to be unbiased if its expected value is equal to the true value of the population parameter. In other words, if we were to repeatedly take samples from the population and calculate the estimator for each sample, the average value of the estimator over all the samples would be equal to the true value of the population parameter. The expected value of an unbiased estimator is a key property because it ensures that the estimator is not systematically overestimating or underestimating the population parameter. Instead, the estimator provides an unbiased estimate of the population parameter on average across all possible samples. It is important to note that not all estimators are unbiased. Biased estimators may systematically overestimate or underestimate the population parameter, leading to incorrect conclusions. Therefore, unbiasedness is a desirable property for an estimator to have.

To learn more about population parameter click here

brainly.com/question/30689789

#SPJ4

Answer:

Can I get the pdf?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Answer A on Edmentum

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct option is First option i.e. f(1) = 52,000; f(n) = 1.2 · f(n - 1) - 0.30 · f(n - 1) + 2,300; for n ≥ 2

Percentage can be calculated by dividing the value by the total value, and then multiplying the result by 100.

On average, his salary is 1.2 times the previous year's salary:

f(n)=1.2 X f(n-1)

30% of his income is budgeted for rent:

Rent: R = 30%f(n-1)

           = 30 X f(n-1)/100

        R = 0.30 X f(n-1)

In addition to his salary, Adrian's income increases by $2,300 each year as a result of gifts from family members:

Gifts: G=2,300

If Adrian initially has $52,000:

n=1, f(n)=f(1)=52,000

If n denotes the number of years, which recursive equation gives Adrian's annual income as a function of the year, f(n)?

f(1)=52,000

f(n)=1.2 X f(n-1)-R+G; for n ≥ 2

f(n)=1.2 X f(n-1)-0.30*f(n-1)+2,300; for n ≥ 2

Thus, the correct option is First option i.e. f(1) = 52,000; f(n) = 1.2 · f(n - 1) - 0.30 · f(n - 1) + 2,300; for n ≥ 2

Learn more about Percentage from:

https://brainly.com/question/13450942

#SPJ2

Answer:

hope it helps you.......

The required slope of the line passing through the points is m = 9/2. Option A is correct.

Given that,
To determine the slope of the line that passes through the points (2, −3.5) and (4, 5.5).

The slope of the line is a tangent angle made by line with horizontal. i.e. m =tanx where x in degrees.

Here,

The slope of the line passing through two points is given by,
m = (y₂ - y₁) /  (x₂ - x₁)
Substitute value in the above equation
m= 5.5 +3.5 / 4 - 2
m = 9 / 2

Thus, the required slope of the line passing through the points is m = 9/2. Option A is correct.

Learn more about slopes here:

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ5

Answer:

BC / 8 = sin 35° by definition.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4 inches of snow has fallen rate per hour

therefore the unit rate is 4 inches of snow per hr.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4 per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

because 12 divided by 3 is 4

Answer:

Corresponding: The top left, The bottom left

Alternate interior: Bottom right

Alternate exterior: Top middle

None of these: Top right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

\(x = 2 \: or \: x = \frac{1}{2} \\ (x - 2)(2x - 1) = 0 \\ {2x}^{2} - x - 4x + 2 \\ {2x}^{2} - 5x + 2\)

Step-by-step explanation:

90° counterclockwise rotation

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12 dimes, 10 nickels

Step-by-step explanation:

12x10=120 or in this case $1.20

10x5=50 or $0.50

50+120=170 or $1.70

Sorry if any of it is wrong, I am doing this in the car and in my head

The alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true when computing the test z-value in a significance test.

False. In a test of significance, the alternative hypothesis is not assumed to be true when computing the test z-value. The test z-value is calculated based on the observed sample data and the null hypothesis, which represents the assumption that there is no significant effect or difference.

The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, represents the claim or research hypothesis that contradicts the null hypothesis. The test statistic, such as the z-value, is then used to assess the evidence against the null hypothesis and determine the likelihood of observing the data under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

The alternative hypothesis provides the direction of the effect being tested, but it is not assumed to be true for the purpose of calculating the test statistic.

To learn more about “null hypothesis” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

Answer:

Skill.

This is a fairly simple analogy.

The NPV is positive, it is worth taking the Investment.

Net Present Value (NPV) is an assessment method that determines the attractiveness of an investment. It is a technique that determines whether an investment has a positive or negative present value.

This method involves determining the future cash inflows and outflows and adjusting them to their present value. This helps determine the profitability of the investment, taking into account the time value of money and inflation.The formula for calculating NPV is:

NPV = Σ [CFt / (1 + r)t] – CIWhere CFt = the expected cash flow in period t, r = the discount rate, and CI = the initial investment.

The given problem can be solved by using the following steps:

Calculate the present value (PV) of the expected cash inflows:

Year 1: $28,000 / (1 + 0.08)¹ = $25,925.93Year 2: $28,000 / (1 + 0.08)² = $24,009.11Year 3: $28,000 / (1 + 0.08)³ = $22,173.78Total PV = $72,108.82

Calculate the PV of the initial investment: CI = $7,000 / (1 + 0.08)¹ + $35,000 / (1 + 0.08)²CI = $37,287.43Calculate the NPV by subtracting the initial investment from the total PV: NPV = $72,108.82 – $37,287.43 = $34,821.39

Since the NPV is positive, it is worth taking the investment.

For more questions on Investment.

https://brainly.com/question/29227456

#SPJ8

Answer:

3.435973837*10^10

Step-by-step explanation:

4 to the 7th power is 16384

and 8 to the 7th power is 2097152

multiplied by each other is 3.435973837*10 to the 10th power

if you have to round to the nearest 10th the answer is 3.44

Step-by-step explanation:

Use z-score table to find the z-score that corresponds to .7000   ( 70%)

approx   .525   s.d.  above the mean

  .525  * 10 =  5.25  points above 100   = 105.25